yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The war on rationality | Steven Pinker


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

A question that I often get is: Do you believe in progress? Well, I don't believe in progress, at least not as a force in the Universe. To quote Fran Lebowitz, "I don't believe in anything you have to believe in." Because there isn't any arc bending toward justice. There is no force that's lifting us ever upward. Quite the contrary. The Universe often seems to be out to get us. There are parasites that want to eat us from the inside. There's the laws of entropy: there are more ways for things to go wrong than to go right.

There's human nature: we were not selected by the processes of evolution to be particularly nice. We have the capacity for revenge and exploitation. So that's what's lined up against us. But nonetheless, progress has happened. How do we explain that? What might seem like a miracle? The answer is 'rationality.' If people deploy their rationality, their cognition, their language—with the goal of making other people better off—then the result, over time, is what we call 'progress.'

Can we become more rational? It's a pressing question because irrational beliefs lead to public health disasters. They can lead to wars and genocides. We'd really be better off if more of us were more rational. My name is Steve Pinker. I am a Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. My most recent book is called "Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters."

There is a capacity in us to become collectively more rational—we can just see it looking backwards. The three great things people desire are to be healthy, wealthy, and wise—and so we can start with those three. Health: meaning in life is to be alive rather than dead, and longevity has vastly increased. We live more than twice as long as our ancestors. So we have not just extra life, but as if we've been granted an extra life.

Wealthy: 200 years ago, 90% of the world lived in extreme poverty. Today, about 9% of the world lives in extreme poverty, and that proportion falls every day. Wise: our natural state is illiteracy and ignorance. And until pretty recently, a small, aristocratic minority was able to read and write. Now it's a majority; 90% of the world's population under the age of 25. As Barack Obama said a decade ago, "If you had to choose a period of history to live in, you'd pick now."

When people see my argument that many things have, on average, gotten better, the reaction is often, "Oh, it's so nice. You're an optimist." And I always resist that. I don't really consider myself an optimist, I just consider myself someone who looks at data rather than headlines. Headlines are guaranteed to make you pessimistic, even cynical, or fatalistic because headlines are a non-random sample of the worst things happening on Earth, at any given time.

It's when you plot data—and that includes gradual trends—you see with your own eyes how things have gotten better, as a fact about human history. Raising the question of how rational our species is bumps you immediately up against a kind of paradox. By some measures, we've never been more rational. We have evidence-based medicine, we've got 3D printing, we've got robotics, we've got artificial intelligence. That's at the high end, but we are also seeing an awful lot of what you might call 'Rationality Inequality.'

That is, at the other end, there's an awful lot of fallacies and irrationalities. There are conspiracy theories such as that the Covid vaccines are actually a plot by Bill Gates to inject microchips to surveil us. There's the big lie that the American Election of 2020 was stolen in defiance of all evidence. How do you explain, or how do I explain—as someone who claims to know a thing or two about rationality—how the same species could indulge in both?

Part of the answer is that we are storytelling animals. We spin narratives. That's one of the ways that we make sense of the world. But we do have a habit to fall back on narratives when it comes to big important questions, like: 'How did the world come into being?' 'What really happens in the White House?' Most people, it's like, you can't ...

More Articles

View All
This Particle Breaks Time Symmetry
Most processes in our universe are time reversible. In other words, the physics works the same way forwards or backwards. Which is why you can’t tell if I’m playing these videos normally or in reverse. People typically point to entropy as the only excepti…
Hands off My Phone! (An ELA audio drama)
[Music] [Applause] Oh no, he didn’t! That is so harsh. Hey, your dad took your phone away just for getting a D on the history test? Yup, my mind is blown. Mine too! I mean, that was an easy test. What? I can’t believe you got a D! Hey, that’s not really……
Where Do Trees Get Their Mass?
Trees are some of the biggest organisms on the planet, but where do they get that matter to grow? Man: Rich nutrients out the ground. Man: Start with soil or in the air. Man: Goodness out of the soil, I suppose. Derek Muller: Comes out of the soil? M…
Worked example: rational vs. irrational expressions (unknowns) | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told let A and B be rational numbers and let B be non-zero. They had to say let B be non-zero because we’re about to divide by B. Is A over B rational or irrational? Well, let’s think about it. They’re both rational numbers, so that means that A, s…
Perceive | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Open your minds, word Smiths! We’re talking about the word “perceive.” Ah, it’s one of those E before I words; some of the hardest to spell in English. Perceive is a verb. This verb means to notice something. You might also know it from its noun form, “p…
Catch of the Week - Hooked on a Monstah | Wicked Tuna
All right, behind the boat, you can see we’re right in the whales, circling us like jaws. It’s really good time for some June. It’s embark J. Yeah, we run real, real, real. You gotta pull it all the way, work it down. All right guys, you keep going. This…