yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 centimer cell. What is the concentration? What is the concentration of the potassium permanganate?

Prior to determining the absorbance for the unknown solution, the following calibration data were collected for the spectrophotometer. The way that we would tackle this is we know that there is a linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. We could describe it something like this: that absorbance is going to be equal to some slope times our concentration, and you could say some y-intercept.

If we're purist about it, then the y-intercept should be zero because at a zero concentration, you should have a zero absorbance. But the way that chemists would typically do it is that they would put these points into a computer and then have the computer do a linear regression. You could also do that by hand, but that's a little bit out of the scope of this video.

I did that; I went to Desmos and I typed in the numbers that they gave, and this is what I got. So I just typed in these numbers, and then it fit a linear regression line to it, and it got these parameters: m is equal to this, and b is equal to this.

Now we could say significant figures; it seems like the small significant figures here we have are three, but we could just view the m and the b as intermediate numbers in our calculations. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to use this m and b, and then my final answer I'm going to round to three significant figures.

So what this tells us is that our absorbance is going to be 5.65333 times our concentration minus 0.008. Now they've given us what a is. Let me get rid of all of this stuff here. They told us that our absorbance is 0.539. So we know that 0.539 is equal to 5.65333c minus 0.0086.

And then if you want to solve for c, let's see. We could add this to both sides first, so you get 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to 5.65333c. Then divide both sides by this, and you would get c is equal to, or is going to be approximately equal to—be a little careful; all of these would really be approximates.

c is going to be approximately equal to 0.539 plus 0.0086 divided by 5.65333. Of course, we want to round to three significant figures. All right. 0.539 plus 0.0086 is equal to that divided by 5.65333 is equal to this.

So if we go three significant figures, this is going to be 0.0969. So I would write the concentration is approximately 0.0969 molar.

More Articles

View All
What If The World is Actually a Prison? | The Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer
What if this world is actually one giant prison? When the 19th-century philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer observed the amount of pain that we experience during our lifetimes, he concluded that it’s not happiness and pleasure we’re after, but a reduction of t…
Hear the Untold Story of a Canadian Code Talker from World War II | Short Film Showcase
If we can just finish up with you reintroducing yourself again or you state your name and if you’d like to say a few quick words. I’m Charles, check accountants. I’m a mentee and have English and premium. I love my country. I do everything they asked me …
Algorithms and selection | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
Imagine you’re playing a word game where you need to guess only three words. What strategy might you use to solve for all the words in this game? One approach might be to just guess all of the letters in alphabetical order. So you start by guessing A, the…
Can Stoics Be Activists? | Q&A #5 | July 2019
Hello everyone! Welcome to the fifth Einzelgänger Q&A. Before the weekend, I reached the 50,000 subscriber mark on this channel. When I started back in January, I’d never had expected that this channel would reach this magic number so quickly or, at a…
Charlie Munger's Most Iconic Moments
I don’t think there are good arguments against my position. I think the people that oppose my position are idiots. And well, you don’t want to be like the motion picture executive in California. They said the funeral was so large ‘cause everybody wanted t…
How to light multiple matches with a single bullet
Hey, it’s me Destin. About three years ago I did a YouTube video, but I tried to have a lot of matches with a bullet, and I never could do it. So, we’ve kind of up the ante here. We’ve taken that same rifle, that Ruger 10⁄22, and we’ve made a fully adjust…