yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

_-substitution: definite integrals | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is get some practice applying u-substitution to definite integrals. So let's say we have the integral. So we're going to go from x equals 1 to x equals 2, and the integral is (2x \times (x^2 + 1)^3 , dx).

So, I already told you that we're going to apply u-substitution, but it's interesting to be able to recognize when to use it. The key giveaway here is, well, I have this (x^2 + 1) business of 3rd power, but then I also have the derivative of (x^2 + 1) which is (2x) right over here.

So I could do the substitution. I could say (u) is equal to (x^2 + 1), in which case the derivative of (u) with respect to (x) is just (2x + 0) or just (2x). I could write that in differential form. A mathematical hand-wavy way of thinking about it is multiplying both sides by (dx), and so you get (du = 2x , dx).

Now, at least this part of the integral I can rewrite. So let me at least write this. This is going to be, I'll write the integral—we're going to think about the bounds in a second—so we have (u^3).

You do the same orange color: (u^3), that's this stuff right over here. And then (2x , dx), remember you could just view this as (2x \times (x^2 + 1)^3 \times dx). So (2x , dx), well (2x , dx) that is (du).

So that and that together, that is (du).

Now, an interesting question because this isn't an indefinite integral—we're not just trying to find the antiderivative, this is a definite integral—so what happens to our bounds of integration? Well, there's two ways that you can approach this.

You can change your bounds of integration because this one is (x = 1) to (x = 2), but now we're integrating with respect to (u). So one way, if you want to keep your bounds of integration—or if you want to keep this a definite integral, I guess you could say—you would change your bounds from (u =) something to (u =) something else.

So your bounds of integration, let's see, when (x = 1), what is (u)? Well, when (x = 1), you have (1^2 + 1), so you have (2): (u = 2) in that situation. When (x = 2), what is (u)? Well, you have (2^2) which is (4) plus (1) which is (5), so (u = 5).

And you won't typically see someone writing (u =) or (u = 5); it's often just from (2) to (5) because we're integrating with respect to (u). You assume it's (u = 2) to (u = 5).

So we could just rewrite this as being equal to the integral from (2) to (5) of (u^3 , du). But it's really important to realize why we changed our bounds. We are now integrating with respect to (u) and the way we did it is we used our substitution right over here.

What (x = 1), (u = 2); when (x = 2): (2^2 + 1) (u = 5). Then we can just evaluate this right over here. Let’s see: this is going to be equal to the antiderivative of (u^3) which is (\frac{u^4}{4}), and we're going to evaluate that at (5) and (2).

So this is going to be (\frac{5^4}{4} - \frac{2^4}{4}), and then we could simplify this if we like, but we've just evaluated this definite integral.

Now, another way to do it is to think about the— is to try to solve the indefinite integral in terms of (x) and use (u) substitution as an intermediate. So one way to think about this is to say, well, let's just try to evaluate what the indefinite integral of (2x \times (x^2 + 1)^3 , dx) is.

And then whatever this expression ends up being algebraically, I'm going to evaluate it at (x = 2) and at (x = 1). So then you use the (u) substitution right over here, and you would get this would simplify using the same substitution as the integral of (u^3 , du).

Once again, you're going to evaluate this whole thing from (x = 2) and then subtract from that it evaluated at (x = 1).

And so this is going to be equal to, well let's see, this is (\frac{u^4}{4}) and once again evaluating it at (x = 2) and then subtracting from that at (x = 1).

And then now we can just back substitute. We could say, "Hey look, (u = x^2 + 1)". So this is the same thing as (\frac{(x^2 + 1)^4}{4}) and we're now going to evaluate that at (x = 2) and (x = 1).

And you will notice that you'll get the exact same thing. When you put (x = 2) here, you get (2^2 + 1) which is (5) to the (4)th power over (4), that right over there. And then minus (1^2 + 1) is (2) to the (4)th power over (4), that right over there.

So, either way, you'll get the same result. You can either keep it a definite integral and then change your bounds of integration and express them in terms of (u). That's one way to do it. The other way is to try to evaluate the indefinite integral, use (u) substitution as an intermediary step, then back substitute back, and then evaluate at your bounds.

More Articles

View All
Is a US Recession Really Coming Soon?
This video is sponsored by Seeking Alpha. Sign up to Seeking Alpha Premium using my link to score a 7-Day free trial and $25 off your annual subscription. Is the US really headed for a recession? A week ago, you probably saw the stock market take a decen…
Are We At A Turning Point For Crypto? | Crypto Banter
[Music] [Applause] [Music] Oh, it’s a great time to welcome our friend Mr. Wonderful! Welcome back, and Jiren, welcome back to the show. Do you think that we’ve seen the bottom, and is — or are we headed for another leg down? I have a slightly different …
AMC TO $100,000 | What You MUST Know
What’s at Melbourne Capital? It’s Wall Street bets here. And before we start the video, we gotta grab some popcorn because before we go to the Moon, we gotta make a quick pit stop at the movie theater and talk about the insanity that is AMC. That’s right…
The Discovery That Transformed Pi
This video is about the ridiculous way we used to calculate Pi. For 2000 years, the most successful method was painstakingly slow and tedious, but then Isaac Newton came along and changed the game. You could say he speed-ran Pi, and I’m gonna show you how…
Why I'm Selling
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So, as most of you know, since I’ve started the channel and really for the last 10 years, I’ve dedicated the majority of my efforts and my money towards investing in real estate, with a lot of it documented here in the ch…
Making Something Social Destroys the Truth of It
Making something social destroys the truth of it because social groups need consensus to survive. Otherwise, they fight; they can’t get along. Consensus is all about compromise, not about truth-seeking. Science was this unique discipline, at least in Natu…