yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The beauty of collective intelligence, explained by a developmental biologist | Michael Levin


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.
  • People tend to think of intelligence as being of two kinds: There's the quote, unquote "real" intelligence, which is what we are supposed to have, and then there's this idea of a 'collective intelligence,' so swarms of bees, colonies of ants, shoals of fish, and so on.

And people tend to think of those as radically different things. But the reality is all intelligence is collective intelligence, and this is because we are all made of parts. So you and I are collections of cells, and these cells, including neurons and various other cells in our body, have many competencies—this is because they were once separate individuals by themselves. They were unicellular organisms with all of the skills needed to survive in a complex world.

And that journey that we all took, those progressive steps by which we construct ourselves—we construct our bodies, we construct our minds—that journey is maybe the most profound question in all of science.

I'm Michael Levin, and I'm a developmental biologist at Tufts University. Developmental biology is maybe the most magical of all the sciences because you get to see with your own eyes that journey that we all take from physics to mind.

We all start out life as an unfertilized oocyte, and then slowly, gradually, step-by-step, that oocyte turns into a bunch of cells that self-construct an embryo, and eventually that embryo matures and becomes a large-scale adult. In the case of a human, it will be an individual with metacognitive capacities and the ability to reason.

But we all have our origin in that chemistry and physics of that initial oocyte. And the magic of developmental biology is that there is a mechanism by which all of these cells get together, and they are able to cooperate towards large-scale goals.

This is the notion that biology uses what I call a "Multi-scale competency architecture," which basically means that we are not simply nested structurally in terms of cells which comprise tissues, comprising organs, and bodies, and then ultimately societies and so on—that's obviously true on a structural level.

But more interesting is the fact that each of these layers has certain problem-solving competencies. Each one solves problems in their own space, so cells are simultaneously solving problems in physiological spaces and metabolic spaces and gene expression spaces, and tissues and organs are solving those problems.

But, for example, during embryogenesis or regeneration, they're also solving problems in anatomical space. They're trying to navigate a path from the shape of an early embryo or a fertilized zygote all the way up to the complexity of a human body with all of the different types of organs and structures.

So the competency architecture refers to the fact that all of the parts inside of us and inside of all other creatures are themselves competent agents with preferences, with goals, with various abilities to pursue those goals, and other types of problem-solving capacities.

What evolution has given us is this remarkable architecture where every level shapes the behavioral landscape of the levels below—and the levels below do clever and interesting things that allow the levels above not to have to micromanage, and to be able to control in an interesting top-down capacity.

One of the most important things about this emerging field of diverse intelligence is that we, as humans, have very limited capacity and finely-honed ability to see intelligence in medium-sized objects moving at medium speeds through three-dimensional space.

So we see other primates and we see crows and we see dolphins, and we have some ability to recognize intelligence. But we really are very bad at recognizing intelligence in unconventional embodiments where our basic expectations strain against this idea that there could be intelligence in something extremely small or extremely large.

People often criticize this approach by saying, "Well, then anything goes. If you can pick up a rock and say, 'I think this rock is cognitive and intelligent, you know, there's a spirit with hopes and dreams inside of..."

More Articles

View All
15 Character Traits You Notice When Hanging Out With Rich, Successful People
If you want to be rich and successful, then you have to learn how to hang around rich and successful people. They should feel like you’re one of them, not like you’re an outsider. When you hang around successful people long enough, you’ll see that they ju…
The truth about my $78 per month Tesla
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So I rarely ever make follow-up videos like this, but given the amount of views last Tesla video got and also a lot of the misunderstandings with that video when it comes to tax write-offs, how they’re applied, and ho…
3 Mistakes You Make When You're Starting Out (& How to avoid them)
You know, some mistakes are almost unavoidable, especially when you’re just starting out on a new project or business. It takes a lot of trial and error to get to a point where most things you start manage to hit the spot on a consistent basis. These are …
Creating objective summaries | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers. Today I want to talk about objective summaries by way of introducing you to the character of Joe Friday, a fictional cop from an old radio show from the 50s called Dragnet. The show had this iconic theme, and it went like this: Friday was a…
Energy dissipation across two resistors in series example
A student builds a circuit with a battery and two resistors in series. The resistance of R2 is double the resistance of R1. Below is the graph of the energy lost at R1 over time. So, that’s this graph. Which of the following shows the energy lost at R2 ov…
How To Get A PERFECT Credit Score For $0
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here! So it finally happened, and we are celebrating today because for the last nine years, my credit score has never once surpassed the legendary eight hundred score. I got it once to seven ninety-nine, but it was just never a…