yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

First Image of a Black Hole!


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This is the first-ever image of a black hole released by the Event Horizon Telescope collaboration on April 10th, 2019. It shows plasma orbiting the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy M87. The bright region shows where plasma is coming towards us, and since it's traveling near the speed of light, it appears brighter when coming towards us and dimmer when going away. This is called relativistic beaming.

From the images, scientists can tell that the plasma is orbiting clockwise. It takes around 2 days for the plasma to complete one orbit. Here, we are looking at the black hole using electromagnetic waves with a wavelength of 1.3 millimeters—radio waves. This was the part of the spectrum used to make the image because it can show us the features close in to the event horizon, and it can pass through the accretion disk and interstellar dust to reach our telescopes.

The supermassive black hole in M87 is very active, meaning it's constantly feeding on lots of matter from its glowing hot accretion disk. But it also has narrow collimated jets above and below it, shown here in blue, thought to be created by incredibly strong magnetic fields. The jets extend out at least 5,000 lightyears, and one of them appears to be pointing almost straight at us.

Relativistic beaming is again the reason we can see the jet coming towards us in this Hubble Space Telescope image, but not the one going away. Since the jet is pointed almost straight at us, I'm thinking our perspective is almost perpendicular to the accretion disk. But let's have a look at what we would see if we were looking at different orientations. The warping of space-time around the black hole means we can see light even from parts of the accretion disk behind the black hole. They are lensed above and below the shadow region. Not gonna lie, this is so trippy; I could stare at it for a long time.

So, the big question most people are going to be asking is why is the image so fuzzy? The answer is because it's so tiny. Don't get me wrong; the black hole itself is huge, supermassive in fact. As measured from this picture, the black hole has a mass 6.5 billion times that of our Sun. The actual size of its shadow is nearly the size of our solar system, but located fifty-three and a half million light years away, its size from our perspective is only about 40 micro arcseconds— that's the angle it makes on the sky.

To understand what that means, take the whole sky and divide it into 180 degrees. Then divide a degree into 60 arcminutes and an arcminute into 60 arcseconds. Divide an arcsecond into a hundred, and into a hundred again, and into a hundred once more, and that is the size of the black hole shadow—only about 40 micro arcseconds. It puts us at the very limit of what we are technologically capable of seeing.

In fact, to get this sort of resolution, due to the basic law of physics, the diffraction limit, we needed a telescope the size of the Earth. That being impractical, the scientists used eight telescopes spread across the globe. They all simultaneously observed M87, and as the Earth rotated, that helped fill in the Earth-sized telescope that they were trying to simulate.

But M87 was not the only black hole they looked at. They also observed the supermassive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy, Sagittarius A*. They haven't yet released an image of this black hole, but this simulation shows what it might look like. It's much closer, at around 26,000 light-years away, but also much smaller, with a mass only four million times that of our Sun. It's also less active, only periodically gobbling up matter, and it would have much more variation over time with matter orbiting every four to thirty minutes.

That's probably why we'll have to wait a little longer to see the black hole at the center of our galaxy. For now, the striking image of the black hole in M87 confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt that black holes do exist. The general theory of relativity, published over a hundred years ago, is supported again in spectacular fashion in the strongest gravities and at the limits of our ability to test the theory.

What I love about moments like this is the ridiculous extremes these scientists achieved—these 200 scientists in pursuit of a goal that seemed impossible, and yet they achieved it. I want to extend my personal congratulations to everyone on the team for an amazing discovery. I'll be linking to all their work in the description.

More Articles

View All
Hunting and Eating Invasive Iguanas | National Geographic
They’re invasive species in Puerto Rico, and we’re trying to control that problem so we could start eating them and we can start hunting them. El grupo de loja, one arrowed, agua de este tzedakah, pay a day’s end. L agree cultura de Puerto Rico pro Pokag…
Teach Elementary with Khanmigo
Hi, I’m Michelle, a professional learning specialist here at Khan Academy and a former classroom teacher just like you. I’d like to introduce you to Kigo, your AI-driven companion who’s revolutionizing teaching for a more engaging and efficient experience…
Flora, Fauna, Funga | Documentary | National Geographic Society
(Tranquil music) (Birds chirping) - [Giuliana] Without fungi, no plant could live outside of water. Without fungi, nothing would decompose. (Tranquil music continues) (Birds chirping) Most of the fluxes of nutrients on our planet would not exist. Basicall…
Nuclear fission | Physics | Khan Academy
An atomic bomb and a nuclear power plant work on the same basic principle: nuclear fusion chain reactions. But what exactly is this? More importantly, if the same thing is happening inside both a bomb and a nuclear reactor, then why doesn’t the nuclear re…
What is Random?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here and Derek. Generate(!) 78? That’s so random. Or is it? What does it mean to be random? Can anything really be random? What’s the most random thing ever? Today let’s stop being random and become ‘ransmart’. If something is unpred…
Should You Eat Yourself?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And Jake. And Kevin. And we are in Santa Monica, which of course means that the “V” in “Vsauce” will stand for the Roman numeral five, as in five questions from you guys. Our first question comes from “@notch”. He didn’t ask th…