yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Maclaurin polynomial | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We're told that ( f(x) ) is equal to one over the square root of ( x + 1 ), and what we want to figure out is what is the second degree Maclaurin polynomial of ( f ). And like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

So, let's remind ourselves what a Maclaurin polynomial is. A Maclaurin polynomial is just a Taylor polynomial centered at zero. So the form of this second degree Maclaurin polynomial, and we just have to find this Maclaurin expansion until our second degree term, it's going to look like this.

So ( P(x) ), I'm using ( P ) for a polynomial, it's going to be our ( f(0) ) plus we could view that as ( f(0) ) times ( x^{0} ) power; well, that's just ( f(0) ). ( f(0) ) plus ( f'(0) x ) plus ( \frac{f''(0)}{2} x^{2} ).

Now, if we wanted a higher degree, we could keep on going, but remember they're just asking us for the second degree. So this is the form that we're going to need. We're going to have these three terms. So let's see if we can evaluate these. Let's see if we can evaluate the function and its derivatives at 0.

So ( f(0) ) is equal to ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{0 + 1}} ). Well, that's ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1}} ), the principal root of 1, which is positive 1, so that's just going to be equal to 1. So that right over there is equal to 1.

Now let's evaluate ( f' ) of ( x ) and then I'll evaluate ( f' ) of 0. ( f'(x) ) is equal to... well, ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{x + 1}} ). This is the same thing as ( (x + 1)^{-\frac{1}{2}} ).

So if I'm thinking of the first derivative of ( f ), well I could use the chain rule here. The derivative of ( x + 1 ) with respect to ( x ) well that's just going to be 1. Then I'll take the derivative of this whole thing with respect to ( x + 1 ) and I'll just use the power rule there.

So it's going to be ( -\frac{1}{2} ) times ( (x + 1)^{-\frac{3}{2}} ) and so the first derivative evaluated at zero is just ( -\frac{1}{2} ) times one, one to the negative three halves; one to the negative three half power well that's just going to be 1.

So this whole thing ( f'(0) ) is just ( -\frac{1}{2} ). So that is this right over here is ( -\frac{1}{2} ), and now let's figure out the second derivative.

Alright, I'll do this, let me do this in this green color. So the second derivative with respect to ( x ), well I do the same thing again. The derivative of ( x + 1 ) with respect to ( x ) is just one, so I just have to take the derivative of the whole thing with respect to ( x + 1 ).

So I take my exponent, bring it out front, ( -\frac{3}{2} ) times ( -\frac{1}{2} ) is going to be ( \frac{3}{4} ) times ( (x + 1) ), and then I decrement the exponent here by 1 or by two halves, so it's going to be ( -\frac{5}{2} ).

So the second derivative evaluated at zero, well if this is equal to zero, you're going to have one to the negative five halves, which is just one times ( \frac{3}{4} ) is going to be ( \frac{3}{4} ). So this part right over here is ( \frac{3}{4} ), and so you're going to have ( \frac{3}{4} \div 2 ). ( \frac{3}{4} \div 2 ) is ( \frac{3}{8} ).

So our Taylor or actually our Maclaurin polynomial, our second degree Maclaurin polynomial ( P(x) ) is going to be equal to, and I'll do it in the same colors, it's going to be equal to ( 1 - \frac{1}{2} x + \frac{3}{8} x^{2} ).

And we are done! There you have, we have our second degree Maclaurin polynomial of ( f ), which could be used to provide an approximation for our function, especially as we—as especially for ( x )'s near zero.

More Articles

View All
How A Nuclear War Will Start - Minute by Minute
Mr. President! Nuclear missiles will strike our country in 14 minutes. I know it’s your first day in office, so I’m going to walk you through it, but you’re the only one who can authorize our nuclear retaliation in response, and you’ve only got a few minu…
Baker v. Carr | National Constitution Center | Khan Academy
[Kim] Hi, this is Kim from Kahn Academy. Today we’re learning more about Baker versus Carr, a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1962. Baker versus Carr grappled with an incredibly important issue: whether one person’s vote is equal to another person’…
New Discovery: Blood-Red Worms That Thrive in a Toxic Cave (EXCLUSIVE VIDEO) | National Geographic
These worms are small. They’re red, blood red, and they occur in well knots of worms—lots of worms together. Finding the worms in a place like sulfur cave shows that there are even places on Earth where creatures can live, where they are not connected to …
Peter Lynch: Why You Should Always Ignore Economic Predictions When Investing
You don’t have to go far to find dire economic predictions. Just turn on your TV or open YouTube, and you will see predictions about what will cause the next financial crisis, economic collapse, or great depression. Whether it’s caused by rising interest …
Urska Srsen Speaks at Y Combinator Female Founder Conference 2016
Hello. Before I actually started talking about myself for the next 20 minutes, I wanted to kick off this speech with a quote from a woman that I admire a lot, and who unfortunately died last week. For those of you who don’t know her, Zaha Hadid was an Ira…
Where No Grid Has Gone Before | Breakthrough
We don’t go to them and say, hey, we’ve got electricity. We’re going to bring it to you. We’re going to bring you modern entertainment that electricity provides, no. They’re coming to us and saying, we’re so far off the grid, we don’t have any electricity…