yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
The 10th and 14th Amendments in relation to federal and state powers
What we’re going to do in this video is talk a little bit more about federal powers versus state powers. As we’ve mentioned in other videos, this is a very relevant topic because even today you’ll have Supreme Court decisions being decided based on citing…
Trump-Putin call puts Ukraine in unfavorable position ahead of peace talks
It finally happened: US president Donald Trump held his first official phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin after re-entering office, and as many feared for months, things look bad for Ukraine. Having run his campaign on the promise to end Rus…
Using similarity to estimate ratio between side lengths | High school geometry | Khan Academy
So we’ve been given some information about these three triangles here, and then they say use one of the triangles. So use one of these three triangles to approximate the ratio. The ratio is the length of segment PN divided by the length of segment MN. S…
Lunch On Board The Hot Tuna | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
We’re bite chasers today. The strategy today is going to be tackle the guy with the ball. If we hear someone’s marking or someone’s getting bit, we’re beelining right for them. Right now, the clock is ticking. Whoever’s on the meat is getting mugged today…
Keeping the Inuit Way of Life Alive in a Changing World | Short Film Showcase
Inuit were born to be outside. My earliest memories of growing up with my family were connected to the land, using dog-teams, skin tents. Hi ox he lived on the land. You took what you needed. We didn’t have electric power; we didn’t have modern convenien…
Tangram Paradoxes
I can take the seven pieces of a tangram and arrange them into a shape called the monk, but I can take the same seven pieces and arrange them into a monk with no feet. Wait, what? Where’d the foot go? How can these be made of the same pieces? Is it magic…