yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using Le Chȃtelier’s principle to predict shifts in equilibrium | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Carbon monoxide will react with hydrogen gas to produce methanol. Let's say that the reaction is at equilibrium, and our job is to figure out which direction the equilibrium will shift: to the left, to the right, or not at all. As we try to make changes to the reaction at equilibrium, for example, if we add some hydrogen gas to our reaction at equilibrium, we're increasing the concentration of one of our reactants. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the net reaction will move in the direction that decreases the stress placed on the system.

So, if the stress is increased in the amount of one of the reactants, the equilibrium will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. In part B, some methanol is removed, so for decreasing the concentration of our product, the equilibrium is going to shift to make more of our product. Therefore, the equilibrium will shift to the right.

Next, the volume is increased in the reaction at equilibrium. If we increase the volume, we decrease the pressure; therefore, we could consider the stress to be decreased pressure. Le Chatelier's principle says the net reaction is going to go in the direction that relieves the stress. So, if the stress is decreased pressure, the net reaction is going to shift to increase the pressure, and we can figure out which direction that is by looking at the balanced equation.

On the reactant side, there's one mole of gas and two moles of gas for a total of three moles of gas. On the product side, there's only one mole of gas. So, there are three moles of gas on the left and only one mole of gas on the right. Since the net reaction is going to try to increase the pressure, the equilibrium shifts to the left toward the side that's going to form more moles of gas, therefore increasing the pressure.

Next, we try adding some neon gas to our reaction mixture at equilibrium. Well, neon gas is an inert gas, which means it doesn't react with any of our reactants or products. If we look at the expression for the reaction quotient, Qp, neon gas is not included. Therefore, adding neon gas is not going to change the value for Qp, so the reaction remains at equilibrium.

So, the answer is there's no shift when an inert gas is added. That might sound a little strange at first because adding neon gas means that the total pressure would increase since you're adding a gas. However, the partial pressures stay the same. So, the partial pressures for methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen gas actually stay the same; and therefore, Q doesn't change.

Next, we add a catalyst to our reaction at equilibrium. Catalysts speed up reactions by lowering the activation energy. However, the catalyst is going to speed up the forward and the reverse reactions by the same amount, and therefore the reaction remains at equilibrium. So, there's no shift when a catalyst is added to a reaction at equilibrium.

Then, in part F, let's try decreasing the temperature in the reaction at equilibrium. Well, this reaction is exothermic because delta H is less than zero, so we can treat heat as a product. So, we go ahead and write heat on the product side. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of our product. Therefore, the net reaction will move to the right to make more of the product.

When that reaction moves to the right, you can think about that being an increase in the amount of products and, therefore, a decrease in the amount of reactants. When you increase the products and decrease the reactants, you increase the value for the equilibrium constant. Therefore, lowering the temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant for an exothermic reaction.

Note that changing the temperature in part F is the only change that actually changed the equilibrium constant. So, in all the other ones, in A through E, the equilibrium constant stayed the same value.

More Articles

View All
The Cult of Conformity in Silicon Valley
Who would want to be an early employee at imeem and Justin TV? Non-conformists, like, they would never be. You know a conformist would not be caught dead working at an early stage. This is Michael Seibel with Dalton Caldwell. Today, we’re talking about co…
Homeroom with Sal & Meaghan Pattani - Tuesday, July 7
Hi everyone! Welcome to the Khan Academy homeroom. For those who are wondering what this is, this is just a forum for all of us to stay together, especially since it was started when schools closed. Obviously, summer has arrived, and I announced that scho…
The Fight to Stop Illegal Bear Trafficking in Southeast Asia | National Geographic
What I’ve seen in LA is spare cages, no bigger than, uh, 2 m by 2 m by 2 m. These animals would likely be placed in those cages as cubs and spend the duration of their lives there. We’ve seen a worrying trend with the increase in captive population of wil…
What Shark Is Attacking Tourists? | SharkFest
[dramatic music] NARRATOR: So what is behind this deadly spate of attacks? According to local news reporter Jerry Sinon, it’s a question on everyone’s mind. There was a lot of rumors in regards to the attacks. Why did it happen? And in two weeks’ time, i…
How POV affects readers | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! I want to talk to you today about point of view in literature and how it can shape what we as readers take away from a story. Now, we’ve talked about this in more basic terms before: Is a story in first, second, or third person? But I would…
Our Prayers Are With You, Boo | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
[Music] All right, man, we’ll give a prayer this morning. Everybody needs it, and we’re going to do it. Lord, we’ll come for you this morning headed out here to the east. I want to thank you for that sunshine. Well, we’re looking at our morning star, th…