yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Analyzing model in vertex form
An object is launched from a platform. Its height in meters, x seconds after the launch, is modeled by h of x is equal to negative 5 times x minus 4 squared plus 180. So normally, when they talk about seconds or time, they usually would use the variable …
Khan Stories: Shrey
It was amazing! I don’t think I’ll ever forget in my life. “Mom, I made it to Harvard!” I mean, it was like a Bollywood Hollywood kind of a sentence. I’m Srey. Um, I’m a freshman at Harvard, class of 2022, and I’m from New Delhi, India. I’ve been using …
YC Tech Talks: Machine Learning
[Music] foreign [Music] Welcome to YC Tech Talks Machine Learning. I’m Paige from our work at a startup team, the team that helps people get jobs at YC startups. So for tonight’s event, we have Founders who are going to be talking about interesting proble…
New Human Ancestor Discovered: Homo naledi (EXCLUSIVE VIDEO) | National Geographic
We do have our genus. What these discoveries are telling us is that there’s a lot out there to be found, that we actually don’t have the whole story of human evolution. I mean, it looks like it might be a fragment of like the superorbital taurus or someth…
Moon 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] Over 150 moons orbit the solar system’s planets. And one of those moons calls Earth home. The moon was formed about 4.5 billion years ago when, according to one theory, the Earth slammed into another early planet. Debris from this collision beg…
Mohnish Pabrai: How to Find and Analyze an Investment (2021)
I put about 10% of the fund’s assets into Frontline, and in a few months, shipping rates started to go up. It went up to like $10 or $11 a share. I had a very nice gain in a relatively short period of time, and I exited Frontline, patted myself on the bac…