yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using Le Chȃtelier’s principle to predict shifts in equilibrium | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Carbon monoxide will react with hydrogen gas to produce methanol. Let's say that the reaction is at equilibrium, and our job is to figure out which direction the equilibrium will shift: to the left, to the right, or not at all. As we try to make changes to the reaction at equilibrium, for example, if we add some hydrogen gas to our reaction at equilibrium, we're increasing the concentration of one of our reactants. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the net reaction will move in the direction that decreases the stress placed on the system.

So, if the stress is increased in the amount of one of the reactants, the equilibrium will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. In part B, some methanol is removed, so for decreasing the concentration of our product, the equilibrium is going to shift to make more of our product. Therefore, the equilibrium will shift to the right.

Next, the volume is increased in the reaction at equilibrium. If we increase the volume, we decrease the pressure; therefore, we could consider the stress to be decreased pressure. Le Chatelier's principle says the net reaction is going to go in the direction that relieves the stress. So, if the stress is decreased pressure, the net reaction is going to shift to increase the pressure, and we can figure out which direction that is by looking at the balanced equation.

On the reactant side, there's one mole of gas and two moles of gas for a total of three moles of gas. On the product side, there's only one mole of gas. So, there are three moles of gas on the left and only one mole of gas on the right. Since the net reaction is going to try to increase the pressure, the equilibrium shifts to the left toward the side that's going to form more moles of gas, therefore increasing the pressure.

Next, we try adding some neon gas to our reaction mixture at equilibrium. Well, neon gas is an inert gas, which means it doesn't react with any of our reactants or products. If we look at the expression for the reaction quotient, Qp, neon gas is not included. Therefore, adding neon gas is not going to change the value for Qp, so the reaction remains at equilibrium.

So, the answer is there's no shift when an inert gas is added. That might sound a little strange at first because adding neon gas means that the total pressure would increase since you're adding a gas. However, the partial pressures stay the same. So, the partial pressures for methanol, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen gas actually stay the same; and therefore, Q doesn't change.

Next, we add a catalyst to our reaction at equilibrium. Catalysts speed up reactions by lowering the activation energy. However, the catalyst is going to speed up the forward and the reverse reactions by the same amount, and therefore the reaction remains at equilibrium. So, there's no shift when a catalyst is added to a reaction at equilibrium.

Then, in part F, let's try decreasing the temperature in the reaction at equilibrium. Well, this reaction is exothermic because delta H is less than zero, so we can treat heat as a product. So, we go ahead and write heat on the product side. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of our product. Therefore, the net reaction will move to the right to make more of the product.

When that reaction moves to the right, you can think about that being an increase in the amount of products and, therefore, a decrease in the amount of reactants. When you increase the products and decrease the reactants, you increase the value for the equilibrium constant. Therefore, lowering the temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant for an exothermic reaction.

Note that changing the temperature in part F is the only change that actually changed the equilibrium constant. So, in all the other ones, in A through E, the equilibrium constant stayed the same value.

More Articles

View All
Intro to radioactive decay | Physics | Khan Academy
What comes to your mind when you hear the word radioactive? Well, for me, it was this danger, right? But in this video, we’re going to try to understand what exactly is radioactive or what does it mean and why is it so dangerous and how can the same thing…
Spend More Time Making the Big Decisions
Uh, best piece of advice for someone 24 or a new Millennial, uh, out of college, I would say, you know, just spend more time on making the big decisions. There’s basically three really big decisions that you make around that age: it’s where you live, who…
Worked example: Analyzing the purity of a mixture | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We’re told you have a solid that you know is mostly sodium chloride. You suspect that it might have, or it may have, some sodium iodide, potassium chloride, or lithium chloride as well. When you analyze a sample, you see that it contains 73% chlorine by m…
Lithium Stocks to Soar? Insider Trading Worries? Investing Taxes? - Stock Market Q&A
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! So in today’s video, we are quite simply doing a Q&A. I sent the message out on my YouTube community tab recently, and you guys left a lot of comments. So unfortunately, I’m definitely not going to be getting thr…
$1 vs $500,000 Experiences!
I’m about to show you what a half $1 million experience looks like. I promise this is going to blow your mind. In this video, you will find out why it cost a quarter of $1 million to simulate going to space. Why it costs $50,000 to explore the depths of o…
How Apocalypses Paved the Way for Humans (and terror birds) | Nat Geo Explores
Everybody thinks mass extinctions are a bad thing, and for some, yeah, they were literally the worst. But they also show how nature can bounce back. In fact, while extinctions are like a large scale delete button, they’re also a way to trigger some new am…