yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Steven Pinker: Are guns to blame for America’s homicide rate? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

One of the big puzzles when it comes to understanding violence is why the American rate of violence is five to ten times higher than that of other wealthy democracies. There are countries that have spectacularly high rates of violence, mainly in Central America and North and South America and in Southern Africa. But it’s funny to see the United States not quite up there but much higher rates of homicide than our peers in the British Commonwealth and in Europe.

Now the ready answer is, well, that’s because we have all those guns. And that is part of the answer, but it’s not the total answer. Because even if you subtract out all of the gun homicides in the United States and you just look at all the murders committed with ropes and candlesticks and knives and so on, the United States still has a higher rate of homicide. But we also don’t know for sure whether the favorite remedy of many people on the liberal left, namely tougher gun control, would have an effect in lowering homicides given how many guns are already out there.

The United States has more guns than people, so restricting the sale of future guns is a small measure. Maybe it does, but no one really knows for sure. And we do know that the United States itself had quite a spectacular reduction in violent crime starting in the 90s and again in the 2000s. It certainly wasn’t because massive numbers of guns were taken off the streets. Quite the contrary.

So there’s a lot we don’t know, but tragically and boneheadedly, the U.S. Congress passed a law that the Centers for Disease Control was not allowed to study gun violence as a public health problem. Now that is insanity. That is an example of political interference with conductive research. In the United States, gun rights are a sacred cause of the right, and anything that might compromise the right of everyone to have a gun is squelched.

I’ve talked about many of the threats to academic freedom from the campus left, but the political right is far more pernicious because they actually have power. I mean, academics, it’s often said that academic debates are fierce because so little is at stake, but when it comes to government, a lot is at stake. The suppression of research on gun violence is an example of how the right is also guilty of suppressing freedom of inquiry, and it’s one of the reasons why we really...

More Articles

View All
Identifying proportional relationships from graphs | 7th grade | Khan Academy
We are asked how many proportional relationships are shown in the coordinate plane below, and we have the choices. But let’s actually look at the coordinate plane below to think about how many proportional relationships are depicted here. So pause this vi…
What Is The Speed of Dark?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Nyctophobia is the fear of the dark. But there’s another fear that’s more chilling. It’s the fear that darkness will go away: optophobia, the fear of opening your eyes. Light travels at the fastest speed possible for a physical …
Why AI Hasn’t Blown Our Minds…Yet
Hypothetically, if AI is a bust in a bunch of different ways but it works extremely well fixing customer service, that’s still massive. It’s going to change our world; massive impact. Hello, this is Dalton plus Michael and today we’re going to talk about…
Example free response question from AP macroeconomics | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
Video, I want to tackle an entire AP Macroeconomics free response exercise with you. Assume that the economy of Country X has an actual unemployment rate of seven percent, a natural rate of unemployment of five percent, and an inflation rate of three perc…
Lagrange multiplier example, part 2
So where we left off, we have these two different equations that we want to solve. Um, and there’s three unknowns: there’s S, the tons of steel that you’re using; H, the hours of labor; and then Lambda, this Lagrange multiplier we introduced that’s basica…
Finding derivative with fundamental theorem of calculus: chain rule | AP®︎ Calculus | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the function capital F of x, which we’re going to define as the definite integral from 1 to sine of x. So that’s an interesting upper bound right over there of 2t minus 1, and of course dt. What we are curious about is trying to fi…