yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Looking at trends in inflation adjusted income since 1980 | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 10, 2024

What we're looking at is a graphic that's put together by the New York Times, and it's a way of thinking about how incomes have grown since 1980.

So before we even look at the various percentiles of income, this black line is interesting to look at because this is real per capita GDP. You can see relative to 1980, real per capita GDP has grown— it looks like about 80 percent. That's interesting because, in theory, if all of the growth of productivity of a country were evenly distributed, then everyone would be growing on that per capita GDP line.

But what's interesting about this graphic is we clearly do not see that. So, for example, folks with incomes in the 90th to 99th percentiles, their income actually is growing in line with per capita GDP. In the year that this was compiled, that would be someone after taxes making 120,000 to 425,000 dollars per year after taxes. So that's a good amount of money. Someone making 000 after taxes might be making roughly 700,000 or even 800,000 before taxes.

But we see a spread for people making more or making less. The folks in the top one percent, their income has grown about twice as fast as per capita GDP. And folks in the 0.01 percent—so this is one out of every 10,000 people—their income looks like it has grown roughly five times faster than GDP.

And obviously, if some folks' incomes are growing faster than per capita GDP, other folks' incomes have to be growing slower than per capita GDP. We can see that the middle 40 percent, their growth looks like it's about two-thirds as fast as per capita GDP, and the bottom 50 percent, it looks like their growth is about a third of per capita GDP.

Now some folks might say, "Hey, this is alarming; we see an increase in inequality as our economy grows." While some might say, "Hey, this is a side effect of capitalism; everyone's income is growing in real terms." But in a capitalist world, some people might grow more than others. Regardless of your point of view, it's interesting to think about why we see this spread happening.

And we're not going to be able to dissect all of it right now, but I'll talk about some of the areas of interest that might explain this phenomenon. It's not in any particular order, but some folks would point to globalization.

Why would globalization do this? Well, in a globalized world, capital can flow to wherever they can get the cheapest labor. For example, if you're someone in the top one percent or someone in the 0.01 percent, and you own a company, you could take your capital to a lower-cost place. You don't have to make wages in your country go up, and so the demand for labor is going to go offshore.

There will be less demand for labor in your country, so it wouldn't drive wages up. Another possibility that folks could talk about is technology. Technology oftentimes has a similar effect as globalization. Instead of taking labor and taking it offshore to find cheaper labor, technology oftentimes can replace labor.

Or another way to think about it is it can make folks more productive, so you don't need as much labor. The folks who own the technology or are able to take advantage of technological trends—well, they might get a disproportionate amount of that GDP growth.

Related to both of these is the idea of education. Maybe in a globalized world and a technology world, the payback of education matters even more. So if someone doesn't get as much of an education, they can't participate in the benefits of technology as much or jobs that they're qualified for go offshore, so they can't demand as high wages.

Another potential lever to think about is immigration policy, which from a wage point of view could have a similar effect as technology or globalization. If you have an increase in the supply of lower-skilled labor, economics will tell us that the price for that labor—which are wages—would be suppressed.

Another major lever that folks will definitely point to is tax policy or fiscal policy in general. For example, generally speaking, the ordinary income tax rates—the more money you make—become a higher and higher percentage of your income. But people in the very high brackets, in that top 1 or in that top 100 of a percent, many of their income comes disproportionately from capital gains income on asset price appreciation.

And that type of income today is taxed at a significantly lower tax rate than ordinary income. And then last but not least, you have monetary policy. This is the actions of the Federal Reserve and interest rates. Many times, especially when you go through crises, the benefits of lower interest rates might disproportionately benefit those who own capital and who are in the position to borrow at those lower interest rates and then invest it at higher interest rates.

That might speak to some of these higher brackets. So I'll leave you there. The goal of this video isn't to make a value judgment over what's good, what's bad, or what likely is the case, but it's just to get us thinking about the trends that we are for sure seeing and what might be the levers. This isn't an exhaustive list that might be causing them.

More Articles

View All
Magnetic Micro-Robots
These are magnetic microrobots, just millimeters in size. They bend and move in response to applied magnetic fields. And with these magnetic fields controlled by a gaming controller, the micro robots can be driven carefully and precisely. They can turn by…
Safari Live - Day 214 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Hello, hello, and welcome to your live Safari experience that happens every day, twice a day, except for this morning, wher…
Top 5 Stocks the Smart Money is Buying for 2022
Wouldn’t it be great to know the five stocks the world’s biggest and best super investors have been buying for 2022? People like Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Ray Dalio, Bill Ackman, Guy Spier, Monash Prebride, Bill Gates, Seth Klarman, Lee Liu, Michael…
Office Hours with Kevin Hale and Qasar Younis at Startup School SV 2016
Dramatic entrance that was easy, easily pleased crowd. Uh, H we have a favor to ask of all of you guys out there. Um, how many people follow Justin on Snapchat? All right, great. So Justin’s not here. Oh, but there should be punishment for that. But there…
2015 AP Chemistry free response 3a | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Potassium sorbate, and they give us its formula right over here, has a molar mass of 150 grams per mole. They put this decimal here to show us that these are actually three significant figures; even the zero is a significant digit. Here is commonly added …
How to negotiate with billionaires.
I negotiate with billionaires every day in what I do. Everybody always asks me, “How do you negotiate with a billionaire, a big corporate executive, and things like that?” To tell you the truth, you negotiate with them just like you negotiate with anybod…