yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Making conclusions in a test about a proportion | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A public opinion survey investigated whether a majority, more than 50 percent, of adults supported a tax increase to help fund the local school system. A random sample of 200 adults showed that 113 of those sampled supported the tax increase. Researchers …
WHAT'S A DONG?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here, next to a giant bird, which can only mean one thing. I’m in London, where even the pillows say “God save the Queen.” It’s a cushion, Michael. Alright, look. I’ve got a bird trying to tell me what to say. That’s right, in Englan…
Being Ethical Is Long-term Greedy
In one of your tweets, you listed out some of the things you should study, like programming, sales, reading, writing, and arithmetic. One of the items that ended up on the cutting room floor was that you should also study ethics. I was originally going to…
Extraneous solutions | Equations | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about extraneous solutions. If you’ve never heard the term before, I encourage you to review some videos on Khan Academy on extraneous solutions. But just as a bit of a refresher, it’s the idea that you do a bunch of leg…
How To Think Like A CEO
You can’t see the bigger picture, and you can’t work toward a bigger goal if you’ve got the perspective of a worker. That’s the facts. If your brain isn’t used to thinking like those who are achieving big things, you will struggle to find your footing. Ev…
Nestlé: The Most Evil Business in the World
So you’re nestled in the 1970s. You’re the inventor of baby formula, a life-saving creation for babies who, for whatever reason, can’t breastfeed from their mothers. But just helping moms who can breastfeed isn’t enough; it’s such a small segment of the p…