yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Are Humans Hardwired to Be Cruel to Each Other? | Robert Sapolsky | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So when you look at us—us as humans, as apes, as primates, as mammals—when you look at some of the most appalling realms of our behavior, much of it has to do with the fact that social organisms are really, really hardwired to make a basic dichotomy about the social world, which is those organisms who count as Us’s and those who count as Thems.

And this is virtually universal among humans and this is virtually universal among all sorts of social primates that have aspects of social structures built around separate social groupings. Us’s and Thems: we turn the world into Us’s and Thems and we don’t like the Thems very much and are often really awful to them.

And the Us’s, we exaggerate how wonderful and how generous and how affiliative and how just like siblings they are to us. We divide the world into Us and Them. And one of the greatest ways of seeing just biologically how real this fault line is, is there’s this hormone oxytocin. Oxytocin is officially the coolest, grooviest hormone on earth, because what everybody knows is it enhances mother-infant bonding and it enhances pair bonding in couples.

And it makes you more trusting and empathic and emotionally expressive and better at reading expressions and more charitable. And it’s obvious that if you just, like, spritzed oxytocin up everyone’s noses on this planet it would be the Garden of Eden the next day. Oxytocin promotes prosocial behavior. Until people look closely.

And it turns out oxytocin does all those wondrous things only for people who you think of as an “Us”, as an in-group member. It improves in-group favoritism, in-group parochialism. What does it do to individuals who you consider a Them? It makes you crappier to them, more preemptively aggressive, less cooperative in an economic game.

What oxytocin does is enhance this Us/Them divide. So that, along with other findings—the classic lines of Us versus Them along the lines of race, of sex, of age, of socioeconomic class: your brain processes these Us/Them differences on the scale of milliseconds, a twentieth of a second, your brain is already responding differently to an Us versus Them.

Okay, so collectively this is depressing as hell. Oh my god, we are hardwired to inevitably be awful to Thems, and Thems along all sorts of disturbing lines of: "Oh, if only we could overcome these Us and Them dichotomies! Oh no, are we hardwired to divide the world along lines of race and ethnicity and nationality and all those disturbing things?"

And what becomes clear is, when you look closely is: it is virtually inevitable that we divide the world into Us’s and Thems and don’t like Thems very much and don’t treat them well. But we are incredibly easily manipulated as to who counts as an Us and who counts as a Them.

And those fault lines that we view as, “Oh my god, how ancient can you get?” that say, somebody of another race evokes limbic responses in us, commensurate with they are a Them, they respond, they motivate automatic responses—"Oh my god, is that just the basic fault line?"

And then you do something like have faces of the same race versus other race, and either they are or aren’t wearing a baseball cap with your favorite team’s logo on it, and you completely redefine who's an Us. Us is people who like the Yankees and Them are Red Sox fans.

And suddenly you’re processing, within milliseconds, what damn baseball cap they have, and race is being completely ignored. “Oh my god, we are inevitably hardwired to make really distressing Us/Them...” We’re manipulated within seconds as to who counts as an Us and a Them.

Good news with that: we can manipulate us out of some of our worst Us/Them dichotomies and re-categorize people. Bad news: we could be manipulated by all sorts of ideologues out there as to deciding that people who seem just like us "really aren’t. They’re really so different that they count as a Them.”

Okay, so a fabulous study showing this, this double-edged quality to oxytocin, and this was a study done by a group in the Netherlands. And what they...

More Articles

View All
Natural selection in peppered moths | Middle school biology | Khan Academy
You might be familiar with the idea of evolution, that species change over time, and you can see that if you look at old bones, old fossils, how they change through the fossil record. But the obvious question is, how do these species actually do that? Wha…
The Smart Money is Making BIG CHANGES.
What stocks have the smart money been buying and/or selling? That’s what we’re going to be taking a look at in this video. A couple of weeks back, the 13F filings were released, which means we get to take a look behind the curtain and observe all the mark…
Graphical limit at asymptotic discontinuity
All right, we have a graph of ( y ) is equal to ( f(x) ), and we want to figure out what is the limit of ( f(x) ) as ( x ) approaches negative three. If we just look at ( x = -3 ), it’s really hard to see, at least based on how this graph looks, what ( f(…
RC natural response intuition (1 of 3)
Now we’re going to cover a really important circuit in electronics: it’s the resistor-capacitor circuit, or RC circuit. In particular, in this video, we’re going to talk about the natural response of an RC circuit. The natural response is what happens whe…
Keizoku: A Japanese Philosophy to Stop Quitting Everything You Start
You know that feeling when you start something new, maybe it’s reading, working out, or learning a new skill, and you are super excited about it? You buy all the stuff, make all these plans, and then a few weeks later you just stop, and then the guilt set…
Compelling Models for Conservation | Explorers Fest
Loved it! I don’t— I didn’t really think about where it came from. Probably in the same way that you didn’t really think about where your food came from when you were a kid too. I don’t remember exactly when I decided to stop eating sharks in soup or when…