yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Extended: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the final installment of the beaker ball balance problem. So if you haven’t seen the first part, you should probably watch that now. The link is in the description.

Now assuming you have seen it, you know that the balance tips towards the hanging acrylic ball when weighed against a beaker with a submerged ping pong ball. But what would happen if, instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of the beaker, it was instead submerged by my finger? I posed this question in the last video, and you responded with thousands of comments.

Thirteen percent of you thought that the acrylic ball beaker would be heavier. Twenty-nine percent thought the ping pong ball beaker would be heavier. And 54 percent of you thought that they would be balanced. So now let’s see what actually happens in three, two, one. Perfectly balanced.

But why is this the case? Well, just as in the previous experiment, both balls displaced the same amount of water and so they experienced the same upward buoyant force equal to the weight of water they displace. Therefore, there are equal and opposite downward forces on the water, making both beakers heavier by this amount.

And our answer could stop here. But if you are wondering why this result is different from the previous case, consider that in the first part, the downward force on the ping pong ball side was counteracted by the upward tension in the string. But not anymore, because there is no string.

Instead, the downward force from my hand is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the ping pong ball. So that overall both beakers get heavier by the same amount. It is just the weight of water displaced by the ping pong ball or the acrylic ball because it has the same volume.

I hope you enjoyed this experiment. If you have got another way of explaining this, please let me know in the comments.

More Articles

View All
Limits from graphs | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have the graph of y equals f of x right over here, and we want to figure out three different limits. And like always, pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own before we do it together. All right, now first, let’s think about wh…
Mesh current steps 1 to 3
Now we’re going to discuss the second of two popular ways to analyze circuits, and this one is called the mesh current method. This is actually one of my favorites. There’s a fun spot in here where we make up currents flowing around in circles inside the …
Did The Future Already Happen? - The Paradox of Time
Do your past, present and future all exist right now? Are you watching this video, being born and lying on your deathbed at this very moment? Surprisingly, the answer could be yes. But how can that be? What does that even mean? How does time work? Imagin…
Work-Energy Principle Example | Energy and Momentum | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
So the work energy principle states that the net work done on an object is going to equal the change in kinetic energy of that object. And this works for systems as well. So, the net work done on a system of objects is going to equal the change in the tot…
Warren Buffett is BUYING! Pharmaceuticals in, banks out? (Berkshire Q3 13F)
So last quarter, Warren Buffett certainly, uh, shocked a lot of us with the sheer amount of selling that he did from his portfolio. I remember he sold out of seven positions entirely, which is very unlike Warren Buffett. Four of those positions were the b…
Apple Vision Pro: Startup Platform Of The Future?
How much of like the hard interesting stuff Apple did is with the hardware in The Vision Pro versus the software? Well, you need to understand the real world in order to augment it—technology of a self-driving car but on a headset. This is maybe where Fou…