yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Per capita GDP trends over past 70 years | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is a chart from the New York Times that shows us how per capita GDP has trended on an inflation-adjusted basis since 1947. So you can really think about this as the post-World War II era. World War II, of course, ended in 1945.

It's always good to read the fine print to make sure we understand what this is telling us and what it's not telling us. As I mentioned, it is adjusted for inflation. It also says that the incomes given here are post-tax and include government benefits. So if someone's getting a government benefit of a certain value per year, that would be included in their income here. And if someone is, say, making a hundred thousand but paying thirty-five thousand in taxes, then the income is post-tax; it would be the hundred thousand minus the thirty-five thousand, or sixty-five thousand.

There are several interesting things here. This is showing us growth since 1947, so it's not that folks in 1947 that we had a zero per capita GDP or that there was zero income. It's just obviously in 1947 you haven't had any growth since 1947. Then, as you move forward in time over roughly the next 30 years, you get to about 1980. It looks like you've had about a hundred percent growth.

Now, whenever I think in terms of percentage growth—hundred percent growth, two hundred percent growth—I always like to do a little bit of a reality check of how would that compare to where I started. I like to view the zero percent growth as one hundred percent of 1947. I'll make another axis here on the right to supplement what's already there. So this would be one hundred percent of 1947; then if I grow one hundred percent from that, that's the same thing as doubling—so two hundred percent of 1947.

This right over here, if I grow by two hundred percent, that means I am at three hundred percent of 1947. And then if I've grown by three hundred percent, that means I am at four hundred percent of 1947. So one way to think about it is over the course of the thirty years, or thirty-three years, from 1947 to 1980, it looks like inflation-adjusted per capita GDP has essentially doubled. It has grown by one hundred percent.

It also looks like in this yellow line, where they're telling us the average income for the bottom 90 percent—so bottom 90, that's essentially everyone but the top 10 percent—it looks like it's roughly tracked per capita GDP. In fact, it looks like it might have been a little bit ahead of that over some of those years. So if you go from 1947 to 1980, per capita GDP has roughly doubled, and average incomes for that bottom 90 percent have roughly doubled.

Now, something interesting, or at least this graph is highlighting something that might be interesting over the next 40-year period from 1980 to roughly today, which is per capita GDP has continued to trend upward at a seemingly similar rate. But the income, the average income for the bottom 90 percent, does not seem to keep pace with that.

In other videos, we looked at 1980 to now and we saw this trend, but we didn't have the historical data from 1947 to 1980 to see that. You don't always see this. In order for that to happen, that means that the top 10 percent must be growing faster. I'm just making up some curve like that; it must be going at a faster rate.

And even this might be surprising some of you. You might say, "All right, the bottom 90 isn't growing as fast as the average across the country." But by this measure, it looks like on an inflation-adjusted after-tax basis, the bottom 90 percent is at 300 percent of 1947, now give or take, and it was at 200 percent of 1947 in 1980, give or take, which means that the standard of living since 1980 should have improved by about fifty percent for this bottom 90 group.

And I know for a lot of y'all who have been around since 1980 or who know about 1980 say, "Well, maybe that's the case." Most of us definitely have better computing power now. We have nicer large-screen flat TVs, we have cheaper manufactured goods, but other things feel harder for a lot of folks than 1980. Things like buying a house, or healthcare, or college tuition.

And that goes to something that we will probably dig into more in other videos, and that's how inflation is measured. I'm not going to go into detail; other parts on Khan Academy we talk about how inflation is measured in the consumer price index. Whenever you look at any statistics, it's always important to think about how are they calculated and what are the underlying assumptions. Because inflation is trying to capture how much can you buy with a certain amount of money, but that calculation is dependent on what you think people are buying or how you measure the cost of it.

So we'll talk about that in future videos, but the big takeaway here is that the historic trend is that the bottom 90 percent has roughly grown with per capita GDP. But it seems like there's something about the last 40 years—whether it's tax policy, monetary policy, demographic changes, technology, globalization, education, and maybe all of the above—that has led to a change in the trend.

More Articles

View All
Narcotics Hidden in a Toy Car | To Catch A Smuggler
Ready to go? OK. We look for any contraband, agricultural products, narcotics, money, instruments of terror, anything like that prohibited from the United States. So this morning we had an express consignment flight arrive from Germany. What we’re going…
The Housing Market Is Going INSANE (40 Year Mortgages)
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So the banking industry is in deep trouble again, except this time it’s the entire housing market at risk. In just the last few days, bank lending has fallen by the largest amount ever on record, and the situation is gett…
Stop Buying Homes | The Housing Crisis Just Got Worse
What’s up, Grandma’s guys? Here, so, uh, yep, it’s official. The housing market bubble could burst this year, according to this guy! Okay, no, but seriously, it’s long overdue that we talk about what’s going on. Because as both a real estate agent and re…
Comparing P-values to different significance levels | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about significance levels, which are denoted by the Greek letter alpha. We’re going to talk about two things: the different conclusions you might make based on the different significance levels that you might …
Homeroom with Sal & Lisa Damour PhD - Tuesday, September 29
Hello everyone. I am Knoxel. Unfortunately, sounds a little bit under the weather today. I am Kristen, the Chief Learning Officer at Khan Academy, and I’m going to attempt to fill a little bit of his shoes today. We are excited to have as our homeroom gu…
Neil and Seth on the Science of Family Guy | StarTalk
Seth, I called you into my office. Yes, I got to talk to you. Want me to help you clean up? Clean up the office? At some point, I had to find you and talk to you about the science in Family Guy. Yeah, yeah, and I said to myself before I even met you, the…