yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Examples thinking about power in significance tests | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A significance test is going to be performed using a significance level of five hundredths. Suppose that the null hypothesis is actually false. If the significance level was lowered to 100, which of the following would be true?

So pause this video and see if you can answer it on your own.

Okay, now let's do this together and let's see. They're talking about how the probability of a type 2 error or the power would change. So before I even look at the choices, let's think about this.

We've talked about in previous videos that if we increase our level of significance, that will increase our power and power is the probability of not making a type 2 error. So that would decrease the probability of making a type 2 error. But in this question, we're going the other way. We're decreasing the level of significance, which would lower the probability of making a type 1 error but this would decrease the power. It actually would increase the probability of making a type 2 error.

And so which of these choices are consistent with that? Well, choice A says that both the type two error and the power would decrease. Well, those don't… these two things don't move together. If one increases, the other decreases, so we rule that one out. Choice B also has these two things moving together, which can't be true. If one increases, the other decreases.

Choice C: the probability of a type II error would increase. That's consistent with what we have here and the power of the test would decrease. Yep, that's consistent with what we have here, so that looks good.

And choice D is the opposite of that; the probability of a type 2 error would decrease. So this is— they're talking about this scenario over here and that would have happened if they increased our significance level, not decreased it. So we could rule that one out as well.

Let's do another example. Asha owns a car wash and is trying to decide whether or not to purchase a vending machine so that customers can buy coffee while they wait. She'll get the machine if she's convinced that more than 30 percent of her customers would buy coffee.

She plans on taking a random sample of n customers and asking them whether or not they would buy coffee from the machine and she'll then do a significance test using alpha equals 0.05 to see if the sample proportion who say yes is significantly greater than 30 percent.

Which situation below would result in the highest power for her test? So again pause this video and try to answer it.

Well, before I even look at the choices, we can think about what her hypotheses would be. Her null hypothesis is—you could kind of view it as a status quo, no news here—and that would be that the true population proportion of people who want to buy coffee is 30 percent.

And that her alternative hypothesis is that no, the true population proportion, the true population parameter there is greater than 30 percent.

And so if we're talking about what would result in the highest power for her test—so a high power means the lowest probability of making a type 2 error. In other videos we've talked about, it looks like she's dealing with the sample size and what is the true proportion of customers that would buy coffee.

And the sample size is under her control; the true proportion isn't. Don't want to make it seem like somehow you can change the true proportion in order to get a higher power. You can change the sample size but the general principle is: the higher the sample size, the higher the power.

So you want the highest possible sample size and you're going to have a higher power if the true proportion is further from your hypothesis—your null hypothesis proportion. And so we want the highest possible n and that looks like an n of 200, which is there and there.

And we want a true proportion of customers that would actually buy coffee as far away as possible from our null hypothesis which once again would not be under Asha's control. But you can clearly see that 50 is further from 30 than 32 is. So this one, choice D, is the one that looks good.

More Articles

View All
Khan Academy announces GPT-4 powered learning guide
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy, and I’m very excited to let you all know about the work that Khan Academy is now doing in artificial intelligence. Obviously, over the last many months, there’s been a lot of talk about artificial intelligenc…
Tornado Tree Mind Twister
Okay, smart man with your smart physics degree, let’s say your state gets ravaged by tornadoes. You go to the local EMA volunteer center; you volunteer. You and some buddies go out with chainsaws and try to do the best work you can to help people. Okay, …
Constant-volume calorimetry | Thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Calorimetry refers to the measurement of heat flow, and there are many different types of calorimeters. In this case, we’re looking at a constant volume calorimeter, which is also called a bomb calorimeter. Let’s look at how a bomb calorimeter works. Fir…
Avoiding common mistakes in historical essays | US History | Khan Academy
I want to talk about how to avoid some common mistakes when you’re writing a historical paper. This could apply to a term paper, to a blue book essay, even really to your master’s thesis if you wanted to. I want to talk about three phrases that you might …
How To Make A Living With NO "Job" | The Morning Toast Podcast
[Music] Can you tell us you brought us a gift. You set up this entire little moment. What is going on here? Well, today is a very special day in New York and I haven’t been to New York for over a year because of the whole COVID thing. But today my wine c…
Worked example: estimating sin(0.4) using Lagrange error bound | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Estimating the sign of 0.4 using a McLaurin polynomial, what is the least degree of the polynomial that assures an error smaller than 0.001? So, what are we talking about here? Well, we could take some function and estimate it with an Nth degree McLaurin…