yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Computing the partial derivative of a vector-valued function


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Hello everyone. It's what I'd like to do here, and in the following few videos, is talk about how you take the partial derivative of vector-valued functions.

So the kind of thing I have in mind there will be a function with a multiple variable input. So this specific example has a two-variable input T and s. You could think of that as a two-dimensional space, as the input are just two separate numbers, and its output will be three-dimensional. The first component is T squared minus s squared. The Y component will be s times T, and that Z component will be T times s squared minus s times T squared minus s times T squared.

And the way that you compute a partial derivative of a guy like this is actually relatively straightforward. It's, if you were to just guess what it might mean, you’d probably guess right: it will look like the partial of V with respect to one of its input variables, and I'll choose T with respect to T. You just do it component-wise, which means you look at each component and you do the partial derivative to that because each component is just a normal scalar-valued function.

So you go up to the top one, and you say T squared looks like a variable as far as T is concerned, and its derivative is 2T. But s squared looks like a constant, so its derivative is zero. s times T, when s is s, looks like a constant, and when T looks like a variable, it has a derivative of s. Then T times s squared, when T is the variable and s is the constant, it just looks like that constant, which is s squared minus s times T squared.

So now, the derivative of T squared is 2T, and that constant s stays in. So that’s 2 times s times T, and that’s how you compute it probably relatively straightforward. The way you do it with respect to s is very similar. But where this gets fun and where this gets cool is how you interpret the partial derivative, right?

How you interpret this value that we just found, and what that means, depends a lot on how you actually visualize the function. So what I'll go ahead and do in the next video, and in the next few ones, is talk about visualizing this function. It'll be as a parametric surface in three-dimensional space; that's why I've got my graph or program out here. I think you'll find there's actually a very satisfying understanding of what this value means.

More Articles

View All
ATP synthase | Cellular energetics | AP Biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about what is arguably my favorite enzyme, and that is ATP synthase. You might be able to predict from its name what it does: it synthesizes ATP. Now, you’ve probably seen it before. We saw it when we looked at respirat…
Signs of a Toxic Friend | Buddhist Philosophy
At some point in our lives, we begin to question our friendships. Some friendships have stood the test of time and can still be considered sources of mutual enjoyment and growth. But other friends do not seem to add any value to our lives. Or worse: they’…
Introduction to proportional relationships | 7th grade | Khan Academy
In this video, we are going to talk about proportional relationships, and these are relationships between two variables where the ratio between the variables is equivalent. Now, if that sounds complex or a little bit fancy, it’ll hopefully seem a little b…
Charlie Munger's Final Advice For 2024.
I basically believe in a soldier on system. Lots of hardship will come, and you got to handle it well. I soldering through Charlie Munger, sadly passed away in November 2023, one month shy of his 100th birthday. But in a big stroke of luck for us investor…
NERD WARS: Iron Man vs Master Chief: Who Would Win? -- Wackygamer
Iron Man vs. Master Chief special request from I heat voices 94. If you have your own requests, stick them in the comments. Iron Man hands down the winner. You, Rosalie, your Master Chief? AHA! Is part of an army. Iron Man works all by himself. Master Ch…
The Most Insane Weapon You Never Heard About
In the 1950s, the US began the top secret project Sundial; most of it is still classified. The goal: a single nuclear bomb so powerful it would destroy all of human civilization. Conceived in cold logic from the mind of a genius scientist, Sundial had the…