yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Comparing P value to significance level for test involving difference of proportions | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A veterinarian is studying a certain disease that seems to be affecting male cats more than female cats. They obtain a random sample of records from 500 cats. They find 24 of the 259 male cats have the disease, while 14 of 241 female cats have the disease.

The veterinarian uses these results to test their null hypothesis that the true proportion is the same amongst the male and female cats versus the alternative hypothesis that the proportion of males who get the disease is actually higher than the proportion of females. The test statistic was z is equal to 1.46, and the p-value was approximately 0.07. That's useful; they've done a lot of work for us.

Assume that all conditions for inference were met. At the alpha equals 0.10 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a larger proportion of male cats have the disease?

So pause this video and see if you can answer that.

All right, so remember what we do with the significance test. We assume our null hypothesis, and then given that assumption, we look at our data and we calculate a p-value. We say, "Hey, what is the probability of getting the data that we did, assuming our null hypothesis is true?" If that is lower than our significance level, then we reject the null hypothesis because we say, "Hey, assuming the null hypothesis, we got a pretty unlikely event."

We reject it, which would suggest the alternative. Here, our p-value is 0.07, which is indeed less than our alpha, which is less than our significance level—this thing right over here, 0.10. Because of that, we would reject the null hypothesis.

Rejecting the null hypothesis would suggest that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that a larger proportion of male cats have the disease. So we could say it suggests the alternative hypothesis.

On Khan Academy, there are some multiple choice questions like this, and the choice that you would pick might be something like, "Because our p-value is less than our significance level, we would reject the null hypothesis," and that would suggest the alternative.

More Articles

View All
In Your Face - Mind Field (Ep 7)
If I asked you to show me a picture of your mother, you wouldn’t show me a, uh, closeup shot of her elbow. But you could, and you’d be right. That would be a photo of her, but it wouldn’t feel right because it’s not her face. That’s how important faces ar…
Things To Do Online #18 -- DONG!
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And today we’ve got DONG, things you can do online now, guys. Let’s begin with a recommendation from @catchfoot, supercut.org. It’s a reservoir of video collections. For instance, every Steve Buscemi death on camera. Four minut…
Accounting profit vs economic profit | APⓇ Microeconomics | Khan Academy
Let’s continue thinking about how rational agents make decisions. So here, we’re told that Sally runs a business that only sells hamburgers in a building she owns. Every month, they sell 5,000 hamburgers at five dollars per hamburger. She spends two dolla…
Why I Love The 'Comfort Zone'
We hear this one all the time: get out of your comfort zone. People tell us that success can be found in the places that we fear and that we should leave familiar territories to explore the unknown. Not getting out of your comfort zone leads to an unsucce…
Identifying unit fractions word problem | Math | 3rd grade | Khan Academy
This question says Vera’s dinner plate is divided into three equal size sections. Vera puts all her broccoli in one section, and then we’re asked what fraction of Vera’s plate has broccoli. Okay, so we have a plate with three equal size sections, and we …
The Law You Won't Be Told
On a jury, you know your options: guilty, or not. But there’s another choice that neither the judge nor the lawyers will tell you—often because they’re not allowed to, and also it might be better if you don’t know. This video will tell you that third choi…