yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Increased politicization of the Supreme Court | AP US Government and Politics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In your mind, why is the Supreme Court important?

Well, the Supreme Court is important for the original founders’ reasons, or that it was like all American institutions. There were ideas the founders had, and then John Marshall, an important justice, created the office by the practice of the office.

It is important because the court is where America’s thorniest questions go to be resolved. They haven't been resolved in the executive branch and the legislative branch, and so the court has to take them up. That is where the court goes back to those first principles again.

Why do we study American history? What exactly was the outline for how the country is supposed to behave? And are we staying within that outline in those series of ideals? It goes back to the very beginning ingredients of America. So, the court is a test always of whether what we're doing now is in keeping with what we were supposed to do at the founding of the country.

The reason it has become so important recently is that the court ends up doing a lot more than it was ever supposed to do, because of weakness in the executive branch and the legislative branch. A lot of people are now looking to the court to solve problems that should actually be handled by the people's representatives.

The judges are not elected; they are in there for life at the Supreme Court through the process of the president with advice and consent by the Senate. But they are not elected. This was supposed to be a republic in which the elected representatives were the ones making the laws, but that's—we've shifted away from that.

So the court is now making decisions that can affect people's lives for a generation and not be changed as easily as, say, a piece of legislation, which can be vetoed, amended, or superseded by another piece of legislation. It's really permanent changes in American life.

So, my understanding is that the Supreme Court should be above politics. To what degree is that actually the case?

Well, the Supreme Court has had lots of interest. There have been times where the Supreme Court, when Andrew Jackson was president, tried to use the Supreme Court to do what he wanted it to do. And Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to change the functioning of the court because it kept knocking down all the things he wanted to do.

We've had moments where there have been these spasms where presidents have tried to get the court to do what they wanted, but in general, it was the American tradition that the justices were supposed to be picked if they were of good character and if they were of sound legal mind. If they had views on the matters related to the constitution that were sound legally, their politics weren't supposed to be so important.

What has happened is, like so much in modern American life, there has been an intertwining of politics and the legal profession so that now when presidents run for office, they say, "Elect me so that I can put in our kinds of judges." This means that the kind of judge you pick helps you with your voters.

If your voters want a very specific kind of ideological judge, then the more ideological the judge that you pick, the greater your voters will be happy about you. That’ll keep you in office. This is true of the senators advising and consenting on these decisions and true of the presidents who pick them.

Well, that means that the people who go into the office, into the Supreme Court, I should say, end up being more political than in the past. There was a period where when an American president would pick a justice, that justice very often would rule in a way that was totally the opposite of what the members of that president's party wanted.

It happened repeatedly in American life, and that was a symbol. People thought of the idea that these issues before the court were being weighed on their merits and had nothing to do with the ideological views of the judge weighing them. Now, where you sit on a particular issue is often determined by where you came from politically.

More Articles

View All
Ask me anything with Sal Khan: April 10 | Homeroom with Sal
Hello everyone! Welcome to Khan Academy’s daily homeroom. For those of you all who aren’t familiar with what this is, ever since we had the mass school closures because of the COVID-19, all of us at Khan Academy, which is a not-for-profit with a mission o…
How to Stick To Your Goals - A Quick Guide
[Music] Hey, what’s up? Imagine you’re a farmer and you’re really, really excited about planting a new carrot garden. You picture this in your mind: a field full of juicy carrots. You can give all these carrots to your friends. You want to be known as th…
Designing Characters with Deep Learning: Spellbrush (W18) - YC Gaming Tech Talks 2020
My name is Corey; I’m the CEO at Spell Rush, and I’m here to talk to you today about designing characters with deep learning. So, um, we’re Spell Rush. We’re a YC company as well; we’re building deep learning tools for art and artists. What exactly does …
One Step at a Time | Life Below Zero
Long walk on a cold day. Thing I’ve learned about injuries is listen to your body. If your body’s hurting, it’s trying to tell you something. In this case right here, this leg’s trying to tell me not to use it. Just got to take it easy, take it one step …
The 10 BEST Side Hustles - How I Make $10,000 / Month
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, I’ll be honest; not only have I seen every single side hustle video imaginable on YouTube, but I’ve also tried nearly every single one of those options throughout the last 12 years. And let me tell you, even though …
The BETTER Way You Should Use NFTs | Converge 2022
Foreign [Music] [Applause] [Music] O’Leary, Mr. Wonderful, we’re here in San Francisco at Converge, our first crypto ecosystem conference. Thousands of people are here. It’s a great setting, and it’s just wonderful to have you here with us for this conver…