yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Example of under coverage introducing bias | Study design | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A senator wanted to know about how people in her state felt about internet privacy issues. She conducted a poll by calling 100 people whose names were randomly sampled from the phone book. Note that mobile phones and unlisted numbers are not in phone books. The senator's office called those numbers until they got a response from all 100 people chosen. The polls showed that 42% of respondents were very concerned about internet privacy.

What is the most concerning source of bias in this scenario? We should also think about what kind of bias is likely introduced. Is this likely to be an overestimate or an underestimate of the number of respondents? Maybe there is no bias here, but our choices, and "no bias" is not one of the choices. So, you can imagine it's going to be one of these three.

I encourage you to pause this video and think about what we just said. We're a senator, we're trying to figure out what percentage of our constituents are very concerned about internet privacy, and we go to the phone book, we sample 100 people, we keep calling them until they answer, and we get that 42% are very concerned. So, what's the source of bias?

Now let's work through this together. Non-response would have been the case if we selected these hundred people and let's say only 50 people answered the phone, and we didn't keep calling them. Then we'd say, "Well, you know, 50 of the people who we sampled to answer our survey didn't even respond." There was a non-response there. What was there about those 50 people? Maybe there was something that would have skewed the survey. If we had gotten them, it would have maybe yielded better data.

But in this case, they tell us the senator's office called those numbers until they got a response from all 100 people chosen. So, the 100 people that they chose, they made sure they got a response. So, non-response is not going to be an issue here.

Next choice: undercoverage. Well, undercoverage is where you're not able to sample from part of the population. A part of the population that wasn't sampled might introduce bias. Let's think about what happened in this situation. We are a senator, we want to sample all of our constituents, but instead, we sample from the constituents who happen to be listed in the phone book.

So, these are the people who happen to be listed in the phone book. We're not sampling from people who are not in the phone book, who may have landlines and are unlisted. We're also not sampling from people who don't have landlines and only have mobile phones. You might say, "Well, why is that important?"

Well, think about it. People who decide not to list in the phone book or people who don't even have a landline; some of those people might be a little bit more concerned about privacy than everyone else. They explicitly chose not to be listed. So, undercoverage is definitely a very concerning source of bias here.

We are sampling from only a subset of our entire population that we care about. In particular, we're missing out on people who might care about privacy. I would say that because of undercoverage, 42% is likely to be an underestimate of the number of people concerned about internet privacy. There is probably a higher proportion of people out here who care about privacy because they're unlisted or they don't even have a landline.

So, undercoverage probably introduced bias and implies that 42% is an underestimate of the percentage of the senator's constituents who care about internet privacy.

Now, the last question: volunteer response sampling. This would be the case where you know the senator, I don't know, put a billboard out or told someone, maybe on her website, "Hey, vote for this," or "Give us your information on how much you care about internet privacy." That would have been the source of bias there.

Once again, if you did, "Hey, come to my website in Philadelphia," you're only getting information from a subset of your population who are choosing and volunteering. That is not the situation here. She didn't ask 100 people to volunteer; her team went out and got them from the phone book.

So, this was definitely a case of undercoverage.

More Articles

View All
Big Data by the Numbers | Explorer
I’m Richard Bacon. Let’s talk about surveillance. But let’s do it quietly because they’re probably listening. That thing in your pocket that you call a smartphone, it’s a tracking device that just happens to make calls. Digital tracking has become a part …
7 HOLES in the Space Station - Smarter Every Day 135
Ok, it’s Destin. - Deh, it’s Dustin. - Destin, Destin. - Destin. - You got it. - OK, I’ve got it. - [laughs] Alright here’s the deal. We are with Don Pettit. - Have you thought of changing your name to something that’s easier to pronounce? - Just think of…
Dividing polynomials of degree one | Algebra 1 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is get some practice dividing expressions. So, what do I mean by that? So let’s say that I have the expression 6X + 12, and I want to figure out what that divided by, maybe I’ll write this in a different color: divided…
The Loner's Path | Philosophy for Non-Conformists
The Loner’s Path | Philosophy for Non-conformists The path of nonconformity is alluring to those who don’t seek to follow the herd known as a society. Instead, they want to make unique individual choices in life, disregarding other people’s opinions and …
Explicit Laplacian formula
So let’s say you have yourself some kind of multivariable function, and this time let’s say it’s got some very high dimensional input. So X1, X2, on and on and on, up to, you know, X sub n for some large number n. Um, in the last couple videos, I told yo…
The Ninth Amendment | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today we’re learning more about the Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which reads: “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people…