yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Fish Wheel Harvest - Deleted Scene | Life Below Zero
[Music] I’ve had my fish whe running for a few hours now while I’ve been at home taking care of the dogs and doing some other chores. Coming back here, check it, see what I’m catching. This is a big thing for me because it’s going to relieve me financiall…
How to make 2024 the best year of your life
3 2 1 New Year’s resolutions. The helpful tool, or a stressful mandate that society seems to expect of us every year? Probably both! If you’re like me, you think about making a list of what you want to accomplish or the type of person you want to become …
Warren Buffett: What Most Investors Don't Understand About Risk
Can you please elaborate your views on risk? You clearly aren’t a fan of relying on statistical probabilities, and you highlight the need for 20 billion dollars in cash to feel comfortable. Why is that the magic number, and has it changed over time? Yeah…
BEST IMAGES OF THE WEEK: IMG! episode 6
A pizza topped with other smaller pizzas and Chewbacca gone bad. It’s episode 6 of IMG. As fall approaches, BuzzFeed brings us pugs wearing jackets—103 pictures of pugs wearing jackets. But don’t worry, by the time this cat catches the balloons, you will …
A Conversation on Hard Tech with Eric Migicovsky
Welcome! We have Eric here today. So, Eric is a YC partner. He was previously the CEO and founder of Pebble, which went through the YC batch all the way back in the winter of 2011. A long time ago! You’re gonna find Eric. Now we have the other building on…
Being Unhappy Is Very Inefficient
Besides, I’m too smart for it. The other objection is I don’t want it to lower my productivity. I don’t want to have less desire or less work ethic. Fact-check, and that is true. The more happy you are, the more content and peaceful you are. That’s less l…