yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

We Can Have Explanations That Reach the Entire Universe


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

David Deutsch presents at the beginning of The Fabric of Reality this idea that you don't need to know absolutely every single fact that needs to be known in order to understand fundamentally everything that can be understood. He was presenting this vision: there are certain fundamental theories in science and outside of science. His four theories that he had were quantum theory, the theory of computation, a theory of epistemology, and evolution by natural selection. These together formed a worldview—a lens through which you could understand anything that could be understood.

I saw a beautiful video with him on YouTube where he was making the same points. He was saying you don't have to memorize and know every fact, you don't have to know where every particle moved. But if you understand the deep underlying theories behind everything, then you know at a high level how everything works. This can all be understood by a single person, a single brain, a single human being. It's accessible to anybody, and that is a jaw-droppingly powerful idea.

We can have explanations that can reach the entire universe, and it's worth going through the four that you'd mentioned. Quantum theory is one of them, the theory of computation is another one of them, the theory of evolution is another one of them, and then the theory of knowledge or epistemology is the fourth. That's the way he presented it in The Fabric of Reality.

Is it interesting that relativity is not in there? He regards quantum theory as being deeper than the theory of relativity. At some point, most physicists expect that we're going to have a unification of quantum theory and relativity. That's not to say that in that worldview we're dismissing relativity, but his guess is that quantum theory will be more foundational than what the theory of relativity is. There'll be a spacetime of the multiverse—that's why relativity doesn't appear amongst them.

More Articles

View All
Examples of bias in surveys | Study design | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
We’re told that David hosts a podcast, and he’s curious how much his listeners like his show. He decides to start with an online poll. He asks his listeners to visit his website and participate in the poll. The poll shows that 89 percent of about 200 resp…
Second derivatives | Advanced derivatives | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s say that Y is equal to 6 over x squared. What I want to do in this video is figure out what is the second derivative of Y with respect to X. If you’re wondering where this notation comes from for a second derivative, imagine if you started with you…
How to Touch Down on Mars | StarTalk
All right, so let’s back up for a minute, because your specialty was getting the thing there safely. Yes, so that the scientists could do their job. And so, would I remember from Spirit and Opportunity? They preview that the previous round of this, they h…
2015 AP Physics 1 free response 2 c and d
Let’s now tackle the rest of this problem. They say a light bulb is nonic if its resistance changes as a function of current. Your setup from part A, which we have right over here, is to be used or modified to determine whether the light bulb is nonic. H…
Can the US avoid the End of an Empire?
Is there a political solution in the US to avoid the end of Empire, or is it a function of physics? I think this is a big part of, like, Sax’s point of view that there’s a solution; we need to change these people. Or are there too many, call it, conflatin…
There, their, and they're | Frequently confused words | Usage | Grammar
Hello Grim Marians! Today, I want to talk about one of the absolute thorniest issues in usage of English, and it’s the difference between “there,” “their,” and “they’re.” If you can’t tell the difference from the way I’m saying it, that’s because it’s rea…