yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Interpreting direction of motion from velocity-time graph | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

An object is moving along a line. The following graph gives the object's velocity over time. For each point on the graph, is the object moving forward, backward, or neither? So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now let's do this together. We can see these different points on this velocity versus time graph. The important thing to realize is that if the velocity is positive, we're moving forward. If the velocity is negative, we're moving backward. If the velocity is zero, we're not moving either forward nor backward, or neither forward nor backward.

So right over here, we see that our velocity is positive—it's a positive two meters per second. So that means that we are moving forward. Now, over here, our velocity is zero meters per second, so this is neither. Now, over here, our velocity is negative four meters per second. One way to think about it is we're moving four meters per second backward, so I'll write backward.

Now, this is interesting, this last point, because you might be tempted to say, "All right, I'm oscillating. I'm going up, then I'm going down, then I'm going back up; maybe I'm moving forward here." But remember what we're thinking about here: this isn't position versus time; this is velocity versus time. So if our velocity is negative, we're moving backward.

And here, our velocity is still negative—it's becoming less negative, but it's still negative. So we are still moving; we are still moving backward. If we were at this point right over here or at this point, then we would be moving forward if our velocity were positive.

More Articles

View All
Estimating quotients
We are told to use estimation to tell whether each estimated quotient is reasonable or unreasonable. So we have a bunch of estimated quotients here. Someone is estimating that 2419 divided by 3 is roughly equal to 7500. We have to figure out is that reaso…
You'll NEVER want to be SMART ever again: Schopenhauer's Secret
Ruling over others is an art, and many philosophers have offered different ways to master it. However, the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer suggested a unique approach: playing dumb. You can achieve success and be labeled as an arrogant person, but …
Opiates and Pangolin Scales is Rumor Debunked | National Geographic
(upbeat music) [Rachel] Pangolins are a really unique group of mammals. They are covered with these scales that are made of keratin, which is the same material as human finger nails. And it’s those scales that are in high demand, and it’s driving a lot o…
A Man Among Wolves: Photographing Yellowstone’s Iconic Predators | National Geographic
This is so cool! I was in Yellowstone for a year and a half. My job was to shed light on wolf behavior in a natural landscape. A lot of times, wolves get persecuted, and this was an opportunity for me to just show wolves for what they were; for being larg…
Using matrices to manipulate data: Pet store | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
We’re told a certain pet store chain has three types of dog food, and each comes in bags of two different sizes. Matrix A represents the store’s inventory at location A, where rows are food types and columns are bag sizes. So, see, it’s store A that’s wha…
I found the WORST thing money can buy: Virtual Real Estate for $200,000
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, it’s 2018, and I thought we’ve seen it all—from an elderly lady suing her nephew over their split lottery winnings, two people eating Tide Pods, to the worst of all: the closing of Toys R Us. But no! I opened my …