yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
15 Services That Will Never Go Out Of Business
According to the World Economic Forum Future of Jobs report, as many as 85 million jobs worldwide are expected to be replaced by artificial intelligence by 2025. Considering how fast this sector is evolving, it’s not far-fetched to say that this number is…
Saving One of the Most Pristine Wetlands on Earth | National Geographic
The Aqua Bengal Delta, one of the most vibrant wetlands on the planet, could be in danger of disappearing. From deep in the my humble forest highlands of Angola flow the surface water that feeds the Cuiúto and Cubango rivers. These vital waterways, flowin…
Conformity - Mind Field (Ep 2)
So welcome, everyone. My name’s Ron, and your task is to choose the line on the right that matches the line on the left. All right, this seems like an easy enough task: which line on the right is the same length as the one on the left? The answer is clea…
Why Don't We All Have Cancer?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Since this video began, more than a million of your cells have died. It’s natural, don’t worry. But you are literally covered with death. Dead stuff. Fingernails, your hair, the outermost layer of your skin - all made out of dea…
Peter Thiel on the Triumph of the Counter-Elites
From the Free Press, this is Honestly, and I’m Barry Weiss. President-elect Donald Trump is announcing the appointments of additional members of his administration today. Tonight, Trump is announcing that a Department of Government Efficiency will be led…
Long run supply when industry costs are increasing or decreasing | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
What we have here we can view as the long run equilibrium or long run steady state for a perfectly competitive market. Let’s say this is the market for apples and it was this idealized perfectly competitive situation where we have many firms producing. Th…