yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The war on rationality | Steven Pinker


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

A question that I often get is: Do you believe in progress? Well, I don't believe in progress, at least not as a force in the Universe. To quote Fran Lebowitz, "I don't believe in anything you have to believe in." Because there isn't any arc bending toward justice. There is no force that's lifting us ever upward. Quite the contrary. The Universe often seems to be out to get us. There are parasites that want to eat us from the inside. There's the laws of entropy: there are more ways for things to go wrong than to go right.

There's human nature: we were not selected by the processes of evolution to be particularly nice. We have the capacity for revenge and exploitation. So that's what's lined up against us. But nonetheless, progress has happened. How do we explain that? What might seem like a miracle? The answer is 'rationality.' If people deploy their rationality, their cognition, their language—with the goal of making other people better off—then the result, over time, is what we call 'progress.'

Can we become more rational? It's a pressing question because irrational beliefs lead to public health disasters. They can lead to wars and genocides. We'd really be better off if more of us were more rational. My name is Steve Pinker. I am a Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. My most recent book is called "Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters."

There is a capacity in us to become collectively more rational—we can just see it looking backwards. The three great things people desire are to be healthy, wealthy, and wise—and so we can start with those three. Health: meaning in life is to be alive rather than dead, and longevity has vastly increased. We live more than twice as long as our ancestors. So we have not just extra life, but as if we've been granted an extra life.

Wealthy: 200 years ago, 90% of the world lived in extreme poverty. Today, about 9% of the world lives in extreme poverty, and that proportion falls every day. Wise: our natural state is illiteracy and ignorance. And until pretty recently, a small, aristocratic minority was able to read and write. Now it's a majority; 90% of the world's population under the age of 25. As Barack Obama said a decade ago, "If you had to choose a period of history to live in, you'd pick now."

When people see my argument that many things have, on average, gotten better, the reaction is often, "Oh, it's so nice. You're an optimist." And I always resist that. I don't really consider myself an optimist, I just consider myself someone who looks at data rather than headlines. Headlines are guaranteed to make you pessimistic, even cynical, or fatalistic because headlines are a non-random sample of the worst things happening on Earth, at any given time.

It's when you plot data—and that includes gradual trends—you see with your own eyes how things have gotten better, as a fact about human history. Raising the question of how rational our species is bumps you immediately up against a kind of paradox. By some measures, we've never been more rational. We have evidence-based medicine, we've got 3D printing, we've got robotics, we've got artificial intelligence. That's at the high end, but we are also seeing an awful lot of what you might call 'Rationality Inequality.'

That is, at the other end, there's an awful lot of fallacies and irrationalities. There are conspiracy theories such as that the Covid vaccines are actually a plot by Bill Gates to inject microchips to surveil us. There's the big lie that the American Election of 2020 was stolen in defiance of all evidence. How do you explain, or how do I explain—as someone who claims to know a thing or two about rationality—how the same species could indulge in both?

Part of the answer is that we are storytelling animals. We spin narratives. That's one of the ways that we make sense of the world. But we do have a habit to fall back on narratives when it comes to big important questions, like: 'How did the world come into being?' 'What really happens in the White House?' Most people, it's like, you can't ...

More Articles

View All
2015 AP Physics I free response 2 a and b
Some students want to know what gets used up in an incandescent light bulb when it is in series with a resistor: current, energy, or both. They come up with the following two questions: in one second, do fewer electrons leave the bulb than enter the bulb?…
Interactions within and among species | High school biology | Khan Academy
So let’s imagine that we are in the ocean, and we’re going to think a little bit about fish. We know that organisms usually are not just by themselves; there are other organisms around. There might be other members of their species around, and there are v…
A Taxing Time | Teacher Resources | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
If I say the phrase “tax season” to you, you likely imagine a period in spring leading up to the middle of April. This is, after all, when Tax Day falls on or around April the 15th. However, what if I were to tell you that tax season was every season? Wha…
WORLD’S MOST AMAZING ARCHER in Slow Motion - Smarter Every Day 130
Hey it’s me Destin, welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I know when you think about archery you think about Nottingham, and one guy in particular, Robin Hood. But I’m gonna tell you about a guy today in my home town that might even be better than Robin Hoo…
Determining sample size based on confidence and margin of error | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
We’re told Della wants to make a one-sample z-interval to estimate what proportion of her community members favor a tax increase for more local school funding. She wants her margin of error to be no more than plus or minus two percent at the 95% confidenc…
What is Beautiful Deleveraging?
A number of people asked me, “What is a beautiful deleveraging?” Well, first let me start with what is the deleveraging. Sometimes there’s too much debt burden, which also means that somebody’s holding too many debt assets and they’re not going to get pai…