yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Information for congruency


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So, I have two triangles depicted here and we have some information about each of those triangles. We know that this side of this left triangle has length eight. We know that this side has length seven, and then we know that this angle is 50 degrees.

On this triangle, we see some things that look a bit a little bit familiar. This triangle, this side has length eight. This side has length seven, and this angle right over here has a measure of 50 degrees.

So, my question to you is: Can you definitively say, not assuming that these are drawn to scale because they actually aren't, can you definitively say that these triangles are congruent? Or could you definitively say that they aren't congruent? Or can you not say either? Would you have to say that there's not enough information?

Pause this video and think about that.

So essentially, what we have here are two pairs of sides that have the same length and an angle, but that angle is not between those two sides. If the angle were here and here, then we could use side angle side or side angle side to deduce that, hey, these are congruent. But that's not what we're dealing with; we are dealing with side side angle versus side side angle.

I'm saying the side and the side before the angle because otherwise, if I don't do that, it becomes a little bit crass. So, we're really saying a side side angle is not sufficient to prove congruency.

The reason why it's not is that you can actually construct different triangles with the same constraints. For example, on this rightmost triangle, it could look like this, or it could look like this. The seven side could go down like this and intersect just like that.

Now, you might be saying, "Hey, that's not what it looks like." It looks very similar, but remember we're not going on looks; we have to go based on the information they've given us.

So, you could just as easily, based on the information and the constraints they've given us, have a triangle like this. The very fact that you can create two different triangles that are clearly not congruent based on the exact same information and the exact same constraints tells you that that information, those constraints, are not enough to tell you that these are congruent triangles.

More Articles

View All
iPhone 4 is for LOSERS? -- Wackygamer
Today was Thursday. We’re recording this Thursday, June 2nd. Exciting part: iPhone 4 launch! That’s not exciting. I went 7:00 a.m. this morning. You’re pathetic! No, I’m not. What the point of getting iPhone 4? Ione, what’s what’s what’s different with …
Bank Failures Are Coming (Do This ASAP)
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here, and it looks like it’s happening again. Not even a year after the failure of Silicon Valley, Signature, and First Republic Bank, another storm seems to be brewing. And no, I’m not talking about the insane amount of ra…
Easy Photography Life Hack!
Okay, I just learned the greatest life hack. If you see something that you want to take a picture of, but you left your phone at home, don’t worry. Just do this: blindfold yourself for like 30 minutes, and then stare at what you want to take a picture of …
Into the Ocean | Branching Out | Part 3
[Music] As we eco-road trip across this amazing land, we can’t forget the rivers we’ve crossed and the waves crashing beside coastal roads. More than 70 percent of our planet is covered in water, and more than 96 of that is in our oceans. Unfortunately, 1…
Constitutional compromises: The Three-Fifths Compromise | US government and civics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In the last video, we discussed one of the compromises made at the Constitutional Convention, the compromise of the electoral college. In this video, I want to discuss a different compromise: the compromise over slavery. Now, you’ll remembe…
Worked examples: Definite integral properties 2 | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So what we’re going to do in this video is several examples where we evaluate expressions with definite integrals. Right over here we have the definite integral from -2 to 3 of 2 F of x DX plus the definite integral from 3 to 7 of 3 F of x DX. All we know…