yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Re: Randyom Neuron (Reply to Everett)


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Hey Randy,

Um, I'm having a bit of trouble trying to explain myself in the comments, as you've probably noticed. So, this is a short video. Um, Everett's requirement for free work for free will, or rather one of them, was that not only does the self have to be a cause of election X, but it has to be the first cause of that election.

I think the simplest answer that shows that this isn't the case is: first causes are not caused; the self is caused. I hope we can agree on that, and therefore the self is not a first cause of any particular outcome.

So, um, meanwhile what you've tried to do is to show that non-determinism in a neuron could be the first cause of certain elections. What I'm trying to say is that I think you're conflating a neuron with the entire self, while it's just a part of it.

Um, when I think of the self being the cause of something, I think of this cause in terms of something like a decision, in the way we use the word decision in normal language. Um, so I think decisions of the kind "John decided to go to the shop" can be properly considered to be caused by the self, because my intuition is that the self as a whole is involved in some way to get to that outcome.

Um, so if myself causes me to take an umbrella with me, that's the same thing as I decided to take my umbrella. So, myself caused cause of action X is the same as I made a decision in favor of cause of action X.

On the other hand, if a particular outcome can be traced solely to the non-deterministic action of a neuron, as you're suggesting might be the case, I'm not happy to say that the outcome has been caused by the self because the neuron isn't itself.

So, I hope that gives some idea of how I'm thinking about this at the moment. Thanks.

More Articles

View All
TIL: A Bumblebee's Buzz Is Basically a Superpower | Today I Learned
All bees buzzed, but bumblebees are one of the very few types of bees that actually take that buzzing sound and use it like a secret weapon to get pollen. In fact, what the bumblebee is doing is sonication, or buzz pollination. It’s a technique that it’s …
Changes in POV and dramatic irony | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! Today I’d like to talk about differences in point of view in literature. When we analyze the perspectives of storytellers, whether that’s a point of view character, an omniscient narrator, or a narrator that attaches closely to multiple per…
Worked example: Interpreting potential energy curves of diatomic molecules | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we began to think about potential energy as a function of internuclear distance for diatomic molecules. What do I mean by diatomic molecules? Well, we looked at molecular hydrogen, which is just H₂, which is just two hydrogens covalen…
Constructing exponential models: half life | Mathematics II | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told carbon 14 is an element which loses exactly half of its mass every 5,730 years. The mass of a sample of carbon 14 can be modeled by a function m which depends on its age t in years. We measure that the initial mass of a sample of carbon 14 is 7…
AI for ELA with Khan Academy
Uh, welcome and thank you so much for joining us. We’re here to talk about AI for ELA. Um, we have Maddie with us from Hobart, Indiana; Sarah and myself are from KH Academy. Um, so let’s just start with a set of introductions. Um, let’s start with Maddie.…
McDonald v. Chicago | Civil liberties and civil rights | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today we’re learning more about McDonald vs. Chicago, a 2010 Supreme Court case challenging a handgun ban in the city of Chicago. The question at issue was whether the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process or immunities cl…