yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Examples thinking about power in significance tests | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A significance test is going to be performed using a significance level of five hundredths. Suppose that the null hypothesis is actually false. If the significance level was lowered to 100, which of the following would be true?

So pause this video and see if you can answer it on your own.

Okay, now let's do this together and let's see. They're talking about how the probability of a type 2 error or the power would change. So before I even look at the choices, let's think about this.

We've talked about in previous videos that if we increase our level of significance, that will increase our power and power is the probability of not making a type 2 error. So that would decrease the probability of making a type 2 error. But in this question, we're going the other way. We're decreasing the level of significance, which would lower the probability of making a type 1 error but this would decrease the power. It actually would increase the probability of making a type 2 error.

And so which of these choices are consistent with that? Well, choice A says that both the type two error and the power would decrease. Well, those don't… these two things don't move together. If one increases, the other decreases, so we rule that one out. Choice B also has these two things moving together, which can't be true. If one increases, the other decreases.

Choice C: the probability of a type II error would increase. That's consistent with what we have here and the power of the test would decrease. Yep, that's consistent with what we have here, so that looks good.

And choice D is the opposite of that; the probability of a type 2 error would decrease. So this is— they're talking about this scenario over here and that would have happened if they increased our significance level, not decreased it. So we could rule that one out as well.

Let's do another example. Asha owns a car wash and is trying to decide whether or not to purchase a vending machine so that customers can buy coffee while they wait. She'll get the machine if she's convinced that more than 30 percent of her customers would buy coffee.

She plans on taking a random sample of n customers and asking them whether or not they would buy coffee from the machine and she'll then do a significance test using alpha equals 0.05 to see if the sample proportion who say yes is significantly greater than 30 percent.

Which situation below would result in the highest power for her test? So again pause this video and try to answer it.

Well, before I even look at the choices, we can think about what her hypotheses would be. Her null hypothesis is—you could kind of view it as a status quo, no news here—and that would be that the true population proportion of people who want to buy coffee is 30 percent.

And that her alternative hypothesis is that no, the true population proportion, the true population parameter there is greater than 30 percent.

And so if we're talking about what would result in the highest power for her test—so a high power means the lowest probability of making a type 2 error. In other videos we've talked about, it looks like she's dealing with the sample size and what is the true proportion of customers that would buy coffee.

And the sample size is under her control; the true proportion isn't. Don't want to make it seem like somehow you can change the true proportion in order to get a higher power. You can change the sample size but the general principle is: the higher the sample size, the higher the power.

So you want the highest possible sample size and you're going to have a higher power if the true proportion is further from your hypothesis—your null hypothesis proportion. And so we want the highest possible n and that looks like an n of 200, which is there and there.

And we want a true proportion of customers that would actually buy coffee as far away as possible from our null hypothesis which once again would not be under Asha's control. But you can clearly see that 50 is further from 30 than 32 is. So this one, choice D, is the one that looks good.

More Articles

View All
Bud Light - The Poster Boy For Brand Mismanagement
Well, Bud Light has become the poster boy for brand mismanagement from multiple perspectives. So let me, let me lay it out for you because the discussions that have risen and the narrative that’s risen around Bud Light is probably a good lesson for every …
Nintendo FURNITURE??? -- Mind Blow #15
A real Zelda Treasure chest? And coming soon from 7-Eleven: two cups, one straw. Vsauce, Kevin here. This is Mind Blow. A few years we were treated to a functioning NES controller coffee table. Well, here’s a brand new one with custom NES art and a place…
Why Startup Founders Should Launch Companies Sooner Than They Think
What’s going on is that founders are just, they’re embarrassed about the state of their own product. They’ve come from companies that have mature, polished products, and they compare their launch to like an Apple launch. If Apple fumbles a launch, the wor…
Demolishing My House
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here! So first off, let me just start by saying I was blown away by how many people wanted an update from the aftermath after my tenants moved out. I don’t think I have ever received so many comments from everyone, all aski…
15 Luxuries in Life You Have Access To (Are You Using Them?)
You know, luxuries used to be about the things we couldn’t have. They were aspirational, always out of reach, and reserved for the elite. They elevated people’s lives far beyond the ordinary. But our definition of luxury has changed. Those first two facto…
Crucial Tactics Of Heavy MANIPULATION You NEED TO KNOW | STOICISM
Did you know that every day in every encounter there’s a hidden battlefield? It’s the unseen struggle of manipulation versus authenticity, where our thoughts and hearts are the prizes to be won. It’s not just in the movies or dramatic books; it’s in our o…