yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Estimate multiplying multi digit numbers


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What I would like to do in this video is get some practice estimating the product of multi-digit numbers, and there's just no better way of getting practice than just trying it ourselves.

So, right over here, it says estimate 29 times 3198. Why don't you pause this video and try to estimate this? Of course, you can do this by multiplying this out on paper or using a calculator, but this is a useful skill. Try to do it in your head; see if you can estimate what this is going to be.

Well, before even looking at these answers, I would say this is going to be approximately equal to... Let's see, 29 is awfully close to 30, and then I could multiply that times... I could either multiply that times 3200, which is awfully close to 3198, or if I want an even more rough approximation, I could say that's roughly equal to 30 times 3,000.

So, if I did 30 times 3,000, 3 times 3 is equal to 9, and then I have one, two, three, four zeros. One, two, three, four zeros! And actually, my approximation, it turns out, is here right over here: 90,000.

Now, if I wanted a slightly better approximation, I could have said this is approximately equal to 30 times 3200. This you could also do in your head. You could say, well, what is 3 times 32? Well, that is going to be 96, and then you have one, two, three zeros. One, two, three zeros! So this would be a slightly better approximation, and if this is what you got, the closest answer here is still going to be equal to 90,000.

Let's do another example. So here we are asked to estimate 137 times 18. So pause this video again and see if you can come up with an estimate; try to do it in your head.

Well, there's once again many ways of trying to tackle it. The way I would tackle it, I would say, well, that's pretty close to 140 times 20, and then this would be equal to 14 times 2 is 28, and then we have two zeros here, so that would be roughly 2800. But when I look over here, there is no 2800, and so maybe the closest one right over here is 2,000.

So that could be an approximation. Another way... it looks actually the way that they did it is they even did a coarser approximation. They rounded this to the nearest hundred, and so they said this is approximately equal to 100 times... and they rounded this to the nearest 10: 100 times 20, which is even easier to do in your head, which is equal to 2000, which is this choice that they got right over here.

More Articles

View All
The Real Problem With AI ✨
Evil artificial intelligence might try to take over the world. You shouldn’t trust anything it says. Well, first, the AI would attempt to gain access to as many technological systems as possible. Then, it would study us, gathering data and identifying our…
Collecting Animal Bones in Alaska | Best Job Ever
[Music] So here we are on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. We’re here looking for Caribou antlers and [Music] bones. We are pretty much finding bones wherever we go. What we have here is a shed bull Caribou antler, so a male, large male. This is where…
The Threat of AI Weapons
I’ll explain more at the end, but let me set up this clip in five words: robot killers, Stephen Fry, watch. Autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare after gunpowder and nuclear bombs. They could mount rapid devastating at…
Homeroom with Sal & Magnus Carlsen - Friday, March 12
Hi everyone! Welcome to homeroom with Sal. We have a very exciting conversation, and I also have two temporary co-hosts today because our guest is a bit of a hero for them. We have a bit of a chess household, so we’re going to have a hopefully very engagi…
Math's Fundamental Flaw
There is a hole at the bottom of math, a hole that means we will never know everything with certainty. There will always be true statements that cannot be proven. Now, no one knows what those statements are exactly, but they could be something like the T…
Mistakes when finding inflection points: not checking candidates | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Olga was asked to find where f of x is equal to x minus two to the fourth power has inflection points. This is her solution. So we look at her solution, and then they ask us: Is Olga’s work correct? If not, what’s her mistake? So pause this video and see…