yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using Le Chȃtelier’s principle to predict shifts in equilibrium | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Carbon monoxide will react with hydrogen gas to produce methanol. Let's say that the reaction is at equilibrium, and our job is to figure out which direction the equilibrium will shift: to the left, to the right, or not at all. As we try to make changes to the reaction at equilibrium, for example, if we add some hydrogen gas to our reaction at equilibrium, we're increasing the concentration of one of our reactants. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the net reaction will move in the direction that decreases the stress placed on the system.

So, if the stress is increased in the amount of one of the reactants, the equilibrium will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. In part B, some methanol is removed, so for decreasing the concentration of our product, the equilibrium is going to shift to make more of our product. Therefore, the equilibrium will shift to the right.

Next, the volume is increased in the reaction at equilibrium. If we increase the volume, we decrease the pressure; therefore, we could consider the stress to be decreased pressure. Le Chatelier's principle says the net reaction is going to go in the direction that relieves the stress. So, if the stress is decreased pressure, the net reaction is going to shift to increase the pressure, and we can figure out which direction that is by looking at the balanced equation.

On the reactant side, there's one mole of gas and two moles of gas for a total of three moles of gas. On the product side, there's only one mole of gas. So, there are three moles of gas on the left and only one mole of gas on the right. Since the net reaction is going to try to increase the pressure, the equilibrium shifts to the left toward the side that's going to form more moles of gas, therefore increasing the pressure.

Next, we try adding some neon gas to our reaction mixture at equilibrium. Well, neon gas is an inert gas, which means it doesn't react with any of our reactants or products. If we look at the expression for the reaction quotient, Qp, neon gas is not included. Therefore, adding neon gas is not going to change the value for Qp, so the reaction remains at equilibrium.

So, the answer is there's no shift when an inert gas is added. That might sound a little strange at first because adding neon gas means that the total pressure would increase since you're adding a gas. However, the partial pressures stay the same. So, the partial pressures for methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen gas actually stay the same; and therefore, Q doesn't change.

Next, we add a catalyst to our reaction at equilibrium. Catalysts speed up reactions by lowering the activation energy. However, the catalyst is going to speed up the forward and the reverse reactions by the same amount, and therefore the reaction remains at equilibrium. So, there's no shift when a catalyst is added to a reaction at equilibrium.

Then, in part F, let's try decreasing the temperature in the reaction at equilibrium. Well, this reaction is exothermic because delta H is less than zero, so we can treat heat as a product. So, we go ahead and write heat on the product side. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of our product. Therefore, the net reaction will move to the right to make more of the product.

When that reaction moves to the right, you can think about that being an increase in the amount of products and, therefore, a decrease in the amount of reactants. When you increase the products and decrease the reactants, you increase the value for the equilibrium constant. Therefore, lowering the temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant for an exothermic reaction.

Note that changing the temperature in part F is the only change that actually changed the equilibrium constant. So, in all the other ones, in A through E, the equilibrium constant stayed the same value.

More Articles

View All
Discussing Reincarnation in Hinduism | The Story of God
[Music] We think of Hinduism as having reincarnation and life after life after life. But there is really an end to that. That they’re hoping and seeking, which is to go to enlightenment. So once they’ve gone through enough, and I guess learned enough, th…
Finding Nemo's Plot Mistake - Smarter Every Day 115
[ music ] Hey, it’s me Destin, welcome back to Smarter Every Day. Tonight is… what? Family movie night! Very good, what are we going to watch tonight? What is this? Nemo! OK, let’s go. What happened to the mommy? He didn’t… he got ate, maybe. She did. [ D…
Growing Greens (Deleted Scene) | Life Below Zero
[Music] [Music] Well, I’m about out of water for water in my greenhouse, so I got to pump some water up from the river to fill up my tank. I go through a lot of water on hot sunny days. If I have a hot week, I’ll go through almost two of these tanks in on…
Wu-wei | The Art of Letting Things Happen
Once upon a time, a novice farmer indulged himself in motivational videos. He became familiar with ideas like the importance of ‘effort,’ the ‘hustle culture,’ and ‘work hard, play hard.’ After binge-watching for days, he walked onto his farm, fired up, …
If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You Happy?
A common complaint where I’m from, where I’m surrounded by lots of smart overachievers, is that happiness is for stupid people or happiness is for lazy people. A lot of times, it’s not. Runners will say, “I don’t want to be happy because I want to be succ…
How I Got the Shot: Photographing Great White Sharks off Cape Cod | National Geographic
I was trying to do something that hadn’t been done before. That’s it. Oh, I was trying to get a picture of a great white shark in Cape Cod, and that hadn’t been done. Messed up. I was using these seal decoys, swarming, doing aerial photography, using spo…