yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Solving square-root equations: two solutions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the equation ( 6 + 3w = \sqrt{2w + 12} + 2w ). See if you can pause the video and solve for ( w ), and it might have more than one solution, so keep that in mind. All right, now let’s work through this together. The first thing I’…
How The Rich Live Longer
When your life looks exactly as you dreamed of, you want to live forever. Which is exactly what the ultra-rich are trying to do. Well, forever might be a bit of a stretch, but not entirely excluded, as you’ll see later. So what if money could buy you not …
What The Midterm Elections Will Mean For Investors | Meet Kevin
[Music] [Applause] [Music] What about Keystone Pipeline? Should Biden have kept that going? It would have been the fourth phase of it. We’ve got the other three. Do we really need it? Any changes expected? Yeah, I think it’s clear now that the market thi…
Homeroom With Sal - Is College Right for Me? (Part 2)
All right, well, I think we are back. So we had a little bit of technical difficulties as sometimes might happen on the internet. But Ernest, you were going through your explanation, and you were talking about how at Morehouse you were able to work with t…
Worked example: estimating sin(0.4) using Lagrange error bound | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Estimating the sign of 0.4 using a McLaurin polynomial, what is the least degree of the polynomial that assures an error smaller than 0.001? So, what are we talking about here? Well, we could take some function and estimate it with an Nth degree McLaurin…
Planet or Plastic? | Explorer's Fest
[Applause] Some of you may have seen or heard about that classic film called The Graduate, starring Dustin Hoffman. As a young graduate was advised by the crusty businessman, “The future, my boy, is plastics.” Think 1960s, when plastics in our society wer…