yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Sampling distribution of sample proportion part 2 | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

This right over here is a scratch pad on Khan Academy created by Khan Academy user Charlotte Allen. What you see here is a simulation that allows us to keep sampling from our gumball machine and start approximating the sampling distribution of the sample proportion.

So, her simulation focuses on green gumballs, but we talked about yellow before. In the yellow gumballs, we said 60 were yellow, so let's make 60 percent here green. Then let's take samples of 10, just like we did before, and then let's just start with one sample.

So, we're going to draw one sample, and what we want to show is we want to show the percentages, which is the proportion of each sample that are green. So, if we draw that first sample, notice out of the 10, 5 ended up being green, and then it plotted that right over here under 50 percent. We have one situation where 50 were green.

Now let's do another sample. So, this sample 60 are green, and so let's keep going. Let's draw another sample, and now that one we have, we have 50 are green. So, notice now we see here on this distribution two of them had 50 green. We could keep drawing samples, and let's just really increase, so we're going to do 50 samples of 10 at a time.

So here we can quickly get to a fairly large number of samples, and here we're over a thousand samples. What's interesting here is we're seeing experimentally that our sample, the mean of our sample proportion here is 0.62. What we calculated a few minutes ago was that it should be 0.6.

We also see that the standard deviation of our sample proportion is 0.16, and what we calculated was approximately 0.15. As we draw more and more samples, we should get even closer and closer to those values, and we see that for the most part we are getting closer and closer. In fact, now that it's rounded, we're at exactly those values that we had calculated before.

Now, one interesting thing to observe is when your population proportion is not too close to zero and not too close to one, this looks pretty close to a normal distribution. That makes sense because we saw the relation between the sampling distribution of the sample proportion and a binomial random variable.

But what if our population proportion is closer to zero? So, let's say our population proportion is 10, 0.1. What do you think the distribution is going to look like then? Well, we know that the mean of our sampling distribution is going to be 10, and so you can imagine that the distribution is going to be right skewed. But let's actually see that.

So here we see that our distribution is indeed right skewed, and that makes sense because you can only get values from 0 to 1. If your mean is closer to zero, then you're going to see the meat of your distribution here, and then you're going to see a long tail to the right, which creates that right skew.

If your population proportion was close to one, well, you can imagine the opposite is going to happen. You're going to end up with a left skew, and we indeed see right over here a left skew. Now, the other interesting thing to appreciate is the larger your samples, the smaller the standard deviation.

So, let's do a population proportion that is right in between. So here this is similar to what we saw before; this is looking roughly normal. But now, and that's when we had a sample size of 10, but what if we have a sample size of 50 every time?

Well, notice now it looks like a much tighter distribution. This isn't even going all the way to one yet, but it is a much tighter distribution. The reason why that made sense, the standard deviation of your sample proportion is inversely proportional to the square root of n, and so that makes sense.

So hopefully, you have a good intuition now for the sample proportion, its distribution, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion, that you can calculate its mean and its standard deviation, and you feel good about it because we saw it in a simulation.

More Articles

View All
The Housing Market Is Going INSANE (40 Year Mortgages)
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So the banking industry is in deep trouble again, except this time it’s the entire housing market at risk. In just the last few days, bank lending has fallen by the largest amount ever on record, and the situation is gett…
New Discovery: Blood-Red Worms That Thrive in a Toxic Cave (EXCLUSIVE VIDEO) | National Geographic
These worms are small. They’re red, blood red, and they occur in well knots of worms—lots of worms together. Finding the worms in a place like sulfur cave shows that there are even places on Earth where creatures can live, where they are not connected to …
Negative frequency
I want to talk a little bit about one of the quirkier ideas in signal processing, and that’s the idea of negative frequency. This is a phrase that may not initially make any sense at all. What does it mean to be a negative frequency? Could there be a sine…
The Genius of Cycloidal Propellers: Future of Flight?
The first cycloidal propellers were thought up in the early 20th century, but now the same principles are being repurposed for modern vertical takeoff and Landing Vehicles. Later we’ll be checking out the company’s cycl Tech, who are doing just that, and …
Follow Mexico's 'Bat Man' on a Search for Vampire Bats | Short Film Showcase
[Music] To an untrained eye, you see a rainforest, but someone who has a little bit of information of what was going on there can see the effects of humans all over the place. [Music] The Maya lived here for over 1,500 years, sustaining densities that wer…
Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic
Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can’t account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because acco…