yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
The 6 BEST Side Hustles That Pay $20-$200 Per Hour
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here! So chances are, if you clicked on the video, you want to make some extra money. Good news: you came to the right spot. So let’s go over some of my favorite side hustles that pretty much anyone can do in their spare t…
Khan Academy Live: AP US History
E hey! I’m Kim, and welcome to our AP US History live study session at Khan Academy. So, the exam is this Friday, May 5th, and I would like to take some time with you over the next hour to talk through some of the major ideas that will kind of help you ma…
10 THINGS INTELLIGENT PEOPLE AVOID - STOICISM
[Music] Life is a journey filled with choices, each one shaping our path and destiny. What if I told you that the key to a more purposeful and fulfilling life lies not in what you do but in what you choose to avoid? Intelligent people, those who truly thr…
YC Tech Talks: Machine Learning
[Music] foreign [Music] Welcome to YC Tech Talks Machine Learning. I’m Paige from our work at a startup team, the team that helps people get jobs at YC startups. So for tonight’s event, we have Founders who are going to be talking about interesting proble…
Traveling Back in Time? | StarTalk
If I had a time machine, I think I’d go back to when a Mars-sized protoplanet sideswiped Earth in the early solar system, sideswiping our crust, casting billions of tons of rock into orbit around the Earth, which then coalesced to form our Moon. I want, I…
Life After Death
We’ve had to talk about death a lot in the past few years. Whether as referring to the number of casualties in a war or as the number of victims of a virus, although we primarily discuss it within the context of our society, we understandably still keep d…