yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Determinant when multiplying a matrix by a constant


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So let's say that I have matrix A and its elements, it's a 2x2: a, b, c, d. We have a lot of practice taking determinants of matrices like this. The determinant of this matrix, same thing as the determinant of a, b, c, d, it's going to be equal to a times d, a d, minus b times c.

Now, what would happen if we multiply one row of this matrix by a constant? What would happen to its determinant? Well, let's try it out. So you have your original, the determinant of your original matrix a, b, c, d. I'm just rewriting what I just did up here: that's a d minus b c.

Now, if I were to multiply, let's say, this first row by a constant k, how would that change the determinant? Well, instead of this being just an a, this is now a k a. Instead of this being just a b, it is now a k b. And so this is equal to k times a d minus b c, which is the same thing as it's equal to k times our original determinant of our matrix A.

So that seems pretty interesting, and I encourage you to see that if you, instead of doing the first row, you did the second row, you would have gotten the same outcome. And then you can also verify that look, if I multiply both of these rows by that constant k, how would that change things? Well then, I'm going to have k a times k d, so you're going to have a k squeezed in there, and then you're going to have k b times k c.

And so this would actually be, you could factor out a k squared, and so this is going to be k squared times the determinant of A. And that can be extended to a generalized property that if I have some n by n matrix A, then the determinant, the determinant of k times that n by n matrix A, the determinant of this, when I multiply a constant times an entire matrix, I'm multiplying that constant times all the rows, you could say all of the elements.

Well, this is going to be equal to... pause this video, see if you can intuit what this general formula is going to be. You might be tempted to say it's k times the determinant of A, but remember that's only if I multiply one row by k. But if I multiply the entire matrix by k, well then this determinant is going to be the constant k to the nth power times the determinant of our n by n matrix A.

And you could see this play out in a three by three case. In fact, I encourage you to try it out with some three by threes, and you could also do a generalized proof for an n by n case. But I won't do that now; this is really just to give you the idea.

More Articles

View All
RECESSION WARNING: My YouTube Income Is Crashing
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, things are getting serious, and we have a lot of indicators that would point to a potential recession. For example, it’s shown that a lack of conferences tends to coincide with a slowing economy. Exotic dancers say t…
Developing kinematic equations from data | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
How do we figure out how big a runway we need so that the plane that’s landing, for example, can stop safely? Or imagine there’s an asteroid that’s hurling towards the Earth. Don’t worry, it’s not going to hit the Earth; it’s going to come very close by.…
Warren Buffett's Inflation WARNING for 2021
From raw material purchases by Berkshire subsidiaries, are you seeing signs of inflation beginning to increase? We’re seeing very substantial inflation. It’s very interesting. I mean, we’re raising prices, people are raising prices to us, and it’s being …
Khan Academy Student Demo
Hi everyone, this is Jeremy Shiffling from Khan Academy. Thanks so much for taking time to join me in this big week, either before the start of school or in the middle of the start of school, depending on where you’re calling from. But wherever you are in…
Interpreting y-intercept in regression model | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Adriana gathered data on different schools’ winning percentages and the average yearly salary of their head coaches in millions of dollars in the years 2000 to 2011. She then created the following scatter plot and trend line. So this is salary in million…
Can We Fix Climate Change? | Explorer
We can’t really fix climate change. We can mitigate it. We can get to work on it. We can spread it out. We can make things better. What we got to do is stop burning fossil fuels immediately, as soon as we possibly can. Then there’s a strange effect that …