yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Creating Objects That Build Themselves | Nat Geo Live


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Skylar Tibbits: We focus on designing physical components that can build themselves. So, this project proposes that you can have self-assembly at very large scales. This is interesting for construction scenarios where it's hard to get to; it's dangerous. There are extreme environments; it's hard to get people or machines, or where it's difficult to build things in space, underwater, etc. That we could potentially deposit materials and they could come together to build highly functional things. In this case, it's a ten-by-ten-by-ten space frame. When the helium dies, you're left with a large rigid structure.

The other category of research we look at is how to program physical materials to change shape and property on demand. On the top left is our materials and geometry. That's the obvious stuff. Everything we know in the physical world is made out of materials and geometry. Each one of those, though, responds to different types of energy. If you have moisture, you might want to use wood. If you have metal, you might want to use heat to activate it. And the way that we design the geometry and how those materials come together creates mechanical transformation and allows us to control how it folds, curls, bends, or twists.

And we've released three materials so far. The first one is programmable carbon fiber, textiles, and wood. With wood, there's a long history of using wood as an active building material. From Japanese joinery that would use moisture to make more precise tight joints to contemporary examples. But there's two main problems. One of the problems is that there's a lot of energy that goes into forcing plywood to form into arbitrary shapes. You have to force it, steam it, and have molds. The other is that you are constrained by the grain direction that you can find in the forest.

So, we print wood; we actually deposit wood. We chop it up into a pulp with sawdust and adhesive or plastics; we're able to print different grain directions. Two-dimensional patterns, three-dimensional patterns that allow it to fold, curl, twist and go from any one arbitrary shape into any other arbitrary shape. So, we believe that today we program computers and machines, and tomorrow we'll program matter itself. Thank you. (applause)

More Articles

View All
The Secret of Great Photography: "Getting Access" | Nat Geo Live
While I was living in India, the biggest door of my career opened. I pitched a story to National Geographic, and it was to go and tell the story about the last, hand-pulled rickshaw pullers who were living in Calcutta. Word was that they were going to ban…
LC natural response intuition 2
We’ve been working on an intuitive description of the natural response of an LC circuit, and in the last video, we got everything set up. Now we’re ready to close the switch. Let’s close our switch, and now our switch is closed again. What happens? Well,…
The Venus Project: mistakes that advocates make
So there’s been an exchange between Stefan Molyneux and Peter Joseph on YouTube lately, and I’ve been commenting on both videos and communicating with advocates of the Venus Project. In this video, I’ll try to correct some of the most important misconcept…
FLY | Trailer (IMAX) | National Geographic Documentary Films
Freaking out, you shake him and give me 10 seconds. Okay, okay, have a nice one. Okay, 3, 2, 1! There’s this feeling when you left the object; it’s a form of just absolute bliss, and you want it again, and you want it again. When Jim and I started jumpin…
There Is No End of Science
That’s an excellent example of what’s called a crucial test, which is sort of the pinnacle of what science is all about. If we do a test and it doesn’t agree with a particular theory that we have, that’s problematic. But that doesn’t mean that it refutes …
Comparing fractions word problems
We’re told that Katie made a table to show how much time she spent on homework last week. So, we can see the different subjects and then how much she spent in terms of hours. So, on math, she spent three-fourths of an hour, reading seven-eighths of an ho…