yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Neptune 101 | National Geographic
(Mysterious music) [Narrator] Along the dark edges of the Solar System, it floats. Anchored by a star but barely graced by its warmth, this traveler drifts alone, as deceptively calm and elusive as the deep blue sea. Neptune is the eighth planet from the…
Definite integral of piecewise function | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have an f of x right over here, and it’s defined piecewise. For x less than zero, f of x is x plus one. For x greater than or equal to zero, f of x is cosine of pi x. We want to evaluate the definite integral from negative one to one of f of x dx. …
Writing a quadratic function to fit data and estimate solutions | Algebra 1 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
We’re told Amtha is a high jump finalist at the World Athletics Championships. She tracks the heights of her practice jumps to get an idea of her capability during the competition. And so, this is timing the air intense of a second. This is height in feet…
Pope Francis: The Story Behind National Geographic's Cover Photo | Nat Geo Live
[Music] Dave: What was tougher, covering the pope for six months or slogging through a Honduran jungle looking for a lost city? Oh well, it was definitely much harder to access the Vatican than the jungle. For me, when you work around the pope, you have…
How To Get Rich
world won’t get there by making a social media platform. You aren’t Mark Zuckerberg. The reason these men got to where they are today is because they took a path that no one else ventured down. They made really stupid decisions that led to better decision…
Where Did Pablo Picasso's Genius Come From? | National Geographic
Where does genius come from? Pablo Picasso’s journey to genius began with a puff of his uncle Salvador’s cigar, so claims the man himself. It’s possible this puff ignited what some historians call the rage to master: a voracious dedication to push the bou…