yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

What Is The Coastline Paradox?


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

I've been driving along Australia's famous Great Ocean Road. And I'm stopped here near the Twelve Apostles, which are these big sandstone bluffs. Actually, there's only eight of them left because the others have eroded over time. And erosion is really what's given us this coastline the way it looks now.

So that brings to mind a question for me. Which is, "How long is the Australian coastline?" Well, if you were to measure it out in lengths of 500 kilometers, you would find that it's about 12 and a half thousand kilometers long. But the CIA World Factbook puts the figure at more than double that: over 25,700 kilometers.

But how can it be that we have two different estimates for the length of the same coastline? Well, this is called "The Coastline Paradox." The answer is, it depends on the length of measuring stick that you use. So, if you connect up the dots from cliff to cliff to cliff, you get a shorter length of coastline than if you measure with a smaller measuring stick and measure into every inlet.

So what length of measuring stick should we use? Well, in theory, you can go all the way down to the size of a water molecule. And if you do that, then the length of Australia's coast is virtually infinite. Do you believe me that you could have a finite area object like Australia bounded by an infinite perimeter? It doesn't seem to make sense.

But I can give you another example of this: it's called the Koch snowflake. So what you do is you take a triangle with sides of length 1 and then on each side add another triangle with sides of length a third. Continue doing that again and again forever. What you end up with is a shape which is a finite area but an infinite perimeter.

Shapes like these are called fractals, and many coastlines have the same fractal structure, which means they have some sort of self-similarity on many different scales. So you can zoom in and zoom in, and the coastline looks roughly the same.

So if you want to know the length of a coastline, you need to first specify the length of your measuring stick because that's what the answer depends on.

More Articles

View All
Ask me anything with Sal Khan: #GivingTuesdayNow | Homeroom with Sal
Hello, welcome to our daily homeroom livestream! For those of y’all that this is your first time coming, this is something that we started doing when we started seeing school closures around the world. Khan Academy, we are a not-for-profit with a mission …
Can You Upload Your Mind & Live Forever?
The desire to be free from the limits of the human experience is as old as our first stories. We exist in an endless universe, only bound by the laws of physics, and yet our consciousness is trapped in mortal machines made of meat. With the breathtaking e…
How To Save A LOT Of Money In College
What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. So I took a look at my YouTube analytics the other day, and it turns out that a very large percentage of my audience, nearly 80%, is between the ages of 18 and 35 years old. I know from that a big part of the demographic…
Drew Houston - CEO and Founder of Dropbox | Entrepreneurship | Khan Academy
So, uh, excited to have Drew Hon here. Uh, you know, a very well-known figure amongst kind of our team out here. Um, and for those who are maybe watching this video later, uh, founder of Dropbox. How many, how many billions of people do you have using? I …
These Tiny, Stunning Moths Are Only Found in One Place on Earth | National Geographic
A lot of people will think moth, and they’ll think dark gray fuzzy thing that they don’t want flying around their lights at night. These things don’t look like that at all, and in fact, most moths don’t. You say to anybody “microscopic moth,” they’re some…
Transforming exponential graphs | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told the graph of y = 2^x is shown below. All right, which of the following is the graph of y = 2^(-x) - 5? So there’s two changes here: instead of 2^x, we have 2^(-x) and then we’re not leaving that alone; we then subtract five. So let’s take them…