yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Explaining the “Eureka Effect” | StarTalk
No one can imagine anybody else playing that role but you. So what were you doing? What’s your secret? Come on! I love the whole concept of scientists who deal with, uh, insoluble, uh, problems. I love the story of a noted scientist who was trying to fin…
Definite integral of absolute value function | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have F of x being equal to the absolute value of x + 2, and we want to evaluate the definite integral from 4 to 0 of f of x dx. And like always, pause this video and see if you could work through this. Now, when you first do this, you might stumble…
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unlocking The Truth | Official Trailer | National Geographic
I’ve only been in jail once: the Stanford prison experiment. In the summer of 1971, Dr. Zimbardo took a bunch of college kids, randomly assigned them to be prisoners and guards, and locked them in the basement. The only thing we told the guards was, “Do w…
NFTs Will Be Bigger Than Bitcoin! | ft. guest shark Kevin Hart!
What are the one or two things that are necessary, um, for a software platform to succeed at scale? You mentioned speed, but what are some of the qualities that are necessary, um, for one of these platforms to win? You know, what in the end of the day det…
BEST Images of the WEEK! ... IMG! #28
When your house breaks, fix it. And a private toilet! It’s episode 28 of IMG. Do you like cake? Do you like tacos? Well, get yourself a Taco Bell cake covered in say cheese, then say arson. Just don’t burn down the melting stairs. Wieners for kids! But z…
IF YOU Want To Make A MILLION DOLLARS - WATCH THIS!|Kevin O'Leary
First of all, you know, I guess I should apologize. I haven’t been back on the tube in weeks because I’ve been crazy busy shooting season 12 of Shark Tank in itself, which is an extraordinary feat. I gotta do a big shout out to the cast and crew on this b…