yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Startup School 2019 Orientation
Good morning founders! Welcome to Startup School 2019. I’m gonna go over four things in this orientation. I’m gonna introduce you to the Startup School team. I’m gonna introduce you to your fellow classmates/founders. I’m gonna explain how Startup School …
Kevin O'Leary Rates Brooklyn Dumpling Shop's Finest | Chef Wonderful
[Music] That’s what I’m talking about. Hey, Chef Wonderful here, and I want to talk about dumplings. Yes, I love dumplings, and I think they are just the most amazing food. They bring so many cultures together. It’s such a healthy snack, or you can be dec…
Shape properties after a sequence of transformations
In past videos, we’ve thought about whether segment lengths or angle measures are preserved with a transformation. What we’re now going to think about is what is preserved with a sequence of transformations, and in particular, we’re going to think about a…
Why Is Your BOTTOM in the MIDDLE?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. A human, running like a quadruped, is creepy. Artist Rui Martins created this animation about a year ago. 127 years ago, Eadweard Muybridge shot these real images of a child with infantile paralysis walking on all fours. Walking…
My Response To Dave Ramsey
What’s up you guys? It’s Grahe here. So I normally don’t make response videos here in the channel, but after watching a 1-hour upload from the personal finance host Dave Ramsey, I wanted to dive deeper into one of the most controversial and debated topics…
Progressive Aspect | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello, grammarians! Let’s talk about the progressive aspect. So, we talked about the simple aspect as something that is just the most bare form. It’s what you see here: I walk, I will walk, I walked. But aspect allows us to talk about things that are on…