yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
The 5 Financial Goals To Achieve In Your 20s
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, I have no idea how to start this video other than to say that I went down a bit of a rabbit hole the other day. You know, like when you come across something online and then for some reason, you open up another ta…
Solving exponent equation using exponent properties
So I have an interesting equation here. It says ( V^{-65} ) times the fifth root of ( V ) is equal to ( V^{K} ) for ( V ) being greater than or equal to zero. What I want to do is try to figure out what ( K ) needs to be. So what is ( K ) going to be equa…
Why Warren Buffett is Keeping $144B out of the Stock Market
How many times on the channel have I regarded Warren Buffett as the best stock market investor to have ever lived? I’ve said that a lot, and he is. He took over Berkshire Hathaway in 1965, and since that time, his regime of acquisitions and investments ha…
Big Tech is Destroying Ownership
Do you own the music that you listen to? If you collect vinyl records or just happen to still have CDs laying around, then you do. But the majority of us in 2023 rely on subscription services like Spotify or Apple Music to borrow the music we enjoy. What…
Chris Dixon at Startup School 2013
So today I’m going to talk about good ideas that look like bad ideas. There’s a great, my clicker is not working, sorry, technical problems there. Okay, thanks, oops. So there’s a great PG blog post where he talks about Peter Thiel came to talk and said …
Could Solar Storms Destroy Civilization? Solar Flares & Coronal Mass Ejections
The Sun, smooth and round and peaceful. Except when it suddenly vomits radiation and plasma in random directions. These solar flares and coronal mass ejections, or CMEs, can hit Earth and have serious consequences for humanity. How exactly do they work? H…