yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Telling History: Behind the Scenes | Killing Reagan


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we strove to do, what any filmmaker should strive to do when they're doing a period piece, is to be authentic and to be absolutely real.

"Get out of here, Road's okay! Stage Coach rolling! The crow that stage Co are you hit!"

"Damn it, Jerry! I think you br my WR!"

We took great pains in being historically accurate. We had two different teams at National Geographic who were at my disposal, making sure that I got everything right. You know, there's a certain amount of artistic license that writers take. We came up with a story that is engaging and, at the same time, is flawless in terms of its research.

"Get his clothes off, please!"

So, a couple of months after the assassination attempt, all the doctors and all the nurses that were involved in saving Ronald Reagan's life put together their own little mini-documentary. They reenacted everything exactly as it happened, and so this became extraordinarily valuable to us.

"Mr. President, today we're all Republicans."

I think the thing that we've been blessed with on all of our killing Productions is, foremost, writers who are incredibly facile with the material and deeply familiar with it.

And so, they can again take something that we already have some basic walking knowledge of and transcend that. We're exposed to those things we recognize, and yet we get a different perspective on them.

I don't think we even realized when we cast Tim and Cynthia how truly lucky we were to have two people who were equally committed, deeply researched these roles, and who have such an alluring and sort of complex relationships that we were able to build on screening together.

Eric Simonson, both as a theatrical background as a writer and as a director, I think was able to bring to this sort of a dynamic that gave us an immediacy in terms of our experience of this period in history.

And then, with Rod Lurie, who is a director at the top of his forum, but one who thrives in this political forum, there was such a deep foundation of understanding and determination to tell the story as authentically, as fully, and as dramatically as possible.

And that, to me, is also what defines doing a piece like this for National Geographic.

More Articles

View All
15 Philosophies That Will Change Your Life
A single sentence could change your life. These philosophies are meant to shake you out of complacency. They’re meant to bring you back down to earth to make you aware of your presence in the world. When it hits home, it’ll give you the inspiration to get…
Q&A with YC at the Female Founders Conference 2016
Okay, so the first question that someone asked was: How does a company determine if they’re right for YC? If they should apply? Well, every startup’s right for Y Combinator. I mean, I think a lot of people say, like, “Oh, I’m too early” or “I’m too far al…
Joe Rogan brutally rejects Kamala Harris’s list of demands to appear on his podcast
The world’s biggest podcast host, Joe Rogan, has exposed a list of Kamala Harris’s demands in order to appear on his show. Following the hugely successful podcast interview between Joe Rogan and Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump, which was view…
Optimistic in India | Years of Living Dangerously
I was told that if I wanted to see how the US will play a part in India’s energy future, I should come here—a coal power plant, believe it or not, erected right in the middle of Delhi. Mr. Ambassador, nice to meet you. Nice to meet you. I love the movie …
15 Things That Are Not Missing From a Rich Person’s Home
Here is something you didn’t know. The inside of a rich person’s house is usually more expensive than the acquisition price of the property, or it’s at least coming close. When you think about rich people’s homes, you probably picture gold-plated everyth…
Examples thinking about power in significance tests | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A significance test is going to be performed using a significance level of five hundredths. Suppose that the null hypothesis is actually false. If the significance level was lowered to 100, which of the following would be true? So pause this video and se…