yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

3 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is Awesome! 3/3


3m read
·Nov 2, 2024

Three reasons why we should continue using nuclear energy.

One: nuclear energy saves lives. In 2013, a study conducted by NASA found that nuclear energy has prevented around 1.8 million deaths. Even if you include the death tolls from Chernobyl and Fukushima, nuclear energy ranks last in death per energy unit produced. While nuclear waste is really toxic, it’s usually stored somewhere, while the toxic byproducts of fossil fuels are pumped into the air we breathe every day. So, just by reducing the amount of fossil fuels burned, countless cases of cancer or lung disease and accidents in coal mines have been avoided. If we can choose between lots of dangerous stuff being put into a deep hole and lots and lots and lots of dangerous stuff being pumped into the atmosphere, the former seems more logical. Nuclear energy feels way more dangerous, though. Single catastrophic events burn into our memory, while coal and oil kill silently. It’s like the death rate of flying versus driving. Even in the best-case scenario, it would take at least forty years to switch to 100%-renewable energy. So, for as long as we continue using fossil fuels, nuclear energy will save way more lives than it destroys.

Two: nuclear energy reduces CO₂ emissions. Nuclear energy is arguably way less harmful to the environment in terms of climate change than fossil fuels, our main source of energy. Since 1976, about 64 gigatons of greenhouse gas emissions have not been pumped out thanks to nuclear energy. And by the mid-21st century, that could amount to an additional 80–240 gigatons. Humanity’s energy consumption is rising steadily. According to US government projections, China alone will add the equivalent of a new 600-MW coal plant every 10 days for the next 10 years. China already burns 4 billion tons of coal each year. Coal is cheap, relatively abundant, and easy to get to. So it’s not likely that humanity will stop using it soon. Nuclear energy might be the only way of dampening the effects of climate change and preventing a catastrophic man-made global warming. Compared to the other things we do, nuclear energy is relatively clean. So, even if it is a good idea to quit nuclear energy long-term, it might be a good solution for the next hundred years or so, compared to the alternatives.

Three: new technologies. Maybe technology will solve the problem of nuclear waste and dangerous power plants. The nuclear reactors we’ve used so far are mostly outdated technology because nuclear innovation stopped in the 1970s. There are models, like the thorium reactor, that could solve the problem altogether. Thorium is abundant, really hard to turn into nuclear weapons, and up to two orders of magnitude less wasteful than current nuclear reactors. The waste material might also be only dangerous for a few hundred years, in contrast to a couple of thousand years. 1 ton of thorium is estimated to provide the same amount of energy as 200 tons of uranium or 3.5 million tons of coal. So while we cannot know for sure if alternative nuclear technology will keep its promises, shouldn’t we at least do more research before we forego an opportunity to solve lots of humanity’s current problems? It may not be an easy challenge, but that hasn’t stopped us before.

So, should we use nuclear energy? There are risks involved in any great human endeavor, and we have to make an informed decision, rather than rely on gut feeling. If you want to hear the other side of the argument, or a short introduction to nuclear energy, click here.

More Articles

View All
If NASA Wasn't Broke
The impact of NASA is undeniable. They have the ability to burn the importance and results of pure physics, math, engineering, and science in general into the minds of everyone they reach. Go into any middle school science classroom and you’ll see posters…
Wolf Scraps For Dinner | The Great Human Race
They’ve devoured it. There’s no reason to put ourselves in danger. We’re going to let these wolves finish eating this carcass and take off. I think they’re losing interest; they got to be full. With food options limited in the frozen tundra, Ice Age man …
Fourier series coefficients for cosine terms
So we’ve been spending some time now thinking about the idea of a Fourier series, taking a periodic function and representing it as the sum of weighted cosines and sines. Some of you might say, “Well, how is this constant weighted cosine or sine?” Well, y…
Summarizing nonfiction | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers. Today I’m going to be talking about the skill of summary, which you might be familiar with in the form of summarizing stories. It’s like a retelling, but shorter and in your own words. This is an important skill – summarizing fiction – but …
Constitutional powers of the president | American civics | US government and civics | Khan Academy
So this is here, um, I’m here with Jeffrey Rosen, head of the National Constitution Center, and we’re going to talk about Article Two of the United States Constitution. So, Jeffrey, what does Article Two deal with? It deals with the executive power, the…
Why I'm NOT Investing in Bitcoin! | Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary & Anthony Pompliano
You you and I originally clashed, if you want to call it that, around a topic that you’re so engrained with. It’s part of your brand; it’s bitcoin. I’m like everybody else saying, “If it works, I should own some,” but frankly all I’ve seen so far is volat…