yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
2003 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting (Full Version)
[Applause] We promise not to sing Good Morning, and we’re delighted to have you all here. One of the things that makes it fun to run Berkshire is that we see real shareholders. We probably have a larger proportion of our shares held by individuals and not…
Variance of a binomial variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is continue our journey trying to understand what the expected value and what the variance of a binomial variable is going to be, or what the expected value or the variance of a binomial distribution is going to be, wh…
Why Happiness Is Like Water (animated)
Let’s talk a little bit about that crazy thing called happiness. It’s the state of mind that everyone is after. Furthermore, there’s a complete industry that revolves around attaining it. But happiness is not static. It’s not that you do X and Y, which le…
Catching King Salmon in the Arctic | Life Below Zero
She’s not even holding an equilibrium there. Let’s just give her a few minutes, but she’s definitely waking up. I think it’s going to be worth releasing. That’s good. Send her up river. Well, I’m glad we did that. She deserved it. Well, let’s go check ou…
Using explicit formulas of geometric sequences | Mathematics I | High School Math | Khan Academy
The geometric sequence Asobi is defined by the formula, and so they say they tell us that the E term is going to be equal to 3 * -1⁄4 to the IUS 1 power. So, given that, what is a sub5, the fifth term in the sequence? So pause the video and try to figur…
The Dangers of Kite Surfing | Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails
Ben Aaron: In the 1800s, as engineers searched for cost effective alternatives to horses and steam for powering public transport, wind, in the form of large kites, was seriously considered. But now, after two centuries of development, we still don’t have …