yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
I got a CUSTOMIZED Credit Card from ZHC
Do you know about how much every single month you would just spend just on yourself? [Applause] Whatever we make, we spend. What’s the most you’ve spent for a video? Like anywhere from 300,000 to—Wow! What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So if you’ve sp…
Destination Delicious: Experiencing Austin with an Appetite for Adventure | National Geographic
Foreign photography leads you to magic places that you wouldn’t go without the camera. [Music] Curiosity is sort of like the fundamental thing that, as a documentary photographer, you have to have. That’s why I became a photographer. I work a lot in the A…
Inside Bill Gates’ 2021 Stock Portfolio
[Music] So Bill Gates, we all know him, we all love him. He is currently the fourth richest person in the whole world, and we know him because these days he uses his wealth to fund the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which does fantastic charity work a…
What Is The Scariest Thing?
[Michael breathing heavily] [laughing nervously] Everyone is scared of something. But is there something that everyone is scared of? What is the scariest thing possible? ♪ [Michael] So what is the scariest thing? - Is it thunder? - [thunder crackles] Shad…
The Mobile Home Economics | Explorer
[music playing] Frank Rolfe? Yes. Billy Mintz. Hi, Billy. How are you? BILLY MINTZ (VOICEOVER): Frank Rolfe’s company is the fifth largest owner of mobile home parks in the United States. BILLY MINTZ: Beautiful place. FRANK ROLFE: Thank you very…
Quotient rule | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is introduce ourselves to the Quotient Rule, and we’re not going to prove it in this video. In a future video, we can prove it using the Product Rule, and we’ll see it has some similarities to the Product Rule. But her…