Re: Randyom Neuron (Reply to Everett)

2m read

·Nov 8, 2024

Hey Randy,

Um, I'm having a bit of trouble trying to explain myself in the comments, as you've probably noticed. So, this is a short video. Um, Everett's requirement for free work for free will, or rather one of them, was that not only does the self have to be a cause of election X, but it has to be the first cause of that election.

I think the simplest answer that shows that this isn't the case is: first causes are not caused; the self is caused. I hope we can agree on that, and therefore the self is not a first cause of any particular outcome.

So, um, meanwhile what you've tried to do is to show that non-determinism in a neuron could be the first cause of certain elections. What I'm trying to say is that I think you're conflating a neuron with the entire self, while it's just a part of it.

Um, when I think of the self being the cause of something, I think of this cause in terms of something like a decision, in the way we use the word decision in normal language. Um, so I think decisions of the kind "John decided to go to the shop" can be properly considered to be caused by the self, because my intuition is that the self as a whole is involved in some way to get to that outcome.

Um, so if myself causes me to take an umbrella with me, that's the same thing as I decided to take my umbrella. So, myself caused cause of action X is the same as I made a decision in favor of cause of action X.

On the other hand, if a particular outcome can be traced solely to the non-deterministic action of a neuron, as you're suggesting might be the case, I'm not happy to say that the outcome has been caused by the self because the neuron isn't itself.

So, I hope that gives some idea of how I'm thinking about this at the moment. Thanks.

Snowflake Science to Study Avalanches | Explorer

Can Fake Furs Help Protect Leopards? | National Geographic

View All

Print statements and adding values | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy

Programs manipulate data in the forms of integers, floats, booleans, and strings. But how do they manipulate data? Perhaps the most obvious thing we can do here is add values together. But in order to do that, we’ll need the plus operator. In programming…

Pick one desire at a time and pick it carefully

You know, if you there’s the old saying, like, if you love what you do, you’ll never work a day in your life. It’s a little exaggerated; it’s more aspirational. Of course, there’s all kinds of things you’re going to have to do that you don’t necessarily w…

Le Chatelier's principle: Worked example | Chemical equilibrium | Chemistry | Khan Academy

In this video, we’re going to go through an example reaction that uses Le Chatelier’s principle. So, what we’re going to do is we’re going to apply Le Chatelier’s principle to look at various changes to this reaction when we perturb our reaction from equi…

Pedigrees | Classical genetics | High school biology | Khan Academy

What you see depicted here is known as a pedigree. A pedigree is a way of analyzing the inheritance patterns of a trait within a family, and it can be useful to understand more about that trait. Maybe to make some insights about the genetics of that trait…

Axe Ghost devlog - The bug that ruined the run

My name is Thomas K. I’m working on a game called Axe Ghost. It’s currently in development. There’s a demo on Steam, and my good friend Rishad Buser, he plays the beta version of Axe Ghost, and when he’s able, he streams his daily runs. Richard, by the wa…

The Technical Advisor for Silicon Valley on HBO: Ed McManus

Okay, so today we have Ed McManis. He was a technical adviser for Silicon Valley, uh, on HBO season 3. Um, so Ed, what’s your background? Okay, so, uh, I was a technical co-founder of a Y Combinator startup called Yard Sale. Um, and, uh, we launched two …

Re: Randyom Neuron (Reply to Everett)

More Articles