yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Why would NASA outsource missions to SpaceX? | Peter Ward


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

One of the greatest criticisms leveled at NASA is that they don’t take enough risk, and that’s for good reason. You’ve seen that they have had tragedies in their past. They had the Challenger disaster. They’ve had two tragedies in the shuttle program alone. And we saw whole crews die in those.

And that makes you nervous. That’s bad for PR. That’s bad for a government. That’s bad for a president. If you see these national heroes who are supposed to be going into space to further the species and get glory for the country, and they don’t come back, that aside from being a terrible, terrible thing is also extremely bad PR, and it did affect NASA a lot.

And what we’ve seen now is NASA has shifted some of that risk. NASA’s role has changed. Back then they would be a contractor, and they would tell companies to build them a specific part of a rocket. But they would do the whole mission themselves.

Now we see NASA is more of a client, so it’s shifted the responsibility and the risk to SpaceX. SpaceX is basically selling NASA a ride to the international space station. So if something were to go wrong—and thankfully as the years go on it’s less likely that something will go wrong—NASA doesn’t have as much of that risk.

It doesn’t have as much responsibility, I guess. It will come under fire for hiring SpaceX, but ultimately anything bad that would happen would be on SpaceX’s shoulders. So you’ve seen NASA has switched, has taken the risk and put it onto the private companies.

And the private companies are much better equipped to deal with that risk. They don’t have to elect their CEO every four years, for example. They don’t have to answer to a whole country, and they can go ahead and do things that other people couldn’t.

And you’ve seen it in America in the past, actually. You saw the railroad expansion. America used private companies to do that. It wasn’t the government. They gave them huge amounts of land and said go and build us a railroad system, and there are actually a lot of similarities between those two scenarios.

A lot of people see Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin as the railroad companies who are being tasked with connecting us with another frontier, essentially.

More Articles

View All
Gupta Dynasty | World History | Khan Academy
In previous videos, we talked about the emergence of the Morya Empire around 322 BCE, shortly after the invasion of Alexander the Great, as the first truly great Indian empire that unifies most of the Indian subcontinent. Now, that empire eventually falls…
REAL CYCLOPS SHARK and more great images -- IMG! #46
Rober De Niro and Rober De Faro and shoelace love. It’s episode 46 of IMG! Here’s a great infographic about New Year’s resolutions. For instance, 88% of them fail. But you see these images of cats? They are cat scans. For something sweet, check out SCAND…
The Stock that's Getting Worse as the Economy Gets Better...
Well, things are starting to look up. Vaccines are being distributed, lockdowns are being lifted—unless, of course, you live in Australia. But businesses are opening up, and the economy is starting to recover. However, for one very well-known company, th…
15 Things You Should Learn from the Greatest Empires’ Mistakes
These Empires conquered, and these Empires fell. Just like we learned from their success stories, yesterday we can learn from their failures today. Every move they made can be scaled down from a rule that reached hundreds of thousands of people across the…
Follow Mexico's 'Bat Man' on a Search for Vampire Bats | Short Film Showcase
[Music] To an untrained eye, you see a rainforest, but someone who has a little bit of information of what was going on there can see the effects of humans all over the place. [Music] The Maya lived here for over 1,500 years, sustaining densities that wer…
What Are You?
Are you your body? Well, kind of, right? But is there a line where this stops being true? How much of yourself can you remove before you stop being you? And does the question even make sense? Your physical existence is cells, trillions of them, at least …