yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Walking in Miep's Footsteps | A Small Light | National Geographic
[Music] Meat Piece was Otto Frank’s secretary, and she was a very close friend of the Frank family. They actually met in 1933. She was the first person he asked when he decided they needed to go and hide in the annex, and she immediately said yes. I knew…
Representing systems of any number of equations with matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we saw that if you have a system of three equations with three unknowns, like this, you can represent it as a matrix vector equation. Where this matrix, right over here, is a three by three matrix that is essentially a coefficient mat…
Dividing rational expressions: unknown expression | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told the following equation is true for all real values of Y for which the expression on the left is defined, and D is a polynomial expression. They have this equation here; what is D? All right, so essentially what they’re saying is they don’t wan…
Graphs of rational functions: y-intercept | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
Let F of x = A * x^n + Bx + 12 over C * x^m + Dx + 12, where M and N are integers and A, B, C, and D are unknown constants. All right, this is interesting! Which of the following is a possible graph of y equal F of x? They tell us that dashed lines indic…
The Fear of Death
[Music] Foreign death can only be interpreted by people who are alive. Yet since no one who is alive can simultaneously experience what it’s like to be dead, who then does death actually concern? This logic is oddly reassuring. Even so, if my doctor were …
Joel McHale in a Slot Canyon | Running Wild With Bear Grylls
[music playing] OK, this is going to be tight. BEAR GRYLLS (VOICEOVER): Comedian and actor Joel McHale and I are trying to navigate a deep slop canyon in the Arizona desert. Oh my god. BEAR GRYLLS (VOICEOVER): But it just became dangerously narrow. Oh…