yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
The Water Crisis | National Geographic
The following program is paid content for Finish. Fresh water—we can’t live without it, but it’s running out fast. We call this the bathtub ring, and the reservoir has dropped 120 feet in the last 20 years. Now I’m tracking down innovators who are trying…
What Forces Are Acting On You?
What are the forces acting on you right now? I want to answer this question by introducing something called a free body diagram. This is a sketch that scientists make that shows all the forces acting on an object. Each force is represented by an arrow; th…
What is artificial intelligence
In this video, we’re going to talk about what artificial intelligence even is. So to start with that, let’s just break down these words: artificial and intelligence. We could start with intelligence. What does that mean to you? Well, for most of us, we a…
Homeroom with Sal & Vas Narasimhan - Tuesday, August 17
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here. Welcome to Homeroom with Sal. We have a very exciting show today. After a bit of a hiatus, we haven’t done a live stream in a little while, but we have Vas Narasimhan, who is the CEO of Novartis. We had him on last year at the …
Why Black Holes Could Delete The Universe – The Information Paradox
Black holes are the most powerful things in the universe, strong enough to rip whole stars into atom-sized pieces. Well, this is scary enough. They have an even more powerful and dark property: they might delete the universe itself. Black holes in a nuts…
Why Don't We Shoot Nuclear Waste Into Space?
Here in the Kotart Labs, we test very important ideas to see what happens when you blow things up or play with black holes. Many of you suggested that we look into an idea that sounds reasonable: shooting nuclear waste into space. It’s one of those concep…