yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Expected payoff example: protection plan | Probability & combinatorics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told that an electronic store gives customers the option of purchasing a protection plan when customers buy a new television. That's actually quite common. The customer pays $80 for the plan, and if their television is damaged or stops working, the store will replace it for no additional charge. The store knows that two percent of customers who buy this plan end up needing a replacement that costs the store twelve hundred dollars each.

Here is a table that summarizes the possible outcomes from the store's perspective. Let x represent the store's net gain from one of these plans. Calculate the expected net gain, so pause this video, see if you can have a go at that before we work through this together.

So we have the two scenarios here. The first scenario is that the store does need to replace the TV because something happens, and so it's going to cost twelve hundred dollars to the store. But remember, they got eighty dollars for the protection plan, so you have a net gain of negative one thousand one hundred and twenty dollars from the store's perspective.

There's the other scenario, which is more favorable for the store, which is the customer does not need a replacement TV. So that has no cost, and so their net gain is just the eighty dollars for the plan.

To figure out the expected net gain, we just have to figure out the probabilities of each of these and take the weighted average of them. So what's the probability that they will have to replace the TV? Well, we know two percent of customers who buy this plan end up needing a replacement. So we could say this is 2 over 100 or maybe I'll write it as 0.02. This is the probability of x, and then the probability of not needing a replacement is 0.98.

And so, our expected net gain is going to be equal to the probability of needing a replacement times the net gain of a replacement. So it's going to be times negative one thousand one hundred and twenty dollars, and then we're going to have plus the probability of not needing a replacement, which is 0.98 times the net gain there, so that is $80.

So we have 0.02 times negative one thousand one hundred and twenty, and that we're going to add. I'll open parentheses, 0.98 times eighty, closed parentheses, is going to be equal to 56. So this is equal to 56, and now you understand why the stores like to sell these replacement plans.

More Articles

View All
Safari Live - Day 272 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Good afternoon everybody and welcome to a stormy, blustery, windy Masai Mara. We’ve had a massive storm that has just blown…
What's Next After Bridgewater?
I was asked what am I going to do now that I’ve transitioned Bridgewater. Um, and how’s it, what’s the new activity for Ray Dalio, what’s he going to do? Um, first of all, what a journey it’s been! 47 years, it’s been fantastic, and I’m so excited to hav…
The Man of a Trillion Worlds | Cosmos: Possible Worlds
NARRATOR: Harold Uris was a chemist. Like Gerard Kuiper, he also had to fight his way into science. Uris’ family was poor, like Kuiper’s, so he took a job teaching grammar school in a mining camp in Montana. The parents of one of his students urged him to…
Approximating solutions with graphing calculator
We’re told this is the graph of ( y ) is equal to ( \frac{3}{2} ) to the ( x ) and that’s it right over there. Use the graph to find an approximate solution to ( \frac{3}{2} ) to the ( x ) is equal to ( 5 ). So pause this video and try to do this on your …
Growth vs Value Investing. Which is Better?
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we are going to be comparing two corners of the investing world: that is, growth investing versus value investing. We’re going to have a look at what each one is about, compare the two, and also look a…
Aileen Lee and Kirsty Nathoo at the Female Founders Conference
So, I’m Kirsty Nathu. I’m a partner at Y Combinator and also the CFO. And our next speaker is Aileen Lee. Aileen is the founder of Cowboy Ventures, which has a fund that invests in seed-stage companies. Before starting Cowboy, Aileen was at Kleiner Perkin…