yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Interpreting change in exponential models | Mathematics II | High School Math | Khan Academy


5m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So I've taken some screenshots of the Khan Academy exercise interpreting rate of change for exponential models in terms of change. Maybe they're going to change the title; it seems a little bit too long. But anyway, let's actually just tackle these together.

So the first day of spring, an entire field of flowering trees blossoms. The population of locusts consuming these flowers rapidly increases as the trees blossom. The relationship between the elapsed time ( t ) in days since the beginning of spring and the total number of locusts ( l(t) ) — so the number of locusts is going to be a function of the number of days that have elapsed since the beginning of spring — is modeled by the following function:

[ l(t) = 750 \times 1.85^t ]

Complete the following sentence about the daily rate of change of the locust population. Every day, the locust population — well, every day, think about what's going to happen. I'll draw a little table just to make it hopefully a little bit clearer.

So let me draw a little bit of a table. We'll put ( t ) and ( l(t) ).

So when ( t = 0 ) (so when zero days have elapsed), well, there's going to be ( 1.85^0 ). This is going to be ( 1 ), so you're going to have ( 750 ) locusts right from the get-go. Then, when ( t = 1 ), what's going to happen? Well, then this is going to be:

[ 750 \times 1.85^1 ]

So it's going to be times ( 1.85 ). When ( t = 2 ), what's ( l(t) )? It's going to be:

[ 750 \times 1.85^2 ]

Well, that's the same thing as ( 1.85 \times 1.85 ). So notice, and this just comes out of this being an exponential function, every day you have ( 1.85 ) times as many as you had the day before.

We essentially take what we had the day before and we multiply by ( 1.85 ). Since ( 1.85 ) is larger than one, that's going to grow the number of locusts we have. So this is going to grow. I'm actually not using — I'm not on the website right now, so that's why normally there would be a drop-down here. So I'm going to grow by a factor of, well, I'm going to grow by a factor of ( 1.85 ) every day.

Let's do another one of these. All right, so this one tells us that Vira is an ecologist who studies the rate of change in the bear population of Siberia over time. The relationship between the elapsed time ( t ) in years since Vira began studying the population and the total number of bears ( n(t) ) is modeled by the following function. All right, fair enough. So we've got a little exponential thing going on.

Complete the following sentence about the yearly rate of change of the bear population. What's the thing about every year that passes? ( t ) is in years now.

Every year that passes is going to be ( \frac{2}{3} ) times the year before. I can do that same table that I just did just to make that clear. So let me do that. Whoops! Let me, let me make this clear.

So table — so this is ( t ) and this is ( n(t) ). When ( t = 0 ), ( n(t) ) — you're going to have ( 2187 ) bears. So that's the first year that she began studying that population. Zero years since Vira began studying the population.

The first year is going to be:

[ 2187 \times \left( \frac{2}{3} \right)^1 ]

So times ( \frac{2}{3} ). The second year is going to be:

[ 2187 \times \left( \frac{2}{3} \right)^2 ]

So that's just ( \frac{2}{3} \times \frac{2}{3} ). Each successive year, you're going to have ( \frac{2}{3} ) the bear population of the year before. You're multiplying the year before by ( \frac{2}{3} ).

So every year, the bear population shrinks by a factor of, by a factor of ( \frac{2}{3} ). All right, let's do one more of these.

So they tell us that Akiba started studying how the number of branches on his tree change over time. All right, the relationship between the elapsed time ( t ) in years since Akiba started studying history and the total number of its branches ( n(t) ) is modeled by the following function.

Complete the following sentence about the yearly percent change in the number of branches. Every year, blank percent of branches are added or subtracted from the total number of branches.

Well, I'll draw another table, although you might get used to just being able to look at this and say, well, look each year you're going to have ( 1.75 ) times the number of branches you had the year before. And so if you have ( 1.75 ) times the number of branches of the year before, you have grown by ( 75 ).

And I'll make that a little bit clearer. So ( 75 ) percent of branches — every year ( 75 ) percent of branches are added to the total number of branches. And I'll just draw that table again like I've done in the last two examples to make that hopefully clear.

Okay, okay, so this is ( t ) and this is ( n(t) ). So ( t = 0 ): you have ( 42 ) branches. ( t = 1 ): it's going to be:

[ 42 \times 1.75 ]

When ( t = 2 ): it's going to be:

[ 42 \times (1.75)^2 ]

( 42 \times 1.75 ) times ( 1.75 ). So every year you are multiplying times ( 1.75 ). So times ( 1.75 ). Something funky is happening with my pen right over there, but if you're multiplying by ( 1.75 ), if you're growing by a factor of ( 1.75 ), this is the same thing as adding ( 75 ).

Once again, you are adding ( 75 ). Think about it this way: if you just grew by a factor of one, then you're not adding anything; you're staying constant. If you grow by ten percent, then you're going to be ( 1.1 ) times as large. If you grow by two hundred percent, then you're going to be two times as large.

So this right over here — this right over here is — is going, or if, if you — let me be clear, careful what I just said. I think I just mistake that. If you grow by two hundred, you're going to be three times as large as you were before. One is constant, and then another two hundred percent would be another twofold, so that would make you three times as large.

Don't want to confuse you. My brain recognized that I said something weird right at that end. All right, hopefully you enjoyed that.

More Articles

View All
First Look at Jane | National Geographic
Louis Leakey sent me to Gombe because he believed that an understanding of chimpanzees in the wild would help him to better guess how our Stone-Age ancestors may have behaved. It had long been thought that we were the only creatures on earth that used and…
15 Things That Whisper "I’m High Class"
A general rule of thumb is that if your name is on your work clothes, you’re working class; if it’s on your office door, you’re middle class; and if it’s on your building, you’re upper class. With that said, here are 15 things that whisper “I’m high class…
Ray Dalio on the Keys to Success
What are some of the keys to success? And beyond success, fulfilling success to a fulfilled life that you’ve seen in your experience? Well, I think you have to define what success is for yourself. I don’t think it’s the accoutrements of, um, necessarily …
How to Solve Money Disputes Like a Multi-Millionaire | Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary
Hi there, Mr. Wonderful here. There’s nothing more stressful than a money dispute, whether it’s with a business partner or a family member, and in these extraordinary times, the stakes are higher than ever. But you know what? You don’t need that stress. Y…
Catch of the Week - Burn Blubber | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
[Music] That bird is up there waiting to get a little snack. All right guys, I got a more need to bite. Boy, need to bite bad! We’re on! We’re on! R on! Let’s get him! It’s going to be a nice one, baby! Look at that! Mark, that’s what you want right ther…
Fractions greater than 1 on the number line
We’re asked to move the dot to 7⁄6 on the number line, so pause this video. I can move this dot right over here, but I encourage you: pause the video and put your finger on where 7⁄6 would be on the number line. All right, now let’s work on this together…