yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
The Mobile Home Economics | Explorer
[music playing] Frank Rolfe? Yes. Billy Mintz. Hi, Billy. How are you? BILLY MINTZ (VOICEOVER): Frank Rolfe’s company is the fifth largest owner of mobile home parks in the United States. BILLY MINTZ: Beautiful place. FRANK ROLFE: Thank you very…
Dario Amodei: Anthropic CEO on Claude, AGI & the Future of AI & Humanity | Lex Fridman Podcast #452
If you extrapolate the curves that we’ve had so far, right? If you say, well, I don’t know, we’re starting to get to like PhD level and last year we were at undergraduate level, and the year before we were at like the level of a high school student. Again…
A productive day in my life vlog
Hi guys, it’s me, Dude! Today, we’ll look at a day of a productivity ninja. I woke up at 5:30 AM using my Yabai sunlight alarm. I represented my waking up scene to show you guys how I feel when I wake up super early. We had many things to do this day, so…
Interpreting change in exponential models: changing units | High School Math | Khan Academy
The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere increases rapidly as we continue to rely on fossil fuels. The relationship between the elapsed time T in decades—let me highlight that because that’s not a typical unit—but in decades since CO2 levels w…
Khan Academy Ed Talks with Olav Schewe - Tuesday, June 1
Hello! Welcome to Ed Talks with Khan Academy. We are excited to have you here as we talk to people who are influential in the education space. Today, we’re talking to Olive Chewie, who has a book coming out that we’re looking forward to talking to about l…
How Engineers Hack Cameras to Photograph and Study Sharks and Lions | National Geographic
[Music] [Music] Crittercam was an animal-born imaging device. It’s basically a camera plus a bunch of sensors for collecting scientific data as well as point-of-view imagery. This was the first HD Crittercam we actually made. We built that camera in like …