yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How 3-D Imaging Helps Archaeologists Preserve the Past | National Geographic


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

(Gentle instrumental music) We are in the western side of the Lambayeque Valley in the north coast of Peru. This is an area where, in the past, many, many important Pre-Columbian societies developed, particularly the Moche and the Lambayeque. This is an area that is super-interesting from many points of view: ecology, the creation of landscape, the creation of culture. And in the center of everything is this complex of pyramids called Chotuna-Chornancap.

Are we in a hurry? Yes. Damaged by water, looting, and encroachment is the biggest threat to archaeological sites all around the world. That’s why we are here in Chotuna, looking at an excavation, helping people like Carlos Wester do his work. Archaeologists have always been looking for better ways of doing their work. We’re very opportunistic. We are in the early stages of using drones for this type of work. Finally, we can fly above our excavations and take a picture that reveals everything that we have been seeing from below.

(Light instrumental music) Within a day, we can have all the pictures taken and we can have three-dimensional models. And by the next day, I will have a completely developed assessment of what to do to prevent damage produced by water. So, what one drone can do in one hour is equivalent to what we could do with traditional methods in three months. Drones only fly. They take pictures. We don’t have a real confirmation of what is below the ground, and for that, we need archaeology.

Archaeology is a destructive process. When we dig, we destroy, so we have to be extremely careful to record everything we find in the ground. We are rushing to save sites before they are destroyed. And the truth of the matter is that they are destroyed at a faster pace than we can rescue the information that they contain.

There are many reasons for studying and preserving the past. We are only the continuation of a process that started a long time ago. And many of the problems that we have today can only be solved if we look back at how we came to be the way we are.

More Articles

View All
It Takes a Village | Port Protection
For today, our goal out here is to make a duck barn so that we could have fresh eggs for the winter time. The people of Port Protection may pride themselves on being self-sufficient. I was looking for the other piece of rebar, but you only needed the one …
Hindu gods overview | World History | Khan Academy
Hinduism is often known for its large and complex pantheon of gods. The goal of this video is to give an overview of them and to think about how they are connected and how they are perceived. So, the Hindu Trinity, as it is often called, is made up of Sh…
5 Games That Will Get You Laid: V-LIST #2
Hey V saucers! My name is Danielle, and I’m back today to tell you some games that your girl will play with you, and she might actually like it. Now, one of my most recommended games to get your girlfriend to play with you is Halo 3. Halo 3 is a really, r…
Ice Breakers - Ep. 1 | National Geographic Presents: IMPACT With Gal Gadot
GAL: “I want them to feel like they don’t have to conceal what they love or who they are to conform.” This is Kameryn’s wish for the girls she coaches as a figure skater and life role model, as she reminds them to always embrace their beauty, their joy, a…
Intermolecular forces and vapor pressure | Intermolecular forces | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
So we have four different molecules here, and what I want you to think about is if you had a pure sample of each, which of those pure samples would have the highest boiling point, second highest, third highest, and fourth highest? Pause this video and try…
Neil and Katy Discuss Fingerprints and Individuality | StarTalk
Why are there seven million people? And why do each one of us have our own fingerprint? Even twins have different fingerprints, who are otherwise genetically identical. Why would you rather we were all the same? No, I’m not. Why is that more odd to you th…