yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Who has the Deathly-est Hallows? Harry Potter or Dr Strange --NERD WARS
Hey everybody! Welcome to Nerd Wars. I’m Fatih and I’m Jeff. We decided to do one topical: it’s Harry Potter versus Doctor Strange. I’ll be arguing Harry Potter, and I’ll be arguing Doctor Strange. Harry Potter is real! It’s real! They got a wand, and yo…
Neanderthals 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] Neanderthals are often depicted as brutish cave men, but science shows that our early ancestors were actually quite advanced. Neanderthals, or homo neanderthalensis, are our closest relatives in the human family tree. The species lived from abo…
Congress Wants To Ban Credit Scores | Major Changes Ahead
What’s up, Grandma’s guys? Here, so no surprise, your credit score is pretty much the single most influential deciding factor when it comes to all things personal finance, building wealth, and saving a ton of money. Those three numbers pretty much become …
How to Overcome Instant Gratification
Do you ever find yourself reaching for that extra slice of pizza or endlessly scrolling through social media instead of working on your goals? We all struggle with instant gratification, but imagine what you could achieve if you mastered self-control. In …
The Stock Market JUST Went From BAD To WORSE | How To Prepare
All right, so this is getting out of control. First, we had Facebook plummet 26% in a single day. Then we had Netflix fall 35% overnight as they lost subscribers. Shortly after, Walmart drops 25% on missed earnings. And then the nail in the coffin: Tarjay…
Interpret a quadratic graph | Quadratic functions & equations | Algebra 1 | Khan Academy
Katie throws a ball in the air for her dog to chase. The function f models the height of the ball in meters as a function of time in seconds after Katie threw it. We could see that right over here this is our function f. So at time t equals zero, the hei…