yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Increased politicization of the Supreme Court | AP US Government and Politics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In your mind, why is the Supreme Court important?

Well, the Supreme Court is important for the original founders’ reasons, or that it was like all American institutions. There were ideas the founders had, and then John Marshall, an important justice, created the office by the practice of the office.

It is important because the court is where America’s thorniest questions go to be resolved. They haven't been resolved in the executive branch and the legislative branch, and so the court has to take them up. That is where the court goes back to those first principles again.

Why do we study American history? What exactly was the outline for how the country is supposed to behave? And are we staying within that outline in those series of ideals? It goes back to the very beginning ingredients of America. So, the court is a test always of whether what we're doing now is in keeping with what we were supposed to do at the founding of the country.

The reason it has become so important recently is that the court ends up doing a lot more than it was ever supposed to do, because of weakness in the executive branch and the legislative branch. A lot of people are now looking to the court to solve problems that should actually be handled by the people's representatives.

The judges are not elected; they are in there for life at the Supreme Court through the process of the president with advice and consent by the Senate. But they are not elected. This was supposed to be a republic in which the elected representatives were the ones making the laws, but that's—we've shifted away from that.

So the court is now making decisions that can affect people's lives for a generation and not be changed as easily as, say, a piece of legislation, which can be vetoed, amended, or superseded by another piece of legislation. It's really permanent changes in American life.

So, my understanding is that the Supreme Court should be above politics. To what degree is that actually the case?

Well, the Supreme Court has had lots of interest. There have been times where the Supreme Court, when Andrew Jackson was president, tried to use the Supreme Court to do what he wanted it to do. And Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to change the functioning of the court because it kept knocking down all the things he wanted to do.

We've had moments where there have been these spasms where presidents have tried to get the court to do what they wanted, but in general, it was the American tradition that the justices were supposed to be picked if they were of good character and if they were of sound legal mind. If they had views on the matters related to the constitution that were sound legally, their politics weren't supposed to be so important.

What has happened is, like so much in modern American life, there has been an intertwining of politics and the legal profession so that now when presidents run for office, they say, "Elect me so that I can put in our kinds of judges." This means that the kind of judge you pick helps you with your voters.

If your voters want a very specific kind of ideological judge, then the more ideological the judge that you pick, the greater your voters will be happy about you. That’ll keep you in office. This is true of the senators advising and consenting on these decisions and true of the presidents who pick them.

Well, that means that the people who go into the office, into the Supreme Court, I should say, end up being more political than in the past. There was a period where when an American president would pick a justice, that justice very often would rule in a way that was totally the opposite of what the members of that president's party wanted.

It happened repeatedly in American life, and that was a symbol. People thought of the idea that these issues before the court were being weighed on their merits and had nothing to do with the ideological views of the judge weighing them. Now, where you sit on a particular issue is often determined by where you came from politically.

More Articles

View All
Sal Discusses the Safety of Reopening Schools on the Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer
Doctor, when the CDC Director, Robert Redfield, says these new guidelines are meant to facilitate the opening of schools around the country, not keep them closed. Based on your reading of these new guidelines, do you think they accomplish that goal? Well…
What Happens AFTER Nuclear War?
Nuclear war would forever split human history. Into anything that happened before and the post-war apocalypse. In the worst case, mass fires consume everything within tens of thousands of square kilometers, killing hundreds of millions within hours. But t…
15 Reasons Persuasive People Always Get What They Want
No matter how hard you work at something, if you don’t know how to persuade people, you’re never going to get what you want. Hard work falls flat without the driving force of persuasion. Good persuasion skills beat hard work any day. That’s why a charisma…
Homeroom with Sal & Neel Kashkari - Tuesday, February 2
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to the homeroom live stream! We’ve had a little bit of a hiatus, so it’s good to see all of y’all again. We have a really exciting guest today, Neil Kashkari, who is the president of the Federal Reserv…
Interpreting the meaning of the derivative in context | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’re told that Eddie drove from New York City to Philadelphia. The function ( d ) gives the total distance Eddie has driven in kilometers ( t ) hours after he left. What is the best interpretation for the following statement: ( d’ ) of 2 is equal to 100?…
You're Wasting Time : How to Actually Grow Your YouTube Channel With a 9-5
You’re probably juggling a 9 to 5, family, or other responsibilities. Wonder if it’s even possible to grow on YouTube with just 1 hour a day? I completely get it because I personally spent 4 years failing at it. Then, after years of trial and error, somet…