yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Military Father | No Man Left Behind
My task was to take out one of the most high-value strategic command and control targets in Belgrade, the capital city of the former Republic of Yugoslavia. I felt absolutely totally confident that I was as well trained and well prepared as possible for a…
Using associate property to simplify multiplication
In this video, we’re going to think about how we can use our knowledge of multiplying single-digit numbers to multiply things that might involve two digits. So, for example, let’s start with what is 5 times 18. You can pause the video and see how you mig…
The Best Decisions You Can Make In Life
During the course of your life, you’ll be faced with some decisions that will completely change the way you experience what time you have on this planet. Even though most decisions are reversible, they will still have a great impact on your life. These ar…
Bitcoin Is About To Snap
What’s up Grandma! It’s guys here, so we gotta bring attention to a topic that, in my opinion, is not getting enough recognition. Which I think is surprising because this has the potential to completely change the trajectory in terms of how we transact mo…
Warren Buffett: The Big Problem with Dividend Investing
Why won’t you pay a dividend to your shareholders? Well, we think our shareholders 5 years from now will be wealthier counting what they would get from the reinvestment of the dividend. We think they’ll be wealthier if we hold on to the money now. We may…
Sunni and Shia Islam part 2 | World History | Khan Academy
Where we left off in the last video, we were in the year 656, and the third Khilafah Uthman, or Usman, is assassinated. Ali is chosen to be Khalif. Remember, Shia believe that Ali should have been Khalif immediately after the death of Muhammad, and they c…