yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Volume with cross sections: squares and rectangles (no graph) | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

The base of a solid is the region enclosed by the graphs of ( y = -x^2 + 6x - 1 ) and ( y = 4 ). Cross sections of the solid perpendicular to the x-axis are rectangles whose height is ( x ). Express the volume of the solid with a definite integral. So pause this video and see if you can have a go at that.

All right, now what's interesting about this is they've just given us the equations for the graphs, but we haven't visualized them yet, and we need to visualize them. Or at least, I like to visualize them so I can think about this region that they're talking about. So maybe a first thing to do is think about, well, where do these two lines intersect?

So when do we have the same ( y ) value? Or another way to think about it is when does this thing equal 4? So if we set them equal to each other, we have ( -x^2 + 6x - 1 = 4 ). This will give us the ( x ) values where these two lines intersect. If we want to solve for ( x ), we can subtract 4 from both sides, and we get ( -x^2 + 6x - 5 = 0 ).

We can multiply both sides by negative 1. We will get ( x^2 - 6x + 5 = 0 ), and then this is pretty straightforward to factor. ( 1 \times 5 = 5 ) or actually, I say negative 1 times negative 5 is 5, and negative 1 plus negative 5 is negative 6. So it's going to be ( (x - 1)(x - 5) = 0 ).

These intersect when ( x = 1 ) or ( x = 5 ). Since we have a negative out front of the second degree term, we know it's going to be a downward opening parabola, and we know that we intersect ( y = 4 ) when ( x = 1 ) and ( x = 5 ). The vertex must be right in between them, so the vertex is going to be at ( x = 3 ).

Let’s actually visualize this a little bit. It’s going to look something like this. Draw it with some perspective because we have to think about a three-dimensional shape. So that's our ( y ) axis; this is our ( x ) axis. Let me draw some ( y ) values: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. This is probably sufficient.

Now we have ( y = 4 ), which is going to look something like this, so that is ( y = 4 ). Then we have ( y = -x^2 + 6x - 1 ), which we know intersects ( y = 4 ) at ( x = 1 ) or ( x = 5 ). So let's see: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

We have that point right over there: ( (1, 4) ) and then we have ( (5, 4) ). We know the vertex is when ( x = 3 ), so it might look something like this. We could substitute 3 back in here:

( y = -9 + 18 - 1 ). What is that going to be? That's going to be ( y = 8 ). So we have the point ( (3, 8) ). This is 5, 6, 7, 8—yep, right about there.

So we are dealing with a situation that looks something like this. This is the region in question, so that's going to be the base of our solid. They say cross sections of the solid perpendicular to the x-axis.

Let me draw one of those cross-sections. This is a cross-section perpendicular to the x-axis—rectangles whose height is ( x ). So this is going to have height ( x ) right over here. The height is ( x ).

Now, what is this? The width I guess we could say of this rectangle? Well, it's going to be the difference between these two functions. It's going to be the upper function minus the lower function, so that right over there is going to be ( -x^2 + 6x - 1 ) and then minus 4, which gives us the lower function.

So that could be simplified as ( -x^2 + 6x - 5 ). If we want to figure out the volume of this little section right over here, we multiply ( x ) times this and then we would multiply that times an infinitesimally small depth ( dx ).

Then we can just integrate from ( x = 1 ) to ( x = 5 ). So let's do that. The volume of just this little slice over here is going to be the base, which is ( -x^2 + 6x - 5 ), times the height ( x ), times the depth ( dx ).

What we want to do is sum up all of these, and you could imagine right over here you would have—or like right over here—you would have a cross-section that looks like this ( x ), it's now much larger; the height is ( x ).

So now it looks something like this. I'm just drawing two cross-sections just so you get the idea. So this is any one cross-section for a given ( x ), but now we want to integrate our ( x ) going from ( x = 1 ) to ( x = 5 ); ( x = 1 ) to ( x = 5 ).

And there you have it; we have expressed the volume of that solid as a definite integral. It's worth noting that this definite integral—if you distribute this ( x ), if you multiply it by all of these terms—it's very solvable. You don't need a calculator; you're just going to get a polynomial over here that you have to take the anti-derivative of in order to evaluate the definite integral.

More Articles

View All
The Secret History of Grillz | Explorer
Deep in an underwater cave on Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula, a team of archaeologists made a groundbreaking discovery: the skulls of ancient Maya, who ruled over a 4,000-year-old civilization. Perhaps most surprising was that these skulls reveal the ancient …
Action and reaction forces | Movement and forces | Middle school physics | Khan Academy
You’ve probably heard the phrase that for every force there’s an equal and opposite reaction force, and this is also known as Newton’s third law of motion. But it’s also one of the most misunderstood laws of physics. So that’s why we’re going to dig into …
Read What You Love Until You Love to Read
Before we go and talk about accountability and leverage and judgment, you’ve got a few tweets further down the line that I would put in the category of continuous learning. They’re essentially: there is no skill called business. Avoid business magazines …
Path of Stoicism: How to become a Stoic in the Modern World
We’re all pretty used to rain. We’re either prepared for it with an umbrella or raincoat, or just get wet. Rarely does it genuinely upset us. But what about when it rains for days and the streets flood so you can’t go outside? Or when you realize you can’…
Estimating with decimal multiplication
We are asked to estimate what is 2.7 times 4 roughly equal to. Pause this video and see if you can answer that. All right, so we could think of 2.7 times 4 as being roughly equal to, or some people might say as approximately equal to. Let’s see, 2.7, tha…
Fractions greater than 1 on the number line
We’re asked to move the dot to 7⁄6 on the number line, so pause this video. I can move this dot right over here, but I encourage you: pause the video and put your finger on where 7⁄6 would be on the number line. All right, now let’s work on this together…