yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The mind-bending physics of time | Sean Carroll


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.
  • Lexicographers will tell you that time, the word, "T-I-M-E," is the most used noun in the English language. We can't get through the day without talking about time all the time. I think about how we use time when we actually talk about it. If you say, "Meet me at 7 p.m.," no one panics. No one says like, "Oh my God, what are you talking about with these esoteric concepts about 7 p.m.?"

We all know what to do operationally. Time, in some sense, is just a label on different events in the Universe. The Universe happens over and over again at different things we call moments, and time helps us tell the difference between one moment and another. So what time is, I don't think is the problem.

The issue—the real puzzles—come about when we talk about the properties that time has. We have a past, we have a present, we have a future. How are they different? Are we moving through it? We have memories of the past, but we have no memories of the future. Why is that? Where does that asymmetry come from? Why are we all born young? Why do we all inevitably age?

Why do we think that we can affect the future but not the past? Could we possibly travel back into it? Anyway, there's a lot of questions about the nature of time that are really confusing, and many of them we don't know the answer to, but what time is, I don't think it's one of them. One of the most noticeable features of time is that it has a direction, right? That there's a difference between the past and future.

Sometimes we think about this as just an intrinsic feature of reality. Like the past already happened, it's in the books—the future is up for grabs. It hasn't happened yet, and the present is where we live. But then, along comes physics. And what people notice about our best theories of physics is that those theories do not distinguish between the past and the future.

But in our everyday lives, nothing is more obvious. It really requires a bit of mental discipline to say, "Well, time could exist without an arrow." And one way of thinking about that is there is no intrinsic arrow of space, but there's still space, okay? We live in a three-dimensional world—up, down, left, right, forward, backward—at the level of the fundamental laws of physics, there's no special direction in space.

And how you perceive that is imagine you're an astronaut: you're flying around in your little spacesuit. There wouldn't be any difference between any direction you could look. There's no experiment you could do in physics that would point out a direction in the universe, but space still exists. Likewise, time would still exist even if there wasn't an arrow.

But here on Earth, we do have an arrow of space. If I pick up a coffee cup and let it go, it will always fall down. There's clearly a distinction between up and down. No one is tempted to think that's a fundamental feature of the Universe. It's not because downness is embedded in the laws of physics. It's because we live in the vicinity of an influential object—the Earth.

The arrow of time is exactly the same way. We in our everyday lives perceive an arrow of time because we live in the aftermath of an influential event: the Big Bang. And that gets us into a realm of the concept of 'entropy.' Entropy is how messy, how disorganized, how random a system is.

When things are nice and neat and tidy, they are low entropy. When they're all messy and all over the place, they're high entropy. And there's a natural tendency of things in the Universe to go from low entropy to high entropy. This is called the 'second law of thermodynamics.'

The real question is: Why was the world ever low entropy to begin with? Why was the world lower entropy yesterday than it is today? The explanation is not completely satisfying, to be honest. The explanation is the following: because it was even lower entropy the day before yesterday.

And why was the Universe even lower entropy the day before yesterday? Because it was even lower entropy the day before that. And this chain of reasoning goes back 14 billion years to the Big Bang, to the origin of our observ...

More Articles

View All
Using a table to estimate P-value from t statistic | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Katarina was testing her null hypothesis that the true population mean of some data set is equal to zero versus her alternative hypothesis that it’s not equal to zero. Then she takes a sample of six observations, and using that sample, her test statistic,…
Tracking users on the Internet | Internet safety | Khan Academy
So there’s a bunch of reasons why a website might want to track you, and depending on your opinion, you might think some of these are reasonable and you might think some of them are unreasonable. Just to understand, imagine if you were to go to, say, Khan…
Nkashi: Race for the Okavango | National Geographic
The water is a gift from God. I live in the Delta. All of my life is in the Delta. My name is Gobonamang Kgetho. I was born a poler. For you to be a poler, you have to know how to pole a mokoro (canoe). You also need to know your way around the water, and…
I’ve Read 50 Business Books—These Are The 3 You MUST READ
[Music] In the last 12 months, I made 113k 851 outside of YouTube sponsorships and AD Revenue, all without having any full-time employees for a long time. Even though I don’t want to admit it, I relied heavily on AdSense and sponsorships. While they worke…
Evaluating composite functions: using tables | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] So we have some tables here that give us what the functions f and g are when you give it certain inputs. So, when you input negative four, f of negative four is 29. That’s going to be the output of that function. So we have that for both f and…
SPACE CATS !!! - Smarter Every Day 85
Hey, it’s me D. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! So, a couple of weeks ago, I asked a question here on Smarter Every Day in hopes that it would be beamed up to the space station so the astronauts could answer. Well, that happened! Why don’t we take the …