yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Determinant when multiplying a matrix by a constant


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So let's say that I have matrix A and its elements, it's a 2x2: a, b, c, d. We have a lot of practice taking determinants of matrices like this. The determinant of this matrix, same thing as the determinant of a, b, c, d, it's going to be equal to a times d, a d, minus b times c.

Now, what would happen if we multiply one row of this matrix by a constant? What would happen to its determinant? Well, let's try it out. So you have your original, the determinant of your original matrix a, b, c, d. I'm just rewriting what I just did up here: that's a d minus b c.

Now, if I were to multiply, let's say, this first row by a constant k, how would that change the determinant? Well, instead of this being just an a, this is now a k a. Instead of this being just a b, it is now a k b. And so this is equal to k times a d minus b c, which is the same thing as it's equal to k times our original determinant of our matrix A.

So that seems pretty interesting, and I encourage you to see that if you, instead of doing the first row, you did the second row, you would have gotten the same outcome. And then you can also verify that look, if I multiply both of these rows by that constant k, how would that change things? Well then, I'm going to have k a times k d, so you're going to have a k squeezed in there, and then you're going to have k b times k c.

And so this would actually be, you could factor out a k squared, and so this is going to be k squared times the determinant of A. And that can be extended to a generalized property that if I have some n by n matrix A, then the determinant, the determinant of k times that n by n matrix A, the determinant of this, when I multiply a constant times an entire matrix, I'm multiplying that constant times all the rows, you could say all of the elements.

Well, this is going to be equal to... pause this video, see if you can intuit what this general formula is going to be. You might be tempted to say it's k times the determinant of A, but remember that's only if I multiply one row by k. But if I multiply the entire matrix by k, well then this determinant is going to be the constant k to the nth power times the determinant of our n by n matrix A.

And you could see this play out in a three by three case. In fact, I encourage you to try it out with some three by threes, and you could also do a generalized proof for an n by n case. But I won't do that now; this is really just to give you the idea.

More Articles

View All
The 5 Forces Impacting the World Order
Your analysis of economic historical events is based on five forces, and I’d really like to start this conversation by getting you to just quickly summarize those five forces. Okay, uh, just to give you a little bit of background, I um, I’m a global macr…
How Horses Save Humans From Snakebites
[Zac] Are you all right to grab the back end? [Derek] Uh, well, not at the moment. Not yet. Get him up. You gotta lock him in. A scratch from this species will knock you. Knock you down… Could kill you? Or… Oh definitely, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. So I am…
Q&A with Destin - Smarter Every Day 148
Hey, it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I get a lot of questions because of Smarter Every Day. Some that are personal, some that are about the channel, all different kinds of things, and I’ve never really addressed them in a formal way. So…
The Problem With Financial Minimalism
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So lately, I’ve noticed a big push towards the concept of financial minimalism. For those of you that are not aware, this is the concept in which you cut out every expense in your life that does not add to your overall e…
Limits of piecewise functions | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s think a little bit about limits of piecewise functions that are defined algebraically like our F of x right over here. Pause this video and see if you can figure out what these various limits would be. Some of them are one-sided and some of them are…
Linear approximation of a rational function | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So there are situations where you have some type of a function. This is clearly a non-linear function. f of x is equal to 1 over x minus 1. This is its graph, or at least part of its graph, right over here. But where you want to approximate it with a line…