yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Creating Objects That Build Themselves | Nat Geo Live


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Skylar Tibbits: We focus on designing physical components that can build themselves. So, this project proposes that you can have self-assembly at very large scales. This is interesting for construction scenarios where it's hard to get to; it's dangerous. There are extreme environments; it's hard to get people or machines, or where it's difficult to build things in space, underwater, etc. That we could potentially deposit materials and they could come together to build highly functional things. In this case, it's a ten-by-ten-by-ten space frame. When the helium dies, you're left with a large rigid structure.

The other category of research we look at is how to program physical materials to change shape and property on demand. On the top left is our materials and geometry. That's the obvious stuff. Everything we know in the physical world is made out of materials and geometry. Each one of those, though, responds to different types of energy. If you have moisture, you might want to use wood. If you have metal, you might want to use heat to activate it. And the way that we design the geometry and how those materials come together creates mechanical transformation and allows us to control how it folds, curls, bends, or twists.

And we've released three materials so far. The first one is programmable carbon fiber, textiles, and wood. With wood, there's a long history of using wood as an active building material. From Japanese joinery that would use moisture to make more precise tight joints to contemporary examples. But there's two main problems. One of the problems is that there's a lot of energy that goes into forcing plywood to form into arbitrary shapes. You have to force it, steam it, and have molds. The other is that you are constrained by the grain direction that you can find in the forest.

So, we print wood; we actually deposit wood. We chop it up into a pulp with sawdust and adhesive or plastics; we're able to print different grain directions. Two-dimensional patterns, three-dimensional patterns that allow it to fold, curl, twist and go from any one arbitrary shape into any other arbitrary shape. So, we believe that today we program computers and machines, and tomorrow we'll program matter itself. Thank you. (applause)

More Articles

View All
Watch One Family's Journey Through A Life-Changing Face Transplant | National Geographic
I love you. You just make sure you have to be dreams, okay? That’s ever. I love you. We’re just outside the door. You’re a great hand into the best. All right, okay? We invent the wrong McDonald’s house as a last week. Two years, there’s so many different…
The Japanese Government Wants You to Date | Explorer
[music playing] FRANCESCA FIORENTINI (VOICEOVER): Here in the Japanese countryside, some of Japan’s most eligible bachelors are waiting to meet their mates. The mayor is here. Parents are here. Eligible bachelors and bachelorettes are here. FRANCESCA FI…
Chad Rigetti at Startup School SV 2016
Everybody, our next speaker is Chad Retti from Retti Quantum Computing. Retti Quantum Computing went through YC in the summer of 2014. Um, at that point they had nothing. Uh, they are now one of the leading Quantum Computing companies in the world. And ne…
Squire, Edlyft, Promise: The Journey, Challenges, & Impact
My co-founder Dave and I didn’t have any history working in the barbershop industry or in tech for that matter. Both of us had been going to barber shops for years. I started going as a kid, around six or seven, with my dad. It was like 20 years later, an…
Why Being Busy is Ruining Your Life
Hey, it’s Joey. What could be better ideas? So, a lot of people think being busy is a good thing, as if picking up pieces of paper and putting them back down again, writing emails, and, you know, walking around checking your watch, and basically just havi…
Alpha decay | Physics | Khan Academy
Why doesn’t our periodic table go on forever? Why don’t we have, for example, elements with 300 protons? So, say, a TH000 protons. Well, the short answer is because the heavier the elements, the more unstable they become. For example, elements about atomi…