yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Determinant when multiplying a matrix by a constant


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So let's say that I have matrix A and its elements, it's a 2x2: a, b, c, d. We have a lot of practice taking determinants of matrices like this. The determinant of this matrix, same thing as the determinant of a, b, c, d, it's going to be equal to a times d, a d, minus b times c.

Now, what would happen if we multiply one row of this matrix by a constant? What would happen to its determinant? Well, let's try it out. So you have your original, the determinant of your original matrix a, b, c, d. I'm just rewriting what I just did up here: that's a d minus b c.

Now, if I were to multiply, let's say, this first row by a constant k, how would that change the determinant? Well, instead of this being just an a, this is now a k a. Instead of this being just a b, it is now a k b. And so this is equal to k times a d minus b c, which is the same thing as it's equal to k times our original determinant of our matrix A.

So that seems pretty interesting, and I encourage you to see that if you, instead of doing the first row, you did the second row, you would have gotten the same outcome. And then you can also verify that look, if I multiply both of these rows by that constant k, how would that change things? Well then, I'm going to have k a times k d, so you're going to have a k squeezed in there, and then you're going to have k b times k c.

And so this would actually be, you could factor out a k squared, and so this is going to be k squared times the determinant of A. And that can be extended to a generalized property that if I have some n by n matrix A, then the determinant, the determinant of k times that n by n matrix A, the determinant of this, when I multiply a constant times an entire matrix, I'm multiplying that constant times all the rows, you could say all of the elements.

Well, this is going to be equal to... pause this video, see if you can intuit what this general formula is going to be. You might be tempted to say it's k times the determinant of A, but remember that's only if I multiply one row by k. But if I multiply the entire matrix by k, well then this determinant is going to be the constant k to the nth power times the determinant of our n by n matrix A.

And you could see this play out in a three by three case. In fact, I encourage you to try it out with some three by threes, and you could also do a generalized proof for an n by n case. But I won't do that now; this is really just to give you the idea.

More Articles

View All
The More You Want, the Worse It Gets | The Seven Deadly Sins | GREED
How do you catch a monkey? There’s a simple and effective way to do it without hurting the animal. Once there was a farmer who cut a hole in a coconut, which was just big enough for the monkey to slide in his hand. He tied the coconut to a tree and put a …
The Race to Win Staten Island
Back in the long, long ago, New York and New Jersey fought over the islands betwixt them. Were they New York or were they New Jersey? To determine what was whose, New York proposed a race! All islands that could be encircled in less than 24 hours would be…
What could be ahead for the US dollar?
Throughout the last, you know, 30-40 years, there have been many moments where we said we’re on the brink of collapse. What is the time frame you think for when this is going to get really bad? And when it does get really bad, what would that actually loo…
Statistical and non statistical questions | Probability and Statistics | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is think about the types of questions that we need statistics to address and the types of questions that we don’t need statistics to address. We could call the ones where we need statistics as statistical questions. I’ll ci…
The Secret History of Grillz | Explorer
Deep in an underwater cave on Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula, a team of archaeologists made a groundbreaking discovery: the skulls of ancient Maya, who ruled over a 4,000-year-old civilization. Perhaps most surprising was that these skulls reveal the ancient …
Heating curve for water | Thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s look at the heating curve for water. A heating curve has temperature on the y-axis, in this case, we have it in degrees Celsius, and heat added on the x-axis; let’s say it’s in kilojoules. Let’s say we have 18.0 grams of ice, and our goal is to cal…