yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Associative and commutative properties of addition with negatives | 7th grade | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is evaluate this pretty hairy expression. We could just try to do it; we could go from left to right, but it feels like there might be a simpler way to do it. I'm adding 13 here, and then I'm subtracting 13. I have a negative 5 here, and then I have a positive 5.

You might be tempted to say, "Well, maybe I could change the order of that." I'm adding and subtracting things. Well, if we were just adding a bunch of numbers, you could change the order. For example, we know that 9 plus 7 is equal to 16, and if I just change the order, the commutative property tells us, "Well, 7 plus 9." It applies to addition. If I swap the order here, it's still going to be equal to 16. But that's not true if I do 9 minus 7 or 7 minus 9. If I change the order, I'm not getting the same result. The commutative property does not apply to subtraction.

This top expression is positive 2, this bottom expression is negative 2. So I can't just use the commutative property here to change the order with which I am adding and subtracting because I have subtraction here. But what if I could rewrite this expression so it only involves addition? How can you do that, Sal? You are probably thinking, and the key realization is: when you subtract a number, it's the same thing as adding the opposite.

For example, if I have 6 minus 3, that is the same thing as adding the opposite of positive 3, which is negative 3. Or if I had 6 minus negative 3, subtracting a number is the same thing as adding its opposite. So what I could do is, all of these places where I'm subtracting a number, instead I could just rewrite it so I'm adding the opposite.

So let me do that. I can rewrite this expression as negative 5 plus 13. So far I'm only adding here. I'm subtracting all of a sudden minus 21. Subtracting a number, well, I can rewrite that as adding its opposite. So subtracting—let me just use another color—subtracting a number is the same thing as adding its opposite. All right, let me keep going. Then I'm adding a 5. Remember, I'm just trying to make this so I'm just adding a bunch of things instead of adding and subtracting.

I have the plus 21. Now again, I am subtracting a number, so I can rewrite that as adding—I'm subtracting a positive 13. I can rewrite that as adding a negative 13. And then, last but not least, over here, I am subtracting again. I'm subtracting a number, so I can rewrite that as adding the opposite of this number. So I'm now adding positive 11. Subtracting negative 11 is the same thing as adding positive 11.

Now, why did I do this? Well, now I can use the commutative property. All I'm doing is I'm adding a bunch of numbers now, so I can swap the order in which I add. So I could now rewrite it. Let's see, I have a negative 5, and now let me add this positive 5 next. So, add the positive 5, and then I have—I'm adding a positive 13. And to that, I can add the negative 13. Remember, the only reason why I can now swap the order is because I'm only adding a bunch of integers.

Next, I have this negative 21, so let me circle that—I'm adding a negative 21. Adding negative 21, and then I could add the positive 21, which is right over there, and then last but not least, I add 11. Now, why was all of this super useful? Well, now look what happens. Things start to simplify a lot. Not only when I'm doing addition can I use the commutative property, can I change the order, but I can also use the associative property very easily.

So I could start to say, "All right, let me add these two first," and I could also add these two. I can pair these up, and that's useful because these cancel out with each other; they're opposites. If I take a negative 5 plus a positive 5, that's a zero. A 13 plus a negative 13, that's a zero. A negative 21 plus 21, that's a zero. And so what am I left with? I am just left with a positive 11.

So hopefully you see that if I can rewrite subtraction as adding the opposite, I can now use the commutative and the associative properties to really simplify things, which is really useful for the rest of your mathematical careers. I encourage you, in your own time, go left to right with this original expression, and you'll see that you get this exact same result. It's just going to actually take you a lot more time.

More Articles

View All
Beginning of the Greco Persian Wars | World History | Khan Academy
This right here is a map of the Persian Empire in 490 BCE before the Common Era, and you see that it is an extensive empire. It was established by Cyrus the Great and then his successors. We talked about it in previous videos, how they were able to conque…
Per capita GDP trends over past 70 years | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
This is a chart from the New York Times that shows us how per capita GDP has trended on an inflation-adjusted basis since 1947. So you can really think about this as the post-World War II era. World War II, of course, ended in 1945. It’s always good to r…
Building Shelter | How to Survive on Mars
When we get to Mars, we need to solve our basic needs, in particular protection from radiation. The first crew that lands on Mars will live in their ship, but you can’t live there very long. The cosmic radiation and the solar radiation is going to penetra…
Most Important Lifestyle Habits Of Successful Founders
Let’s examine the facts. Yes, fact, fact, fact, fact, great, you’re fine. Yes, however, sometimes we look at the facts, and you’re not fine. [Music] This is Michael Seibel with Dalton Caldwell. In our last video, we talked about the setbacks that make fou…
Khan Academy Ed Talks with Marc Sternberg - Wednesday, March 10
Hello! Welcome everyone to Ed Talks with Khan Academy. I’m Christine DeCervo, the Chief Learning Officer here at Khan Academy, and today I’m excited to talk to Mark Steinberg, who is the K-12 Education Program Director at the Walton Family Foundation. So…
Slope and intercepts from tables
We’re told Kaia rode her bicycle toward a tree at a constant speed. The table below shows the relationship between her distance to the tree and how many times her front tire rotated. So, once her tire rotated four times, she was 22 and a half meters from…