yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is there a center of the universe? - Marjee Chmiel and Trevor Owens


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

What is at the center of the universe? It's an essential question that humans have been wondering about for centuries. But the journey toward an answer has been a strange one.

If you wanted to know the answer to this question in third century B.C.E. Greece, you might look up at the night sky and trust what you see. That's what Aristotle, THE guy to ask back then, did. He thought that since we're on Earth, looking up, it must be the center, right? For him, the sphere of the world was made up of four elements: Earth, water, air, and fire. These elements shifted around a nested set of solid crystalline spheres. Each of the wandering stars, the planets, had their own crystal sphere. The rest of the universe and all of its stars were on the last crystal sphere. If you watch the sky change over time, you could see that this idea worked fine at explaining the motion you saw. For centuries, this was central to how Europe and the Islamic world saw the universe.

But in 1543, a guy named Copernicus proposed a different model. He believed that the sun was at the center of the universe. This radically new idea was hard for a lot of people to accept. After all, Aristotle's ideas made sense with what they could see, and they were pretty flattering to humans. But a series of subsequent discoveries made the sun-centric model hard to ignore. First, Johannes Kepler pointed out that orbits aren't perfect circles or spheres. Then, Galileo's telescope caught Jupiter's moons orbiting around Jupiter, totally ignoring Earth. And then, Newton proposed the theory of universal gravitation, demonstrating that all objects are pulling on each other. Eventually, we had to let go of the idea that we were at the center of the universe.

Shortly after Copernicus, in the 1580s, an Italian friar, Giordano Bruno, suggested the stars were suns that likely had their own planets and that the universe was infinite. This idea didn't go over well. Bruno was burned at the stake for his radical suggestion. Centuries later, the philosopher Rene Descartes proposed that the universe was a series of whirlpools, which he called vortices, and that each star was at the center of a whirlpool. In time, we realized there were far more stars than Aristotle ever dreamed.

As astronomers like William Herschel got more and more advanced telescopes, it became clear that our sun is actually one of many stars inside the Milky Way. And those smudges we see in the night sky? They're other galaxies, just as vast as our Milky Way home. Maybe we're farther from the center than we ever realized.

In the 1920s, astronomers studying the nebuli wanted to figure out how they were moving. Based on the Doppler Effect, they expected to see blue shift for objects moving toward us, and red shift for ones moving away. But all they saw was a red shift. Everything was moving away from us, fast. This observation is one of the pieces of evidence for what we now call the Big Bang Theory. According to this theory, all matter in the universe was once a singular, infinitely dense particle. In a sense, our piece of the universe was once at the center.

But this theory eliminates the whole idea of a center since there can't be a center to an infinite universe. The Big Bang wasn't just an explosion in space; it was an explosion of space. What each new discovery proves is that while our observations are limited, our ability to speculate and dream of what's out there isn't. What we think we know today can change tomorrow. As with many of the thinkers we just met, sometimes our wildest guesses lead to wonderful and humbling answers and propel us toward even more perplexing questions.

More Articles

View All
Chimú 101 | National Geographic
(Gentle music) [Narrator] Before the Spanish conquest and before the Inca empire, one group created the most important South American civilization at the time, the Chimu. The Chimu civilization lasted almost half a millennium, from the year 1000 to aroun…
2015 AP Physics 1 free response 3c
All right, now let’s tackle part C. Use quantitative reasoning, including equations as needed, to develop an expression for the new final position of the block. Express your answer in terms of D. All right, I’m going to set up a little table here for par…
Warren Buffett Keeps Buying These 3 Stocks...
Well, as of the time of recording, we’ve now ticked 45 days past the end of Q2, and that means the 13F filings are out. These are regulatory filings that portfolio managers with at least 100 million in assets under management must submit to the SEC every …
All Hands on the Float House Deck | Life Below Zero
COLE: Man, it’s almost heartbreaking this is gonna go onto a deck instead of in the wall, in the walls in the house or something. It’s just gorgeous wood. This western red cedar is expensive, but it’s light, uh, and it’s really rot resistant so it won’t b…
HOW TO DOUBLE YOUR MONEY
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here! So unfortunately, we got a little bit of bad news, and that is that T-Series is catching up to PewDiePie’s. So we need to make sure, number one, everyone is subscribed to PewDiePie; number two, everyone needs to unsub…
Analyzing motion problems: position | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Divya received the following problem: A particle moves in a straight line with velocity ( v(t) ) is equal to the square root of ( 3t - 1 ) meters per second, where ( t ) is time in seconds. At ( t = 2 ), the particle’s distance from the starting point was…