yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Louis C.K., #MeToo, and accountability: Why binary thinking doesn't help | Pete Holmes | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Obviously, we're going through a spiritual evolution right now, and that involves a lot of suffering on everybody's part. And that's where growth comes. We'd all like to increase pleasure and minimize pain, but the truth is, suffering, even collective suffering that we're going through, is often the earmark that some real change is happening.

When I look at what's happening with #MeToo, my heart breaks basically for everybody involved. I think it's interesting -- I did a radio show where we were talking about Louis, and it was so interesting to me to see the comedians that saw Louis as a symbol of artistic freedom. They were arguing, "He doesn't have to apologize."

And then I was saying, "You're absolutely right, he doesn't. But wouldn't it be nice? Wouldn't it be great if he did?" Because, like it or not, he's become a symbol. And I know he never asked for that, but he's become a symbol.

And if he shared his growth -- and by the way, I'm a Louis optimist. I think he's capable of doing this, and if he sees this, I hope that he will and I'm hopeful that he will. I actually think he might. If he uses this platform and this becoming of a symbol to share his growth and his suffering and his development and his evolution, like it or not -- I know he never asked for that -- there's probably millions of people that would take that in a positive way, that would unhinge some of their calcified spots and maybe they'd grow with him.

Does he have to do that? No. But this is my point. So to these comedians, Louis represents, "Nobody tells me what I can talk about." Because he went back on stage and he was making all these dark jokes. And people were like, "Why isn't he talking about his abuse and what he did?" And they were like, "He doesn't have to."

And I was like, "Ah, OK." So to them, he's a symbol of liberty, agency, artistic freedom. Great. Fine. To other people, though -- and we need to sit in the middle of these things, not either-or; it needs to be both-and -- to other people, he represents abusers.

And page one of the abuser handbook, especially if it's in your family, is if you're abused -- and he feels like he's in our family, doesn't he? He's like a relative. He's in our homes, he's on our phones, he's in our ears. He's part of us, and so he feels familial.

And if you're going to do something like that, and we all know it, and if an abuser acts like nothing happened, that's page one of the abuser's handbook, is to be at Thanksgiving and just act like it didn't happen. So you're opening up a cosmic wound.

So, to this side, Louis becomes a symbol of deceit and abuse. Where's the truth? It's somewhere in the middle. Because on this side, I see people going -- I feel the fear -- going: "If this is how we're going to whip this person for his ugliness -- and his... ugliness is the right word -- how are they going to respond to my ugliness, maybe if it's not even of the same caliber?"

But it makes us afraid. Is this what we're going to do? Are we going to beat people up? Are we going to spit on them and shame them and strip them of everything? We get afraid. But I also -- my heart breaks, obviously, for the people that are going (this is bringing up a global unconsciousness): "When I see him, I see my abuser." It breaks my heart.

But the truth is definitely somewhere in the middle. And it's a lot quieter, I think, than we're being. Because it's real fun to ring all the bells and bang all the pots, and it feels like we're casting out demons, but I think Martin Luther King was right: light casts out darkness, you know what I mean?

And we feel so impotent and futile, especially with the president talking about grabbing pussies. And we're like, "We can't seem to affect that. Well, let's marshal ourselves. Can we clean up this?" And I hope we can and I hope we change.

And then I also can -- I'm trying to also understand both sides, and I think that's important. Because we're a very binary world. We love being either-or. You're either Red Sox or Yankees. You see it even in sexuality, you're either gay or straight, you're either male or female...

More Articles

View All
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
All right, welcome back. A big shock from a big retailer, Tractor Supply, which actually is huge, got more than 2,200 stores all across America. Last night, coming out and saying they are cutting all of their diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. That…
What we've learned in 100 Episodes - Smarter Every Day 100!!
[party whistles] Hey it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. A very special Smarter Every Day. The 100th episode, but not only that, it kind of coincided with a million subscribers, so thank you very much for your support. And because of that, …
Calculating height using energy | Modeling Energy | High School Physics | Khan Academy
So I have an uncompressed spring here, and this spring has a spring constant of 4 newtons per meter. Then, I take a 10 gram mass, a 10 gram ball, and I put it at the top of the spring. I push down to compress that spring by 10 centimeters. Let’s call that…
S&P 500 short. A present for the holidays
So no one actually knows this. It’s a big mystery as to how much money did stock investors actually make. If no one knows how much money stocks have actually returned, why do people think that it’s actually given investors back something positive? There’s…
How Far Can We Go? Limits of Humanity (Old Version – Watch the New One)
Is there a border we will never cross? Are there places we will never reach, no matter how hard we try? Turns out there are. Even with science fiction technology, we are trapped in our pocket of the universe. How can that be? And how far can we go? We li…
Worked example: rational vs. irrational expressions (unknowns) | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told let A and B be rational numbers and let B be non-zero. They had to say let B be non-zero because we’re about to divide by B. Is A over B rational or irrational? Well, let’s think about it. They’re both rational numbers, so that means that A, s…