yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Invalid | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hello wordsmiths! The word we’re featuring in this video is invalid. That’s right, it’s not true—or rather, that’s what it means: incorrect, false, not accepted. It’s an adjective. It comes from Latin, where the prefix “in” means not and the word “valiru…
2015 AP Calculus AB/BC 3cd | AP Calculus AB solved exams | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Bob is writing his bicycle along the same path for ( 0 \leq t \leq 10 ). Bob’s velocity is modeled by ( b(t) = t^3 - 6t^2 + 300 ) where ( t ) is measured in minutes and ( b(t) ) is measured in meters per minute. Find Bob’s acceleration at time ( t = 5 ). …
Charlie Munger’s Final Warning for Investors in 2024
It’s a radically different world from the world we started in. I think it’s going to get tougher. That was Charlie Munger speaking at the Berkshire Hathaway shareholders’ meeting earlier this year. I was there, sitting alongside tens of thousands of peopl…
the earth is running out of time..
New York City, one of the United States’ most recognizable cities. In September 2020, one of the many artistic landmarks of the city was repurposed. It was the metronome near Union Square. If you’ve ever walked by it or seen it online, you’ll probably not…
The Absurdity of Detecting Gravitational Waves
1.3 billion years ago in a galaxy far, far away, two black holes merged. As they violently spiraled into each other, they created traveling distortions in the fabric of space-time: gravitational waves. In the last tenth of a second, the energy released in…
PPCs for increasing, decreasing and constant opportunity cost | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
So we have three different possible production possibilities curves for rabbits and berries here, which we’ve already talked about in other videos. But the reason why I’m showing you three different curves is because these three different curves clearly h…