yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

It’s Rare to Have Competing, Viable, Scientific Theories


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Edition that's similar to Bayesianism, isn't it? In both cases, they're assuming that you can enumerate all the possible theories, but you can't, because that's the creativity coming in. It's very rare in science to have more than one viable theory in physics. We mentioned Newtonian theory of gravity and there was general relativity. That's one of the rare occasions where you actually have these two competing theories.

It's almost unknown to have three competing theories. What confuses people is that induction and Bayesianism work really well for finite constrained spaces that are already known. They're not good for new explanations. Bayesianism is, "I got new information, I used to weight the previous probability predictions that I had, now I've changed my probability based on the new data." So, I believe that something different is going to happen.

For example, I don't know if you remember the Monty Hall show. Monty Hall calls you up and there's three doors. There's treasure behind one of them, and then two of them don't have anything. You pick which door it's going to be: door number one, two, or three. Then he opens one of the other two doors and shows you there's nothing behind it. Now, do you want to change your vote?

The understanding of knife probability says, "No, I wouldn't change my vote. Why should it matter that one of the ones he showed me doesn't have something? The probability should not have changed." But Bayesianism says, "You've got new information, you should revise your guess, and you should switch to the other door."

The easier way to say that is, imagine there were 100 doors, and then you picked one at random. Then he opens 98 of the remaining 99 and shows you there's nothing. Now, do you switch? Of course you'd want to switch, because what are the odds that you picked one of the 100 in the first place? Now your odds are one in two.

People discover this and say, "Of course! Now I'm a smart Bayesian; I can update my priors based on new information. That's what smart people do, and therefore I'm a Bayesian." But it in no way helps you discover new knowledge or new explanations.

That's the uncontroversial use of Bayesianism, which is a very powerful tool. It's used in medicine, trying to figure out which of these medicines might be more effective than others. So, there are whole areas of mathematics like Bayesianism that can be applied in science without controversy at all.

It's where we say that Bayesianism is the way in which we can generate new explanations or the way in which we can judge one explanation against another. In fact, the way in which we generate new explanations is creativity, and the way in which we judge one explanation against another is either experimental refutation or straightforward criticism of realizing that one of those explanations is just a bad explanation.

More Articles

View All
There Can Be No Final Theory of Gravity
In almost all cases, you only ever have one theory on offer. In the case of gravity, there literally is only one theory on offer at the moment: there’s general relativity. Previously, we did have two theories; we had Newtonian gravity, and we had general …
Real Life Money Puzzles | Teacher Resources | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
We join this episode of real life money puzzles already in progress. “Hey, Lizette.” “Yeah, BR.” “So I’m trying to work out these two offer letters.” “I know, baby. I’m so proud of you! Everybody wants to work with my boyfriend.” “Hey, no, but seriously,…
Fever Feels Horrible, but is Actually Awesome!
Fever feels bad. So we take medication to suppress it – but is this a good idea? It turns out fever is one of the oldest defenses against disease. What exactly is it, how does it make your immune defense stronger and should you take a pill to combat it? …
How To Beat The Odds When Buying Stocks (Mohnish Pabrai: The Dhandho Investor)
[Music] So there’s been a lot of people trying to get into the stock market over the past year or so, and I actually just finished re-reading Monish Pabrai’s book, “The Dondo Investor,” which is a very good stock market book. But I’ve actually forgotten h…
Wolves in Yellowstone, LIVE! | Yellowstone Live
How’re you guys doing? We’re live in West Yellowstone ahead of Yellowstone Live tonight at 9:00, 8:00 Central on National Geographic and Nat Geo Wild with Trent, a naturalist at the Grizzly Wolf Discovery Center. Thank you so much for being here. Q: Tell…
Elephant Encounter in 360 - Ep. 2 | The Okavango Experience
Travie giant elephants in front of you, interacting with you, connecting with you, smelling you, listening to you, looking at you, telling you to stop, telling you to go away, telling you to stay. I am fine with you. Those interactions are powerful to me.…