yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Expected payoff example: protection plan | Probability & combinatorics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told that an electronic store gives customers the option of purchasing a protection plan when customers buy a new television. That's actually quite common. The customer pays $80 for the plan, and if their television is damaged or stops working, the store will replace it for no additional charge. The store knows that two percent of customers who buy this plan end up needing a replacement that costs the store twelve hundred dollars each.

Here is a table that summarizes the possible outcomes from the store's perspective. Let x represent the store's net gain from one of these plans. Calculate the expected net gain, so pause this video, see if you can have a go at that before we work through this together.

So we have the two scenarios here. The first scenario is that the store does need to replace the TV because something happens, and so it's going to cost twelve hundred dollars to the store. But remember, they got eighty dollars for the protection plan, so you have a net gain of negative one thousand one hundred and twenty dollars from the store's perspective.

There's the other scenario, which is more favorable for the store, which is the customer does not need a replacement TV. So that has no cost, and so their net gain is just the eighty dollars for the plan.

To figure out the expected net gain, we just have to figure out the probabilities of each of these and take the weighted average of them. So what's the probability that they will have to replace the TV? Well, we know two percent of customers who buy this plan end up needing a replacement. So we could say this is 2 over 100 or maybe I'll write it as 0.02. This is the probability of x, and then the probability of not needing a replacement is 0.98.

And so, our expected net gain is going to be equal to the probability of needing a replacement times the net gain of a replacement. So it's going to be times negative one thousand one hundred and twenty dollars, and then we're going to have plus the probability of not needing a replacement, which is 0.98 times the net gain there, so that is $80.

So we have 0.02 times negative one thousand one hundred and twenty, and that we're going to add. I'll open parentheses, 0.98 times eighty, closed parentheses, is going to be equal to 56. So this is equal to 56, and now you understand why the stores like to sell these replacement plans.

More Articles

View All
15 Biggest Problems in Life (& How to solve them)
The quality of your life is determined by your ability to shape it effectively and efficiently. If we boil everything down to the basics, you’re left with 15 if-then algorithms for life. Welcome to alux.com, the place where future billionaires come to get…
Constructing exponential models: half life | Mathematics II | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told carbon 14 is an element which loses exactly half of its mass every 5,730 years. The mass of a sample of carbon 14 can be modeled by a function m which depends on its age t in years. We measure that the initial mass of a sample of carbon 14 is 7…
Less versus fewer | Frequently confused words | Usage | Grammar
Hello Garian, hello Rosie, hi David. Uh, so you’ve called me into the recording booth today? Yes, because uh, you have a bone to pick with me—just a little bit. Yeah, so I have always, in my usage, I always drawn a distinction between less and fewer. I w…
Fibonnaci on a Marble-Powered Computer
This is the Turing Tumble. It is a marble powered computer. So sorry nerds, it’s kind of a jock thing now. What you are watching is my solution to a puzzle posted on their forums. I have programmed the machine to output marbles according to the Fibonacci…
Elon Musk Just Abandoned his Twitter Deal... What Next?
It was back on the 4th of April that Elon Musk first announced he was buying 9% of Twitter, a large yet relatively small ownership stake in the company. It was enough to be heard but not necessarily enough to be listened to. And to nobody’s great surprise…
Lucy in the Sky with Asteroids | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
What sparked my interest in space was just dreaming about the stars. This is Adriana Ocampo, she’s a NASA scientist, and back when she was a kid in Argentina, she’d grab her dog and head to the roof of her house. You know, we would go every evening that w…