yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
The Courage To Be Disliked
I made my first video on this channel in July 2017 after months of going back and forth on whether or not I actually wanted to create a YouTube channel. What would people think? What if people hate the videos and tell me that I don’t know what I’m talking…
The Biggest Market Crash Of Our Generation Is Coming
What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. So, I have to make a comment on probably one of the most impactful videos that I have seen in a long time from Patrick Bet-David on Valuetainment, with a warning that the biggest market crash of our generation is here. T…
What is risk and return? | Investments and retirement | Financial literacy | Khan Academy
So probably the main thing you will hear when you talk about investing is: What is the return that you got on your investment? Return on investment is often times, people will say ROI, and there’s a lot of different ways of calculating it. But maybe the m…
Free Will is Incoherent
In this video, I’ll explain why libertarian free will is, at best, meaningless and, at worst, incoherent. By the way, if your worldview depends on its existence, your boat is leaking badly. According to a naturalistic worldview, here’s a rough sketch of …
What China's Ban of Crypto Means For Investors | Meet Kevin
I want to get started right away. So, uh, I want to start with cryptocurrencies. Obviously, Bitcoin has been running. We’ve crossed that 60,000 psychological threshold. NFTs are all the rage right now. Crypto Punks, we’ve got many other NFTs as well. Uh,…
I can't keep doing this to myself
Guys, I’m making this video out of necessity. There’s a large part of me—it’s been the prevailing part of me as of late—that makes me not want to make this video because it’s unfiltered, because it’s not ready. What I want to say isn’t totally polished. I…