yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Increased politicization of the Supreme Court | AP US Government and Politics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In your mind, why is the Supreme Court important?

Well, the Supreme Court is important for the original founders’ reasons, or that it was like all American institutions. There were ideas the founders had, and then John Marshall, an important justice, created the office by the practice of the office.

It is important because the court is where America’s thorniest questions go to be resolved. They haven't been resolved in the executive branch and the legislative branch, and so the court has to take them up. That is where the court goes back to those first principles again.

Why do we study American history? What exactly was the outline for how the country is supposed to behave? And are we staying within that outline in those series of ideals? It goes back to the very beginning ingredients of America. So, the court is a test always of whether what we're doing now is in keeping with what we were supposed to do at the founding of the country.

The reason it has become so important recently is that the court ends up doing a lot more than it was ever supposed to do, because of weakness in the executive branch and the legislative branch. A lot of people are now looking to the court to solve problems that should actually be handled by the people's representatives.

The judges are not elected; they are in there for life at the Supreme Court through the process of the president with advice and consent by the Senate. But they are not elected. This was supposed to be a republic in which the elected representatives were the ones making the laws, but that's—we've shifted away from that.

So the court is now making decisions that can affect people's lives for a generation and not be changed as easily as, say, a piece of legislation, which can be vetoed, amended, or superseded by another piece of legislation. It's really permanent changes in American life.

So, my understanding is that the Supreme Court should be above politics. To what degree is that actually the case?

Well, the Supreme Court has had lots of interest. There have been times where the Supreme Court, when Andrew Jackson was president, tried to use the Supreme Court to do what he wanted it to do. And Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to change the functioning of the court because it kept knocking down all the things he wanted to do.

We've had moments where there have been these spasms where presidents have tried to get the court to do what they wanted, but in general, it was the American tradition that the justices were supposed to be picked if they were of good character and if they were of sound legal mind. If they had views on the matters related to the constitution that were sound legally, their politics weren't supposed to be so important.

What has happened is, like so much in modern American life, there has been an intertwining of politics and the legal profession so that now when presidents run for office, they say, "Elect me so that I can put in our kinds of judges." This means that the kind of judge you pick helps you with your voters.

If your voters want a very specific kind of ideological judge, then the more ideological the judge that you pick, the greater your voters will be happy about you. That’ll keep you in office. This is true of the senators advising and consenting on these decisions and true of the presidents who pick them.

Well, that means that the people who go into the office, into the Supreme Court, I should say, end up being more political than in the past. There was a period where when an American president would pick a justice, that justice very often would rule in a way that was totally the opposite of what the members of that president's party wanted.

It happened repeatedly in American life, and that was a symbol. People thought of the idea that these issues before the court were being weighed on their merits and had nothing to do with the ideological views of the judge weighing them. Now, where you sit on a particular issue is often determined by where you came from politically.

More Articles

View All
A Former FBI Agent Explains the Terrorist Watch List | Explorer
What exactly can the government do to him, to any of us, whether we’re on the watch list or not? As a journalist, my first hunch is to go straight to the source. Michael German is a former FBI agent who has experience with the terrorism watch list. What …
Taking the Pulse of Our Planet | National Geographic
A lot of our mapping and a lot of our work is about discovery. Still, it’s still that way, but it’s equal now to measurements that will help people make better decisions at a scale that is really important. That scale might be the state of California scal…
Conditions for inference for difference of means | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A food scientist wants to estimate the difference between the mean weights of eggs classified as jumbo and large. They plan on taking a sample of each type of egg to construct a two-sample t-interval. Which of the following are conditions for this type of…
Torque Basics | Simple harmonic motion and rotational motion | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
Imagine you’ve got a door here with a blue doorknob. Any one of these 10-newton forces will cause the door to rotate around the hinge, or the axis, or sometimes this is called the pivot point. Any one of these forces will cause the door to rotate. My que…
They Shut Down My Coffee Company
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So, I think it’s about time that we have an open talk about what happened with my coffee company because I read all the comments asking what’s going on. Well, trying to get any update from me on the status of when it’s go…
Senate checks on presidential appointments | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Presidents of the United States have many powers, but perhaps one of the most influential of these powers is the power of appointment. They can, of course, appoint members of their cabinet. They can appoint ambassadors, and they can appoint judges. We cou…