yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Thank you for an amazing year!
That’s, that’s, I started selling jets over 40 years ago, and a lot has changed since those early days. But one thing I really didn’t see coming is this: me sharing my life to millions across the world and you guys tuning in week in and week out. It was …
Example finding critical t value
We are asked what is the critical value t star (t asterix) for constructing a 98% confidence interval for the mean from a sample size of n, which is equal to 15 observations. So just as a reminder of what’s going on here, you have some population. There’…
RECESSION ALERT: The 5 BEST Index Funds To Buy ASAP
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, I’ve noticed that people love to over complicate investing. Just buy into money puts expiring on May 12th over here, March in your portfolio. When the Fibonacci sequence falls below the 369-day moving average, you’ll…
Is A 2-Sided Polygon Possible?
65, 4, 3, 2, 1. Why don’t we ever learn about dgon and monogon? Well, it’s because they’re impossible, right? No real eyes realize that you and I walk around on Dion and monagons every day. But big flat tells us that two straight lines can only meet at no…
Why “Looking Poor” Is Important
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. In the last few months, you might have come across one of these videos: the importance of looking poor. After all, when you really dig into it, it is insane how many people these days are pretending to be rich, diggi…
Homeroom with Sal & David Siegel - Wednesday, July 14
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! It’s been a little while since we last saw each other, so it’s so good to see you again. We have an exciting conversation today with David Siegel, who’s a co-chair, co-foun…