yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Impact of transforming (scaling and shifting) random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let's say that we have a random variable x. Maybe it represents the height of a randomly selected person walking out of the mall or something like that. Right over here, we have its probability distribution, and I've drawn it as a bell curve, as a normal distribution. Right over here, it could have many other distributions, but for visualization's sake, it's a normal one in this example.

I've also drawn the mean of this distribution right over here, and I've also drawn one standard deviation above the mean and one standard deviation below the mean. What we're going to do in this video is think about how this distribution, and in particular, how the mean and the standard deviation get affected if we were to add to this random variable or if we were to scale this random variable.

So let's first think about what would happen if we have another random variable, which is equal to—let's call this random variable y—which is equal to whatever the random variable x is, and we're going to add a constant. So, let's say we add—so we're going to add some constant here; I'll do a lowercase k. This is not a random variable; this is a constant. It could be the number 10.

So, if these are random heights of people walking out of the mall, well, you're just going to add 10 inches to their height for some reason. Maybe you want to figure out, well, the distribution of people's heights with helmets on or plumed hats or whatever it might be. How would that affect—the mean of y and the standard deviation of y—relate to x?

So we could visualize that. What the distribution of y would look like; instead of this—instead of the center of the distribution—instead of the mean here being right at this point, it's going to be shifted up by k. In fact, we can shift the entire distribution; it would be shifted to the right by k in this example.

Maybe k is quite large; maybe it looks something like that. This is my distribution for my random variable y here, and you can see that the distribution has just shifted to the right by k. We have moved to the right by k. We would have moved to the left if k was negative, or if we were subtracting k.

So, this clearly changes the mean; the mean is going to now be k larger. So we can write that down. We can say that the mean of our random variable y is equal to the mean of x + k. You see that right over here.

But has the standard deviation changed? Well, remember, standard deviation is a way of measuring typical spread from the mean, and that won't change. So, for a random variable x, this length right over here is one standard deviation. Well, that's also going to be the same as one standard deviation here.

This is one standard deviation here; this is going to be the same as our standard deviation for our random variable y. And so we can say the standard deviation of y of our random variable y is equal to the standard deviation of our random variable x.

So, if you just add to a random variable, it would change the mean but not the standard deviation. You see it visually here. Now, what if you were to scale a random variable? So, what if I have another random variable? I don't know, let's call it z, and let's say z is equal to some constant times x.

And so, remember, this k is not a random variable; it's just going to be a number. It could be, say, the number 2. Let's think about what would happen. So, let me redraw the distribution for our random variable x. So, let's see if k were 2. What would happen?

With this distribution, it would be scaled out. It would be stretched out by two, and since the area always has to be one, it would actually be flattened down by a scale of two as well, so it still has the same area.

So, I can do that with my little drawing tool here. Let me try to first—I'm going to stretch it out. Oops! First, actually, I'll make it shorter by a factor of two. But more importantly, it is going to be stretched out by a factor of 2. So, let me align the axes here so that we can appreciate this.

It's going to look something like this. It's going to look something like this. When you scale the random variable, this is what the distribution of our random variable z is going to look like. I'll do the z’s color so that it's clear.

You can see two things. One, the mean for sure shifted—the mean here for sure got pushed out. It definitely got scaled up, but also we see that the standard deviation got scaled. The standard deviation right over here of z has been scaled.

It actually turns out that it's been scaled by a factor of k. So, this is going to be equal to k times the standard deviation of our random variable x. And it turns out that our mean right over here, so let me write that too, our mean of our random variable z is going to be equal to—that's also going to be scaled up times—or it's going to be k times the mean of our random variable x.

So, the big takeaways here: if you have one random variable that's constructed by adding a constant to another random variable, it's going to shift the mean by that constant, but it's not going to affect the standard deviation. If you try to scale—if you multiply one random variable to get another one by some constant, then that's going to affect both the standard deviation. It's going to scale that, and it's going to affect the mean.

More Articles

View All
Radius comparison from velocity and angular velocity: Worked example | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We are told a red disc spins with angular velocity omega, and a point on the edge moves at velocity V. So they’re giving us angular velocity, and also you could view this as linear velocity, and they are both vectors, that’s why they are bold…
Interpretting exponential expression
The expression ( 5 * 2^T ) gives the number of leaves in a plant as a function of the number of weeks since it was planted. What does two represent in this expression? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own. All right, so let’s …
Why the Smart Money is Buying Alibaba Stock
So we’ve talked about the business. We’ve talked about the risks. Now I wanted to explore why our super investors are buying into Alibaba. So if you’ve been living under a rock, in Q1 Charlie Munger and Monish Pabrai were buying. Then in Q2, Monash Pabrai…
Why Are So Many Starfish Dying? | National Geographic
From Mexico all the way to Alaska, there has been a massive die-off of sea stars. The estimates are in the tens to hundreds of millions of sea stars that have died in the last couple of years. It’s one of the largest mortality events associated with a dis…
Do the ultra successful share similar characteristics?
It’s hard to say whether these ultra high net worth people, billionaires or corporate executive types, really have the same style. I think everybody has their own unique style. I think it’s part of the active negotiations; it’s just part of the game. It …
Climate 101: Deforestation | National Geographic
[Narrator] Forests cover about 30% of the planet. And the ecosystems they create play an essential role in supporting life on earth. But deforestation is clearing earth’s forest on a massive scale. And at the current rate of destruction, the world’s rainf…