yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Caught in a mangrove rip tide | Primal Survivor: Extreme African Safari
The current’s already taking me. I can feel it, so I’ll just let it do its thing. Not far down the channel, we spot something. “Look at that! The fish trap!” So that’s obviously the Michikenda. Send it from tribes whose ancient ancestors migrated out of…
The Hidden Pattern behind all Financial Bubbles
Tulip Mania. Imagine spending the equivalent of a luxury house on a flower. Welcome to the 1630s Netherlands, where tulips became the world’s first documented financial bubble and taught us lessons about market psychology that we’re still ignoring today. …
After the Avalanche: Life as an Adventure Photographer With PTSD (Part 3) | Nat Geo Live
I went back to Africa this time. Exploration had taken on a different modality here. We were gonna explore the upper headwaters of the Okavongo, the Cuito river catchment that flows out of the Angolan highlands. Steve Boyes, another NG explorer, took us t…
Explorers See Greenland's Glaciers Like Never Before | National Geographic
[Music] Lots of people who have tried before us had failed, and all of their aircraft are scattered across the ice cap. You ready? Oh yeah! When thinking about flying a tiny helicopter across the North Atlantic, the answer is no, way too dangerous, ab…
AI for improved math scores
Hi everyone! Nice to meet you. My name is Danielle Sullivan, and I’m so excited to be the facilitator of this excellent math conversation today with my amazing colleagues. Today, we want to talk about math instruction, how it’s changed and shifted since t…
Do Chairs Exist?
Hey Vsauce! Michael here. And here. Michael here! Hey, Vsauce! What is here?…. What is there? What is there? What REALLY exists? Do waves exist, or are there just things that are wavy? When does a piece of food I’ve eaten stop being food and become me? Do…