yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Inside The Navy's Indoor Ocean
I’m here at the Navy’s Indoor Ocean at Carderock. This is the biggest wave pool in the world, and they can make all kinds of different waves so they can test scale ships and make them better before they actually go out on the open ocean. I came in and I’d…
Intermediate value theorem example | Existence theorems | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let F be a continuous function on the closed interval from -2 to 1, where F of -2 is equal to 3 and F of 1 is equal to 6. Which of the following is guaranteed by the intermediate value theorem? So before I even look at this, what do we know about the int…
Going 50% Bitcoin
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So get this: every six months, CNBC surveys 750 millionaires to find out how and where they’re investing their money. For the first time ever, they found a rather surprising trend among Millennials. Nearly half of them h…
Warren Buffett: How Long Can Stocks Stay Overvalued?
If you can stay objective throughout that, if you can detach yourself temperamentally from the crowd, you get very rich and you won’t have to be very bright. I mean, I’m sure you are, but it just doesn’t take brains; it takes temperament. Investors behav…
Using similar triangles to reason about slope | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy
So you have likely already learned about the notion of the slope of a line and what we define that is. The change in y over the change in x as we go from any one point on the line to another point on the line. Some of you, when you first saw this, might b…
Abiotic factors and an organism's range | High school biology | Khan Academy
So, let’s talk a little bit about abiotic factors for an organism’s range. Before we even get into it, let’s just think about what these words mean. In other videos, we’ve talked about how abiotic means non-living, while biotic would refer to living. So, …