yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
9 Stocks Super Investors are Buying! (2023)
So, I’m about to let you in on one of the biggest secrets when it comes to investing. Listen closely because this advice could help you make a ton of money. If you want to know what stocks you should be buying, pay attention to what great investors are p…
Unleashing the Power of the Mind Through Neuralink #Shorts
Each near-link N1 chip is roughly 4x4 millimeters with a thousand electrodes each. It’s feasible to fit up to 10 of these inside your head in different areas, all to measure and affect different parts of your brain. Using just 256 electrodes, or about two…
These Tiny, Stunning Moths Are Only Found in One Place on Earth | National Geographic
A lot of people will think moth, and they’ll think dark gray fuzzy thing that they don’t want flying around their lights at night. These things don’t look like that at all, and in fact, most moths don’t. You say to anybody “microscopic moth,” they’re some…
Common chain rule misunderstandings | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’re going to do in this video is focus on key misunderstandings that folks often have, and we actually got these misunderstandings from the folks who write the AP exams from the actual College Board. So, let’s say that we are trying to take the derivat…
Harvesting microgreens with Chef Mory | Farm Dreams
Welcome to Curry’s Woods here in Jersey City. Thank you. Um, it was actually originally built for low-income residents around 1960. Wow! And then it was redone in the early 2000s. So what we’ve tried to do over the last couple of years is really find part…
Tiger Sharks' Superpowered Jaws | SharkFest | National Geographic
Tiger sharks are one of the largest predatory sharks on the planet. They feed off an extensive menu: whales, birds, even other sharks. But there’s one delicacy that takes more effort than others. Turtles! So how much jaw power does it take to crunch throu…