yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Baby Making On Mars | StarTalk
We will actually send in each crew two men and two women. But of course we don’t know yet. Scientists don’t know yet if, uh, if fertilization works in reduced gravity of Mars. We don’t know how a fetus will develop in the reduced gravity of Mars. So befo…
Density curve worked example | Modeling data distributions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Consider the density curve below. It’s depicted right over here; it’s a little unusual looking. It looks more like a triangle than our standard density curves, but it’s valid. Which of the following statements are true? Choose all answers that apply: Th…
Worked example: Approximation with local linearity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’re told the function ( f ) is twice differentiable with ( f(2) = 1 ), ( f’(2) = 4 ), and ( f”(2) = 3 ). What is the value of the approximation of ( f(1.9) ) using the line tangent to the graph of ( f ) at ( x = 2 )? So pause this video and see if you c…
Warren Buffett: How to Invest During High Inflation
Stocks sell at silly prices from time to time. It doesn’t take a high IQ to figure out that they’re cheap, but it does take a temperament that’s willing to step up and actually act. That, there, as I’m sure you are all aware, is Mr. Warren Buffett, the 92…
Documenting Democracy | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
Lots of tear gas, lots of rubber bullets, and I think I lived with garlic and onions in my pockets for like several months because that’s one common way to kind of get rid of the effects of tear gas. People would just hand those to you to help you out whe…
Sal Khan and Francis Ford Coppola fireside chat
All right, so very exciting, uh, we’re here at Khan Academy with the team, and we have some students from Khan Lab School as well, uh, with, uh, the I’d say legendary Francis Ford Coppola, uh, most known for film making. Uh, I, you know, obviously The Go…