yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

What Is The Coastline Paradox?


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

I've been driving along Australia's famous Great Ocean Road. And I'm stopped here near the Twelve Apostles, which are these big sandstone bluffs. Actually, there's only eight of them left because the others have eroded over time. And erosion is really what's given us this coastline the way it looks now.

So that brings to mind a question for me. Which is, "How long is the Australian coastline?" Well, if you were to measure it out in lengths of 500 kilometers, you would find that it's about 12 and a half thousand kilometers long. But the CIA World Factbook puts the figure at more than double that: over 25,700 kilometers.

But how can it be that we have two different estimates for the length of the same coastline? Well, this is called "The Coastline Paradox." The answer is, it depends on the length of measuring stick that you use. So, if you connect up the dots from cliff to cliff to cliff, you get a shorter length of coastline than if you measure with a smaller measuring stick and measure into every inlet.

So what length of measuring stick should we use? Well, in theory, you can go all the way down to the size of a water molecule. And if you do that, then the length of Australia's coast is virtually infinite. Do you believe me that you could have a finite area object like Australia bounded by an infinite perimeter? It doesn't seem to make sense.

But I can give you another example of this: it's called the Koch snowflake. So what you do is you take a triangle with sides of length 1 and then on each side add another triangle with sides of length a third. Continue doing that again and again forever. What you end up with is a shape which is a finite area but an infinite perimeter.

Shapes like these are called fractals, and many coastlines have the same fractal structure, which means they have some sort of self-similarity on many different scales. So you can zoom in and zoom in, and the coastline looks roughly the same.

So if you want to know the length of a coastline, you need to first specify the length of your measuring stick because that's what the answer depends on.

More Articles

View All
The Monroe Doctrine
On December 2nd, 1823, US President James Monroe was giving his annual State of the Union Address to Congress when he threw in a couple of remarks about the United States’s relationship with the powers of Europe. He said, “The American continents, by the …
How To Raise Kids When You're Rich | Impaulsive Podcast
It’s done, he says. What do you mean it’s done? I said. It means no more checks. And I said to him, the dead bird under the nest never learns how to fly. And he said, what the [ __ ] does that mean? [Music] [Applause] [Music] Mr. Wonder, Mr. Wonderful, …
How to Invest in the 2020 Stock Market Bubble...
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we’re going to be talking about how we as investors should be approaching the topic of investing right now. Man, 2020 has been a whirlwind year, not just in general but also in the stock market. Someho…
Let's Buy a Car! | Teacher Resources | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
[Music] Con Academy financial literacy theater proudly presents the purchase. This is Wall-E. Say hi to the people, Wall-E. Hi to the people, Wall-E! Wally is about to buy a car from a dealership. Oh boy! Unfortunately for Wally, he is the world’s mo…
Armies of the Future | StarTalk
[Music] Rise of the robots. I. This is a story that’s never ending, heavily treated in science fiction platforms. Uh, for all, for in all frontiers: servant robots, military robots, sex robots. And maybe that’s inevitable, given the direction technolog…
Definite integral properties (no graph): function combination | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Given that the definite integral from -1 to 3 of f of x dx is equal to -2, and the definite integral from -1 to 3 of G of x dx is equal to 5, what is the definite integral from -1 to 3 of 3 f of x - 2 G of x dx? All right, so to think about this, what we…