yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Are Humans Hardwired to Be Cruel to Each Other? | Robert Sapolsky | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So when you look at us—us as humans, as apes, as primates, as mammals—when you look at some of the most appalling realms of our behavior, much of it has to do with the fact that social organisms are really, really hardwired to make a basic dichotomy about the social world, which is those organisms who count as Us’s and those who count as Thems.

And this is virtually universal among humans and this is virtually universal among all sorts of social primates that have aspects of social structures built around separate social groupings. Us’s and Thems: we turn the world into Us’s and Thems and we don’t like the Thems very much and are often really awful to them.

And the Us’s, we exaggerate how wonderful and how generous and how affiliative and how just like siblings they are to us. We divide the world into Us and Them. And one of the greatest ways of seeing just biologically how real this fault line is, is there’s this hormone oxytocin. Oxytocin is officially the coolest, grooviest hormone on earth, because what everybody knows is it enhances mother-infant bonding and it enhances pair bonding in couples.

And it makes you more trusting and empathic and emotionally expressive and better at reading expressions and more charitable. And it’s obvious that if you just, like, spritzed oxytocin up everyone’s noses on this planet it would be the Garden of Eden the next day. Oxytocin promotes prosocial behavior. Until people look closely.

And it turns out oxytocin does all those wondrous things only for people who you think of as an “Us”, as an in-group member. It improves in-group favoritism, in-group parochialism. What does it do to individuals who you consider a Them? It makes you crappier to them, more preemptively aggressive, less cooperative in an economic game.

What oxytocin does is enhance this Us/Them divide. So that, along with other findings—the classic lines of Us versus Them along the lines of race, of sex, of age, of socioeconomic class: your brain processes these Us/Them differences on the scale of milliseconds, a twentieth of a second, your brain is already responding differently to an Us versus Them.

Okay, so collectively this is depressing as hell. Oh my god, we are hardwired to inevitably be awful to Thems, and Thems along all sorts of disturbing lines of: "Oh, if only we could overcome these Us and Them dichotomies! Oh no, are we hardwired to divide the world along lines of race and ethnicity and nationality and all those disturbing things?"

And what becomes clear is, when you look closely is: it is virtually inevitable that we divide the world into Us’s and Thems and don’t like Thems very much and don’t treat them well. But we are incredibly easily manipulated as to who counts as an Us and who counts as a Them.

And those fault lines that we view as, “Oh my god, how ancient can you get?” that say, somebody of another race evokes limbic responses in us, commensurate with they are a Them, they respond, they motivate automatic responses—"Oh my god, is that just the basic fault line?"

And then you do something like have faces of the same race versus other race, and either they are or aren’t wearing a baseball cap with your favorite team’s logo on it, and you completely redefine who's an Us. Us is people who like the Yankees and Them are Red Sox fans.

And suddenly you’re processing, within milliseconds, what damn baseball cap they have, and race is being completely ignored. “Oh my god, we are inevitably hardwired to make really distressing Us/Them...” We’re manipulated within seconds as to who counts as an Us and a Them.

Good news with that: we can manipulate us out of some of our worst Us/Them dichotomies and re-categorize people. Bad news: we could be manipulated by all sorts of ideologues out there as to deciding that people who seem just like us "really aren’t. They’re really so different that they count as a Them.”

Okay, so a fabulous study showing this, this double-edged quality to oxytocin, and this was a study done by a group in the Netherlands. And what they...

More Articles

View All
Hess's law | Thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Hess’s law states that the overall change in enthalpy for a chemical reaction is equal to the sum of the enthalpy changes for each step, and this is independent of the path taken. So it doesn’t matter what set of reactions you use; if you add up those rea…
If You Have These 7 Traits, You’re in Your LAST Life Cycle
Narrator: Have you ever felt out of place, like you’re here but not of here? You laugh, you love, you play the part, but deep down something feels off. You watch the world rush by—careers, relationships, the endless chase—but it all feels hollow, like a g…
Finding percentages with a double number line
We’re told that Omar’s class has 28 students in it. 21 of them take the bus to school. What percentage of the students in Omar’s class take the bus to school? Pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All right, well, I’m going to try to visua…
WATCH THIS Before Building Multiple Income Streams
It’s been constantly said that in order to get really wealthy, you need to have multiple streams of income. We’ve also mentioned this in past videos. Ideally, you should aim to have around three to seven individual streams of income to be safe. But here’s…
In high jump, your centre of mass goes under the bar
[Applause] I am about 1.75 m tall, but some of the world’s best high jumpers can clear more than half a meter above. [Applause] [Music] That this is Josh Lodge, an Australian high jumper. What’s your personal best high jump? 2 minutes 22? That’s pretty h…
Interpreting units in formulas: novel units | Mathematics I | High School Math | Khan Academy
So, we’re told to consider the formula ( Y ) is equal to ( \frac{2C}{P} ) where ( y ) represents the carrot yield. So, ( y ) represents the carrot yield, ( c ) represents the number of expected carrots, and ( P ) represents the number of plants. So, ( P…