yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Are Humans Hardwired to Be Cruel to Each Other? | Robert Sapolsky | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So when you look at us—us as humans, as apes, as primates, as mammals—when you look at some of the most appalling realms of our behavior, much of it has to do with the fact that social organisms are really, really hardwired to make a basic dichotomy about the social world, which is those organisms who count as Us’s and those who count as Thems.

And this is virtually universal among humans and this is virtually universal among all sorts of social primates that have aspects of social structures built around separate social groupings. Us’s and Thems: we turn the world into Us’s and Thems and we don’t like the Thems very much and are often really awful to them.

And the Us’s, we exaggerate how wonderful and how generous and how affiliative and how just like siblings they are to us. We divide the world into Us and Them. And one of the greatest ways of seeing just biologically how real this fault line is, is there’s this hormone oxytocin. Oxytocin is officially the coolest, grooviest hormone on earth, because what everybody knows is it enhances mother-infant bonding and it enhances pair bonding in couples.

And it makes you more trusting and empathic and emotionally expressive and better at reading expressions and more charitable. And it’s obvious that if you just, like, spritzed oxytocin up everyone’s noses on this planet it would be the Garden of Eden the next day. Oxytocin promotes prosocial behavior. Until people look closely.

And it turns out oxytocin does all those wondrous things only for people who you think of as an “Us”, as an in-group member. It improves in-group favoritism, in-group parochialism. What does it do to individuals who you consider a Them? It makes you crappier to them, more preemptively aggressive, less cooperative in an economic game.

What oxytocin does is enhance this Us/Them divide. So that, along with other findings—the classic lines of Us versus Them along the lines of race, of sex, of age, of socioeconomic class: your brain processes these Us/Them differences on the scale of milliseconds, a twentieth of a second, your brain is already responding differently to an Us versus Them.

Okay, so collectively this is depressing as hell. Oh my god, we are hardwired to inevitably be awful to Thems, and Thems along all sorts of disturbing lines of: "Oh, if only we could overcome these Us and Them dichotomies! Oh no, are we hardwired to divide the world along lines of race and ethnicity and nationality and all those disturbing things?"

And what becomes clear is, when you look closely is: it is virtually inevitable that we divide the world into Us’s and Thems and don’t like Thems very much and don’t treat them well. But we are incredibly easily manipulated as to who counts as an Us and who counts as a Them.

And those fault lines that we view as, “Oh my god, how ancient can you get?” that say, somebody of another race evokes limbic responses in us, commensurate with they are a Them, they respond, they motivate automatic responses—"Oh my god, is that just the basic fault line?"

And then you do something like have faces of the same race versus other race, and either they are or aren’t wearing a baseball cap with your favorite team’s logo on it, and you completely redefine who's an Us. Us is people who like the Yankees and Them are Red Sox fans.

And suddenly you’re processing, within milliseconds, what damn baseball cap they have, and race is being completely ignored. “Oh my god, we are inevitably hardwired to make really distressing Us/Them...” We’re manipulated within seconds as to who counts as an Us and a Them.

Good news with that: we can manipulate us out of some of our worst Us/Them dichotomies and re-categorize people. Bad news: we could be manipulated by all sorts of ideologues out there as to deciding that people who seem just like us "really aren’t. They’re really so different that they count as a Them.”

Okay, so a fabulous study showing this, this double-edged quality to oxytocin, and this was a study done by a group in the Netherlands. And what they...

More Articles

View All
Oceans 101 | National Geographic
Oceans cover over 70 percent of the Earth’s surface. They not only serve as the planet’s largest habitat, but also help to regulate the global climate. The ocean is a continuous body of salt water that surrounds the continents. It is divided into four ma…
The reason I built the worlds first private jet showroom!
The reason I built the first and only Aviation showroom in the world is because nobody else has. I had to be different. Everybody in our industry today lives off a mobile phone and a laptop; that’s a business, that’s their office. To me, it just doesn’t s…
Differentiating functions: Find the error | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’re going to do in this video is look at the work of other people as they try to take derivatives and see if their reasoning is correct, and if it’s not correct, try to identify what they should have done or where their reasoning went wrong. So over he…
LA 92 - Official Film Trailer | National Geographic
We’re southbound on Pon. It appears to be three male blacks in the vehicle; it’s a white Hyundai. [Applause] I believe at any time during this evening, did it go through your mind that this was not a human being that you were beating? The police approach…
Techno Optimism, Explained
I cannot wait for the day where my daughter and son say, “Oh, 45 minutes to Tokyo? That’s so slow!” I can’t wait. Hello, this is Dalton, post-Michael, and today we’re going to talk about why we are optimistic about the future. So, to be clear, at YC, we…
how to ACTUALLY CHANGE your life in 2023 (step by step guide)
We all experienced failure at some point in our lives. Maybe you didn’t get that promotion you were hoping for, or you didn’t accomplish a personal goal you set for yourself. But for some reason, when it gets closer to New Year’s, we tend to be more hopef…