yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Maclaurin polynomial | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We're told that ( f(x) ) is equal to one over the square root of ( x + 1 ), and what we want to figure out is what is the second degree Maclaurin polynomial of ( f ). And like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

So, let's remind ourselves what a Maclaurin polynomial is. A Maclaurin polynomial is just a Taylor polynomial centered at zero. So the form of this second degree Maclaurin polynomial, and we just have to find this Maclaurin expansion until our second degree term, it's going to look like this.

So ( P(x) ), I'm using ( P ) for a polynomial, it's going to be our ( f(0) ) plus we could view that as ( f(0) ) times ( x^{0} ) power; well, that's just ( f(0) ). ( f(0) ) plus ( f'(0) x ) plus ( \frac{f''(0)}{2} x^{2} ).

Now, if we wanted a higher degree, we could keep on going, but remember they're just asking us for the second degree. So this is the form that we're going to need. We're going to have these three terms. So let's see if we can evaluate these. Let's see if we can evaluate the function and its derivatives at 0.

So ( f(0) ) is equal to ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{0 + 1}} ). Well, that's ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1}} ), the principal root of 1, which is positive 1, so that's just going to be equal to 1. So that right over there is equal to 1.

Now let's evaluate ( f' ) of ( x ) and then I'll evaluate ( f' ) of 0. ( f'(x) ) is equal to... well, ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{x + 1}} ). This is the same thing as ( (x + 1)^{-\frac{1}{2}} ).

So if I'm thinking of the first derivative of ( f ), well I could use the chain rule here. The derivative of ( x + 1 ) with respect to ( x ) well that's just going to be 1. Then I'll take the derivative of this whole thing with respect to ( x + 1 ) and I'll just use the power rule there.

So it's going to be ( -\frac{1}{2} ) times ( (x + 1)^{-\frac{3}{2}} ) and so the first derivative evaluated at zero is just ( -\frac{1}{2} ) times one, one to the negative three halves; one to the negative three half power well that's just going to be 1.

So this whole thing ( f'(0) ) is just ( -\frac{1}{2} ). So that is this right over here is ( -\frac{1}{2} ), and now let's figure out the second derivative.

Alright, I'll do this, let me do this in this green color. So the second derivative with respect to ( x ), well I do the same thing again. The derivative of ( x + 1 ) with respect to ( x ) is just one, so I just have to take the derivative of the whole thing with respect to ( x + 1 ).

So I take my exponent, bring it out front, ( -\frac{3}{2} ) times ( -\frac{1}{2} ) is going to be ( \frac{3}{4} ) times ( (x + 1) ), and then I decrement the exponent here by 1 or by two halves, so it's going to be ( -\frac{5}{2} ).

So the second derivative evaluated at zero, well if this is equal to zero, you're going to have one to the negative five halves, which is just one times ( \frac{3}{4} ) is going to be ( \frac{3}{4} ). So this part right over here is ( \frac{3}{4} ), and so you're going to have ( \frac{3}{4} \div 2 ). ( \frac{3}{4} \div 2 ) is ( \frac{3}{8} ).

So our Taylor or actually our Maclaurin polynomial, our second degree Maclaurin polynomial ( P(x) ) is going to be equal to, and I'll do it in the same colors, it's going to be equal to ( 1 - \frac{1}{2} x + \frac{3}{8} x^{2} ).

And we are done! There you have, we have our second degree Maclaurin polynomial of ( f ), which could be used to provide an approximation for our function, especially as we—as especially for ( x )'s near zero.

More Articles

View All
The Ponzi Factor: Proof by Definition
I talked with the author who has written a book so dangerous if this information becomes mainstream it alters the entire engine of our economy. Tong Lu has revealed just how our stock market is the dictionary definition of a Ponzi scheme. Here’s my conver…
Worked examples for standard algorithm exercise
We’re now going to do a few example questions from the Khan Academy exercise on the standard algorithm. So we’re asked which of the following correctly multiplies 74 times 8 using the standard algorithm. So pause this video and see if you can work on that…
Natascha McElhone: Playing Elizabeth Hopkins | Saints & Strangers
Elizabeth is a stranger. She’s not a program. She should even come for religious reasons, and this is indicative of the age and the era, 1620s. Uh, Elizabeth is introduced and is in the story largely because of her husband, Steven Hopkins. She comes with…
Bill Belichick & Ray Dalio on Picking People: Part 2
In our conversations, one of the things that I liked about what you did, and um, which is what I do, is you get very clear on the specs. You know that people are different, and you make very clear distinctions of what somebody is like, you know. We try to…
Introducing a New Baby Elephant – Day 85 | Safari Live
Today, X is malaria; thankfully, that is the best in the home B. Of course, I do excuse the shadows on my face, but you will notice that when I turn my face to the Sun, I’m unable to open my eyes. That is because it is so very bright. So let’s not look at…
15 Richest People in Media (& How They Built Their Fortunes)
The media industry is a dynamic sector that shapes our world and influences public opinion. From broadcasting to digital platforms, it connects us to news, entertainment, and information. But amidst these diverse ventures, some individuals have achieved r…