yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Why would NASA outsource missions to SpaceX? | Peter Ward


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

One of the greatest criticisms leveled at NASA is that they don’t take enough risk, and that’s for good reason. You’ve seen that they have had tragedies in their past. They had the Challenger disaster. They’ve had two tragedies in the shuttle program alone. And we saw whole crews die in those.

And that makes you nervous. That’s bad for PR. That’s bad for a government. That’s bad for a president. If you see these national heroes who are supposed to be going into space to further the species and get glory for the country, and they don’t come back, that aside from being a terrible, terrible thing is also extremely bad PR, and it did affect NASA a lot.

And what we’ve seen now is NASA has shifted some of that risk. NASA’s role has changed. Back then they would be a contractor, and they would tell companies to build them a specific part of a rocket. But they would do the whole mission themselves.

Now we see NASA is more of a client, so it’s shifted the responsibility and the risk to SpaceX. SpaceX is basically selling NASA a ride to the international space station. So if something were to go wrong—and thankfully as the years go on it’s less likely that something will go wrong—NASA doesn’t have as much of that risk.

It doesn’t have as much responsibility, I guess. It will come under fire for hiring SpaceX, but ultimately anything bad that would happen would be on SpaceX’s shoulders. So you’ve seen NASA has switched, has taken the risk and put it onto the private companies.

And the private companies are much better equipped to deal with that risk. They don’t have to elect their CEO every four years, for example. They don’t have to answer to a whole country, and they can go ahead and do things that other people couldn’t.

And you’ve seen it in America in the past, actually. You saw the railroad expansion. America used private companies to do that. It wasn’t the government. They gave them huge amounts of land and said go and build us a railroad system, and there are actually a lot of similarities between those two scenarios.

A lot of people see Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin as the railroad companies who are being tasked with connecting us with another frontier, essentially.

More Articles

View All
A Rare Look at the Secret Life of Orangutans | Short Film Showcase
Something like seven million years ago, there was nothing like a human on Earth. There was not even a pre-human standing upright; there were simply great apes, very much like the ones that live with us today. [Music] I was crossing the river at dawn. It…
Finding missing side when given area | Math | 3rd grade | Khan Academy
The picture has an area of 80 square cm. What is the width of the picture? So here’s our picture: this super fun giraffe listening to music. Our picture’s shape is a rectangle, and we’re asked to find the width of that rectangle. Well, maybe we don’t kn…
Warren Buffett: "Rule #1: Never lose money. Rule #2: Never forget rule #1."
Warren Buffett: The first rule of investment is: Don’t lose. And the second rule of investment is: Don’t forget the first rule. And that’s all the rules there are. I mean, if you buy things for far below what they’re worth, and you buy a group of them, yo…
Meet Six Rescued Rhinos That Survived Poaching | Short Film Showcase
Dingle, darlin’, lion’s den. They both lost their horns to poaching. They hit Worden family one day. Nice. How could the other panic? In his voice he said, “Are you, are you nuts? Press!” I said, “I said game drivers has come in, reported they were raided…
Safari Live - Day 174 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. A very good afternoon everybody and everyone, and a very warm welcome also to our sunset safari drive all the way from the K…
Stock Splits are Secretly Pumping the Stock Market
Stock splits, they’re supposed to be totally irrelevant, right? They don’t change anything about the company, they don’t change anything about the valuation, they don’t change anything about the investing thesis. Well, bizarrely, stock splits are somehow …