yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Don’t Rely on Credibility Stamps


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

There are a lot of institutions in our society today that are relying upon credibility stamps. They used to be how you gain credibility in society. So, if you were a journalist writing for the New York Times or Washington Post, then you had the masthead of the New York Times and Washington Post. If you're a professor at Harvard, you have credibility because you're a professor at Harvard.

So, of course, those systems got hacked. A lot of social scientists who have no business telling the world what to do are now in there with their nonsense political models masquerading as economists or natural scientists. Or you have people who are activists writing under the mastheads of these formerly great newspapers and burning up the credibility capital that these newspapers have built up over time.

The internet is exposing them slowly but steadily. We're going through a transition phase where the masses still believe in the institutions, and we're caught in this shelling point, this coordination point for the institutions. How do I know if I should hire you? Well, you have a diploma from Harvard. I know it's not as good as it used to be. I know a Harvard humanities diploma is probably nonsense at this point, but I don't have any other credibility metric to filter you, and I need to do it in an efficient way.

What we're seeing is the transition of power from institutions to individuals, but it's going to be messy. It's going to take a couple of generations, or at least a generation, and in the meantime, the institutions are fighting back. We're in the Empire Strikes Back phase where they're trying to take over the new platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Patreon, which empower the individuals.

The university, in all of academia, has a very big stick in terms of being able to train their own next generation of teachers, who then go on to teach the next generation of primary and secondary school students. Yeah, it's a priesthood. You're only allowed to say what the priests have approved, and you can only say that if you're yourself a priest, and the priest gets to decide who's a priest.

More Articles

View All
See the Remarkable Way This Veteran Is Healing from War | Short Film Showcase
I don’t consider myself a marathon runner. I’m not like the elite guys from Kenya and all those countries; that’s basically all they do. I’m a working man. I get up and go to work every day. I serve people, and that’s the most rewarding thing about my job…
How Solving this Medical Mystery Saved Lives | Nat Geo Explores
Not that long ago, we didn’t understand why we got sick. There was no internet, and doctors were basically guessing. But then, in the 19th century, a few scientists figured it out: germs. One of the scientists was Louis Pasteur. The milk, already pasteuri…
Homeroom with Sal & Martha S. Jones - 19th Amendment and Women's Voting Rights
Hi everyone, welcome to today’s homeroom. Uh, I’m very excited about the conversation we are about to have. I will start with my standard reminder, reminding everyone that Khan Academy is a not-for-profit organization. We can only exist through philanthro…
Worked example: Calculating molar mass and number of moles | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We are asked to calculate the number of moles in a 1.52 kilogram sample of glucose. So, like always, pause this video and try to figure this out on your own. This periodic table of elements will prove useful. All right. Now, if we’re trying to figure out…
MARS | Exclusive Sneak Peek
And now an exclusive sneak peek at the first episode of [Music] [Music] Mars Retro Rockets about to fire in 1, 2, 3… bre… 1, 2… [Music] three. We dream it’s who we are, down to our bones, ourselves. That instinct to build, that drive to seek beyond what …
Introduction to remainders
We’re already somewhat familiar with the idea of division. If I were to say 8 divided by 2, you could think of that as 8 objects: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Divided into equal groups of two. So how many equal groups of two could you have? Well, you could hav…