yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Re: Leap Years, 2012 & The Mayan Calendar


3m read
·Nov 7, 2024

Hello, Internet. A lot of you sent me this image making the rounds which concerns the Mayan prediction that the world will end on December 21, 2012. The claim is that the Mayan calendar short counted the years because they forgot about leap days, so the world should have already ended. This is followed by "Mind = Blown," which I'm not sure how to take. Do people think that the world forgot to have its apocalypse or that were it not for leap days that we'd already be living in the future?

Either way, it's spawned many an argument that people ask me to explain, which I'm happy to do, because my next big video was delayed by pestilence, which struck me down into the depths of unproductive misery for the last few weeks. So, if you haven't already, please watch the related videos now; otherwise, this won't make a whole lot of sense, and there are a few corrections I'd like to make.

The first of these is that I shouldn't have called the Mayans "Mayans." Maya is the correct singular and plural noun to use in the same way that sheep is both singular and plural. Mayan is the name of the language and the adjective form of the word, as in the Mayan civilization. Secondly, I showed a picture of the Aztec calendar stone, rather than a Mayan calendar, in my 2012 video, which at the time I thought was okay because the Aztec calendar is the same as the Mayan—just with different names, sort of like the Greek and Roman gods.

And, frankly, the Aztec one is much cooler looking. But I was still wrong to show it because, despite naming it the Aztec calendar stone, archeologists don't actually think it's a calendar. And, speaking of stone, I used the term Stone Age to describe the Maya, which made many people very angry. For clarity, Stone Age does not mean stupid; it's the technological classification of a civilization limited to stone tools.

Advanced though their astronomy and mathematics were, the Maya never discovered metallurgy and thus couldn't move on to the Bronze Age, then the Iron Age, then the Diamond Age. Right. Enough corrections. It's explanation time for this image which raised three questions: 1) Does the Mayan calendar have leap days? 2) Did the Maya miscount the years? 3) Should the world have already ended?

The answer to all of these is no. To briefly recap, leap years exist to stop seasons from drifting out of sync with the calendar; a problem that vexed Pope Gregory because every year Easter and spring were getting further apart. To fix this, he introduced the modestly named Gregorian calendar, with its fancy leap year rules to keep the seasons and thus the holidays together.

But, while Pope Gregory cared about the seasons, the ancient Maya did not. Presumably because where they lived, the weather comes in only one season: too hot and too humid. So the Mayan calendar ignores seasons in favor of accurately tracking the days since the creation of the Mayan religion. This renders leap years an unnecessary complication.

Though the Mayan calendar is no stranger to complication, with its cycles within cycles within cycles within cycles within cycles that, if you're interested, Hank Green can tell you much more about. But back to the miscounting claims, which comes from our idea that leap days are extra days, which, of course, they really aren't.

The Gregorian calendar doesn't give people extra days any more than daylight saving time gives people extra sunlight. If you transported Pope Gregory 1,000 years back in time to meet the Mayan Lady Xoc and then made them count the days until this year's winter solstice, they'd agree on that number because they're just counting sunrises.

It's not like Pope Gregory with his clever modern calendar would notice 500+ days that the Lady Xoc somehow missed, perhaps while distracted by the pain from her thorns-through-the-tongue routine. The only thing that they would disagree on is what to call that day, with Pope Gregory insisting on December 21, 2012, and Lady Xoc preferring the 13th Baktun.

So, this image is wrong because it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. The Mayan calendar doesn't have leap days because it doesn't need them. It counts days just fine, and its long cycle will finish on December 21, 2012, but the world will still go on.

More Articles

View All
15 High Paying Jobs Right Now
In an ideal world, we’d all start a business. It would be successful. We could employ multiple people, and we’d all live happily ever after in financial freedom. But sometimes, though, just to get there, we have to put in a lot of extra work elsewhere. Fo…
Algebra Foundations - Course Trailer
When you’re sitting in a math class and the teacher starts writing some symbols on the board that you might not quite understand just yet, it might be tempting to say, “Hey, why do I need to learn this? This seems a little bit abstract for me.” To answer…
Does it really matter what browser I choose?
So Kelly, we have several different options on what type of browser we use. Does it matter from a safety and privacy point of view? Yeah, there are a couple factors that you might wanna think about that make a browser potentially safer. So one thing that…
Carl Jung & The Psychology of Self-Sabotage (feat. Emerald)
Consciousness succumbs all too easily to unconscious influences, and these are often truer and wiser than our conscious thinking. Also, it frequently happens that unconscious motives overrule our conscious decisions, especially in matters of vital importa…
Introduction to genetic engineering | Molecular genetics | High school biology | Khan Academy
The idea of genetic engineering is something that we associate with the 20th century. We didn’t even know that genes were actually the mechanism of heredity until the middle of the 20th century, and the direct modification of genes for some purpose really…
Differentiability at a point: algebraic (function is differentiable) | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Is the function given below continuous differentiable at x = 3? And they’ve defined it piecewise, and we have some choices: continuous, not differentiable, differentiable, not continuous, both continuous and differentiable, neither continuous nor differen…