yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Einstein Refused To Accept The Disordered Universe | David Bodanis | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

What Einstein did in 1905, his first theory of relativity, that would be enough for most people. But he had another idea, a more powerful idea which came together in 1915 when he was in his mid-30s, the middle of World War I, and it's called General Relativity. And it's a magnificent idea; if he hadn't come up with it, I doubt if anybody else would have in the more than century since then.

And it's a notion of explaining how all of space and time and all of matter and everything is organized, and what's amazing is instead of being a long complicated thing, he got it down to two little symbols, and this was extraordinary. He thought who had created a universe where all the complexity we see, the spinning of the earth around the sun, how the galaxy moves, if it moves at all, that all this could be explained in terms of two simple symbols. And he thought this was fabulous, and then he looked at his symbols and he realized they predicted that the universe was expanding.

He asked his astronomer friends in 1917/1918, "Is the universe in fact expanding?" And they said no, it's static. They thought at that time the universe was just the Milky Way Galaxy, a whole bunch of stars floating there in space and beyond there, there was just an empty void. It was sort of like Donald Trump's brain; there was just angry magnetic fields full of nothing.

And Einstein thought, "Are you sure?" And they said, "Well, that's kind of what the universe is like." So he had to change that beautiful simple equation and had to put in an extra term, which is symbolized by the lambda. And instead of thinking God or the old one or whatever force there is behind the universe had made something very simple for us to discover, there's this ugly equation, this additional term that sort of canceled the expansion.

Anyways, about ten years later, in 1929, Edwin Hubble in California and other people said, "Oy, were we wrong." They probably didn't say the word "oy," but were we wrong, they said. The universe is expanding after all. And Einstein thought, "The good news is I get to take away the lambda, that extra term. I can go back to that beautiful, simple, clear thing I discovered back in 1915 in general relativity."

And that's okay. That's an allowable mistake. I don't think that's his greatest mistake. The great mistake came after that. He drew a psychological conclusion. He concluded that he was wrong to have listened to experimental evidence because he believed that the universe should be crisp and clear, exact. From now on, if he had those beliefs and experimental evidence came up that contradicted it, he could ignore it.

Remember, he would have been right; he would have been right to ignore all the evidence that the astronomers thought about the shape of the universe. They were wrong for ten years. Well, it turns out in the late 1920s, when Einstein had this breakthrough or this idea, that's when quantum mechanics was coming in, this idea of the ultra-small, electrons, things like that.

And they seemed to move around not in the clear, beautiful ways that Einstein wanted, but there was randomness and chance and probability. Einstein thought, "Okay, that's the limits of our technical abilities. Our observations only see this fuzziness, but if we have better tools, we'll be able to see things more exactly."

Einstein thought that things like uncertainty were just a temporary stage in mankind's development, but the physicists said, "No, the evidence is really clear." And Einstein said, "I was burnt once before with that lambda and the expansion of the universe. I'm not going to be burned again."

So he dug in; he doubled up, and as time went on, the evidence for quantum mechanics, for this randomness and probability on the ultra-small, that evidence became stronger and stronger, but Einstein was stuck. He couldn't let it go. He just thought, "If I had held at my confidence for ten years before, I would have been okay."

Well, maybe it might be 20 years; maybe it might be beyond my lifetime, but I'm sure Einstein thought, "I'm sure that the universe can't be disordered." That's why he said, "God does not play dice with the universe," and his good friend Niels Bohr said, "Einstein, stop telling God what to do."

More Articles

View All
National Parks: Inside a Movement to Attract More Visitors of Color | National Geographic
[Music] There was a time when I would see African-Americans at such an infrequent rate that when I saw them, it was just that silence, and that was once every month or so when I first came here. But now my expectation is that every day I’m here in at my j…
Elad Gil Shares Advice from the High Growth Handbook, a Guide to Scaling Startups
The first question I wanted to ask you: the book is called High-Growth Handbook, not the High-Growth Hanjo, just High-Growth Handbook. Given that so few companies ever make it to high growth, you know, thousands of employees, why should an average entrepr…
Standard normal table for proportion above | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A set of philosophy exam scores are normally distributed with a mean of 40 points and a standard deviation of 3 points. Ludwig got a score of 47.5 points on the exam. What proportion of exam scores are higher than Ludwig’s score? Give your answer correct …
Warren Buffett: The Coming 45.1% Stock Market Reset
Warren Buffett’s favorite measure of the health of the stock market is sending some serious warning messages. In fact, the so-called Warren Buffett indicator is projecting that the U.S. stock market has to fall by a whopping 45.1 percent in order for the …
London dispersion forces | Intermolecular forces and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is start talking about forces that exist between even neutral atoms or neutral molecules. The first of these intermolecular forces we will talk about are London dispersion forces. So it sounds very fancy, but it’s actu…
Standard deviation of residuals or Root-mean-square error (RMSD)
What we’re going to do in this video is calculate a typical measure of how well the actual data points agree with a model—in this case, a linear model. There are several names for it; we could consider this to be the standard deviation of the residuals, a…