yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Information for congruency


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So, I have two triangles depicted here and we have some information about each of those triangles. We know that this side of this left triangle has length eight. We know that this side has length seven, and then we know that this angle is 50 degrees.

On this triangle, we see some things that look a bit a little bit familiar. This triangle, this side has length eight. This side has length seven, and this angle right over here has a measure of 50 degrees.

So, my question to you is: Can you definitively say, not assuming that these are drawn to scale because they actually aren't, can you definitively say that these triangles are congruent? Or could you definitively say that they aren't congruent? Or can you not say either? Would you have to say that there's not enough information?

Pause this video and think about that.

So essentially, what we have here are two pairs of sides that have the same length and an angle, but that angle is not between those two sides. If the angle were here and here, then we could use side angle side or side angle side to deduce that, hey, these are congruent. But that's not what we're dealing with; we are dealing with side side angle versus side side angle.

I'm saying the side and the side before the angle because otherwise, if I don't do that, it becomes a little bit crass. So, we're really saying a side side angle is not sufficient to prove congruency.

The reason why it's not is that you can actually construct different triangles with the same constraints. For example, on this rightmost triangle, it could look like this, or it could look like this. The seven side could go down like this and intersect just like that.

Now, you might be saying, "Hey, that's not what it looks like." It looks very similar, but remember we're not going on looks; we have to go based on the information they've given us.

So, you could just as easily, based on the information and the constraints they've given us, have a triangle like this. The very fact that you can create two different triangles that are clearly not congruent based on the exact same information and the exact same constraints tells you that that information, those constraints, are not enough to tell you that these are congruent triangles.

More Articles

View All
15 Things Mentally Strong Men Don’t Do
You can tell if a man is mentally strong within a few minutes of meeting him. The way he speaks to you, the way he speaks about other people, and the things he says about himself will immediately let you know if this is a confident, self-assured person th…
Cortex Subtle T's & Hoodies! Annual Limited Drop!
For years I struggled to find the perfect t-shirt, sadly without success. Then, over at Cortex Incorporated, where we mostly make premium paper productivity products, we pondered: can we also produce the perfect shirt? Something everyday casual, but that…
I FOUND THE 5 WORST BANK ACCOUNTS EVER
[Music] What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, get ready! We’re in for quite the video today because so far on this channel, I have only covered the best bank accounts out there. I’m talking about the banks without any fees, offering you nothing but fr…
KAMALA REFUSES TO APOLOGIZE!
I think what he did and how he did it did was did not make much sense because he actually didn’t do much of anything. She missed the opportunity yet again. This thing is killing her, this border wall thing. What she should have come out and said—and she …
Four factors of production | AP Microeconomics | Khan Academy
An idea that will keep coming up as you study economics is the idea of the four factors of production, which are usually listed as land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship. The idea here is if you want to produce anything, so let’s just say this circle …
Reflecting functions: examples | Transformations of functions | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is do some practice examples of exercises on Khan Academy that deal with reflections of functions. So, this first one says this is the graph of function f. Fair enough. Function g is defined as g of x is equal to f of …