yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Why the world is going crazy—and how to win back our minds | Jamie Wheal | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

JAMIE WHEAL: It's really easy to forget that we're just monkeys with clothes. If you took all of life on Earth and you compressed it into one 24-hour day, anatomically modern man shows up at four seconds before midnight, cave paintings at one second before midnight. We've been playing at civilization for a fraction of a second. Everything is going into exponential change, from education to quantum computing, to cryptocurrency, to transport, to macroeconomics, to geopolitics, to climate crisis, to everything. It's breaking our brains. We're overwhelmed, we're collapsing in grief. It does feel that the handrails, the things that we used to look to for stability and security, have just evaporated.

If we've experienced a collapse in meaning, how do we go about restoring it? I'm Jamie Wheal, founder of the Flow Genome Project, and author of "Recapture the Rapture: Rethinking God, Sex, and Death in a World That's Lost Its Mind." The collapse in meaning, that I think you can at least argue we're in the midst of right now, is complex and multivariable. We've had a collapse in traditional organized religion, what you could call kind of Meaning 1.0. For the first time ever, the nuns, the spiritual but not religious, like the "none of the above's," is the largest and fastest growing religious movement in North America.

There are increasingly folks that feel like, "Hey, those stories, those codes, those ways of being, don't match my identity. Don't match my choices. Don't match my community." So organized religion is no longer a place to hang our hats. And at the same time, modern liberalism has also been getting a little creaky. That's Meaning 2.0. Think of the ivory tower in academia, news media, businesses, and corporate titans and leadership, potentially even medicine. And you just take those and you just go one by one. You're like, oh, well, Goldman Sachs sold middle America down the river in 2008.

And McKinsey helped Purdue Pharma sell more OxyContin well after the negative effects were demonstrated. The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, which used to be considered the journals of record, are now imploding. And the same thing with doctors, the same thing with corruptions in peer review, and the replication crisis. Basically everything you've ever seen on a TED Talk is probably not true. So all of the places that we used to use rules of thumb or decision-making shortcuts, that's just evaporated.

So in that collapse, we're getting fundamentalism on one side, and we're getting nihilism on the other. We're getting diseases of despair. We're getting real heartbreak. I think you could make a case that that is why we're seeing this uptick in conspiracy theories of all stripes. Will anybody make sense of all of this nonsense for me? If you can give me a happily ever after, if you can tell me that I'm one of the good guys, and you promised to get me to the other side, hundreds of thousands of people these days are deeply vulnerable to that promise.

These are rapture ideologies. We can see examples of that with ISIS and Christian Zionism. But I think what is equally important to note is that they show up in Wall Street, in Silicon Valley. All of these rapture ideologies share the same structure. Number one, the world as we know it is screwed. Number two, there's an inflection point coming soon. Number three, as soon as we get to that inflection point, me and mine, the elect, the saved, are going to score one of the golden tickets to the other side.

Number four, so let's get there as fast as possible. Don't worry about the collateral damage of the world we're leaving behind. So the question then is, how do we create liberating structures so that a lot of people all around the world can experiment, innovate, and adapt their own approaches to finding and restoring meaning, without it coming top-down? If we want to create Meaning 3.0, which is a blend of traditional religion and modern liberalism, how do we have the salvation that religion promises and the inclusion that modern liberalism...

More Articles

View All
Khan Academy Ed Talks featuring Elisa Villanueva Beard - Wednesday, December 9
Hi everyone! Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to Ed Talks on Khan Academy. I know what you’re thinking: What are these Ed Talks? Well, this is kind of a subset of the Homeroom with Sal conversations that are more focused on education and are from …
Definite integral of radical function | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we want to evaluate the definite integral from -1 to 8 of 12 * the cube root of x dx. Let’s see, this is going to be the same thing as the definite integral from -1 to 8 of 12 * the cube root is the same thing as saying x to the 1⁄3 power dx. And so n…
McDonald v. Chicago | National Constitution Center | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy, and today we’re learning more about McDonald v. Chicago, a 2010 Supreme Court case challenging a handgun ban in the city of Chicago. The question at issue was whether the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process or Immunities …
Married for 88 Years, This Couple Shares Their Secrets to Love | Short Film Showcase
[Music] Episode of Hustle and Athena Rocket. Allah Captain Miranov Qatari long, that’s an understanding in the future. [Music] There is any, yeah, I want a coffee date. Efficient without my dad is under Nate with the grace of God, and Mohammed said in on…
What Makes Sugar-Free Gum Sweet? | Ingredients With George Zaidan (Episode 11)
Takes a lot more than just sugar to make gum sweet, so can I make my own gum sweetener from scratch without sugar? Hit the stuff inside your stuff. Ingredients; the ingredients in this popular gum are, and the ones responsible for flavor are. Now let’s d…
Addition using groups of 10 and 100 | 2nd grade | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] So, let’s do some practice problems on Khan Academy exercises that make us rewrite an addition problem so that we can get them to rounder numbers. Numbers that might be multiples of 10, or multiples of 100. So, let’s see here, I have 63 plus…