yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Science Is an Error-Correcting Mechanism


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

So getting back to good explanations, where do these explanations come from?

There's currently an obsession with induction. Induction being the idea that you can predict the future from the past. You can say, "I saw one, then two, then three, then four, then five, so therefore next must be six, seven, eight, nine."

There's a belief that this is how new knowledge is created, this is how scientific theories are formed, and this is how we can make good explanations about the universe.

What's wrong with induction, and where does new knowledge come from? You did mention the black swan earlier, and I'd like to go back to that.

The black swan is an example that various people have used over the years in order to illustrate this idea that repeatedly observing the same phenomena over and again should not make you confident that it will continue in the future.

In Europe, we have white swans. So any biologist who's interested in birds may be observing white swan after white swan and apparently concluding on that basis that therefore all swans are white. Then someone travels to Western Australia, and there you notice that there are swans that otherwise look identical to the ones in Europe, but they're black.

Let's consider another example of induction. Ever since the beginning of your life, you have observed that the sun has risen. Does this mean that scientifically you should conclude the sun will rise tomorrow and rise every day after that?

This is not what science is about. Science is not about cataloging a history of events that have occurred in the past and presuming they're going to occur again in the future. Science is an explanatory framework; it's an error-correcting mechanism.

It's not ever of the form, "The sun always rose in the past; therefore, it will rise in the future." There's all sorts of ways in which we can imagine the sun won't rise tomorrow. All you need to do is to take a trip to Antarctica, and there, for some months of the year, the sun doesn't rise at all.

If you go to the International Space Station, you won't see the sun rise once per day and set once per day; it will rise and set repeatedly over the course of your very fast journey around the earth.

More Articles

View All
Fight or Die | Edge of the Unknown on Disney+
It’s freaking gnarly, dude. It’s as gnarly as I could have imagined it being. This is a lot of fun. Just really nervous about how fast I’m going to be actually flying off the lip. With drop kayaking, when you’re really pushing yourself is when you feel m…
Michael Burry Just Doubled Down on Stocks
As you all know, Michael Barry, depicted in The Big Short by Christian Bale, made his millions by betting against the U.S. housing market in the lead-up to the 2008 global financial crisis by buying credit default swaps on doomed mortgage-backed securitie…
What if the Moon was a Disco Ball?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. If we turned the Moon into a giant disco ball, day and night would not be a disco party. Instead of diffusely reflecting sunlight onto all of us, a mirror-tiled moon would reflect specularly. You would be lucky to momentarily ca…
Pristine Seas: The Global Expedition Launches in the Pacific | National Geographic Society
The global Expedition is kicking off with our own purpose modified vessel, the MV Argo. This is the largest marine conservation effort ever attempted to protect the world’s ocean, starting in the Pacific. [Music] Life on Earth wouldn’t exist without hea…
Male Polar Bear Fight Club - Ep. 2 | Wildlife: The Big Freeze
(Polar bear whining) - It’s been four months since your last bite. (Snow crunching) You may fool yourself into digging out some frozen kelp, but you know that dinner actually sits comfortably (seal purring) 200 miles away. It’s so frustrating. (Polar bear…
Analyzing a cumulative relative frequency graph | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Nutritionists measured the sugar content in grams for 32 drinks at Starbucks. A cumulative relative frequency graph—let me underline that—a cumulative relative frequency graph for the data is shown below. So they have different amounts of sugar in grams …