yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
NASA's Urgent Message | Years of Living Dangerously
I think the future of agriculture in California is really at risk today. Don Cheadle was here, and we were talking about issues of satellite observations of groundwater depletion and how it’s happening in California. Over the last few years, California’s …
The scale of formality | Style | Grammar
Hello Grimarians! Hello Rosie! Hi David! So, we’re going to be talking about what we call the spectrum of formality today, in the context of language style. Balancing your style between formal and informal language when it’s appropriate is just a general…
Honest Q&A About My Relationship, Smoking, Marriage, and More
Hello, hello! Let’s do a little Q&A. I basically collected some questions on my Instagram story. If you’re not following me on Instagram, what are you doing? Okay, I promise I’m going to be more active. Okay, I say this like every single month, and th…
The Housing Crisis that's Collapsing an Economy
If you’ve seen China in the news lately, you’re probably familiar with photos like these: lots of construction seemingly going on until you look closer, and you realize that there’s actually nobody working on these buildings. This is because China’s prope…
10 Luxury Watch Brands That Are More Expensive Than ROLEX
Hello again! Alex Aires here. It’s great to have you back with us in a video in which we’ll be helping you build your knowledge of watches. And not just any old watches; we’re talking about ones at the seriously high end of the scale. Ask most people toda…
Adding decimals with ones, tenths and hundredths
Let’s do some more involved examples using decimals. So, let’s say we want to add four and 22 hundredths to 61 and 37 hundredths. Like always, I encourage you to pause the video and try to figure it out on your own. Well, the way that my brain tries to …