yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How social learning made us hugely successful as a species | Nicholas Christakis | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

We are very unusual as a species in that not only do we have the capacity to learn—many species do this. A fish in the sea learns that if it swims towards the light it will encounter prey there. We also have the capacity for social learning, which itself is unusual and interesting—that is, we can learn from each other. And social learning is extremely efficient.

For example, I can put my hand in the fire and learn that that's hot and pull my hand out. So I have gotten some benefit of knowledge, but I've paid a price. Or I could watch you put your hand in the fire, get almost as much benefit learning that fire is dangerous, and pay none of the price. So watching from you and learning from you by social learning and imitative learning is extremely efficient.

But we not only do that; we teach each other. We affirmatively set out to teach each other stuff. This is very rare in the animal kingdom. In fact, this aspect of our species lies at the core of our capacity for culture, which is the capacity to transmit knowledge across place and time. So we carry with us the benefits of all the innovations and all the learning that had been done by all prior members of the human species, carried forward unto this day.

And when we learn something new, we transmit it laterally to other people. This fundamental quality of teaching also actually has political implications. Because if we are actually to effectively teach and learn from each other, we must create environments that support free and open expression. How are we to learn from each other? How are we to acquire novel information? How are we to work together to establish the truth of our environment if we don't affirmatively foster and support this rather wonderful innate quality that we have to teach and learn from each other?

We are innately a friendly species, but we need environments which allow us to optimally express our inclination to be friendly. We don't want, for example, environments in which we're pitted against each other, where we have leaders that are kind of saying, these people are responsible for your problems. We want environments which say, we can be united in our common humanity.

And analogously, we want environments which are supportive and conducive to teaching and learning. We want environments—we want to create environments in which we maximize the flow and the spread of information. Some of the most foundational liberties that we have that are encapsulated in the Bill of Rights, by some kind of implicit or deliberate insight by the founding fathers, actually speak to these fundamental qualities that we evolved to have.

For example, the freedom of assembly is enshrined in constitutions around the world, including ours. The freedom of speech is enshrined in our constitution, and many others as well. These are innate desires that we have to talk to and learn from each other, to assemble and connect with each other. And they are seen as fundamental political principles and have been since our founding...

More Articles

View All
The Dark Secrets of the Manhattan Project
In 1946, a 41-year-old hairdresser named Janice Shot came to A Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York, to be treated for scleroderma. It were a connective tissue condition. She had escaped the violence against Jews in Belarus during the Second Wo…
Divergence example
So I’ve got a vector field here V of XY where the first component of the output is just ( x \cdot y ) and the second component is ( y^2 - x^2 ). The picture of this vector field is here; this is what that vector field looks like. What I’d like to do is co…
Warren Buffett Shares His 2,600 Year Old Investment Advice
First investment primer that I know of, and it was pretty good advice, was delivered in about 600 BC by Aesop. And Aesop, you’ll remember, said a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Incidentally, Aesop did not know it was 600 BC; he was smart, but …
Homeroom with Sal & John B. King Jr. - Tuesday, August 25
Hi everyone! Welcome to the Homeroom live stream. Very excited about the conversation we’re about to have. But before we jump into that, I’ll make a couple of my standard announcements. First of all, just a reminder that Khan Academy is a not-for-profit …
Edgar: crowdfunding drive
Uh, my name is Thomas, and last year I made the film “George Ought to Help.” Right now, I’m working on a follow-up called “Edgar the Exploiter.” It will be similar to George in that it will be a gentle pro-liberty propaganda piece, because George was a s…
Slinky Drop Answer
Well, this is going to be really tough to see. So how are we going to actually determine what the right answer is? Uh, if I were to drop it now, it would happen so fast you wouldn’t really see clearly what’s happening. So I’ve brought along my slow motion…