yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using Le Chȃtelier’s principle to predict shifts in equilibrium | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Carbon monoxide will react with hydrogen gas to produce methanol. Let's say that the reaction is at equilibrium, and our job is to figure out which direction the equilibrium will shift: to the left, to the right, or not at all. As we try to make changes to the reaction at equilibrium, for example, if we add some hydrogen gas to our reaction at equilibrium, we're increasing the concentration of one of our reactants. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the net reaction will move in the direction that decreases the stress placed on the system.

So, if the stress is increased in the amount of one of the reactants, the equilibrium will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. In part B, some methanol is removed, so for decreasing the concentration of our product, the equilibrium is going to shift to make more of our product. Therefore, the equilibrium will shift to the right.

Next, the volume is increased in the reaction at equilibrium. If we increase the volume, we decrease the pressure; therefore, we could consider the stress to be decreased pressure. Le Chatelier's principle says the net reaction is going to go in the direction that relieves the stress. So, if the stress is decreased pressure, the net reaction is going to shift to increase the pressure, and we can figure out which direction that is by looking at the balanced equation.

On the reactant side, there's one mole of gas and two moles of gas for a total of three moles of gas. On the product side, there's only one mole of gas. So, there are three moles of gas on the left and only one mole of gas on the right. Since the net reaction is going to try to increase the pressure, the equilibrium shifts to the left toward the side that's going to form more moles of gas, therefore increasing the pressure.

Next, we try adding some neon gas to our reaction mixture at equilibrium. Well, neon gas is an inert gas, which means it doesn't react with any of our reactants or products. If we look at the expression for the reaction quotient, Qp, neon gas is not included. Therefore, adding neon gas is not going to change the value for Qp, so the reaction remains at equilibrium.

So, the answer is there's no shift when an inert gas is added. That might sound a little strange at first because adding neon gas means that the total pressure would increase since you're adding a gas. However, the partial pressures stay the same. So, the partial pressures for methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen gas actually stay the same; and therefore, Q doesn't change.

Next, we add a catalyst to our reaction at equilibrium. Catalysts speed up reactions by lowering the activation energy. However, the catalyst is going to speed up the forward and the reverse reactions by the same amount, and therefore the reaction remains at equilibrium. So, there's no shift when a catalyst is added to a reaction at equilibrium.

Then, in part F, let's try decreasing the temperature in the reaction at equilibrium. Well, this reaction is exothermic because delta H is less than zero, so we can treat heat as a product. So, we go ahead and write heat on the product side. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of our product. Therefore, the net reaction will move to the right to make more of the product.

When that reaction moves to the right, you can think about that being an increase in the amount of products and, therefore, a decrease in the amount of reactants. When you increase the products and decrease the reactants, you increase the value for the equilibrium constant. Therefore, lowering the temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant for an exothermic reaction.

Note that changing the temperature in part F is the only change that actually changed the equilibrium constant. So, in all the other ones, in A through E, the equilibrium constant stayed the same value.

More Articles

View All
These Indoor Wildfires Help Engineers Study the Real Thing | National Geographic
Fire, especially wildfire, is a really complex phenomenon. I hear people talking about being able to control fire; I don’t think that’s something that will happen soon. But here we are, at least trying to understand fire. There are factors that affect fir…
At Night, This Bus Doubles As a Homeless Shelter | Short Film Showcase
[Music] Oh, make a lot of money. [Music] All right, you know this point out. Don’t lay it down, don’t put your feet on the seats. All right, you’re tired up against the window over there. Make it respectful for the next people that are getting off. They’r…
Bradley Cooper attempts to cross a snowy ravine on his own | Running Wild with Bear Grylls
Key things that Bradley needs to remember this morning is all the intricacies of firing that grappling gun. Then he’s got to secure that line; if necessary, use that Vector system to double up that strength. Then he’s got to commit to it and go for it bec…
Magical Misdirections | StarTalk
There’s the traditional magic trick of pulling the rabbit out of a hat, and these, and card tricks, and generally we think of our attention being sort of misdirected rather than there being an illusion. So, Suzanna, tell me about the kinds of misdirectio…
Nothing Exists But You | The Philosophy of Solipsism
The ancient Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi once dreamt he was a butterfly. He felt free, flying from flower to flower, doing the things a butterfly does. He didn’t doubt he was a butterfly and had forgotten that he was Zhuangzi. When he woke up, he realized …
Once You’re Rich Do This for Your Parents (Cheap to Expensive)
Did you know that by the time you’ve reached 19 years old, you would have already spent 95% of the time you’ll get with your parents in your lifetime? It doesn’t sound right, but it is true. You get your own life, your own family, your work, your passions…