yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Comparing P value to significance level for test involving difference of proportions | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A veterinarian is studying a certain disease that seems to be affecting male cats more than female cats. They obtain a random sample of records from 500 cats. They find 24 of the 259 male cats have the disease, while 14 of 241 female cats have the disease.

The veterinarian uses these results to test their null hypothesis that the true proportion is the same amongst the male and female cats versus the alternative hypothesis that the proportion of males who get the disease is actually higher than the proportion of females. The test statistic was z is equal to 1.46, and the p-value was approximately 0.07. That's useful; they've done a lot of work for us.

Assume that all conditions for inference were met. At the alpha equals 0.10 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a larger proportion of male cats have the disease?

So pause this video and see if you can answer that.

All right, so remember what we do with the significance test. We assume our null hypothesis, and then given that assumption, we look at our data and we calculate a p-value. We say, "Hey, what is the probability of getting the data that we did, assuming our null hypothesis is true?" If that is lower than our significance level, then we reject the null hypothesis because we say, "Hey, assuming the null hypothesis, we got a pretty unlikely event."

We reject it, which would suggest the alternative. Here, our p-value is 0.07, which is indeed less than our alpha, which is less than our significance level—this thing right over here, 0.10. Because of that, we would reject the null hypothesis.

Rejecting the null hypothesis would suggest that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that a larger proportion of male cats have the disease. So we could say it suggests the alternative hypothesis.

On Khan Academy, there are some multiple choice questions like this, and the choice that you would pick might be something like, "Because our p-value is less than our significance level, we would reject the null hypothesis," and that would suggest the alternative.

More Articles

View All
Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person
I’ve been asked to talk to you today about an essay that I wrote, uh, for the New York Times, um, last year, which went under a rather dramatic, uh, heading. Uh, it was called “Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person.” And perhaps we can just begin, um, we’re…
Mr. Freeman, part 24
… Not bad … But I did not say that money is a bad thing. I respect every religion … as servile, as it is. Oh … yes … you do not know … Only calm down, stop splashing with your spinal cord. MONEY IS GOD. And you believe religion is Christianity, Buddhism,…
When the time is right, God sends you this video..
I don’t believe this video “Found You” by coincidence because I don’t believe in coincidences at all. I set the intention and I prayed to God, prayed to Jesus, the Holy Spirit that this message would only find the people who this will apply to. So, I’m on…
How Much Does a Shadow Weigh?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And I’m sure that we all love to have fun with hand shadows, but how much does a shadow weigh? It might sound like a silly question, because it is. I mean, a shadow cannot be put on a scale and weighed. But the material that it…
15 Things That are Mutually Exclusive in Life
Some of you are living in a paradox of choice. You desire something, but you take the exact opposite actions that would lead to that outcome. Some outcomes are mutually exclusive. Mutually exclusive means if a coin lands on heads, it cannot simultaneously…
The Stock Market Just Peaked
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, between record high inflation, imminent rate hikes, and outsized earnings, there’s no denying that there’s a lot of uncertainty and opposing viewpoints in the market right now. On the one side, we have some of the m…