yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Examples thinking about power in significance tests | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A significance test is going to be performed using a significance level of five hundredths. Suppose that the null hypothesis is actually false. If the significance level was lowered to 100, which of the following would be true?

So pause this video and see if you can answer it on your own.

Okay, now let's do this together and let's see. They're talking about how the probability of a type 2 error or the power would change. So before I even look at the choices, let's think about this.

We've talked about in previous videos that if we increase our level of significance, that will increase our power and power is the probability of not making a type 2 error. So that would decrease the probability of making a type 2 error. But in this question, we're going the other way. We're decreasing the level of significance, which would lower the probability of making a type 1 error but this would decrease the power. It actually would increase the probability of making a type 2 error.

And so which of these choices are consistent with that? Well, choice A says that both the type two error and the power would decrease. Well, those don't… these two things don't move together. If one increases, the other decreases, so we rule that one out. Choice B also has these two things moving together, which can't be true. If one increases, the other decreases.

Choice C: the probability of a type II error would increase. That's consistent with what we have here and the power of the test would decrease. Yep, that's consistent with what we have here, so that looks good.

And choice D is the opposite of that; the probability of a type 2 error would decrease. So this is— they're talking about this scenario over here and that would have happened if they increased our significance level, not decreased it. So we could rule that one out as well.

Let's do another example. Asha owns a car wash and is trying to decide whether or not to purchase a vending machine so that customers can buy coffee while they wait. She'll get the machine if she's convinced that more than 30 percent of her customers would buy coffee.

She plans on taking a random sample of n customers and asking them whether or not they would buy coffee from the machine and she'll then do a significance test using alpha equals 0.05 to see if the sample proportion who say yes is significantly greater than 30 percent.

Which situation below would result in the highest power for her test? So again pause this video and try to answer it.

Well, before I even look at the choices, we can think about what her hypotheses would be. Her null hypothesis is—you could kind of view it as a status quo, no news here—and that would be that the true population proportion of people who want to buy coffee is 30 percent.

And that her alternative hypothesis is that no, the true population proportion, the true population parameter there is greater than 30 percent.

And so if we're talking about what would result in the highest power for her test—so a high power means the lowest probability of making a type 2 error. In other videos we've talked about, it looks like she's dealing with the sample size and what is the true proportion of customers that would buy coffee.

And the sample size is under her control; the true proportion isn't. Don't want to make it seem like somehow you can change the true proportion in order to get a higher power. You can change the sample size but the general principle is: the higher the sample size, the higher the power.

So you want the highest possible sample size and you're going to have a higher power if the true proportion is further from your hypothesis—your null hypothesis proportion. And so we want the highest possible n and that looks like an n of 200, which is there and there.

And we want a true proportion of customers that would actually buy coffee as far away as possible from our null hypothesis which once again would not be under Asha's control. But you can clearly see that 50 is further from 30 than 32 is. So this one, choice D, is the one that looks good.

More Articles

View All
How Spiders Use Electricity to Fly | Decoder
When you think of flying animals, what do you think of? Birds, butterflies, or bees might first come to mind, but what about spiders? Even though they don’t have wings, it turns out that spiders are actually some of nature’s best aviators. So, how do spi…
TOP 10 ECLIPSE DAY Things to know (please share) - Smarter Every Day 174
Hey, I am Destin. If there is one video you want to share about the eclipse, make it this one. Top 10 things you need to know about eclipse day in just a couple of minutes. Number 1 - Know where you’re going to watch the eclipse from. There is this thin…
What Are Atoms and Isotopes?
So what’s an atom? An atom is, um, oh man, something that builds up everything. An atom, oh that one, um, the small particle, isn’t it? That’s a very small, um, particle. An atom was the smallest indivisible part of an element. You can further divide an a…
15 Ways to Get Rich in the New Economy
People used to get rich because of oil and big industry. You had to employ thousands of people to be one of the select few that service the population in order for you to become wealthy. But now, things have changed. The way the economy works has changed.…
Under- and overstatement | Style | Grammar
Hello, grammarians! Hello, David! Hello, Rosie! So today we’re going to talk about understatement and overstatement, and I could not be more excited. This is like the coolest thing that’s happened to me all week. Oh my gosh! Really? No, I mean, I’m excit…
Photo Evidence: Glacier National Park Is Melting Away | National Geographic
All the glaciers are shrinking. In the 1800s, they were estimated to be about 150 glaciers here; however, today we only have 25 glaciers. The glaciers are measured by a number of different ways. One of the most obvious ones is using repeat photography, wh…