yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Rounding to the nearest tenth and hundredth
Joey used 0.432 lbs of cheese to make mac and cheese for dinner. We could also call this 432,000 pounds of cheese to make mac and cheese for dinner. Round the amount of cheese to the nearest tenth. So, the amount of cheese, once again, is 0.432 lbs. Just…
Iron triangles and issue networks | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Now, a related idea to just what a bureaucracy is in our federal government: another question is how do they get influenced? Now, one idea that you might see in many American government courses is the idea of an iron triangle. So, an iron triangle describ…
Taking the Pulse of Our Planet | National Geographic
A lot of our mapping and a lot of our work is about discovery. Still, it’s still that way, but it’s equal now to measurements that will help people make better decisions at a scale that is really important. That scale might be the state of California scal…
Shark Awareness Day | Pristine Seas | National Geographic
For more than 400 million years, sharks have been vital to the health of our oceans. Sharks are apex predators, by balancing food webs and keeping prey populations healthy. Sharks keep ecosystems healthy. With all these, all these sharks around the submar…
Chicago's Coolest Historical Spots | National Geographic
This vibrant city of art, culture, and industry is also a treasure trove of storied sites. While you’re enjoying public art at Millennium Park and savoring deep-dish pizza, make time to check out some of Chicago’s coolest historical spots. The Chicago Riv…
15 Ways to Get Out of Your Slump
Damn the big slump. The one where two full nights of sleep and takeout on TV on the couch don’t help you. It’s been weeks. You still feel like crap. This is the worst time to feel that way. You need to be on your game. So what do you do? Slumps are a par…