yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Science Is an Error-Correcting Mechanism


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

So getting back to good explanations, where do these explanations come from?

There's currently an obsession with induction. Induction being the idea that you can predict the future from the past. You can say, "I saw one, then two, then three, then four, then five, so therefore next must be six, seven, eight, nine."

There's a belief that this is how new knowledge is created, this is how scientific theories are formed, and this is how we can make good explanations about the universe.

What's wrong with induction, and where does new knowledge come from? You did mention the black swan earlier, and I'd like to go back to that.

The black swan is an example that various people have used over the years in order to illustrate this idea that repeatedly observing the same phenomena over and again should not make you confident that it will continue in the future.

In Europe, we have white swans. So any biologist who's interested in birds may be observing white swan after white swan and apparently concluding on that basis that therefore all swans are white. Then someone travels to Western Australia, and there you notice that there are swans that otherwise look identical to the ones in Europe, but they're black.

Let's consider another example of induction. Ever since the beginning of your life, you have observed that the sun has risen. Does this mean that scientifically you should conclude the sun will rise tomorrow and rise every day after that?

This is not what science is about. Science is not about cataloging a history of events that have occurred in the past and presuming they're going to occur again in the future. Science is an explanatory framework; it's an error-correcting mechanism.

It's not ever of the form, "The sun always rose in the past; therefore, it will rise in the future." There's all sorts of ways in which we can imagine the sun won't rise tomorrow. All you need to do is to take a trip to Antarctica, and there, for some months of the year, the sun doesn't rise at all.

If you go to the International Space Station, you won't see the sun rise once per day and set once per day; it will rise and set repeatedly over the course of your very fast journey around the earth.

More Articles

View All
Government Shutdown Imminent, Rates Spike, Stocks Collapse
Back here at home, time is running out to avoid a government shutdown. Billions of Americans could go without paychecks, including members of the military. The country is headed for a shutdown, and everyone should prepare as such. Big guys, it’s Graham h…
Kinetics of radioactive decay | Kinetics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Strontium-90 is a radioactive isotope that undergoes beta decay. Because radioactive decay is a first-order process, radioactive isotopes have constant half-lives. Half-life is symbolized by t1/2, and it’s the time required for one half of a sample of a p…
Derivatives of sec(x) and csc(x) | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we used the quotient rule in order to find the derivatives of tangent of X and cotangent of X. What I want to do in this video is to keep going and find the derivatives of secant of X and cosecant of X. So, let’s start with secant of …
Laplacian computation example
In the last video, I started introducing the intuition for the Laplacian operator in the context of the function with this graph and with the gradient field pictured below it, and here I’d like to go through the computation involved in that. So, the func…
Pike Surprise | Life Below Zero
This time of year, the pike are spawning in the shallows. There’s a grassy area just up around the corner where I might find some. I haven’t caught a pike yet this year, so you never know exactly what you’re going to find, but I’m hoping for some good fis…
Worked example: finding relative extrema | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have G of X being equal to X to the fourth minus X to the fifth. What we want to do, without having to graph G, is figure out what X values G has a relative maximum. Just to remind us what’s going on in a relative maximum, let me draw a hypothetica…