yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The beauty of collective intelligence, explained by a developmental biologist | Michael Levin


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.
  • People tend to think of intelligence as being of two kinds: There's the quote, unquote "real" intelligence, which is what we are supposed to have, and then there's this idea of a 'collective intelligence,' so swarms of bees, colonies of ants, shoals of fish, and so on.

And people tend to think of those as radically different things. But the reality is all intelligence is collective intelligence, and this is because we are all made of parts. So you and I are collections of cells, and these cells, including neurons and various other cells in our body, have many competencies—this is because they were once separate individuals by themselves. They were unicellular organisms with all of the skills needed to survive in a complex world.

And that journey that we all took, those progressive steps by which we construct ourselves—we construct our bodies, we construct our minds—that journey is maybe the most profound question in all of science.

I'm Michael Levin, and I'm a developmental biologist at Tufts University. Developmental biology is maybe the most magical of all the sciences because you get to see with your own eyes that journey that we all take from physics to mind.

We all start out life as an unfertilized oocyte, and then slowly, gradually, step-by-step, that oocyte turns into a bunch of cells that self-construct an embryo, and eventually that embryo matures and becomes a large-scale adult. In the case of a human, it will be an individual with metacognitive capacities and the ability to reason.

But we all have our origin in that chemistry and physics of that initial oocyte. And the magic of developmental biology is that there is a mechanism by which all of these cells get together, and they are able to cooperate towards large-scale goals.

This is the notion that biology uses what I call a "Multi-scale competency architecture," which basically means that we are not simply nested structurally in terms of cells which comprise tissues, comprising organs, and bodies, and then ultimately societies and so on—that's obviously true on a structural level.

But more interesting is the fact that each of these layers has certain problem-solving competencies. Each one solves problems in their own space, so cells are simultaneously solving problems in physiological spaces and metabolic spaces and gene expression spaces, and tissues and organs are solving those problems.

But, for example, during embryogenesis or regeneration, they're also solving problems in anatomical space. They're trying to navigate a path from the shape of an early embryo or a fertilized zygote all the way up to the complexity of a human body with all of the different types of organs and structures.

So the competency architecture refers to the fact that all of the parts inside of us and inside of all other creatures are themselves competent agents with preferences, with goals, with various abilities to pursue those goals, and other types of problem-solving capacities.

What evolution has given us is this remarkable architecture where every level shapes the behavioral landscape of the levels below—and the levels below do clever and interesting things that allow the levels above not to have to micromanage, and to be able to control in an interesting top-down capacity.

One of the most important things about this emerging field of diverse intelligence is that we, as humans, have very limited capacity and finely-honed ability to see intelligence in medium-sized objects moving at medium speeds through three-dimensional space.

So we see other primates and we see crows and we see dolphins, and we have some ability to recognize intelligence. But we really are very bad at recognizing intelligence in unconventional embodiments where our basic expectations strain against this idea that there could be intelligence in something extremely small or extremely large.

People often criticize this approach by saying, "Well, then anything goes. If you can pick up a rock and say, 'I think this rock is cognitive and intelligent, you know, there's a spirit with hopes and dreams inside of..."

More Articles

View All
Covalent bonds | Molecular and ionic compound structure and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we introduced ourselves to the idea of bonds and the idea of ionic bonds, where one atom essentially is able to take electrons from another atom. But then, because one becomes positively charged and the other becomes negatively charge…
Disability and long term care insurance | Insurance | Financial literacy | Khan Academy
Talking about insurance is never a lot of fun because you’re talking about thinking, or you’re thinking about things that most of us don’t want to have to deal with in life. I’m going to continue that trend by talking about two new scenarios of insurance,…
How To QUIT Your Job With Passive Income (Step By Step)
What’s up, Grambids? Guys, here. So, some of you know I’ve been obsessed with the concept of passive income ever since I learned about the financial independence retire early community in my early 20s. Over those last 12 years, I have done everything poss…
Adding and subtracting fractions with negatives | 7th grade | Khan Academy
Let’s say we wanted to figure out what (3 \frac{7}{3}) minus (-\frac{7}{3}) minus (\frac{11}{3}) is. Pause this video and see if you can have a go at it before we do it together. All right, now let’s work on this together. You might be tempted to deal wi…
Adding decimals with ones and tenths parts
Last video, we got a little bit of practice adding decimals that involved tths. Now let’s do slightly more complicated examples. So let’s say we want to add four to 5.7, or we could read the second number as 5 and 7⁄10. Pause this video and see if you ca…
Game Theory: Winning the Game of Life
Are you the type of person to analyze every second of the interaction you just had with someone for hours on end, or are you normal? Either way, you probably don’t think all that hard about every single detail of the decisions you make in social situation…