yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The war on rationality | Steven Pinker


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

A question that I often get is: Do you believe in progress? Well, I don't believe in progress, at least not as a force in the Universe. To quote Fran Lebowitz, "I don't believe in anything you have to believe in." Because there isn't any arc bending toward justice. There is no force that's lifting us ever upward. Quite the contrary. The Universe often seems to be out to get us. There are parasites that want to eat us from the inside. There's the laws of entropy: there are more ways for things to go wrong than to go right.

There's human nature: we were not selected by the processes of evolution to be particularly nice. We have the capacity for revenge and exploitation. So that's what's lined up against us. But nonetheless, progress has happened. How do we explain that? What might seem like a miracle? The answer is 'rationality.' If people deploy their rationality, their cognition, their language—with the goal of making other people better off—then the result, over time, is what we call 'progress.'

Can we become more rational? It's a pressing question because irrational beliefs lead to public health disasters. They can lead to wars and genocides. We'd really be better off if more of us were more rational. My name is Steve Pinker. I am a Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. My most recent book is called "Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters."

There is a capacity in us to become collectively more rational—we can just see it looking backwards. The three great things people desire are to be healthy, wealthy, and wise—and so we can start with those three. Health: meaning in life is to be alive rather than dead, and longevity has vastly increased. We live more than twice as long as our ancestors. So we have not just extra life, but as if we've been granted an extra life.

Wealthy: 200 years ago, 90% of the world lived in extreme poverty. Today, about 9% of the world lives in extreme poverty, and that proportion falls every day. Wise: our natural state is illiteracy and ignorance. And until pretty recently, a small, aristocratic minority was able to read and write. Now it's a majority; 90% of the world's population under the age of 25. As Barack Obama said a decade ago, "If you had to choose a period of history to live in, you'd pick now."

When people see my argument that many things have, on average, gotten better, the reaction is often, "Oh, it's so nice. You're an optimist." And I always resist that. I don't really consider myself an optimist, I just consider myself someone who looks at data rather than headlines. Headlines are guaranteed to make you pessimistic, even cynical, or fatalistic because headlines are a non-random sample of the worst things happening on Earth, at any given time.

It's when you plot data—and that includes gradual trends—you see with your own eyes how things have gotten better, as a fact about human history. Raising the question of how rational our species is bumps you immediately up against a kind of paradox. By some measures, we've never been more rational. We have evidence-based medicine, we've got 3D printing, we've got robotics, we've got artificial intelligence. That's at the high end, but we are also seeing an awful lot of what you might call 'Rationality Inequality.'

That is, at the other end, there's an awful lot of fallacies and irrationalities. There are conspiracy theories such as that the Covid vaccines are actually a plot by Bill Gates to inject microchips to surveil us. There's the big lie that the American Election of 2020 was stolen in defiance of all evidence. How do you explain, or how do I explain—as someone who claims to know a thing or two about rationality—how the same species could indulge in both?

Part of the answer is that we are storytelling animals. We spin narratives. That's one of the ways that we make sense of the world. But we do have a habit to fall back on narratives when it comes to big important questions, like: 'How did the world come into being?' 'What really happens in the White House?' Most people, it's like, you can't ...

More Articles

View All
Are We Living in a Massive Computer Program? Or a Simulation? | Joscha Bach | Big Think
Could we be living in a simulation? I think that is related, first of all, to the question of what we mean by a simulation. If the question is, “Could we be living inside of a computer program?” then my answer would be: of course, yes. Because the only th…
How to sell private jets to billionaires...
This is a very hectic day in the life of a corporate jet broker. I came into the office at 7:30. I was about to get ready for an important meeting I had at 10:00 when I got a call from George Ganopoulos from Lux Aviation. “You’re kidding! Client, we just…
What’s It Like to Photograph the Pope? | Exposure
I’ve never had an assignment that was so frightening in that I had no idea what I was going to shoot. The biggest challenge to photographing the Vatican that I found was simply getting in there. It’s like a gigantic curtain. Just to get behind this curtai…
Quotient rule | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is introduce ourselves to the Quotient Rule, and we’re not going to prove it in this video. In a future video, we can prove it using the Product Rule, and we’ll see it has some similarities to the Product Rule. But her…
Exponential functions differentiation | Advanced derivatives | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s say that Y is equal to 7⁄2 the x squared minus X power. What is the derivative of Y, derivative of Y with respect to X? And like always, pause this video and see if you can figure it out. Well, based on how this has been color-coded ahead of time, …
2015 AP Physics 1 free response 3c
All right, now let’s tackle part C. Use quantitative reasoning, including equations as needed, to develop an expression for the new final position of the block. Express your answer in terms of D. All right, I’m going to set up a little table here for par…