yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using Le Chȃtelier’s principle to predict shifts in equilibrium | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Carbon monoxide will react with hydrogen gas to produce methanol. Let's say that the reaction is at equilibrium, and our job is to figure out which direction the equilibrium will shift: to the left, to the right, or not at all. As we try to make changes to the reaction at equilibrium, for example, if we add some hydrogen gas to our reaction at equilibrium, we're increasing the concentration of one of our reactants. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the net reaction will move in the direction that decreases the stress placed on the system.

So, if the stress is increased in the amount of one of the reactants, the equilibrium will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. In part B, some methanol is removed, so for decreasing the concentration of our product, the equilibrium is going to shift to make more of our product. Therefore, the equilibrium will shift to the right.

Next, the volume is increased in the reaction at equilibrium. If we increase the volume, we decrease the pressure; therefore, we could consider the stress to be decreased pressure. Le Chatelier's principle says the net reaction is going to go in the direction that relieves the stress. So, if the stress is decreased pressure, the net reaction is going to shift to increase the pressure, and we can figure out which direction that is by looking at the balanced equation.

On the reactant side, there's one mole of gas and two moles of gas for a total of three moles of gas. On the product side, there's only one mole of gas. So, there are three moles of gas on the left and only one mole of gas on the right. Since the net reaction is going to try to increase the pressure, the equilibrium shifts to the left toward the side that's going to form more moles of gas, therefore increasing the pressure.

Next, we try adding some neon gas to our reaction mixture at equilibrium. Well, neon gas is an inert gas, which means it doesn't react with any of our reactants or products. If we look at the expression for the reaction quotient, Qp, neon gas is not included. Therefore, adding neon gas is not going to change the value for Qp, so the reaction remains at equilibrium.

So, the answer is there's no shift when an inert gas is added. That might sound a little strange at first because adding neon gas means that the total pressure would increase since you're adding a gas. However, the partial pressures stay the same. So, the partial pressures for methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen gas actually stay the same; and therefore, Q doesn't change.

Next, we add a catalyst to our reaction at equilibrium. Catalysts speed up reactions by lowering the activation energy. However, the catalyst is going to speed up the forward and the reverse reactions by the same amount, and therefore the reaction remains at equilibrium. So, there's no shift when a catalyst is added to a reaction at equilibrium.

Then, in part F, let's try decreasing the temperature in the reaction at equilibrium. Well, this reaction is exothermic because delta H is less than zero, so we can treat heat as a product. So, we go ahead and write heat on the product side. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of our product. Therefore, the net reaction will move to the right to make more of the product.

When that reaction moves to the right, you can think about that being an increase in the amount of products and, therefore, a decrease in the amount of reactants. When you increase the products and decrease the reactants, you increase the value for the equilibrium constant. Therefore, lowering the temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant for an exothermic reaction.

Note that changing the temperature in part F is the only change that actually changed the equilibrium constant. So, in all the other ones, in A through E, the equilibrium constant stayed the same value.

More Articles

View All
Paul Buchheit: What are some things successful founders have in common?
So this was actually where the focused frugality obsession and love thing came from. I was actually trying to distill it down into a small enough number of words, and then I was going to try to translate it into emoji, but I failed at that part. I couldn’…
Are We Ready For Aliens?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. But what could be out there? The likelihood of extraterrestrial intelligence has been the subject of an equation, and the current lack of any communication with aliens the subject of a paradox. But here’s a different question. …
Fracking explained: opportunity or danger
What is hydraulic fracturing – or fracking? Since the industrial revolution, our energy consumption has risen unceasingly. The majority of this energy consumption is supplied by fossil fuels like coal or natural gas. Recently, there has been a lot of talk…
Catalysts | Reaction rates and equilibrium | High school chemistry | Khan Academy
In this video we’re going to talk a little bit about catalysts. So let’s first imagine that we have two reactants, and I’m going to simplify things with these overly simplified drawings. So let’s say you have this reactant right over here, and I’m drawin…
Citing evidence in literary analysis | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! The following video contains explicit content. Well, okay, not in the way you’re thinking. Uh, it doesn’t contain violence, obscenity, or profanity, or even anything that wouldn’t appear in a G-rated movie. But it will contain explicit evid…
Arteries vs. veins-what's the difference? | Circulatory system physiology | NCLEX-RN | Khan Academy
Let’s talk a little bit about arteries and veins and the roles they play in the circulatory system. So, I want you to pause this video and first think to yourself, do you have a sense of what arteries and veins are? Well, one idea behind arteries and vein…