yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Determinant when multiplying a matrix by a constant


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So let's say that I have matrix A and its elements, it's a 2x2: a, b, c, d. We have a lot of practice taking determinants of matrices like this. The determinant of this matrix, same thing as the determinant of a, b, c, d, it's going to be equal to a times d, a d, minus b times c.

Now, what would happen if we multiply one row of this matrix by a constant? What would happen to its determinant? Well, let's try it out. So you have your original, the determinant of your original matrix a, b, c, d. I'm just rewriting what I just did up here: that's a d minus b c.

Now, if I were to multiply, let's say, this first row by a constant k, how would that change the determinant? Well, instead of this being just an a, this is now a k a. Instead of this being just a b, it is now a k b. And so this is equal to k times a d minus b c, which is the same thing as it's equal to k times our original determinant of our matrix A.

So that seems pretty interesting, and I encourage you to see that if you, instead of doing the first row, you did the second row, you would have gotten the same outcome. And then you can also verify that look, if I multiply both of these rows by that constant k, how would that change things? Well then, I'm going to have k a times k d, so you're going to have a k squeezed in there, and then you're going to have k b times k c.

And so this would actually be, you could factor out a k squared, and so this is going to be k squared times the determinant of A. And that can be extended to a generalized property that if I have some n by n matrix A, then the determinant, the determinant of k times that n by n matrix A, the determinant of this, when I multiply a constant times an entire matrix, I'm multiplying that constant times all the rows, you could say all of the elements.

Well, this is going to be equal to... pause this video, see if you can intuit what this general formula is going to be. You might be tempted to say it's k times the determinant of A, but remember that's only if I multiply one row by k. But if I multiply the entire matrix by k, well then this determinant is going to be the constant k to the nth power times the determinant of our n by n matrix A.

And you could see this play out in a three by three case. In fact, I encourage you to try it out with some three by threes, and you could also do a generalized proof for an n by n case. But I won't do that now; this is really just to give you the idea.

More Articles

View All
Sectional conflict: Regional differences | Period 5: 1844-1877 | AP US History | Khan Academy
From the very beginning of English settlement in North America, the contrast between the Southern colonies and the Northern colonies was stark. Things didn’t improve much when the 13 colonies rebelled in 1776 and became an independent nation. Tensions ove…
Calculating residual example | Exploring bivariate numerical data | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
VI rents bicycles to tourists. She recorded the height in centimeters of each customer and the frame size in centimeters of the bicycle that customer rented. After plotting her results, she noticed that the relationship between the two variables was fairl…
Compare rational numbers using a number line
What we’re going to do in this video is get some practice comparing numbers, especially positive and negative numbers. So for each of these pairs of numbers, I want you to either write a less than sign or a greater than sign, or just think about which of …
Why I won't be getting the Apple Credit Card...
Alright guys, so we got to have a heart-to-heart and talk about the Apple credit card and why I won’t be getting one. They know a lot of you have asked for my opinion when it comes to this, especially coming from the perspective of someone who’s a bit of …
Definite integral involving natural log | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s now take the definite integral from 2 to 4 of (6 + x^2) over (x^3) dx. At first, this might seem pretty daunting. I have this rational expression, but if we just rewrite this, it might jump out at you how this could be a little bit simpler. So, thi…
Cracking Down on Cheetah Traffickers | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
So as they’re coming in, you hear these cheetah cub chirps echoing through the courtroom in the late afternoon of a hot day in Hargesa. The capital of Somaliland, National Geographic Animals Editor Rachel Bale sat in on an unusual trial. Was the proceedin…