yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Why would NASA outsource missions to SpaceX? | Peter Ward


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

One of the greatest criticisms leveled at NASA is that they don’t take enough risk, and that’s for good reason. You’ve seen that they have had tragedies in their past. They had the Challenger disaster. They’ve had two tragedies in the shuttle program alone. And we saw whole crews die in those.

And that makes you nervous. That’s bad for PR. That’s bad for a government. That’s bad for a president. If you see these national heroes who are supposed to be going into space to further the species and get glory for the country, and they don’t come back, that aside from being a terrible, terrible thing is also extremely bad PR, and it did affect NASA a lot.

And what we’ve seen now is NASA has shifted some of that risk. NASA’s role has changed. Back then they would be a contractor, and they would tell companies to build them a specific part of a rocket. But they would do the whole mission themselves.

Now we see NASA is more of a client, so it’s shifted the responsibility and the risk to SpaceX. SpaceX is basically selling NASA a ride to the international space station. So if something were to go wrong—and thankfully as the years go on it’s less likely that something will go wrong—NASA doesn’t have as much of that risk.

It doesn’t have as much responsibility, I guess. It will come under fire for hiring SpaceX, but ultimately anything bad that would happen would be on SpaceX’s shoulders. So you’ve seen NASA has switched, has taken the risk and put it onto the private companies.

And the private companies are much better equipped to deal with that risk. They don’t have to elect their CEO every four years, for example. They don’t have to answer to a whole country, and they can go ahead and do things that other people couldn’t.

And you’ve seen it in America in the past, actually. You saw the railroad expansion. America used private companies to do that. It wasn’t the government. They gave them huge amounts of land and said go and build us a railroad system, and there are actually a lot of similarities between those two scenarios.

A lot of people see Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin as the railroad companies who are being tasked with connecting us with another frontier, essentially.

More Articles

View All
Making Something Social Destroys the Truth of It
Making something social destroys the truth of it because social groups need consensus to survive. Otherwise, they fight; they can’t get along. Consensus is all about compromise, not about truth-seeking. Science was this unique discipline, at least in Natu…
What Science Tells Us About Living Longer | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
Foreign s have always been interested in finding ways to live longer. The oldest surviving story in recorded history is Mesopotamia’s 4,000-year-old Epic of Gilgamesh, and this desire shows up even there. After the death of a close friend, our hero Gilgam…
The importance of taking a break
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So let’s talk about a topic that seems taboo for a lot of these business motivation mindset channels, and that’s the topic of vacation and taking a break. That’s almost like shunned upon in all of these channels that …
What feels like play to you, but looks like work to others?
I think for everybody there is something that they do that other people think is work but is effortless for them. Their friends will basically say to them, “Oh, I can’t believe you can just do that without hating it.” Everyone’s got something like that, a…
The funky -ed irregular verb | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello, Garans. We’re talking about irregular verbs, that is to say, verbs that aren’t formed like regular verbs. To give you a taste of what regular verbs look like, just as a refresher, let’s take the word “walk.” Let’s put it in the present tense. Now…
Ratios with tape diagrams (part:whole)
[Instructor] We’re told that Peni wrote a survey with open-ended and multiple-choice questions. The diagram shows the ratio of the question types. So what it shows us is that for every one, two, three, four, five open-ended questions, there are one, two, …