yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
If you can't focus, please watch this video…
Do you know why your brain is like a browser with too many tabs open? What if I told you that you’re just one funny cat video away from losing your focus completely? In this video, I will dive into a major culprit of focus. By the end of this video, you’l…
BEST Images of the Week! IMG! episode 14
Steampunk R2-D2 and this kitty says thumbs up. It’s episode 14 of [Music]. It’s hard to be a Lego gangster, but it’s easy to kill two birds with one stone. Check out these minimalist superheroes. Can you name them all? The same guy who made these also ma…
Join This Man on a Safari to Sculpt Animals in the Wild | Short Film Showcase
Africa is where I sport up; it’s a place that completely fills me with excitement. I enjoy the heat, the thorns, the smells. To me, it’s all hugely evocative. African wildlife is so diverse; 6:18 is such a movement, such a lot of character. All these thin…
Reasons Not to Have Sex
In most modern-day societies, the idea of not having sex may sound preposterous. After all, isn’t physical intimacy one of the key ingredients of a healthy and fulfilling life? Well, if that’s the case, then we stumble upon a problem: as the visibility of…
Ecosystem | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hello wordsmiths! I have to keep my voice down. You see, you’ve caught me observing a word in its natural habitat. Here we can see the words at play: nominalizing and conjugating, brachiating, snoozing. There’s a waterfall of vowels, there’s the conate ba…
Ray Dalio and Elliot Choy on Why Money Shouldn't be an End Goal
Or do you ever see people around you that make the mistake of thinking that money is the actual goal? Then they maybe got into it aiming to achieve freedom or these other things, security. But then they are just so caught up in moving that goal post that …