yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Kayaking Over a Waterfall | Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

  • I think it's time we the scientifically challenged concentrate on one of science's heroes, Tyler Bradt, kayaker extraordinaire. He wants to kayak over this, Palouse Falls in Washington. Thousands of cubic feet of water pass over this fall every second and drop 186 feet to the pool below. To consider kayaking over this, he must either be a few sandwiches short of a picnic or a world record breaker. We hope.

[music playing]

Oh. There he is, the new world record holder of one of the most dangerous stunts I have ever seen. Needless to say, even if you do have a 186-foot water feature, don't try this at home or anywhere else. Falling off a waterfall is the easy part. But as gravity initially accelerates you down at 32 feet per second per second, it's surviving that's the tricky bit. Our kayaker must go over the falls at the correct speed to give gravity just enough time to generate the angular velocity needed to rotate the kayak 90 degrees. This angle minimizes hydrodynamic drag, so he experiences less impact force and cuts through the water.

It's also worth noting that a kayak's stability is dependent on keeping the center of mass in line with the center of buoyancy, which is in the middle of a submerged volume. Otherwise. OK. Science-taught, let's see if our team of want-to-be record breakers have learned. He's practicing the science with a man-made kind of waterfall, but the law of gravity is the same. The thin layer of water acting as a lubricant combined with the steep angle allows gravity to do its thing. It's not quite the 32 feet per second per second of a waterfall freefall, but he's only practicing.

On to angular velocity, or in this case, the lack of it. Launching too fast meant he gained very little angular velocity, hitting H2O at a terrible angle, thereby maximizing hydrodynamic drag. Which is bad, as it brought him to an almost immediate and very painful stop. Waterfall. Check. Angular velocity. Check. Stability. Check, ish. It's an upside down check, but technically he still got himself into a stable position. It's just a shame his center of mass is directly below his center of buoyancy, as his head is the thing he uses to breathe. Cheering without acknowledging the person that just saved your life. Check.

Even if our want-to-be record breakers do get to grips with angular velocity, hydrodynamic drag, and stability, like Tyler did, 186 feet is just too dangerous. Maybe it's better to kayak somewhere safer, like a puddle.

More Articles

View All
Counting faces and edges of 3D shapes
How many faces does the following shape have? Pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All right, I’m assuming you paused it, and I’ll see if we can work through it together. I’m going to actually try to color the faces. So, we have this face…
Remarks by Kirsty Nathoo
So that wraps up the day of talks. We do have a reception now downstairs; that’s downstairs where you had your lunch, and also outside in the courtyard. Before everybody disappears, I do have some thank yous. Thank you very much to everybody who has been…
Trekking Through One of Africa's Most Majestic Places | National Geographic
The Delta of the Okavango is, for me, the most majestic place on earth. From the expedition, you learn so much; it’s much more than science. It’s much more than just being in a pretty place. Personally, it changed every molecule in my body. It changed the…
8 WAYS HOW KINDNESS WILL RUIN YOUR LIFE | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Is being overly kind actually more harmful than helpful? In a world that often equates kindness with virtue, it might seem counterintuitive to suggest that there’s such a thing as too much generosity. Yet, stepping back and examining the philosophy of Sto…
How to sell a private jet!
Two planes, one locally in Europe and the other one abroad. I think if you just get the Goh-ing 650, if you take a 1-hour trip somewhere around Europe, it’s no big deal. “650, exactly what I was thinking!” “One with the bedroom in the back?” “Yeah, yea…
these inventions changed the world..
The latrine, the porcelain throne, the Oval Office toilets… do I really need to say anything here? Before toilets, we would literally use buckets or just went into the forest or peed on a tree or something. We didn’t really have any efficient way of getti…