yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
We Explain the Seen in Terms of the Unseen
Now people might object at this point and go, “How dare you invoke in science things that cannot be seen, things that cannot be observed? This is completely antagonistic towards the scientific method!” Surely, and I’ll say to anyone who’s thinking that r…
Optimistic Nihilism
Human existence is scary and confusing. A few hundred thousand years ago, we became conscious and found ourselves in a strange place. It was filled with other beings. We could eat some; some could eat us. There was liquid stuff we could drink; things we c…
How To See Air Currents
If there were a portal through which you could see all of the invisible air currents, temperature gradients, and differences in pressure and composition of air, then this is what it would look like to strike a match. This is helium being squeezed out of a…
Impedance of simple networks
Let’s talk about the idea of the impedance of some simple networks. Now, what I’ve shown here is a very simple network. It has two impedances in it, Z1 and Z2, and inside these boxes are one of our favorite passive components, either an R, an L, or a C. T…
Identifying proportional & non-proportional functions | Grade 8 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
We’re asked which situations represent a proportional relationship. Choose all answers that apply. Pause this video and have a go at this before we do this together. All right, before I even look at these choices, a proportional relationship would be bet…
Warren Buffett: Value Investing vs. Growth Investing
So if you tell me that you own a business that’s going to grow to the sky, and isn’t that wonderful? I don’t know whether it’s wonderful or not until I know what the economics are of that growth. How much you have to put in today, and how much you will re…