yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Increased politicization of the Supreme Court | AP US Government and Politics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In your mind, why is the Supreme Court important?

Well, the Supreme Court is important for the original founders’ reasons, or that it was like all American institutions. There were ideas the founders had, and then John Marshall, an important justice, created the office by the practice of the office.

It is important because the court is where America’s thorniest questions go to be resolved. They haven't been resolved in the executive branch and the legislative branch, and so the court has to take them up. That is where the court goes back to those first principles again.

Why do we study American history? What exactly was the outline for how the country is supposed to behave? And are we staying within that outline in those series of ideals? It goes back to the very beginning ingredients of America. So, the court is a test always of whether what we're doing now is in keeping with what we were supposed to do at the founding of the country.

The reason it has become so important recently is that the court ends up doing a lot more than it was ever supposed to do, because of weakness in the executive branch and the legislative branch. A lot of people are now looking to the court to solve problems that should actually be handled by the people's representatives.

The judges are not elected; they are in there for life at the Supreme Court through the process of the president with advice and consent by the Senate. But they are not elected. This was supposed to be a republic in which the elected representatives were the ones making the laws, but that's—we've shifted away from that.

So the court is now making decisions that can affect people's lives for a generation and not be changed as easily as, say, a piece of legislation, which can be vetoed, amended, or superseded by another piece of legislation. It's really permanent changes in American life.

So, my understanding is that the Supreme Court should be above politics. To what degree is that actually the case?

Well, the Supreme Court has had lots of interest. There have been times where the Supreme Court, when Andrew Jackson was president, tried to use the Supreme Court to do what he wanted it to do. And Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to change the functioning of the court because it kept knocking down all the things he wanted to do.

We've had moments where there have been these spasms where presidents have tried to get the court to do what they wanted, but in general, it was the American tradition that the justices were supposed to be picked if they were of good character and if they were of sound legal mind. If they had views on the matters related to the constitution that were sound legally, their politics weren't supposed to be so important.

What has happened is, like so much in modern American life, there has been an intertwining of politics and the legal profession so that now when presidents run for office, they say, "Elect me so that I can put in our kinds of judges." This means that the kind of judge you pick helps you with your voters.

If your voters want a very specific kind of ideological judge, then the more ideological the judge that you pick, the greater your voters will be happy about you. That’ll keep you in office. This is true of the senators advising and consenting on these decisions and true of the presidents who pick them.

Well, that means that the people who go into the office, into the Supreme Court, I should say, end up being more political than in the past. There was a period where when an American president would pick a justice, that justice very often would rule in a way that was totally the opposite of what the members of that president's party wanted.

It happened repeatedly in American life, and that was a symbol. People thought of the idea that these issues before the court were being weighed on their merits and had nothing to do with the ideological views of the judge weighing them. Now, where you sit on a particular issue is often determined by where you came from politically.

More Articles

View All
Simple Aspect | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello gramians. Now previously, we had spoken about just the basic idea of verb aspect, which is kind of like tenses for tenses. I know that’s a little “wheels within wheels,” ridiculous, um, but we’ll make sense of it. What aspect allows you to do is si…
The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments
The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts. The first fallacy, which I…
Coal Mining's Environmental Impact | From The Ashes
[explosion] MARY ANNE HITT: To me, as somebody who had grown up in the mountains and loved the mountains, the idea that a coal company had the right to blow up an entire mountain and wipe it off the map forever was just unconscionable. These places are n…
Coffee: The Greatest Addiction Ever
Every man, woman, and child. The world’s largest buyer of coffee, the US, has to import nearly all of this as the coffee trees from which caffeine is harvested will only grow at commercial levels between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn in…
The Upcoming Stock Market Collapse | Round 2
What’s up? Grandma’s guys here. So, as usual, the market makes absolutely no sense and continues proving time and time again that anything can happen. For example, even though the NASDAQ just narrowly avoided its worst January ever in history, when asked …
The ULTIMATE Beginner's Guide to Investing in Real Estate Step-By-Step
What’s up you guys! It’s Graham here. So, this video is really meant to be a real estate beginner tutorial where I can really cover the basics and outline the blueprints of exactly what’s needed in order to prepare for and actually invest in real estate. …