yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Are Humans Hardwired to Be Cruel to Each Other? | Robert Sapolsky | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So when you look at us—us as humans, as apes, as primates, as mammals—when you look at some of the most appalling realms of our behavior, much of it has to do with the fact that social organisms are really, really hardwired to make a basic dichotomy about the social world, which is those organisms who count as Us’s and those who count as Thems.

And this is virtually universal among humans and this is virtually universal among all sorts of social primates that have aspects of social structures built around separate social groupings. Us’s and Thems: we turn the world into Us’s and Thems and we don’t like the Thems very much and are often really awful to them.

And the Us’s, we exaggerate how wonderful and how generous and how affiliative and how just like siblings they are to us. We divide the world into Us and Them. And one of the greatest ways of seeing just biologically how real this fault line is, is there’s this hormone oxytocin. Oxytocin is officially the coolest, grooviest hormone on earth, because what everybody knows is it enhances mother-infant bonding and it enhances pair bonding in couples.

And it makes you more trusting and empathic and emotionally expressive and better at reading expressions and more charitable. And it’s obvious that if you just, like, spritzed oxytocin up everyone’s noses on this planet it would be the Garden of Eden the next day. Oxytocin promotes prosocial behavior. Until people look closely.

And it turns out oxytocin does all those wondrous things only for people who you think of as an “Us”, as an in-group member. It improves in-group favoritism, in-group parochialism. What does it do to individuals who you consider a Them? It makes you crappier to them, more preemptively aggressive, less cooperative in an economic game.

What oxytocin does is enhance this Us/Them divide. So that, along with other findings—the classic lines of Us versus Them along the lines of race, of sex, of age, of socioeconomic class: your brain processes these Us/Them differences on the scale of milliseconds, a twentieth of a second, your brain is already responding differently to an Us versus Them.

Okay, so collectively this is depressing as hell. Oh my god, we are hardwired to inevitably be awful to Thems, and Thems along all sorts of disturbing lines of: "Oh, if only we could overcome these Us and Them dichotomies! Oh no, are we hardwired to divide the world along lines of race and ethnicity and nationality and all those disturbing things?"

And what becomes clear is, when you look closely is: it is virtually inevitable that we divide the world into Us’s and Thems and don’t like Thems very much and don’t treat them well. But we are incredibly easily manipulated as to who counts as an Us and who counts as a Them.

And those fault lines that we view as, “Oh my god, how ancient can you get?” that say, somebody of another race evokes limbic responses in us, commensurate with they are a Them, they respond, they motivate automatic responses—"Oh my god, is that just the basic fault line?"

And then you do something like have faces of the same race versus other race, and either they are or aren’t wearing a baseball cap with your favorite team’s logo on it, and you completely redefine who's an Us. Us is people who like the Yankees and Them are Red Sox fans.

And suddenly you’re processing, within milliseconds, what damn baseball cap they have, and race is being completely ignored. “Oh my god, we are inevitably hardwired to make really distressing Us/Them...” We’re manipulated within seconds as to who counts as an Us and a Them.

Good news with that: we can manipulate us out of some of our worst Us/Them dichotomies and re-categorize people. Bad news: we could be manipulated by all sorts of ideologues out there as to deciding that people who seem just like us "really aren’t. They’re really so different that they count as a Them.”

Okay, so a fabulous study showing this, this double-edged quality to oxytocin, and this was a study done by a group in the Netherlands. And what they...

More Articles

View All
When Watersports Become Dangerous | Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails
Some things just don’t go together– oil and water, gas and matches, tequila and fireworks. So you can imagine my concern when I heard about a combination of kayaking and surfing. Then I saw this and thought perhaps I’m worrying about nothing. And then I …
Self-destructive? It could be your death drive…
Daedalus, a master craftsman and architect of the labyrinth of Crete, once created wings made from feathers and wax that would help him and his son Icarus escape their imprisonment. Before they attempted to escape, Daedalus warned Icarus against flying to…
Strategic | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
I love it when a plan comes together, word Smiths, because the word I’m featuring in this video is strategic. Strategic, it’s an adjective, and it means related to a plan. It’s the adjective form of strategy, which is a way of thinking about making effect…
How to sell a $20,000,000 private jet.
You have a budget in mind, probably 10 to 20 million. That would be a number that’s not really an issue. What is the Gulf Stream G450? I guess you have two T450s on here; they’re going. One of them was also sold. We have another one that’s 95 million. The…
Using TI calculator for P-value from t statistic | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Miriam was testing her null hypothesis that the population mean of some dataset is equal to 18 versus her alternative hypothesis that the mean is less than 18. With a sample of 7 observations, her test statistic, I can never say that was T, is equal to ne…
Should We Stop Having Babies? | Antinatalism Explored
Is it better never to have been? Some people believe it would indeed be better if no sentient life came into existence. Antinatalism is the philosophical viewpoint that procreation is morally wrong, and therefore, we should avoid it. Some antinatalists th…