yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Are Vintage Cars a GOOD Investment?
Buying something that’s expensive, that’s really beautifully made, and hoping over time it’s going to appreciate. Now, we already know the story about the automotive market. It’s been a great place to put money in the last 20 years. It probably will remai…
Radius comparison from velocity and angular velocity: Worked example | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We are told a red disc spins with angular velocity omega, and a point on the edge moves at velocity V. So they’re giving us angular velocity, and also you could view this as linear velocity, and they are both vectors, that’s why they are bold…
Writing hypotheses for a significance test about a mean | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A quality controlled expert at a drink bottling factory took a random sample of bottles from a batch and measured the amount of liquid in each bottle in the sample. The amount in the sample had a mean of 503 milliliters and a standard deviation of 5 milli…
Dating apps are more dangerous than you think
A couple of weeks ago, I was having dinner with a friend and overheard what had to be a first date at the table right next to us. The conversation was awkward at first, as they both seemed to struggle to get a good flow going. I looked over a bit later to…
Charlie Munger's HUGE Warning of a “Lost Decade” for the Stock Market (2022-2032)
It is no secret that the stock market is at all-time highs. This current bull market has been the longest and strongest in the history of the stock market, and this has people thinking that the good times and strong stock market returns will last forever.…
AP Physics 1 Review of Charge and Circuit | Physics | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] Electric Charge is a property that some, but not all fundamental particles in nature have. The most commonly talked about fundamentally charged particles are the electrons, which orbit the outside of the atom. These are negatively charged. The…