yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using Le Chȃtelier’s principle to predict shifts in equilibrium | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Carbon monoxide will react with hydrogen gas to produce methanol. Let's say that the reaction is at equilibrium, and our job is to figure out which direction the equilibrium will shift: to the left, to the right, or not at all. As we try to make changes to the reaction at equilibrium, for example, if we add some hydrogen gas to our reaction at equilibrium, we're increasing the concentration of one of our reactants. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the net reaction will move in the direction that decreases the stress placed on the system.

So, if the stress is increased in the amount of one of the reactants, the equilibrium will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. In part B, some methanol is removed, so for decreasing the concentration of our product, the equilibrium is going to shift to make more of our product. Therefore, the equilibrium will shift to the right.

Next, the volume is increased in the reaction at equilibrium. If we increase the volume, we decrease the pressure; therefore, we could consider the stress to be decreased pressure. Le Chatelier's principle says the net reaction is going to go in the direction that relieves the stress. So, if the stress is decreased pressure, the net reaction is going to shift to increase the pressure, and we can figure out which direction that is by looking at the balanced equation.

On the reactant side, there's one mole of gas and two moles of gas for a total of three moles of gas. On the product side, there's only one mole of gas. So, there are three moles of gas on the left and only one mole of gas on the right. Since the net reaction is going to try to increase the pressure, the equilibrium shifts to the left toward the side that's going to form more moles of gas, therefore increasing the pressure.

Next, we try adding some neon gas to our reaction mixture at equilibrium. Well, neon gas is an inert gas, which means it doesn't react with any of our reactants or products. If we look at the expression for the reaction quotient, Qp, neon gas is not included. Therefore, adding neon gas is not going to change the value for Qp, so the reaction remains at equilibrium.

So, the answer is there's no shift when an inert gas is added. That might sound a little strange at first because adding neon gas means that the total pressure would increase since you're adding a gas. However, the partial pressures stay the same. So, the partial pressures for methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen gas actually stay the same; and therefore, Q doesn't change.

Next, we add a catalyst to our reaction at equilibrium. Catalysts speed up reactions by lowering the activation energy. However, the catalyst is going to speed up the forward and the reverse reactions by the same amount, and therefore the reaction remains at equilibrium. So, there's no shift when a catalyst is added to a reaction at equilibrium.

Then, in part F, let's try decreasing the temperature in the reaction at equilibrium. Well, this reaction is exothermic because delta H is less than zero, so we can treat heat as a product. So, we go ahead and write heat on the product side. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of our product. Therefore, the net reaction will move to the right to make more of the product.

When that reaction moves to the right, you can think about that being an increase in the amount of products and, therefore, a decrease in the amount of reactants. When you increase the products and decrease the reactants, you increase the value for the equilibrium constant. Therefore, lowering the temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant for an exothermic reaction.

Note that changing the temperature in part F is the only change that actually changed the equilibrium constant. So, in all the other ones, in A through E, the equilibrium constant stayed the same value.

More Articles

View All
Pigs Communicate With Humans in New Experiment | National Geographic
Similar to dogs, pigs are highly susceptible to training due to their social temperament. But little is known about how pigs communicate with humans. In a new study, researchers at Atlas LaRon University in Budapest looked at how highly socialized young p…
More Questions Than Answers | LA 92
I think it is devastating to the image of this city and especially to our police department. JOHN MACK: It’s very apparent that some– not all, but some– of those officers are clearly out of control. And they have to ultimately be willing to take a good, …
Office Hours with Kevin Hale and Qasar Younis at Startup School SV 2016
Dramatic entrance that was easy, easily pleased crowd. Uh, H we have a favor to ask of all of you guys out there. Um, how many people follow Justin on Snapchat? All right, great. So Justin’s not here. Oh, but there should be punishment for that. But there…
Bullet vs Prince Rupert's Drop at 150,000 fps - Smarter Every Day 165
All right, Keith. Prince Rupert’s drop. Prince Rupert’s drop, right? Paper submitted from 1660 to the Royal Society. So this is a very early stuff. Hey, it’s me, D. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I am in the basement of the Royal Society in London, En…
Second derivatives (vector-valued functions) | Advanced derivatives | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
So I have a vector valued function H here. When I say vector valued, it means you give me a T; it’s a function of T. So you give me a T, I’m not just going to give you a number; I’m going to give you a vector. As we’ll see, you’re going to get a two-dimen…
Building a Tree Stand in the Arctic | Life Below Zero
[Music] Gonna swing when it comes off that corner. Put it down, just let it go. Relax, it’s not gonna go anywhere. That’s a lot better there than a minute ago, swinging off the ladder. Fortunately, no accidents happened. A couple of times, some good close…