yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
My Problem Spending Money
What’s up, you graham? It’s guys here, and today we’re going to be talking about why I save so much money. Because over the last few years, I’ve been called quite a few things, ranging anywhere from stingy, cheap, thrifty, frugal, economical, a penny pinc…
What Happens if Earth Suddenly Stops Rotating? #kurzgesagt #shorts
What happens if the Earth suddenly stops rotating? A thing that isn’t attached to its surface remains at its initial speed—not just cars, buildings, and people, but also water and our atmosphere—causing giant tsunami waves and global windstorms. Areas ne…
How Fear and Anxiety Drove Human Evolution | Nat Geo Explores
The heart races. Deep breaths are hard to find. Blood rushes through the body; that’s fear. Anxiety, scientifically, we tend to talk about fear as being a response to immediate threats, which is right there in front. First, anxiety is where there’s the po…
Newton's law of gravitation | Physics | Khan Academy
The mass of the Earth is about 6 * 10 ^ 24 kg. But you know what? I always wondered, how did we figure this out? How on Earth do you figure out the mass of a planet? Well, we did that by using Newton’s universal law of gravity, and in this video, we’re go…
It’s Rare to Have Competing, Viable, Scientific Theories
Edition that’s similar to Bayesianism, isn’t it? In both cases, they’re assuming that you can enumerate all the possible theories, but you can’t, because that’s the creativity coming in. It’s very rare in science to have more than one viable theory in phy…
10 Things I Stopped Buying | Financial Minimalism
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So throughout my entire life, I’ve always made a conscious effort to evaluate my spending, cut back on what isn’t necessary, and focus on clearing out the clutter. But this year absolutely threw us all for a curveball…