yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Ponzi: The Financial Idiot Who Scammed the World
There was a time when the financial world marveled at the genius of Charles Ponzi, the man who was in charge of one of the most successful business investments in America. He had millions of dollars at his disposal and crowds of people lining up literally…
Production Possibilities Curve as a model of a country's economy | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have some country, let’s call it Utense Landia, that can only produce one of two goods or some combination of them. So it can produce forks, and it can produce, or it could produce, spoons. This axis is the quantity of forks; this axis i…
Simplify, Simplify | A Philosophy of Needing Less
Most of the luxuries, and many of the so-called comforts of life, are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind. With respect to luxuries and comforts, the wisest have ever lived a more simple and meagre life than the…
The Dangers of Shark Nets | When Sharks Attack
For the past 20 years, New South Wales averaged four shark attacks a year. But in 2009, a staggering 17 attacks occurred, with species ranging from white sharks to wobble gong sharks. With such a variety of species behind the spike, investigators focused …
Bill Gates: COVID-19 has Set Back Global Health for Years | National Geographic
[Music] Bill, it’s so nice to talk with you about this goalkeeper’s report. But I was really struck how different it was from the last time we talked about goalkeepers in 2018, and that was so much of a more positive report. You know, all of the indicato…
Worked example: Measuring the energy content of foods using soda-can calorimetry | Khan Academy
Calorimetry refers to the measurement of heat flow, and in this worked example, we’re going to burn a marshmallow and find the energy content of the marshmallow. First, let’s look at this setup for our soda can calorimeter. So, our soda can has some wate…