yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Determinant when multiplying a matrix by a constant


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So let's say that I have matrix A and its elements, it's a 2x2: a, b, c, d. We have a lot of practice taking determinants of matrices like this. The determinant of this matrix, same thing as the determinant of a, b, c, d, it's going to be equal to a times d, a d, minus b times c.

Now, what would happen if we multiply one row of this matrix by a constant? What would happen to its determinant? Well, let's try it out. So you have your original, the determinant of your original matrix a, b, c, d. I'm just rewriting what I just did up here: that's a d minus b c.

Now, if I were to multiply, let's say, this first row by a constant k, how would that change the determinant? Well, instead of this being just an a, this is now a k a. Instead of this being just a b, it is now a k b. And so this is equal to k times a d minus b c, which is the same thing as it's equal to k times our original determinant of our matrix A.

So that seems pretty interesting, and I encourage you to see that if you, instead of doing the first row, you did the second row, you would have gotten the same outcome. And then you can also verify that look, if I multiply both of these rows by that constant k, how would that change things? Well then, I'm going to have k a times k d, so you're going to have a k squeezed in there, and then you're going to have k b times k c.

And so this would actually be, you could factor out a k squared, and so this is going to be k squared times the determinant of A. And that can be extended to a generalized property that if I have some n by n matrix A, then the determinant, the determinant of k times that n by n matrix A, the determinant of this, when I multiply a constant times an entire matrix, I'm multiplying that constant times all the rows, you could say all of the elements.

Well, this is going to be equal to... pause this video, see if you can intuit what this general formula is going to be. You might be tempted to say it's k times the determinant of A, but remember that's only if I multiply one row by k. But if I multiply the entire matrix by k, well then this determinant is going to be the constant k to the nth power times the determinant of our n by n matrix A.

And you could see this play out in a three by three case. In fact, I encourage you to try it out with some three by threes, and you could also do a generalized proof for an n by n case. But I won't do that now; this is really just to give you the idea.

More Articles

View All
How Short Your Life REALLY Is
For the past month or so, I’ve been thinking a lot about life. And when people say that, they usually mean what they want to do in life; whether that be their career or relationships, or entertainment or leisure? But I’ve been thinking differently. Of cou…
Can Fake Furs Help Protect Leopards? | National Geographic
We’re talking about hundreds of thousands of people all gathering in one place, and it’s the most amazing spectacle you could see. But you can’t ignore the fact that there are thousands of labor. The use and trade of leopard skins is something new for us.…
Power Under Pressure: Getting it Done (Clip) | Alaska: The Next Generation
Here we go. That’s basically it, and that’ll be the reel system to reel all the line in as that sled goes up. All that’s left to do is to string up the cordage. I gotta couple strands of cord and going to replace that other cordage I was using because tha…
WE DID IT! Thank you all and Merry Christmas!
[Music] We did it, guys! We did it! Come on, that’s so awesome! Guys, 25 YouTube videos in 25 days! The new money advent calendar is successfully completed. Well done, everyone! Well done for keeping up to speed. There’s been about, you know, three to fo…
Proof of expected value of geometric random variable | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
So right here we have a classic geometric random variable. We’re defining it as the number of independent trials we need to get a success, where the probability of success for each trial is lowercase p. We have seen this before when we introduced ourselve…
Amputee Skier Shreds Expectations | Short Film Showcase
His talent pretty much exceeds most any skier I’ve ever seen. He got just to be this incredible, incredible skier. It’s impressive. Vu is probably the best athlete I’ve seen and worked with. I do forget that he has, he has got the one leg. My name is Bas…