yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Thomson's Plum Pudding Model of the Atom


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So the word atom means uncuttable, so the Greeks were thinking of it as a tiny hard sphere.

Phil: That's right.

Derek: And even up until the eighteen hundreds, that was the idea of an atom, the smallest piece of matter, a tiny hard sphere. But then we find out that that's not quite right, not quite. There were experiments in the eighteen hundreds that discovered the electron. JJ Thomson's experiments really worked out the electron was smaller than an atom, about 1000 times smaller than a hydrogen atom, and it was in all atoms.

Phil: That's right, not just hydrogen.

Derek: Whatever material he did his experiments on, he found there were electrons in them. There are electrons in all atoms. So I guess when you find something smaller than an atom, you need to propose a new model for the atom that actually has something smaller in it, some substructure.

Phil: That's right. So something like this. This is our model of the atom.

Phil: This is our model of the atom - in his day, it was known as the plum pudding model, but uh... here we have cherry tart.

Phil: Cherry tart, ok. So the idea being that we have an overall atom, usually pictured as spherical rather than 2D, but uh... but imbedded within it – and this is the important part – there are negative electrons represented by cherries, and they can come out. The overall atom is neutral, so that means that pudding part must be positive.

Derek: Now how would you get one of these electrons out of our pudding here? So electrons are negatively charged, so we'll need to put something very positive, which attracts electrons – a high voltage.

Derek: And that would have the effect of, say, like plucking a cherry out of the pudding.

Phil: That's pretty much it, yeah. You could do it kind of like that, so we're simulating what it would be like to put a positive charge up here.

Phil: That's right, that's right.

Derek: Pulling the electrons out of the atom, that's quite delicious.

Phil: Yeah! Well, that is the most delicious model of the atom, I've gotta say. So shall we uh, split the atom? Why don't you go ahead?

Phil: You want me to do it?

Derek: Yes! Who knows what could happen; a whole bunch of energy could be released.

Phil: Yeah, one, two, three...

More Articles

View All
Kitten Lady on Orphaned Cat Care | National Geographic
Hello, hello everybody, and welcome to my livestream! How are you guys? Happy International Cat Day! My name is Hannah Shaw, and I am known as Kitten Lady. I am a professional animal rescuer and a humane educator. I specialize in saving the lives of the t…
15 Things You Should Know About Your Haters
Fifteen things you should know about your haters. Welcome to A Lux, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired. Hey there, A Luxers! So, we have a juicy video for you today. As you know, success and haters go hand-in-hand. In fact, a good i…
Complex exponentials spin
In the last video, we did a quick review of the exponential and what it means. Then we looked and figured out what the magnitude of an exponential is. The magnitude is equal to one. Now we’re going to look closely at this complex exponential as it represe…
The fastest way to transform your entire life
So my last video was extremely depressing. I made a tutorial on how to ruin the rest of your life, and most of you thought it was an absolute banger, including myself. I thought it was really cool. I put a lot of effort into it, and I put a lot of effort …
Why We’re Going Back to the Moon
That’s one small step for man, one diabetes. On July 16, 1969, Apollo 11 blasted off into space carrying three astronauts bound for the Moon. Four days later, Neil Armstrong became the first man to ever set foot on our celestial neighbor, marking a new e…
Mistakes when finding inflection points: not checking candidates | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Olga was asked to find where f of x is equal to x minus two to the fourth power has inflection points. This is her solution. So we look at her solution, and then they ask us: Is Olga’s work correct? If not, what’s her mistake? So pause this video and see…