yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
STOICISM | The Power Of Judgement
In earlier videos, I talked about the things that are up to us and the things that are not up to us. In this video, I want to go a bit deeper into how we approach life by a powerful yet dangerous tool in our toolbox: our judgment. [Music] First of all, …
The Emotional Journey of Photos | National Geographic
There have been moments when I’ve been out shooting landscapes where I’ve cried because there’s things in front of me that I just can’t believe are even real. So this competition stands out for me because I think it’s just so important to love what you do…
Shark Tank Star Kevin O'Leary's Morning Routine - A Day in the Life of a Multi-Millionaire
I’m Mr. Wonderful here, and I want to talk about this week’s episode of Ask Mr. Wonderful. It’s inspired by an email question from Atlanta. I’m gonna read it to you; you see what I mean. Hi, my name is Elizabeth from Atlanta. I’m one of your Instagram fo…
Seth MacFarlane’s Scientific Influences | StarTalk
Seth, I called you into my office. Yes, I gotta talk to you because you want me to help you clean up. I clean up the office. Uh, I got at some point I had to find you and talk to you about the science and Family Guy. Yeah, yeah, you just have to watch a …
Debunking 3 myths about air pollution | Nat Geo Explores
(upbeat music) - [Narrator] Ever think of how many breaths of air you take in a day? It’s a lot, like 20 thousand, give or take a few. All day, all night, our bodies are at work bringing in the good (bell dings) and kicking out the bad (buzzer sounds). Bu…
When Climate Change Became Personal, She Turned to Radio | Short Film Showcase
My name is Caroline PE. I’m 18 years of age, a child climate ambassador, a news reporter. Hello, hello. Today, we’re looking at deforestation in relation to where I live—in a banana in Lusaka, Zambia. Listening to 99, I really love radio. Radio has becom…