yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Associative and commutative properties of addition with negatives | 7th grade | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is evaluate this pretty hairy expression. We could just try to do it; we could go from left to right, but it feels like there might be a simpler way to do it. I'm adding 13 here, and then I'm subtracting 13. I have a negative 5 here, and then I have a positive 5.

You might be tempted to say, "Well, maybe I could change the order of that." I'm adding and subtracting things. Well, if we were just adding a bunch of numbers, you could change the order. For example, we know that 9 plus 7 is equal to 16, and if I just change the order, the commutative property tells us, "Well, 7 plus 9." It applies to addition. If I swap the order here, it's still going to be equal to 16. But that's not true if I do 9 minus 7 or 7 minus 9. If I change the order, I'm not getting the same result. The commutative property does not apply to subtraction.

This top expression is positive 2, this bottom expression is negative 2. So I can't just use the commutative property here to change the order with which I am adding and subtracting because I have subtraction here. But what if I could rewrite this expression so it only involves addition? How can you do that, Sal? You are probably thinking, and the key realization is: when you subtract a number, it's the same thing as adding the opposite.

For example, if I have 6 minus 3, that is the same thing as adding the opposite of positive 3, which is negative 3. Or if I had 6 minus negative 3, subtracting a number is the same thing as adding its opposite. So what I could do is, all of these places where I'm subtracting a number, instead I could just rewrite it so I'm adding the opposite.

So let me do that. I can rewrite this expression as negative 5 plus 13. So far I'm only adding here. I'm subtracting all of a sudden minus 21. Subtracting a number, well, I can rewrite that as adding its opposite. So subtracting—let me just use another color—subtracting a number is the same thing as adding its opposite. All right, let me keep going. Then I'm adding a 5. Remember, I'm just trying to make this so I'm just adding a bunch of things instead of adding and subtracting.

I have the plus 21. Now again, I am subtracting a number, so I can rewrite that as adding—I'm subtracting a positive 13. I can rewrite that as adding a negative 13. And then, last but not least, over here, I am subtracting again. I'm subtracting a number, so I can rewrite that as adding the opposite of this number. So I'm now adding positive 11. Subtracting negative 11 is the same thing as adding positive 11.

Now, why did I do this? Well, now I can use the commutative property. All I'm doing is I'm adding a bunch of numbers now, so I can swap the order in which I add. So I could now rewrite it. Let's see, I have a negative 5, and now let me add this positive 5 next. So, add the positive 5, and then I have—I'm adding a positive 13. And to that, I can add the negative 13. Remember, the only reason why I can now swap the order is because I'm only adding a bunch of integers.

Next, I have this negative 21, so let me circle that—I'm adding a negative 21. Adding negative 21, and then I could add the positive 21, which is right over there, and then last but not least, I add 11. Now, why was all of this super useful? Well, now look what happens. Things start to simplify a lot. Not only when I'm doing addition can I use the commutative property, can I change the order, but I can also use the associative property very easily.

So I could start to say, "All right, let me add these two first," and I could also add these two. I can pair these up, and that's useful because these cancel out with each other; they're opposites. If I take a negative 5 plus a positive 5, that's a zero. A 13 plus a negative 13, that's a zero. A negative 21 plus 21, that's a zero. And so what am I left with? I am just left with a positive 11.

So hopefully you see that if I can rewrite subtraction as adding the opposite, I can now use the commutative and the associative properties to really simplify things, which is really useful for the rest of your mathematical careers. I encourage you, in your own time, go left to right with this original expression, and you'll see that you get this exact same result. It's just going to actually take you a lot more time.

More Articles

View All
Brave New Words - Ethan Mollick & Sal Khan
Hi everyone, it’s here from Khan Academy, and as some of you all know, I have released my second book, “Brave New Words,” about the future of AI in education and work. It’s available wherever you might buy your books. But as part of the research for that …
Is America Actually Metric?
I’m here at the National Institute for Standards and Technology, and I’m about to see some of the original kilogram standards. Patrick: You are, you are. When were these made? Well, the originals were made in the 1880s. There were 40 of them that were b…
Tastes a Little "Sprucy" | Life Below Zero
I’ve always got a lot more to do than I have time to do. Not necessarily just work that has to be done, but things I want to see, things I want to learn about. Didn’t find any Caribou out there, but I was lucky enough to get a porcupine. I’ve eaten muskr…
The US Constitution | Period 3: 1754-1800 | AP US History | Khan Academy
In the last video, we discussed the Great Compromise made at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, where delegates who were trying to craft a new governmental system for the United States agreed on how the legislative branch of the government would be se…
The Letter That Led to the Atomic Bomb | Genius
ALBERT EINSTEIN (VOICEOVER): Based on this new phenomenon, it is conceivable, though much less certain, that an extremely powerful bomb of a new type may be constructed. FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT: A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded …
Selling Everything - The Next Crash Is Coming
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, you know the saying, “Buy Low, Sell High.” Well, apparently, while retail traders were celebrating the stock market’s best month since 2020, corporate insiders have been selling their stock at the fastest pace since …