yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Homeroom with Sal & Casey Wasserman - Tuesday, July 21
Hi everyone! Welcome to our homeroom live stream. This is something we started several months ago. It’s really a way to stay connected and have interesting conversations about interesting things with interesting people. I’m super excited about our guest t…
How Warren Buffett Finds Great Investment Ideas
You really want to have a database in your mind so that you can tell what kind of a business you’re looking at in general by looking at the figures. Uh, it’s far over right. We never look at any analyst reports. I mean, I don’t think I’ve, you know, if I …
if statements | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
We can use Boolean expressions to ask questions in our programs, but how can we branch control flow based on the answer? To do that, we need conditionals. Conditionals form the basis of selection; they allow the computer to decide which code to run depend…
WHAT IS THIS?? .......... IMG! #39
Mr. T with no hair and a baby giving the peace sign in the womb. It’s episode of 39 IMG! When Tweety Bird gets old, you’re gonna have this. And it’s amazing how little information we need to see familiar objects. It’s also amazing than an iPhone can fall …
First Contact: Life Beyond Earth
On the 15th of August 1977, Ohio State University’s radio telescope Big Ear was listening to the apparent emptiness of the cosmos, as it did every other day. The great silence, as it is often called, persisted, disturbed only by the noisy residents of Ear…
This Indigenous Practice Fights Fire with Fire | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
What you’re hearing is the sound of grass burning in a dense forest in northern California. It’s full of coniferous trees, brush, and shrubs, and tons of branches, and tons of dried out foliage, because the area is so dried up thanks to the warming climat…