yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Worked example: Using formal charges to evaluate nonequivalent resonance structures | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We’re told that three possible resonance structures for the thiocyanate ion are shown below. All right, there we have them. Based on formal charges, which of the three structures contributes most to the resonance hybrid of thiocyanate? And …
United States v. Lopez | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about a relatively recent U.S. Supreme Court case, and this is the United States versus Lopez. The decision was made in 1995, and this is significant because many of the cases we have talked about are things th…
Revolutionizing the Way We Grow Food | Nat Geo Live
( intro music ) Caleb Harper: My talk is about how to solve the global food crisis. Technology and seed is for an adverse world. What if you had a perfect world? Researching this, for me, took me to a place of learning about Mir Space Station. You know, …
Missing Dial Trailer | National Geographic
You don’t know heartbreak until you’re running through the jungle, yelling for your son’s name. “Roben! Oh, that’s my son, chip off the old block!” He emailed us right before he headed into the jungle. “It should be difficult to get lost forever.” What t…
We Traveled Back in Time. Now Physicists Are Angry.
You’re going forward through time one second every second. Congratulations, you’re a time traveler! A bit lame, but let’s start here to get to the fun, real time travel to ride on dinosaurs and high-five Einstein. Time isn’t really a thing that passes bu…
Has Technological Advancement Gone Too Far? #Shorts #Apple #VisionPro
VR can be an incredible experience. It can convince your body that a fake world is real. Anyone who has looked down into a canyon with their headset on will be very familiar with how it can trick the senses. But to get to that world, you must put on the …