yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using Le Chȃtelier’s principle to predict shifts in equilibrium | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Carbon monoxide will react with hydrogen gas to produce methanol. Let's say that the reaction is at equilibrium, and our job is to figure out which direction the equilibrium will shift: to the left, to the right, or not at all. As we try to make changes to the reaction at equilibrium, for example, if we add some hydrogen gas to our reaction at equilibrium, we're increasing the concentration of one of our reactants. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the net reaction will move in the direction that decreases the stress placed on the system.

So, if the stress is increased in the amount of one of the reactants, the equilibrium will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. In part B, some methanol is removed, so for decreasing the concentration of our product, the equilibrium is going to shift to make more of our product. Therefore, the equilibrium will shift to the right.

Next, the volume is increased in the reaction at equilibrium. If we increase the volume, we decrease the pressure; therefore, we could consider the stress to be decreased pressure. Le Chatelier's principle says the net reaction is going to go in the direction that relieves the stress. So, if the stress is decreased pressure, the net reaction is going to shift to increase the pressure, and we can figure out which direction that is by looking at the balanced equation.

On the reactant side, there's one mole of gas and two moles of gas for a total of three moles of gas. On the product side, there's only one mole of gas. So, there are three moles of gas on the left and only one mole of gas on the right. Since the net reaction is going to try to increase the pressure, the equilibrium shifts to the left toward the side that's going to form more moles of gas, therefore increasing the pressure.

Next, we try adding some neon gas to our reaction mixture at equilibrium. Well, neon gas is an inert gas, which means it doesn't react with any of our reactants or products. If we look at the expression for the reaction quotient, Qp, neon gas is not included. Therefore, adding neon gas is not going to change the value for Qp, so the reaction remains at equilibrium.

So, the answer is there's no shift when an inert gas is added. That might sound a little strange at first because adding neon gas means that the total pressure would increase since you're adding a gas. However, the partial pressures stay the same. So, the partial pressures for methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen gas actually stay the same; and therefore, Q doesn't change.

Next, we add a catalyst to our reaction at equilibrium. Catalysts speed up reactions by lowering the activation energy. However, the catalyst is going to speed up the forward and the reverse reactions by the same amount, and therefore the reaction remains at equilibrium. So, there's no shift when a catalyst is added to a reaction at equilibrium.

Then, in part F, let's try decreasing the temperature in the reaction at equilibrium. Well, this reaction is exothermic because delta H is less than zero, so we can treat heat as a product. So, we go ahead and write heat on the product side. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of our product. Therefore, the net reaction will move to the right to make more of the product.

When that reaction moves to the right, you can think about that being an increase in the amount of products and, therefore, a decrease in the amount of reactants. When you increase the products and decrease the reactants, you increase the value for the equilibrium constant. Therefore, lowering the temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant for an exothermic reaction.

Note that changing the temperature in part F is the only change that actually changed the equilibrium constant. So, in all the other ones, in A through E, the equilibrium constant stayed the same value.

More Articles

View All
From Broke To $500,000,000 (The Empire of Ben Mallah)
So I’d like to introduce you to the most loud-mouthed, over-the-top offensive real estate mogul you’re ever going to meet: Ben Mala. “I bought it because I’m a big fat [__] business, that’s what you worry about.” He is your true rags-to-riches story, hav…
Top 5 Gratuitous B00BS in Gaming -- Wackygamer: V-LIST #4
This is Jeff and this is Adam, and we love boobs just as much as the next guy. But a gratuitous nip slip in a video game makes about as much sense as an urve platter at an orgy, which is why we decide to bring you the top five most gratuitous boob shots i…
Transforming Human Poop Into Eco-Friendly Fertilizer | Best Job Ever
I’m gonna go get in my poop dumping uniform. See you in a minute. Working with poop in Haiti may not necessarily seem like something you could really put your heart into, like a job you could really love. Okay, I’m ready! Yes, but basically we’ve create…
Dred Scott v. Sandford | The Civil War era (1844-1877) | US history | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today we’re learning more about the landmark Supreme Court case Dred Scott versus Sanford, decided in 1857. The ruling in the Dred Scott case inflamed sectional tensions over slavery, which had been growing ever more hea…
$500 MILLION DOLLARS - Smarter Every Day 179
Five hundred million dollars— that’s a lot of money! If someone just handed you five hundred million dollars and said, “Here, go do something good for society,” what would you do? I don’t know if you know it, but society is kind of divided right now. It’s…
STOICISM | How to Worry Less About Money
If there’s something that stresses people out, it’s financial problems. On March 11th, 2020, the coronavirus outbreak was officially declared a pandemic. COVID-19 not only started to threaten people’s health on a global scale; it also severely affected th…