yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Steve Jobs Was the "Toughest Bastard" I Ever Met | Kevin O'Leary
Welcome back to segment 3 with Kevin Oli. All right, two words: Steve Jobs. Um, the toughest bastard you’ve ever met. He is tough. He was, you know, I went to his, uh, I called him up. Um, I said to him, “Listen, Steve, you have 2 and a half% of the marke…
Christianity 101 | National Geographic
About 2,000 years ago, in a far-flung province in the Middle East, a man emerged from the desert with a message—one that would radically alter the course of world events and come to define the lives of billions. Christianity is a monotheistic religion th…
Proportionality constant from table
[Instructor] We’re told the quantities x and y are proportional, and then they give us a table where they give us a bunch of x’s and they give us the corresponding y’s. When x is four, y is 10. When x is five, y is 12.5, and so on and so forth. Find th…
Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic
Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can’t account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because acco…
Multiplying 10s | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy
Let’s multiply 40 times 70. So, 40 times we have the number 70. So, we could actually list that out, the number 70, 40 different times and add it up, but that’s clearly a lot of computation to do, and there’s got to be a faster way. So, another way is …
Student tips for using course mastery on Khan Academy
Hi, I’m Shannon from Khan Academy, and I want to show you how to make the most of your learning time. First, make sure you’re logged in to your Khan Academy account by checking for your name in the upper right-hand corner. Now, on the left side, you shou…