yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Molecular evidence for evolutionary relationships examples | High school biology | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

An investigation was carried out on four different plant species to determine which of three species was most closely related to an unknown plant species. The results of the investigation are shown in the data table below. Which plant species appears to be most closely related to the unknown species? Support your answer. So, pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, so here in this data, the first row is for our unknown species. We know that it tests positive for enzyme M. This is blanked out because this says how many differences in amino acid sequences are there between the species in that row and the unknown species. Of course, the unknown species would have zero differences because it is itself. Then this is the gel electrophoresis banding pattern.

So what we want to do is look for as many similarities as possible to our unknown plant species. First, if we looked at the enzyme, whether we test positive for it: species one does not test positive, while species 2 and 3 do. So, species 1 is not looking good. If we look at differences in amino acid sequences, species 1 once again has the most differences in amino acid sequences. This confirms our belief that it might be the most different plant from the unknown plant species.

But then, if we look between plant species 2 and 3, plant species 2 has fewer differences. So right now, plant species 2 is looking like the leading candidate. Plant species 3 has more differences. Then when we look at the gel electrophoresis banding pattern, plant species 2 has the exact same pattern as our unknown plant. That's the only one with the exact same pattern.

Because of that, I'm feeling really good saying that species 2 is most closely related to the unknown species: 2 because same banding pattern, and we could say least different amino acid sequences and tests positive for enzyme M. Let's do another question like this.

Scientists attempted to determine the evolutionary relationships between three different finch species: A, B, and C. In order to do this, they examined the physical characteristics and DNA of these species. DNA was extracted from all three species and analyzed using gel electrophoresis. The results are shown in the diagram.

Then they ask us which statement best describes the method used above to determine the evolutionary relationships between three species of finches. The first choice is: examine the structure of the beaks and compare them. Statement two: observe behavioral and physical characteristics of all the finches and group them by similarities. Choice three: obtain molecular evidence from all three species and identify similarities. Choice four: compare common ancestors of all three of the species and see if they are the same. So, pause this video and see which choice you like.

All right, well, clearly they're looking at molecular evidence. They're taking the DNA of the different species, amplifying them, which means they're making a bunch of copies of certain sequences of that DNA, and then they're running a gel. This means they allow those different segments to separate on this gel. The smaller segments are going to migrate down further, while the larger segments are going to migrate less far.

The more similarities you have on this gel electrophoresis right over here, this banding pattern, the more similar that DNA probably is. So, they are definitely using molecular evidence, and three is the only one that talks about molecular evidence. I will go with choice three.

They did say in the beginning that they examined physical characteristics and DNA of these species, so you could maybe say examine the structure of the beaks and compare them, but that's very specific. It didn't say for sure that they're doing that. That may be one of the physical characteristics that they're looking at, but we know for sure that they're obtaining molecular evidence from all three species and identifying the similarities.

Now, this next part says based on the data they collected using gel electrophoresis, label the branching tree diagram below, writing the letters A, B, and C to represent the possible evolutionary relationships between species A, B, and C. So, pause this video and see if you can figure this out, and I'll show you the banding pattern again.

All right, so down there, and actually, I'll redraw it up here. They draw a tree that looks like this. They want us to put A, B's, and C's in these blanks here. One way to think about it is these two are more closely related; they have a more recent common ancestor than this one over here.

If we look at the banding patterns, it's pretty clear we have this similar band on A and B. They have this band right over here in common, although C shares that one as well. The only other band that A shares in common with C is this one right over here, and B doesn't share anything else in common with C. So, it's pretty clear that A and B share the most common banding patterns.

So I would write that A and B have the most recent common ancestor, and that C is more distant.

More Articles

View All
Why It’s Hard to Forecast the Weather | National Geographic
People have short memories, and you’re only as good as your last forecast. So, if you mess up a forecast, especially a high impact forecast, people will remember that. A 3-day forecast today is about as accurate as a 1-day forecast was in the 1970s. If yo…
Solving equations by graphing: graphing calculator | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
We are told we want to solve the following equation: that the negative natural log of 2x is equal to 2 times the absolute value of x minus 4, all of that minus 7. One of the solutions is x is equal to 0.5. Find the other solution. They say hint: use a gra…
Multiplying fractions by whole numbers word problem | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy
Rishi spent 34s of an hour for 2 days working on his science project. Kyle spent 1⁄4 of an hour for six days working on his science project. Who spent more time on his science project? So we want to know who spent more time. To do that, we need to first …
Don’t Chase Happiness - Become Antifragile | Marcus Aurelius | Stoicism
We often think of strength as the ability to withstand enormous force without breaking. But true strength, as the Stoics taught us, isn’t just about enduring. It’s about thriving because of adversity, not in spite of it. This idea, known as anti-fragility…
Avoiding common mistakes in historical essays | US History | Khan Academy
I want to talk about how to avoid some common mistakes when you’re writing a historical paper. This could apply to a term paper, to a blue book essay, even really to your master’s thesis if you wanted to. I want to talk about three phrases that you might …
Finding Water in the Desert | Primal Survivor
(VOICEOVER)- The riverbed is bone dry. But the trees are still alive. So that means that there’s still water here somewhere. And if you pay enough attention, the desert will show you where to look. I’m just looking at these four-leaf ferns here. There’s m…