yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Are Humans Hardwired to Be Cruel to Each Other? | Robert Sapolsky | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So when you look at us—us as humans, as apes, as primates, as mammals—when you look at some of the most appalling realms of our behavior, much of it has to do with the fact that social organisms are really, really hardwired to make a basic dichotomy about the social world, which is those organisms who count as Us’s and those who count as Thems.

And this is virtually universal among humans and this is virtually universal among all sorts of social primates that have aspects of social structures built around separate social groupings. Us’s and Thems: we turn the world into Us’s and Thems and we don’t like the Thems very much and are often really awful to them.

And the Us’s, we exaggerate how wonderful and how generous and how affiliative and how just like siblings they are to us. We divide the world into Us and Them. And one of the greatest ways of seeing just biologically how real this fault line is, is there’s this hormone oxytocin. Oxytocin is officially the coolest, grooviest hormone on earth, because what everybody knows is it enhances mother-infant bonding and it enhances pair bonding in couples.

And it makes you more trusting and empathic and emotionally expressive and better at reading expressions and more charitable. And it’s obvious that if you just, like, spritzed oxytocin up everyone’s noses on this planet it would be the Garden of Eden the next day. Oxytocin promotes prosocial behavior. Until people look closely.

And it turns out oxytocin does all those wondrous things only for people who you think of as an “Us”, as an in-group member. It improves in-group favoritism, in-group parochialism. What does it do to individuals who you consider a Them? It makes you crappier to them, more preemptively aggressive, less cooperative in an economic game.

What oxytocin does is enhance this Us/Them divide. So that, along with other findings—the classic lines of Us versus Them along the lines of race, of sex, of age, of socioeconomic class: your brain processes these Us/Them differences on the scale of milliseconds, a twentieth of a second, your brain is already responding differently to an Us versus Them.

Okay, so collectively this is depressing as hell. Oh my god, we are hardwired to inevitably be awful to Thems, and Thems along all sorts of disturbing lines of: "Oh, if only we could overcome these Us and Them dichotomies! Oh no, are we hardwired to divide the world along lines of race and ethnicity and nationality and all those disturbing things?"

And what becomes clear is, when you look closely is: it is virtually inevitable that we divide the world into Us’s and Thems and don’t like Thems very much and don’t treat them well. But we are incredibly easily manipulated as to who counts as an Us and who counts as a Them.

And those fault lines that we view as, “Oh my god, how ancient can you get?” that say, somebody of another race evokes limbic responses in us, commensurate with they are a Them, they respond, they motivate automatic responses—"Oh my god, is that just the basic fault line?"

And then you do something like have faces of the same race versus other race, and either they are or aren’t wearing a baseball cap with your favorite team’s logo on it, and you completely redefine who's an Us. Us is people who like the Yankees and Them are Red Sox fans.

And suddenly you’re processing, within milliseconds, what damn baseball cap they have, and race is being completely ignored. “Oh my god, we are inevitably hardwired to make really distressing Us/Them...” We’re manipulated within seconds as to who counts as an Us and a Them.

Good news with that: we can manipulate us out of some of our worst Us/Them dichotomies and re-categorize people. Bad news: we could be manipulated by all sorts of ideologues out there as to deciding that people who seem just like us "really aren’t. They’re really so different that they count as a Them.”

Okay, so a fabulous study showing this, this double-edged quality to oxytocin, and this was a study done by a group in the Netherlands. And what they...

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett's Advice for Investors for 2024
I don’t know if you guys have noticed, but Warren Buffett has kept very quiet over the past six months. No media interviews, very few changes to his portfolio. The guy has been keeping well out of the spotlight. So much so that when his longtime business …
The Most Horrible Parasite: Brain Eating Amoeba
A war has been going on for billions of years that breeds well armed monsters, who struggle with other monsters for survival. Having no particular interest in us, most of them are relatively harmless, as our immune systems deal with their weapons easily. …
Don't Worry, Everything is Out of Control | Stoic Antidotes to Worry
Even though we can’t control the future, we’re worrying ourselves sick because of it. This could be because we don’t control the future. And this lack of control is the reason it frightens us. Or, we think we can control it by ‘thinking about it’ or perha…
Meet the Heroes Who Protect the Last Northern White Rhinos in the World | Short Film Showcase
The most dangerous thing in the bush is humanity. Your life is always at risk; you can die at any time. [Music] My name is Jacob. I work in open data as our knowledge. I know Gattaca, a minute. Oh Peter, Yannick, you owe me money. Another white rain. M…
Does Your Startup Website Pass The First Impression Test? | Design Review
When someone clicks over to your website, this is how long you have to make a great first impression. What’s your takeaway? What do you remember from that? It was pretty something in cleaning services I think. I know what it does; I have no clue, so pleas…
Jim Crow part 4 | The Gilded Age (1865-1898) | US History | Khan Academy
So we’ve been talking about the system of Jim Crow segregation. In the last video, we left off in 1876. In 1876, there was a contested presidential election between a Republican candidate named Rutherford B. Hayes and a Democratic candidate named Samuel J…