yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Patterns in hundreds chart
So what we have in this chart is all the numbers from 1 to 100 organized in a fairly neat way. It’s a somewhat intuitive way to organize it where each row you have 10. So you go from 1 to 10, then 11 to 20, then 21 to 30, all the way to 100. And what we’…
Mars Season 2 – Trailer | National Geographic
There are other human beings on Mars now. Coexistence may prove just as challenging as it does on Earth. ELON MUSK: Mars civilization ultimately looks like an advanced version of Earth. SUSAN WISE BAUER: Industry is going to be absolutely vital to that …
Mike Knoop on Product and Design Processes for Remote Teams with Kevin Hale
Hey guys, welcome to the podcast! How’s it going? Great! Cool. Kevin, welcome back! For people who don’t know you, what do you do? I’m a partner at Y Combinator. I founded a company called Wufoo back in 2006. I was in the second batch at YC. That company…
Introduction to proportional relationships | 7th grade | Khan Academy
In this video, we are going to talk about proportional relationships, and these are relationships between two variables where the ratio between the variables is equivalent. Now, if that sounds complex or a little bit fancy, it’ll hopefully seem a little b…
Behavior and Belief
Hey, Mind Field! Vanessa here. Just kidding. My name is actually Michael. That part when I said that I was Vanessa… that was a lie. So you’re welcome. Humans love lies. More precisely, we love things that aren’t entirely true– because we have to. It’s oft…
The BIGGEST Stimulus Check JUST RELEASED
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here! So lately, I’ve had quite a few people bring this to my attention, so much so that I felt I should make a video about it explaining exactly what’s going on in the entire situation. Because when you see a title like th…