yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

A Conversation with Ooshma Garg - Moderated by Adora Cheung


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Thank you for coming today. My name is Dora; I'm one of the partners here at Y Combinator. Today we're going to have a conversation with Oozma Magog, who is the CEO and founder of Gobble, which creates and delivers 15-minute pan dinners to you. I am personally a happy customer; it's great for people who don't have time to do grocery shopping, prep ingredients, actually cook, and then clean up afterwards.

So, Gobble started in 2011, and while it's doing pretty well today—it’s growing around 100 million revenue per week—I believe it's gone through many ups and downs. So, for my talk today, I want to discuss a couple of things. One is the evolution of her business. She's mostly been in the food business, but she has iterated her business model many times, and I think it'd be interesting to talk about that.

The second topic is something she is an expert in, which is grit and determination. I think she's one of the few people that I've seen who just never gives up. Determination is one of the qualities many people think they have, but when things hit the fan, and things start to fall apart, it can be difficult. So, I think it’s also interesting to talk about. With that, I would love to welcome you to the stage. Thank you! [Applause]

So, welcome, Oozma!

Thank you for having me. Thank you for coming.

So, maybe we can just briefly start from the very beginning. You were a student at Stanford, and I believe you started your first company then, which was—correct me if I'm wrong—you helped students get jobs at banks?

Yes, obviously that didn't work out, and you moved on to Gobble instead. But can you explain why that didn't work out and what made you think that you should just move on from that idea?

Sure! So, back when I was at Stanford, I started this company out of my dorm room. A fun visual is that I had this like, you know, 150-200 square foot room with no space. I lofted my bed like five inches from the ceiling and stuffed some IKEA desks under my bed. We could only fit like three desks in there. I was a junior, so I hired all these really smart freshmen as interns and got a boyfriend so I could sleep somewhere else for the business—joking! Our dorm room became our office. I hid the key in the girls' bathroom, and people would come between classes and get the key from my pink shower caddy, then go into my dorm room and work on our startup.

So that was our house—my first company in Napa. The idea was to help students get jobs. I was the head of this group, Stanford Women in Business, so we were matching people to banks and law firms and consulting firms. I worked on that for three years. I bootstrapped it, and no one would fund me; they told me the idea was too nice or what-have-you. But really, no one was using LinkedIn at the time, and all of these students were looking for work.

I thought that we could really be the LinkedIn for students, and it was all centered around their interests and student groups. Long story short, the idea was working, and we were making money—these companies would write us $20,000, $25,000 checks for annual subscriptions to my recruiting website. It was a two-sided marketplace.

What really happened is, first of all, I poured everything I had into the business, and my health went down the drain, which later leads to Gobble. But what ended up happening is I learned the hard lesson that whoever pays you kind of owns you and determines how your product evolves. These banks and consulting firms and all of them were paying me, and they wanted to recruit students based on quotas—based on like their GPA, their race, or other parts of their background that didn't really have to do with if they were a good cultural match.

So anyways, I was making money, but the mission and the initial vision and all of that of the business—of helping people find good jobs—wasn't true anymore. I actually got to a very dark place and ended up selling the business. So, it could have worked, but the lesson is that it could have worked longer term, but it wasn’t the right fit.

More Articles

View All
Living In Accordance With Nature | A Stoic's Ultimate Goal
[Music] The ancient Stoics argued that living a virtuous life means living in accordance with nature. Now, what did they exactly mean by this? Are we to follow our instincts like animals do, or perhaps should we live a nature-friendly lifestyle? In this …
Homeroom with Sal & Dan Roth - Wednesday, November 11
Hi everyone! Welcome to the homeroom live stream. Sal here from Khan Academy. I’m excited about our conversation today with Dan Roth, editor-in-chief of LinkedIn. A lot to talk about on both the future of work and a lot on just the future of media too. I …
Sun 101 | National Geographic
While billions of stars are scattered throughout the universe, the one at the center of our solar system plays a special role for us here on Earth. Our Sun formed about 4.5 billion years ago in the Milky Way galaxy’s Orion’s fur. It was born when a cloud …
The kinetic molecular theory of gases | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about something called kinetic molecular theory, which sounds very fancy. But as we’ll see in the next few seconds or the next few minutes, it actually helps build our intuition for what is going on with a gas, or at lea…
BONUS VIDEO | Singular They | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] So you may have been hearing a lot of talk about this thing called singular they recently, not knowing entirely what it is or whether or not it’s okay to use in a sentence or in formal writing. Um, it’s been in the news a lot lately; you know …
Science Is an Error-Correcting Mechanism
So getting back to good explanations, where do these explanations come from? There’s currently an obsession with induction. Induction being the idea that you can predict the future from the past. You can say, “I saw one, then two, then three, then four, …