yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

_-substitution: definite integrals | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is get some practice applying u-substitution to definite integrals. So let's say we have the integral. So we're going to go from x equals 1 to x equals 2, and the integral is (2x \times (x^2 + 1)^3 , dx).

So, I already told you that we're going to apply u-substitution, but it's interesting to be able to recognize when to use it. The key giveaway here is, well, I have this (x^2 + 1) business of 3rd power, but then I also have the derivative of (x^2 + 1) which is (2x) right over here.

So I could do the substitution. I could say (u) is equal to (x^2 + 1), in which case the derivative of (u) with respect to (x) is just (2x + 0) or just (2x). I could write that in differential form. A mathematical hand-wavy way of thinking about it is multiplying both sides by (dx), and so you get (du = 2x , dx).

Now, at least this part of the integral I can rewrite. So let me at least write this. This is going to be, I'll write the integral—we're going to think about the bounds in a second—so we have (u^3).

You do the same orange color: (u^3), that's this stuff right over here. And then (2x , dx), remember you could just view this as (2x \times (x^2 + 1)^3 \times dx). So (2x , dx), well (2x , dx) that is (du).

So that and that together, that is (du).

Now, an interesting question because this isn't an indefinite integral—we're not just trying to find the antiderivative, this is a definite integral—so what happens to our bounds of integration? Well, there's two ways that you can approach this.

You can change your bounds of integration because this one is (x = 1) to (x = 2), but now we're integrating with respect to (u). So one way, if you want to keep your bounds of integration—or if you want to keep this a definite integral, I guess you could say—you would change your bounds from (u =) something to (u =) something else.

So your bounds of integration, let's see, when (x = 1), what is (u)? Well, when (x = 1), you have (1^2 + 1), so you have (2): (u = 2) in that situation. When (x = 2), what is (u)? Well, you have (2^2) which is (4) plus (1) which is (5), so (u = 5).

And you won't typically see someone writing (u =) or (u = 5); it's often just from (2) to (5) because we're integrating with respect to (u). You assume it's (u = 2) to (u = 5).

So we could just rewrite this as being equal to the integral from (2) to (5) of (u^3 , du). But it's really important to realize why we changed our bounds. We are now integrating with respect to (u) and the way we did it is we used our substitution right over here.

What (x = 1), (u = 2); when (x = 2): (2^2 + 1) (u = 5). Then we can just evaluate this right over here. Let’s see: this is going to be equal to the antiderivative of (u^3) which is (\frac{u^4}{4}), and we're going to evaluate that at (5) and (2).

So this is going to be (\frac{5^4}{4} - \frac{2^4}{4}), and then we could simplify this if we like, but we've just evaluated this definite integral.

Now, another way to do it is to think about the— is to try to solve the indefinite integral in terms of (x) and use (u) substitution as an intermediate. So one way to think about this is to say, well, let's just try to evaluate what the indefinite integral of (2x \times (x^2 + 1)^3 , dx) is.

And then whatever this expression ends up being algebraically, I'm going to evaluate it at (x = 2) and at (x = 1). So then you use the (u) substitution right over here, and you would get this would simplify using the same substitution as the integral of (u^3 , du).

Once again, you're going to evaluate this whole thing from (x = 2) and then subtract from that it evaluated at (x = 1).

And so this is going to be equal to, well let's see, this is (\frac{u^4}{4}) and once again evaluating it at (x = 2) and then subtracting from that at (x = 1).

And then now we can just back substitute. We could say, "Hey look, (u = x^2 + 1)". So this is the same thing as (\frac{(x^2 + 1)^4}{4}) and we're now going to evaluate that at (x = 2) and (x = 1).

And you will notice that you'll get the exact same thing. When you put (x = 2) here, you get (2^2 + 1) which is (5) to the (4)th power over (4), that right over there. And then minus (1^2 + 1) is (2) to the (4)th power over (4), that right over there.

So, either way, you'll get the same result. You can either keep it a definite integral and then change your bounds of integration and express them in terms of (u). That's one way to do it. The other way is to try to evaluate the indefinite integral, use (u) substitution as an intermediary step, then back substitute back, and then evaluate at your bounds.

More Articles

View All
Arm Yourself With Specific Knowledge
You want to talk a little bit about the skills that you need: in particular, specific knowledge, accountability, leverage, and judgment. So, the first tweet in this area is: “Arm yourself with specific knowledge, accountability, and leverage.” And I’ll th…
20 Minutes on UnderstandMyself.com
Hi everyone. So, I’m making an announcement today, and I suppose you might regard it as an advertisement. So, I’m warning you to begin with because I don’t want you to waste your time if you’re not interested in listening to a description of the newest th…
Michael Pollan: The Vestibule of Hell | Big Think
I was looking for the most unreconstructed cooking I could find, cooking as it’s been practiced for thousands, if not millions of years. And I found that in Eastern North Carolina whole hog barbecue, where there is no sauce to speak of. It’s just this ani…
Associative and commutative properties of addition with negatives | 7th grade | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is evaluate this pretty hairy expression. We could just try to do it; we could go from left to right, but it feels like there might be a simpler way to do it. I’m adding 13 here, and then I’m subtracting 13. I have a n…
A needle in countless haystacks: Finding habitable worlds - Ariel Anbar
Translator: Tom Carter Reviewer: Bedirhan Cinar The universe contains about 100 billion galaxies. Each of those galaxies contains about 100 billion stars. Many of those stars have planets orbiting them. So how do we look for life in all that immensity? I…
Auckland Clip 3: The Dawning of the Moral Sense
It’s not all that happens though when they eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil because it’s not called the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of nakedness. It’s called the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. And I…