yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
Contaminating Mars | MARS
One of the big questions we have is when we get to Mars, how much do we impact it? The scientific community is very worried about Mars being contaminated by our efforts to go there and establish a civilization. Because you don’t want human microbes commin…
Geoengineering: A Horrible Idea We Might Have to Do
By the end of the 21st century, humanity is becoming desperate. Decades of heat waves and droughts have led to unusually poor harvests, while the warming oceans yield fewer fish each year in the tropical zones. Millions suffer from famines, and resource w…
Arctic Ascent with Alex Honnold | Official Trailer | National Geographic
What is he holding on to? On another L, yeah W. It’s like watching a movie, huh? Yeah, pretty much. After Alex Freid, all cap, he seemed lost. Now he’s found other ways to keep contributing to the world: a wall that has never been climbed. A place where …
Trick involving Maclaurin expansion of cosx
The first three nonzero terms of the McLaurin series for the function ( f(x) = x \cos(x) ). So one thing that you’re immediately going to find, let’s just remind ourselves what a McLaurin series looks like. Our ( f(x) ) can be approximated by the polynom…
The 10 Trillion Parameter AI Model With 300 IQ
If O1 is this magical, what does it actually mean for Founders and Builders? One argument is it’s bad for Builders because maybe O1 is just so powerful that OpenAI will just capture all the value. You mean they’re going to capture a light cone of all futu…
The Hidden Science of Fireworks
This is the biggest… hottest… and most explosive— Oh my god. Video on fireworks ever, covering everything from the invention of gunpowder to how fire can burn underwater, how fireworks are made, the colors, shapes, fuses. To how they’re launched. We’l…