yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Determinant when multiplying a matrix by a constant


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So let's say that I have matrix A and its elements, it's a 2x2: a, b, c, d. We have a lot of practice taking determinants of matrices like this. The determinant of this matrix, same thing as the determinant of a, b, c, d, it's going to be equal to a times d, a d, minus b times c.

Now, what would happen if we multiply one row of this matrix by a constant? What would happen to its determinant? Well, let's try it out. So you have your original, the determinant of your original matrix a, b, c, d. I'm just rewriting what I just did up here: that's a d minus b c.

Now, if I were to multiply, let's say, this first row by a constant k, how would that change the determinant? Well, instead of this being just an a, this is now a k a. Instead of this being just a b, it is now a k b. And so this is equal to k times a d minus b c, which is the same thing as it's equal to k times our original determinant of our matrix A.

So that seems pretty interesting, and I encourage you to see that if you, instead of doing the first row, you did the second row, you would have gotten the same outcome. And then you can also verify that look, if I multiply both of these rows by that constant k, how would that change things? Well then, I'm going to have k a times k d, so you're going to have a k squeezed in there, and then you're going to have k b times k c.

And so this would actually be, you could factor out a k squared, and so this is going to be k squared times the determinant of A. And that can be extended to a generalized property that if I have some n by n matrix A, then the determinant, the determinant of k times that n by n matrix A, the determinant of this, when I multiply a constant times an entire matrix, I'm multiplying that constant times all the rows, you could say all of the elements.

Well, this is going to be equal to... pause this video, see if you can intuit what this general formula is going to be. You might be tempted to say it's k times the determinant of A, but remember that's only if I multiply one row by k. But if I multiply the entire matrix by k, well then this determinant is going to be the constant k to the nth power times the determinant of our n by n matrix A.

And you could see this play out in a three by three case. In fact, I encourage you to try it out with some three by threes, and you could also do a generalized proof for an n by n case. But I won't do that now; this is really just to give you the idea.

More Articles

View All
Testing the US Military’s Worst Idea
This is the biggest, most ambitious, most expensive video I’ve ever made. And it’s also gonna be terrifying. We are strapping these giant metal weights to the belly of that helicopter, flying it up several kilometers in the sky, and then dropping these we…
Enforce | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hey, how do you do wordsmiths? This video is about the word enforce. Enforce is a verb. It means to make sure that a rule or law is followed. You might usually hear it in the context of enforcing a law. Right? If I drive too fast, local authorities can e…
Interpret a quadratic graph | Quadratic functions & equations | Algebra 1 | Khan Academy
Katie throws a ball in the air for her dog to chase. The function f models the height of the ball in meters as a function of time in seconds after Katie threw it. We could see that right over here this is our function f. So at time t equals zero, the hei…
Kyle S. More on Playing Hinckley | Killing Reagan
[Music] John was he was lonely and he was depressed. He wasn’t a monster by any mean, you know he was a normal young man, um, who started getting sick and didn’t get the right help in time. He wasn’t medicated. Mental health was different back then; they…
Boveri-Sutton Chromosome Theory
Let’s give ourselves a reminder of how important Gregor Mendel’s work was. In 1866, he published his findings, and it’s important to realize it wasn’t like immediately in 1866 or 1867 the whole world changed and everyone said, “Oh, Gregor Mendel figured i…
Peter Lynch: How to Achieve a 29% Annual Return in the Stock Market
Peter Lynch is definitely someone you should be studying if you want to learn about investing. During his time running the Fidelity Magellan Fund, Lynch averaged a 29.2% annual return, consistently more than double the S&P 500 stock market index, maki…