yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

We Can Have Explanations That Reach the Entire Universe


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

David Deutsch presents at the beginning of The Fabric of Reality this idea that you don't need to know absolutely every single fact that needs to be known in order to understand fundamentally everything that can be understood. He was presenting this vision: there are certain fundamental theories in science and outside of science. His four theories that he had were quantum theory, the theory of computation, a theory of epistemology, and evolution by natural selection. These together formed a worldview—a lens through which you could understand anything that could be understood.

I saw a beautiful video with him on YouTube where he was making the same points. He was saying you don't have to memorize and know every fact, you don't have to know where every particle moved. But if you understand the deep underlying theories behind everything, then you know at a high level how everything works. This can all be understood by a single person, a single brain, a single human being. It's accessible to anybody, and that is a jaw-droppingly powerful idea.

We can have explanations that can reach the entire universe, and it's worth going through the four that you'd mentioned. Quantum theory is one of them, the theory of computation is another one of them, the theory of evolution is another one of them, and then the theory of knowledge or epistemology is the fourth. That's the way he presented it in The Fabric of Reality.

Is it interesting that relativity is not in there? He regards quantum theory as being deeper than the theory of relativity. At some point, most physicists expect that we're going to have a unification of quantum theory and relativity. That's not to say that in that worldview we're dismissing relativity, but his guess is that quantum theory will be more foundational than what the theory of relativity is. There'll be a spacetime of the multiverse—that's why relativity doesn't appear amongst them.

More Articles

View All
A moral consequentialist property norm?
So the context of this is the social contract and one statist’s attempt to defend it. David John Wellman says, “It would be more accurate to characterize my beliefs as if there is such a thing as legitimate property, then the US legitimately owns governin…
Using specific values to test for inverses | Precalculus | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to think about function inverses a little bit more, or whether functions are inverses of each other. Specifically, we’re going to think about can we tell that by essentially looking at a few inputs for the functions and a few ou…
The ACTUAL Solution to Traffic - A Response to CGP Grey
Hello everyone. This video is a response to CGP Grey’s painful take on traffic. Now, I don’t have an issue with CGP Grey or his content in general, but I do believe that his video entitled “The Simple Solution to Traffic” is wildly misinformed and propag…
Identifying composite functions | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’re going to do in this video is review the notion of composite functions and then build some skills recognizing how functions can actually be composed. If you’ve never heard of the term composite functions, or if the first few minutes of this video loo…
Systems and Objects | Dynamics | AP Physics I | Khan Academy
Our world is extraordinarily complicated, so in physics, we’re going to have to make simplifications. Even things in our world that seem simple are extraordinarily complicated. So consider a basketball. It seems simple enough, but it’s composed of an extr…
ZOMBIE BOTTLE-OPENER! ... LÜT #24
Suck on a fish head lollipop and chew bubble gum shaped like butt cheeks. It’s episode 24 of LÜT. Vat19’s chameleon lamp detects the color of the surface it’s on and glows that color. You can also turn your iPhone into a laser pointer with an app and a sm…