yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Computing the partial derivative of a vector-valued function


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Hello everyone. It's what I'd like to do here, and in the following few videos, is talk about how you take the partial derivative of vector-valued functions.

So the kind of thing I have in mind there will be a function with a multiple variable input. So this specific example has a two-variable input T and s. You could think of that as a two-dimensional space, as the input are just two separate numbers, and its output will be three-dimensional. The first component is T squared minus s squared. The Y component will be s times T, and that Z component will be T times s squared minus s times T squared minus s times T squared.

And the way that you compute a partial derivative of a guy like this is actually relatively straightforward. It's, if you were to just guess what it might mean, you’d probably guess right: it will look like the partial of V with respect to one of its input variables, and I'll choose T with respect to T. You just do it component-wise, which means you look at each component and you do the partial derivative to that because each component is just a normal scalar-valued function.

So you go up to the top one, and you say T squared looks like a variable as far as T is concerned, and its derivative is 2T. But s squared looks like a constant, so its derivative is zero. s times T, when s is s, looks like a constant, and when T looks like a variable, it has a derivative of s. Then T times s squared, when T is the variable and s is the constant, it just looks like that constant, which is s squared minus s times T squared.

So now, the derivative of T squared is 2T, and that constant s stays in. So that’s 2 times s times T, and that’s how you compute it probably relatively straightforward. The way you do it with respect to s is very similar. But where this gets fun and where this gets cool is how you interpret the partial derivative, right?

How you interpret this value that we just found, and what that means, depends a lot on how you actually visualize the function. So what I'll go ahead and do in the next video, and in the next few ones, is talk about visualizing this function. It'll be as a parametric surface in three-dimensional space; that's why I've got my graph or program out here. I think you'll find there's actually a very satisfying understanding of what this value means.

More Articles

View All
The Disappearance of Flight 19 | Atlas of Cursed Places
This is actually the lead ship of Flight 19. Wow! The exact same plane as this is Flight 19. Yes. The final word to the men on Flight 19 have been studied and pored over. Every sentence and word analyzed, in depth, by the Navy’s after action report. And t…
Second partial derivative test
In the last video, we took a look at this function ( f(x, y) = x^4 - 4x^2 + y^2 ), which has the graph that you’re looking at on the left. We looked for all of the points where the gradient is equal to zero, which basically means both partial derivatives …
The Dangers of Shark Nets | When Sharks Attack
For the past 20 years, New South Wales averaged four shark attacks a year. But in 2009, a staggering 17 attacks occurred, with species ranging from white sharks to wobble gong sharks. With such a variety of species behind the spike, investigators focused …
Stock Splits are Secretly Pumping the Stock Market
Stock splits, they’re supposed to be totally irrelevant, right? They don’t change anything about the company, they don’t change anything about the valuation, they don’t change anything about the investing thesis. Well, bizarrely, stock splits are somehow …
Recognizing binomial variables | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is get some practice classifying whether a random variable is a binomial variable, and we’re going to do it by looking at a few exercises from Khan Academy. So this is a manager who oversees 11 female employees and 9 …
Billionaire John Paulson Warns Bitcoin is Going to $0 | Buy This Instead
What about cryptocurrencies? Are you a believer in cryptocurrencies? No, I’m not a believer in cryptocurrencies, and I would say that cryptocurrencies are a bubble. Billionaire hedge fund manager John Paulson said in a recent interview that Bitcoin is go…