yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

It’s Rare to Have Competing, Viable, Scientific Theories


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Edition that's similar to Bayesianism, isn't it? In both cases, they're assuming that you can enumerate all the possible theories, but you can't, because that's the creativity coming in. It's very rare in science to have more than one viable theory in physics. We mentioned Newtonian theory of gravity and there was general relativity. That's one of the rare occasions where you actually have these two competing theories.

It's almost unknown to have three competing theories. What confuses people is that induction and Bayesianism work really well for finite constrained spaces that are already known. They're not good for new explanations. Bayesianism is, "I got new information, I used to weight the previous probability predictions that I had, now I've changed my probability based on the new data." So, I believe that something different is going to happen.

For example, I don't know if you remember the Monty Hall show. Monty Hall calls you up and there's three doors. There's treasure behind one of them, and then two of them don't have anything. You pick which door it's going to be: door number one, two, or three. Then he opens one of the other two doors and shows you there's nothing behind it. Now, do you want to change your vote?

The understanding of knife probability says, "No, I wouldn't change my vote. Why should it matter that one of the ones he showed me doesn't have something? The probability should not have changed." But Bayesianism says, "You've got new information, you should revise your guess, and you should switch to the other door."

The easier way to say that is, imagine there were 100 doors, and then you picked one at random. Then he opens 98 of the remaining 99 and shows you there's nothing. Now, do you switch? Of course you'd want to switch, because what are the odds that you picked one of the 100 in the first place? Now your odds are one in two.

People discover this and say, "Of course! Now I'm a smart Bayesian; I can update my priors based on new information. That's what smart people do, and therefore I'm a Bayesian." But it in no way helps you discover new knowledge or new explanations.

That's the uncontroversial use of Bayesianism, which is a very powerful tool. It's used in medicine, trying to figure out which of these medicines might be more effective than others. So, there are whole areas of mathematics like Bayesianism that can be applied in science without controversy at all.

It's where we say that Bayesianism is the way in which we can generate new explanations or the way in which we can judge one explanation against another. In fact, the way in which we generate new explanations is creativity, and the way in which we judge one explanation against another is either experimental refutation or straightforward criticism of realizing that one of those explanations is just a bad explanation.

More Articles

View All
Charlie Munger on Why Most Investors Can’t Outperform the Market
And by the way, my definition of being properly educated is being right when the professor is wrong. Anybody can spit back what the professor tells you. The trick is to know when he’s right and when he’s wrong. That’s the properly educated person. In the…
Regrouping whole number place values | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy
Five thousands equals how many hundreds? There’s probably a few ways we could take this on, but maybe let’s start by thinking about these five thousands. Five thousands is one thousand five times, so let’s think about each of those thousands. Each of thos…
Homeroom with Sal & Marta Kosarchyn - Tuesday, June 30
To our daily homeroom live stream, I’m excited about our conversation today with Khan Academy’s Head of Engineering, VP of Engineering, Marta Casarchin. Uh, but before we get into that, I will give my standard announcement. A reminder to everyone that Kh…
YouTube Is Deleting My Channel
Hey guys, So I apologize that this is not my usual video, but I wanted to bring something to everyone’s attention because I have a feeling I’m not the only one dealing with this, and I want to bring awareness to some issues happening right now. First of…
How to calculate interquartile range IQR | Data and statistics | 6th grade | Khan Academy
Let’s get some practice calculating interquartile ranges. I’ve taken some exercises from the Khan Academy exercises here, and I’m going to solve it on my scratch pad. The following data points represent the number of animal crackers in each kid’s lunchbox…
Productize Yourself
You summarized this entire tweet storm with two words: productize yourself. Productize and yourself. Yourself has uniqueness; productize has leverage. Yourself has accountability; productize has specific knowledge. Yourself also has specific knowledge in…