yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Increased politicization of the Supreme Court | AP US Government and Politics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In your mind, why is the Supreme Court important?

Well, the Supreme Court is important for the original founders’ reasons, or that it was like all American institutions. There were ideas the founders had, and then John Marshall, an important justice, created the office by the practice of the office.

It is important because the court is where America’s thorniest questions go to be resolved. They haven't been resolved in the executive branch and the legislative branch, and so the court has to take them up. That is where the court goes back to those first principles again.

Why do we study American history? What exactly was the outline for how the country is supposed to behave? And are we staying within that outline in those series of ideals? It goes back to the very beginning ingredients of America. So, the court is a test always of whether what we're doing now is in keeping with what we were supposed to do at the founding of the country.

The reason it has become so important recently is that the court ends up doing a lot more than it was ever supposed to do, because of weakness in the executive branch and the legislative branch. A lot of people are now looking to the court to solve problems that should actually be handled by the people's representatives.

The judges are not elected; they are in there for life at the Supreme Court through the process of the president with advice and consent by the Senate. But they are not elected. This was supposed to be a republic in which the elected representatives were the ones making the laws, but that's—we've shifted away from that.

So the court is now making decisions that can affect people's lives for a generation and not be changed as easily as, say, a piece of legislation, which can be vetoed, amended, or superseded by another piece of legislation. It's really permanent changes in American life.

So, my understanding is that the Supreme Court should be above politics. To what degree is that actually the case?

Well, the Supreme Court has had lots of interest. There have been times where the Supreme Court, when Andrew Jackson was president, tried to use the Supreme Court to do what he wanted it to do. And Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to change the functioning of the court because it kept knocking down all the things he wanted to do.

We've had moments where there have been these spasms where presidents have tried to get the court to do what they wanted, but in general, it was the American tradition that the justices were supposed to be picked if they were of good character and if they were of sound legal mind. If they had views on the matters related to the constitution that were sound legally, their politics weren't supposed to be so important.

What has happened is, like so much in modern American life, there has been an intertwining of politics and the legal profession so that now when presidents run for office, they say, "Elect me so that I can put in our kinds of judges." This means that the kind of judge you pick helps you with your voters.

If your voters want a very specific kind of ideological judge, then the more ideological the judge that you pick, the greater your voters will be happy about you. That’ll keep you in office. This is true of the senators advising and consenting on these decisions and true of the presidents who pick them.

Well, that means that the people who go into the office, into the Supreme Court, I should say, end up being more political than in the past. There was a period where when an American president would pick a justice, that justice very often would rule in a way that was totally the opposite of what the members of that president's party wanted.

It happened repeatedly in American life, and that was a symbol. People thought of the idea that these issues before the court were being weighed on their merits and had nothing to do with the ideological views of the judge weighing them. Now, where you sit on a particular issue is often determined by where you came from politically.

More Articles

View All
Example: Correlation coefficient intuition | Mathematics I | High School Math | Khan Academy
So I took some screen captures from the Khan Academy exercise on correlation coefficient intuition. They’ve given us some correlation coefficients, and we need to match them to the various scatter plots on that exercise. There’s a little interface where w…
How to Change Your Life Before 2025
So I’ve fallen off my routine again, and honestly, it sucks. I’m quite sure you know that feeling when you’ve been super consistent, staying on track, hitting all the milestones that you have, and then suddenly something happens, and boom, you’re back to …
Principles for Success: "The Call to Adventure" | Episode 1
Principles for success: an ultra mini-series adventure in 30 minutes and in eight episodes. Episode 1: The Call to Adventure Before we begin, let me just establish the fact that I don’t know much relative to what I need to know. Whatever success I’ve ha…
Who Are the People Who Want to Go to Mars? | StarTalk
Who are these people who want to take one-way trips? They don’t like it here on Earth. Are they the adventure types? They’re the people who want to die young. What is… who are these people? I think that’s what we see. First of all, it’s everyone. It’s al…
Exclusive: Building the Face of a Newly Found Ancestor | National Geographic
We’ve all seen crime investigation shows where they find a skull in the woods, and they take it to a forensic artist who builds the soft tissue of the face back on, and it becomes a recognizable entity. The crime is sometimes solved, but how do you do tha…
IMPOSSIBLE Waterfall!: Mind Blow 11
[Music] A new toilet that can flush golf balls, and Natalie Portman’s real name is Natalie Hlag. Jackie Chan is Kung Chan, and don’t call me Carlos Ray or I’ll stick my boot up your. Vsauce! Kevin here. This is M. Blow things are not always what they see…