yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Senate confirmation as a check on the judicial branch | US government and civics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

When we think about how the executive or the legislative branch have some form of check or power over the judicial branch, a key element of that is the executive's ability to appoint judges to federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. But it's not just that the president can decide who gets to be a justice; they have to be confirmed by the Senate.

What you see over here, what I'm about to play, are the confirmation hearings from Justice Sonia Sotomayor in 2009. What I hope you get from it is it's not an easy process. This is going to be a question from Senator Chuck Grassley, who's a Republican from Iowa, and he's going to be asking about whether marriage is a state or a federal question.

"So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker versus Nelson?"

"That also I thought it was a question that's pending and impending in many courts. As you know, the issue of marriage and what constitutes it is the subject of much public discussion, and there's a number of cases in state courts addressing the issue of who regulates it under what terms."

"Can I please interrupt you? I thought I was asking a very simple question based upon a precedent that Baker versus Nelson is based on the proposition that, yesterday in so many cases, whether it was Griswold, whether it's Roe v. Wade, whether it was Chevron, whether it's a whole bunch of other cases that you made reference to—the Casey case, the Gonzalez case, the League and Creative Leather Products case, the Kilo case—that you made that case to me. You said these are precedents. Now are you saying to me that Baker versus Nelson is not a precedent?"

"No sir, I just haven't reviewed Baker in a while, and so I actually don't know what the status is. If it is the court's precedent, as I've indicated in all of my answers, I will apply that precedent to the facts of any new situation that implicates it."

Always the first question.

"Well then tell me, tell me what sort of a process you might go through."

So anyway, you can see that this is not an easy process. In this situation, you have an appointment by a Democratic president and you have questions from a Republican senator. This is fairly typical. They're likely to ask more pointed questions and try to get the appointee to trip up.

If you were to see questions from a Democratic senator, they'd be more likely to ask questions that would make the nominee look a little bit better, and that tends to always be the case. If it's from the same party, they tend to try to smooth the process, while the opposition party tries to make it a little bit more difficult.

An interesting thing to think about is Justice Sotomayor eventually does get appointed to the Supreme Court, but what was the goal of Senator Grassley here in asking these questions, even if he knew that she was eventually going to be appointed?

There are other themes that we've talked about in government that he might be playing to. He might be asking these questions more for his constituents, or there might be an element of, even if a Supreme Court Justice is going to be appointed, at the end of the day, there's also the court of public opinion, so to speak.

These might be opportunities to sow some seeds of doubt or to make it a little bit more difficult for a Supreme Court Justice to, in the future, vote one way or another based on what they say during these hearings. Interesting things to talk about.

More Articles

View All
You're Just Moments Away from Success
Are you the type of person to analyze every second of the interaction you just had with someone for hours on end, or are you normal? Either way, you probably don’t think all that hard about every single detail of the decisions you make in social situation…
The Race to Win Staten Island
Back in the long, long ago, New York and New Jersey fought over the islands betwixt them. Were they New York or were they New Jersey? To determine what was whose, New York proposed a race! All islands that could be encircled in less than 24 hours would be…
Generalizabilty of survey results example | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Niketi took a random sample of 10 countries to study fertility rate and life expectancy. She noticed a strong negative linear relationship between those variables in the sample data. Here is computer output from a least squares regression analysis for usi…
The Ultimate Conspiracy Debunker
The Internet is like a breeding ground for conspiracy theories. While some are just stupid and funny, others promote ignorance and an unhealthy distrust. So we went to the Kurzgesagt lab and developed a foolproof system to destroy not all but a lot of con…
Elad Gil Shares Advice from the High Growth Handbook, a Guide to Scaling Startups
The first question I wanted to ask you: the book is called High-Growth Handbook, not the High-Growth Hanjo, just High-Growth Handbook. Given that so few companies ever make it to high growth, you know, thousands of employees, why should an average entrepr…
Watch This If You Keep Making Plans but Never Follow Through
I’m a pro procrastinator, and the only time I get motivated is the night before the deadline. When I tell this to people, oftentimes I get recommended to use a planner. Everyone recommends writing things down that I need to do, putting them in an order, b…