yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
How To Turn $25,000 Into A Substantial Return In Real Estate | FT. Scott McGillivray
If you’re an investor and you’re trying to save for retirement, you would put about 50% into stocks and 50% into bonds. But we’re in a very dislocated story about fixed income now. I’ve taken my commercial real estate position from 31% of my portfolio—tha…
Photo Walk in Napa Valley | National Geographic
Hi everybody! I’m Ashley Kalina. Thanks for joining us again. We’re here in beautiful Napa Valley for Get Outdoors Day, and we are here with National Geographic and our friends at Nature Valley. I’m joined by Ben Horton, the wonderful photographer. He’s g…
Invalid conclusions from studies example | Study design | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Jerry was reading about a study that looked at the connection between smartphone usage and happiness. Based on data from approximately 5,000 randomly selected teenagers, the study found that, on average, the teens who spent more time on smartphones were s…
Introduction to Type I and Type II errors | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about type 1 errors and type 2 errors, and this is in the context of significance testing. So just as a little bit of review, in order to do a significance test, we first come up with a null and an alternative…
How To Build Product As A Small Startup - Michael Seibel
A lot of the problems that I faced in the early stages of my companies were because I didn’t have a process to get product out of the door. Um, instead, my co-founders and I would have long debates, which would often turn into arguments. We wouldn’t write…
Sine and cosine from rotating vector
Now I’d like to demonstrate one way to construct a sine wave. What we’re going to do is we’re going to construct something that looks like ( S(\Omega t) ). So, we have our function of time here and we have our frequency. Now this little animation is goin…