yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
INSANE Watches Inspired By Firefighters
So we actually make the watches, Kevin, from genuine upcycled firefighting materials. So even the case itself has 100 years of real firefighting history, we say, beating through every component. This is a wonderful here, Geneva, Switzerland, with Johnny G…
Investigating Rock Carvings | Atlantis Rising
Author George’s Diaz Montek Sano has been researching this area for years, and he’s convinced that some Atlantan refugees fled inland and built shrines to memorialize the lost city. Deciphering the shrine would help Giorgos prove his theory. “No sir, a r…
Do the ultra successful share similar characteristics?
It’s hard to say whether these ultra high net worth people, billionaires or corporate executive types, really have the same style. I think everybody has their own unique style. I think it’s part of the active negotiations; it’s just part of the game. It …
Elephant Poaching Forces This Community to Take Sides | National Geographic
[Music] [Applause] [Music] [Music] [Applause] [Music] Now both very mutants. Life never I believe the one getting one longer commitment can be eaten. Not knocking woman of our barrack. Remaining Billy value involuntary man of ability. Good job became gang…
The Simplest Math Problem No One Can Solve - Collatz Conjecture
This is the most dangerous problem in mathematics, one that young mathematicians are warned not to waste their time on. It’s a simple conjecture that not even the world’s best mathematicians have been able to solve. Paul Erdos, a famous mathematician, sai…
Why The $1 Electric Scooter Will TAKE OVER The World
And for all the young entrepreneurs out there, just realize that sometimes it’s the most simple ideas that often do the best. I think we have the natural tendency just to overcomplicate things because we believe the more complicated something is, the bett…